Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bazooka Boo
      Scammed - left with £40k of debts I can no longer pay

      By Bazooka Boo · Posted

      Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • dx100uk
      Caught fare evasion in tube station

      By dx100uk · Posted

      thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dx100uk
      Cabot Letter Of Claim - old HSBC OD - all fees

      By dx100uk · Posted

      hit letter of claim follow post 2  
    • dx100uk
      International Debt Recovery/Legal UAE debt - scotland

      By dx100uk · Posted

      dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • blfuk1
      Bailiffs employed by private companies do not possess the authority to arrest, restrain, or detain individuals.

      By blfuk1 · Posted

      I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

I've done wrong

worryingmore

By worryingmore
in Benefits and HMRC

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4836 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ErikaPNP

ErikaPNP

Posted
Posted

It certainly wouldn't hurt to call them. Just explain that you sent them an email but have not yet had a response and you are growing more worried. Make sure to note the name of the person you speak to (and the time of the call), and explain that you have called previously to try and stop your claim.

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

PriorityOne

PriorityOne

Posted
Posted

Hi again.... and thank you for the PM.. :-)

 

To be honest, I don't think you've done anything wrong at all. There was no break in the period mentioned via PM and the person in question is still within the age range for you to continue claiming for him providing there's no change in his status. As there hasn't been any change in his status, I can't see there's a problem. It makes no odds whether it was his intention to continue or not; the fact is that he did continue and as such, the status of your claim remains the same.

 

My own daughter was in the system right up until she turned 20 with no problem at all.... :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
worryingmore

worryingmore

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
It certainly wouldn't hurt to call them. Just explain that you sent them an email but have not yet had a response and you are growing more worried. Make sure to note the name of the person you speak to (and the time of the call), and explain that you have called previously to try and stop your claim.

 

many thanks

Edited by worryingmore
Link to post
Share on other sites
worryingmore

worryingmore

Posted
  • Author
Posted
It certainly wouldn't hurt to call them. Just explain that you sent them an email but have not yet had a response and you are growing more worried. Make sure to note the name of the person you speak to (and the time of the call), and explain that you have called previously to try and stop your claim.

 

Erika, i have drafted a letter, can i pm it to you please.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ErikaPNP

ErikaPNP

Posted
Posted
Erika

 

will you check over my letter please. I've tried to do as you suggested, but will you have a look at it for me before i send it

 

many thanks

 

Surely will - pm's are open.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
ErikaPNP

ErikaPNP

Posted
Posted

I've read your letter. From the information you have given in previous pm's to me, your letter is spot-on.

 

I'd strongly advise that if you can't get to a local HMRC office to get a signed for copy and receipt of your letter, that you send it by Royal Mail track and trace.

 

If you do send it via track and trace, the post office will give you a receipt. Keep hold of it and keep a copy of that letter. A few days after posting the letter, pop onto Royal Mail's website. Click on "personal customers", click on "Track an item" then enter the reference number on your receipt. The website will then show you from which office it was delivered and when. Print/save it. Then click no "view proof of delivery". This will bring up the signature and printed name of the person who signed for the item. Print/save that too. You can then show you sent them an item, they received it on X date and X person signed for it. You keep this until you receive a response from them at the very least, just in case there are any issues later on of non receipt.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
ErikaPNP

ErikaPNP

Posted
Posted

It's impossible to say. Some are audio recorded and some aren't. Some advisors make notes of the conversation, some don't (though they are all supposed to). The only one I know who audio records every single call is tax credits.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
worryingmore

worryingmore

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I was very nervous, and managed to explain it all. The person that i spoke to was very nice- couldn't have wished for anyone better really.

 

Said that it is being put down in the best possible way for me, and that i was being honest with them. that someone would look at it and that they would let me know, also said that it could go either way, and that someone else would make the decision. (i think this means the decision as to whether i should get it)- well i hope that's what this means? said that they would investigate it- i hope this doesn't mean a naughty investigation?- this is worrying me a lot, and will do for goodness knows how long.

 

I hope that i've done the right thing. They could come down on me like a tonne of bricks, and all hell break loose; (mixing metaphors)!, despite how nice the person was today.

 

I know this is wishing my life away, but i wish it was this time next year and i felt settled and knew what had happened.

 

I don't feel any better having done it- i'm still off my head with worry. But this is the only way that I was going to bring an end to it all.

 

Erika and Priorityone, if/when you log on, can you post back to me please, i'm in need of a hug (& lots of diazepam)!

Edited by worryingmore
Link to post
Share on other sites
worryingmore

worryingmore

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Hello

 

I'm worried that they might take action against me, & i don't know if i've dropped myself in it more than necessary.

 

Do you think that they will take action against me for this? Thing is, i don't know when to expect to hear from them, it could take ages if they're investigating it, I hope this doesn't mean a naughty investigation? This is what's worrying me the most.

 

What do you think they'll do? I could be waiting for ages to hear anything, and the longer they take, the more worried i'll get because i'll be thinking that they're going through everything to make a case against me.

Edited by worryingmore
Link to post
Share on other sites
PriorityOne

PriorityOne

Posted
Posted

 

Said that it is being put down in the best possible way for me, and that i was being honest with them. that someone would look at it and that they would let me know, also said that it could go either way, and that someone else would make the decision. (i think this means the decision as to whether i should get it)- well i hope that's what this means? said that they would investigate it- i hope this doesn't mean a naughty investigation?- this is worrying me a lot, and will do for goodness knows how long.

 

 

You've read far too much into this..... it means a decision as to whether you'll get the money or not; not a decision to put your head on a spike.... lol...

 

Please calm down.... there is nothing to worry about.

 

((((((((((((( BIG HUGS )))))))))))))

 

:-) :-) :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...