Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
    • Hi,   I am not sure if I posted this already here but I don't think I did. I attach a judgement that raises very interesting points IMO. Essentially EVRi did their usual non attendance that we normally see, however the judge (for the first time I've seen in these threads) dismissed the notice and awarded me judgement by default because their notice misses the "confirmation of compliance" paragraph. in and out in 3 minutes (aside from the chat at the end with the judge about his problems with evri) Redacted - evri CPR loss.pdf
    • Just to update this. I did apply to strikeout and they did not attend the hearing. I won by defualt and the hearing lasted 5 minutes (court only allocated 15). The judge simply explained that the only matter he was really considering is if the Defendant could have any oral evidence to defend the claim. However he said he had decided that based on their defence, and their misunderstanding of law, and their non attendence he did not think they had any reasonsable chance so he awarded me SJ + Costs on the claim form + the strikeout fee. Luckily when I sent the defendant the order I woke up the next day to a wire trasnfer for the full sum of the judgement
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Frontlines Enforcement collected my CTAX LO but didn't pay council - now gone bust!- HELP!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4851 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have recently been visited by a Bailiff representing Woking Borough Council regarding unpaid council tax.

The tax in question was from 2009 where at the time my wife had been advised to pay an outstanding amount to a collections company called Frontline Enforcement which she did in full.

We were then contacted by the Council in 2010 to say that the unpaid council tax was still outstanding

it then turned out that Frontline Enforcement hadn’t been paying the money to the council and had liquidated.

We were then asked to provide proof of payment to the Council and unfortunately for two cash payments my wife neglected to keep receipts so we were unable to provide proof.

As Frontline Enforcement banked with HSBC as did my wife

we contacted HSBC and they agreed to look into the Frontline Enforcement account and provide the necessary proof to the Council.

A year on this has not happened and after talking to the bank further recently they have said their hands are tied under the Data Protection Act.

So we are back at square one with the council breathing down our necks chasing money we have laready paid

– any help would be marvellous.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, Stucci.

 

I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to contact Woking BC and remind them they are required to use Certiifctaed bailiffs for collecting unpiad council tax.

 

First, I'll explain what a Certificated bailiff means.

 

Any bailiff that is handling public money must have a certificate, local authorities do contractually require bailiffs instructed to hold a current certificated.

 

A person holding a bailiffs certificate has a) been tested to be of good honest character,(no criminal records - some exemptions) and b) has lodged a security deposit with the court (or insurance policy) of £10,000.

 

This protects the court or authority if the bailiff absconds with money he has collected from a tax-payer. This is why a bailiff company must always appoint a named "Bailiff in Charge" of each case.

 

You need to start the councils official complaints procedure and the council must make a claim from the certificate bond of the named Bailiff in Charge. Its not for you to make that claim because the Council is liable for its bailiffs that it appoints.

 

If you are fobbed off with excuses, then a good place to start is your local councillor, or the Local Government Ombudsman and explain the above.

  • Haha 1

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

it then turned out that Frontline Enforcement hadn’t been paying the money to the council and had liquidated.

 

You need to contact your local police authority and report an offence under the 2006 Fraud Act and get a crime number. I suggest you compile all the evidence before presenting the package to the local constabulary. Suggest you approach them via their Economic Crimes Unit by way of prior appointment with a specific detective.

 

A year on this has not happened and after talking to the bank further recently they have said their hands are tied under the Data Protection Act.

 

Under Section 29 of the Act, crime and taxation are exempt from the Data Protection Act 1998. There is no reason why the bank should be hiding behind it.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

you might find this thread useful for past info:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?203952

 

i have renamed the thread to bailiff

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have recently been visited by a Bailiff representing Woking Borough Council regarding unpaid council tax.

 

The tax in question was from 2009 where at the time my wife had been advised to pay an outstanding amount to a collections company called Frontline Enforcement which she did in full. What method did she use to pay cash: handed to the enforcement officer?Paypal etc. ?

 

We were then contacted by the Council in 2010 to say that the unpaid council tax was still outstanding

 

it then turned out that Frontline Enforcement hadn’t been paying the money to the council and had liquidated.

 

We were then asked to provide proof of payment to the Council and unfortunately for two cash payments my wife neglected to keep receipts so we were unable to provide proof.

 

As Frontline Enforcement banked with HSBC as did my wife

 

we contacted HSBC and they agreed to look into the Frontline Enforcement account and provide the necessary proof to the Council.

 

A year on this has not happened and after talking to the bank further recently they have said their hands are tied under the Data Protection Act.

 

So we are back at square one with the council breathing down our necks chasing money we have laready paid

 

– any help would be marvellous.

 

I think you will find the onus is now on the Council, write to them putting them to strict proof the debt was not paid to their collection agents, they can't prove you did not pay the amount ,anymore than you can that you did.

 

WD

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have heard of a similar scenario with another company who did work around the derbyshire/peak district area, the councils had to knock the money off each individual bill if the people provided bank statements or receipts. cost the councils a lot of money overall by all accounts. the company was jackson heath bailiffs.

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much 'fork-it' would you suggest I start at the Council or go straight to HSBC or directly to the Police?

 

Thanks again

 

All of them, but having a crime number adds lots of weight. You might be dealing with a fictitious debt or bogus bailiff company, so you need to have police make a proper investigation.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would seriously be tinking of contacting the local press and your Councillor as I would imagine you will not be the only one in this situation. They are asking you to produce a receipt you know longer have from a Company they employed and passed no details on - does this mean they are going to make everytone pay twice. Another course of action is your MP and ask him to raise it in Parliament. A fine example of present day government.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the circumstances I would have thought the Council would have listened to you and taken on board what you have said. It would also suggest others living within the same Council's catchment may also be experiencing the same situation. The Council will without doubt be aware others have paid to Frontline and are now faced with paying the bill twice. The Council should also be making attempts to recover funds from the company, I would ask what they are doing about this? They may have some further information that may lead you to a Liquidator. The Liquidator would be in possession of bank statements that may assist you in tracing the payment.... I have looked on the London Gazette and I cannot see any formal Liquidation or Insolvency procedure for the company, do you have an incorporated numberor the name of the Proprietor??

 

Did your wife pay in the bank over the counter or by some other means......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I wanted to thank everyone for their help and advice and to give you an update. I have tried all the above to find a solution but was met a big no from the HSBC legal team they refused to open the accounts although the Bank Manager at our branch was fantastic even chasing the liquidators and the Crown who now hold the account but we were still unable to gain access and to be fair the council called off the dogs (sorry the debt collectors) and have agreed to let us pay this off directly (AGAIN!) The CAB were great but agreed aside tracking down this chap and getting his written permission there is nothing we can do. So once gain thanks for all your help.

SG

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to thank everyone for their help and advice and to give you an update. I have tried all the above to find a solution but was met a big no from the HSBC legal team they refused to open the accounts although the Bank Manager at our branch was fantastic even chasing the liquidators and the Crown who now hold the account but we were still unable to gain access and to be fair the council called off the dogs (sorry the debt collectors) and have agreed to let us pay this off directly (AGAIN!) The CAB were great but agreed aside tracking down this chap and getting his written permission there is nothing we can do. So once gain thanks for all your help.

SG

 

Woking Borough Council are a large council and frankly, I would be making a Freedom of Information Request to this council to ask for detailf of which companies tendered for the Bailiff Companies and what checks were done with this company to ensure there financial standing. I would also be asking (under Foi) whether there have been any other council tax payers who have claimed to have made payment to Frontline etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i don't see why you should be paying it again there is something not right here the bailiff firm should have had a separate account for the councils money

 

have you sent the council a subject access request to see what it turns up

http://www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/agents02.htm#part4

A separate account for monies due to the creditor should be maintained and accurate books and accounts should be kept and made available to establish monies owed to the creditor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Woking Borough Council are a large council and frankly, I would be making a Freedom of Information Request to this council to ask for detailf of which companies tendered for the Bailiff Companies and what checks were done with this company to ensure there financial standing. I would also be asking (under Foi) whether there have been any other council tax payers who have claimed to have made payment to Frontline etc.

 

Clearly, this council would appear to have entered into a Contract with a company that lists just ONE DIRECTOR.

 

The company was only incorporated on 10th September 2008 and was struck off the register on 20th JUly 2010. They had a First Gazette notification in February 2010. No accounts were ever produced.

 

Somebody's head should "roll" at Woking becuse, they must surely have a "duty of care" to all TAXPAYERS to ensure that a company tasked with the role of collecting council tax on their behalf should at least have produced previous accounts.

 

Sorry.......I would be furious at this and I would stand my ground that payment had ben made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Believe me I am NOT at all happy to be forking out the best part of £1000 again but my choices appear to be pay it or we'll send the Baliffs round again - its crazy but we feel we have no choice. I've tried everything and everyone has tried to help but we've got nowhere. So time is ticking I can't produce the proff so here we are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On top of what has been suggested above have you thought about trying the local media? Your MP could also be interested particularly if there are others who are being told to do the same, the link below may be your MP

http://www.parliament.uk/biographies/jonathan-lord/83146

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...