Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft chasing Lloyds loan now sold to 1st credit


intend
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1964 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 4 months later...
  • Replies 395
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Re Post 325 - update on Credit Card.

 

Had a reply - stating my proposal to pay £10 per month was acceptable - muppets - am currently paying this and requested a reduction to £5.

 

Not sure what to do next

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re Post 325 - update on Credit Card.

 

Had a reply - stating my proposal to pay £10 per month was acceptable - muppets - am currently paying this and requested a reduction to £5.

 

Not sure what to do next

 

 

Pay them the fiver intended.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Like to get things under control so wrote to them clearly stating the offer of £5 - daughter just rung - they have accepted the £5 offer - saves them £5 a month, not much to Dave and his mates but better in her pocket.

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like to get things under control so wrote to them clearly stating the offer of £5 - daughter just rung - they have accepted the £5 offer - saves them £5 a month, not much to Dave and his mates but better in her pocket.

 

Intend

Well one intend!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brig - your help has been invaluable.

Thank you!! Always happy to help!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Credit card update

 

 

- long ago when requested CCA noticed the PPI box was YES

but when checking current statements none was being paid so did not pursue.

 

 

Today told by OH to shift the mountain of papers from LTSb which have been on bedroom floor for months

- never looked at it in detail as nice folks at the Loans section sent me details of loans and PPI payments ( one current claim and one pending).

 

Well lo and behold copy CC statements show PPI on card for 19 months so about to start claim

 

Point for this post here is - son-in-law had lots of £12 charges at same time - how realistic is it to claim these back??

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

outside of 6yrs little chance unless you issue a court claim.

 

 

however if they are within or after the PPI period

very good chance

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fee are from Jan 08 to Feb 09 and within the period he was paying PPI

Go for it!!

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't forget the FOS/FCA have recent told creditors they must include unfair PENALTY charges

that, as a result of the removal of PPI, would not have occurred must be refunded within a PPI reclaim too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't forget the FOS/FCA have recent told creditors they must include unfair PENALTY charges

that, as a result of the removal of PPI, would not have occurred must be refunded within a PPI reclaim too

 

 

dx

 

 

Thanks for adding that dx.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning dx.

 

Re your statement of being able to claim charges incurred because of PPI, this is interesting as 2 previous claims, both banks (Citi and RBS) refused to entertain a refund? Have you any links from FOS/FCA I can quote to reclaim as I've been unable to find anything on the web?

 

Cheers

 

TT

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Loan update - Nice of 1st credit to send me an annual statement of all financial transactions for last year - could have saved the printer ink by sending a blank piece of paper.

 

Also a nice reminder of ways I could pay - account remains in dispute and hopefully will be until statue barred - must check date for this.

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Umm - update - daughter just had a phone call from Crapquest asking for her oh. Told them writing only - not sure why they should be chasing anything - cc debt paid every month and still owned by Lloyds and loan was sold to 1st Credit.

 

Guess it is a case of watch this space, did check date but forgotten, did write it down but forgotten where - an age thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob the usual trying to get more money despite an agreement being in place. ignore?

if they've got anything import to say, they can do it in writing. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Two letters arrived out of the blue - one concerning the credit card (under control - no interest, paying £5 a month over the counter direct to Lloyds) the other about the loan - no agreement no paid for a long while and sold to 1st Credit.

 

Will put up separate posts when I have read them carefully and refreshed my memory - daughter worried by this latest develpment.

 

Intend

 

Right - Credit Card first - not the most significant but probably easier to get a plan going. Single envelope rec'd with two letters in.One with Lloyds letterhead from H Singh Director , Collections and Recoveries

 

"We are writing to notify you that Lloyds Bank has assigned all rights, title and interest in respect of this account to the Cabot Credit Management group, effective 26/03/2015"

 

Yes the date is correct - March!!

 

Then states "Please note your existing repayment arrangement will be honoured by Cabot and will be reviewed within the agreed timescales"

 

Letter from Cabot states they have bought the account. They are happy for me to continue with the existing repayment plan and that payments need to be made to pay them not Lloyds.

 

How best to proceed??

 

Is this sufficient evidence/proof of sale?? Am sure this must have been asked before. Both in same envelope, no actual address on the Lloyds letter just registered office. Tempted to ignore for a while and carry on paying my five pound coins in a t a local branch.

 

Why the delay from sale to the letter??

 

Annoyed that they have sold it as paying regular and offered a F+F which probably more that they got from Cabot.

 

Any advice welcome

 

Intend

Link to post
Share on other sites

STD assignment

 

CCA time

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...