Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie Hall (Quickquid, Payday UK)


Al88
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4895 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got into trouble early this year with two pay day loan companies I had to stop work and had very little income so couldn't pay them.

I understand that I have to repay what I owe and have kept them up-to-date with everything well in September they passed the accounts to a debt collection agency called "Mackenzie Hall" I made an arrangement with them but due to Natwest defaulting my bank account all my money in that account was lost so the agreement was cancelled they have since sent me many letters and phoned loads of times (which I dont answer) and now sent a letter from Meritforce saying they will take me to court I have emailed them 3 times before this to arrange a token payment until feb when my finances get better but not received a reply from them once what can I do?

I don't really want to get a CCJ because work will find out but what happens next does anybody know? Please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Al,

Sorry to read of the problems you're having.

Payday loan companies are notoriously unhelpful if you get into difficulties.

As you've been doing, never discuss it on the phone with them.

I doubt they'd risk court if you make an offer of payment and stick to it even if they refuse it.

 

I personally would not use email, you need to establish a paper trail showing that you have tried to negotiate, and get their responses in writing.

 

Decide on an amount that you feel able to pay reliably. Don't put any priority payments at risk..rent/utilities/council tax etc come first.

 

Write to them by recorded delivery stating something on the lines of:

Due to circumstances beyond my control I am no longer in employment and therefore for the moment I regret I am unable to make repayments of £xxxx as originally agreed on this account.

However I am actively seeking work and am not seeking to avoid my responsibilies, therefore I propose to continue payment at £x per month until my situation improves. I stress that this is the maximum I can afford after payment of priority bills, and the amount is therefore non negotiable. Should you seek enforcement through the courts, based on my current income it is likely that an even lower amount would be ordered.

I would be most grateful if you could assist me through this temporary setback by accepting my offer and freezing interest in order that the debt does not spiral.

I assure you that I will contact you again and increase payments when my financial situation improves.

As a gesture of goodwill and in anticipation of your acceptance of my offer I enclose a cheque/PO for £x as my first payment.

 

Please note that I am only able to discuss this matter in writing for legal reasons.

yours faithfully

 

They'll probably froth at the mouth but stay calm and keep paying the same amount, whatever they say.

Let us know how they respond.

 

Just my thoughts - see what others advise too :-D

 

kind regards,

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest what is the legal status of companies such as Pay Day? I thought with at least some of them there was a possibility of unenforceability, due to them being based abroad, not following CCA74/2006 and so on.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you got a CCJ there is no way your employer would 'find out' unless you told them, and you are a long way off that so far. There is no legal obligation for a company to inform an employer of a CCJ, in fact it is a major breach of Data Protection.

 

As far as unenforceability goes there is not much room to work in since the Rankine case. Just because the parent company is based abroad doesn't make the whole loan unenforceable.

 

Should they go for court action you keep the defence short and sweet and keep out the legal stuff and they haven't got any room themselves to move or do a detailed defence back.... you can also just admit the original sum borrowed plus one months rollover fee.... not the £2,000 I saw recently being chased for a £300 original sum.

 

They work on fear and ignorance, now you have found this forum you can get out of their trap.

 

Don't forget to try to get another basic bank account set up to protect your income, otherwise you might get a nasty shock...

Link to post
Share on other sites

The big problem with these is the interest that builds up and it may be worth contacting the original creditors to negociate a fair repayment. I don't like the idea of dealing with Mucki Hall.

 

I doubt if they will take you to court as are unlikely to get any more than you can reasonably afford but could be wrong.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

See my thread to see what kind of people they are.

You have had no response from them as they actually ignore letters sent to them so definitely send them recorded. They claimed I had sent them no letters despite magically cashing a cheque enclosed with one of these letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MH are (allegedly) at the very bottom of the DCA foodchain and it's extremly unlikely they would go anywhere near a court with this. A lot of DJs (allegedly) strongly disapprove of 'pay day' type loans because of the horrific interest rates ;)

Edited by babybear39
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Al,

It's all part of their standard threat process. They rarely follow through, but just in case send them this too:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?410-LETTER-USED-WHEN-A-DCA-THREATENS-A-DOORSTEP-VISIT

 

In the very unlikely event that they did turn up (and please trust me on this, it's important):

They have NO right to come into your house or take goods.

Here's the recommended way to deal with them:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?441-If-you-do-receive-a-doorstep-visit-we-give-these-suggestions-to-Members.

 

If they do catch you out at the door or outside, all you need to do is say "Let me stop you right there" if they start asking questions, and tell them politely but firmly that you have taken advice and everything must be in writing. You will not discuss your finances on the doorstep. Please leave my property. Then close the door.

They must leave when asked.

 

But again, don't worry too much..they rarely show up!

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All Yesterday I got an email from Mackenzie Hal (Quick Quid)l saying they will accept token payments until my finances improve (Feb) from £879 down £35 per month until Feb then make payments of £150 but want all my creditors names and amounts outstanding should I give them this information? I have told them the amount of debt I have and the end date of some of it.

 

Pay-day Uk one with Meritforce have accepted £50 from the balance of £562.50 if I pay the odd £12.50 now which I am going to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must NEVER give out detailed I&E information to Mucky Hall, they will then pressure you to make lower payments to other creditors who may have a greater claim than theirs.

 

In fact if they get hold of anything automatically HALVE the amount they are asking and if you can try to make a full and final payment of a third of that - they are getting desparate now as a lot of companies are not selling debt as they need the money themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have had similar problems but came to an agreement for monthly payments. However, I recently missed a payment. I have just checked my credit file, and they have logged a "loan" to them complete with payment history. Can they do this, if they are acting as debt collectors?

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...