Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Account Closure


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4777 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can someone please tell me if this agreement is enforceable. Background information. Had a Credit Card with a bank, but was closed sometime in August this year and advised to continue paying balance which meant paying interest only and have been paying minimum requirement. Sent for SAR and CCA. Have now received statement and agreement.

 

Would be grateful for advice.

 

scanned images 004.jpg

scanned images 005.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kanana,

Unfortunately the images are much too small to read. Try and redo them to the original size.

 

Kind regards,

 

Elsa

Try to enlarge this Elsa. Hope it will work this time.

 

Thanks, Kanana

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have removed your attachments as you can see the details through the pen used and you have left various numbers and codes which can id you

 

dx

siteteam

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

:sad:

i have removed your attachments as you can see the details through the pen used and you have left various numbers and codes which can id you

 

dx

siteteam

 

Dear all

 

Sorry for the delay. Please find now attached a letter and agreement from Halifax. I did send them a dispute account letter after I received their response. I will post their response later. I want to know whether these documents holds water in terms of an enforceable CCA.

 

Thank you.

 

Kanana

scanned images 009.pdf

scanned images 008.pdf

scanned_images_007.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is nothing much wrong with those

barring its an application form , but it has i think what it needs

 

you say the a/c was closed

 

how did this happen and why

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks dx100uk

 

The letter just stated that 'since your card is to expire, you will not be abe to use it after the exprity date shown on front of the card). Normally we would send you a new cared before your current one expires. However, after reviewing your credit card account we have decided not to send you a new card and close your accout when your current card expires. You will not be able to open your account again once we have closed it.' Then they apologise for inconvenience caused and asked me to destroy the card due to security reasons and advised to cancel any regular payments. 'If you still owe money on your card, you must continue to make monthly payments until your balance is zero.' This was written on 27th July, 2010.

 

Thank you.

 

there is nothing much wrong with those

barring its an application form , but it has i think what it needs

 

you say the a/c was closed

 

how did this happen and why

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they have terminated your a/c unlawfully IMHO.

 

i bet you have heeps of unlawful over limit fees/late payment fees and mis-sold PPI you can now reclaim too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then they have terminated your a/c unlawfully IMHO.

 

i bet you have heeps of unlawful over limit fees/late payment fees and mis-sold PPI you can now reclaim too

 

dx

 

Thanks dx. What is my next step and what does IMHO mean? My understanding was that the so called agreement was an application form for a Credit card. There is about £300 pounds in over limit fees and I am not sure sure about the PPI. When I put the account in dispute they sent me two sets of Credit agreements, one from Halifax and one from Bank of Scotland with the first page specifying my name and address and the bank agreement. I am also attaching the letter from Halifax and wonder my next move will be before they send a default.

scanned images 011.pdf

scanned images 010.pdf

scanned images 014.pdf

scanned images 012.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont think you can wriggle out of it

poss send a hardship letter asking them to freeze the intererst?

 

i'd get reclaiming too

 

you can get all those unlawful charges back + int at their rate!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Wonder whether someone can direct me in the right direction. I put my account in dispute and stopped paying. I just noticed that Halifax has taken out money from my account as cash after bombarding me with phonecalls which I did not respond to. This is quite vexing. It looks like we are at their mercy and they can do whatever they want. I need to pay what I think I can manage and not what they think suits them. I know I have no alternative, but just thought I could vent out my anger here. Anyone with a suggestion?

 

Thanks.

 

Kanana

Link to post
Share on other sites

if your cc is with the same co as your bank a/c, they are doing this under the offset rules

 

get another banl a/c with someone not in the same group quick and get your wages paid there.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
if your cc is with the same co as your bank a/c, they are doing this under the offset rules

 

get another banl a/c with someone not in the same group quick and get your wages paid there.

 

dx

Dear all,

 

A quick update, I wrote Halifax a hardship letter and also told them that I could only pay £60.00 per month. They wrote back agreeing to my suggestion and that they will review the case in six months time. They stated that charges will be at a reduced rate of 0% p.a. Hopefully they will stick to it.

 

I also claimed bank charges, but they told me that the charges are in excess of 6 years. They also stated that they will not refund the £12 charge but only the difference because the OFT stated that they would not take further action where charges were set at £12 or below and they feel justifed to make those charges in order to meet their costs. They also state that if I am not happy I could contact the Financial Ombudsman whom I understand do not work in the interest of consumers.

 

Any advice on this?

 

Thank you.

 

Kanana

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Credit Card fees over 6 years old are re-claimable, The limitation act 1980 is quite clear ( see section 32 ) that in cases of fraud, deliberate concealment or the consequences of a mistake the period of limitation does not begin to run until the Claimant has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it. Claimant's could not have been in the slightest bit aware that charges applied to their credit card accounts were either unlawful or unfair prior to the OFT publishing their report into credit card charges on April 5th 2006.

 

Basically, until that time any Claimant could not reasonably have been expected to have discovered the credit card companies deliberate concealment etc.

Claimants would therefore be fully justified in arguing that the period of limitation did not commence on this matter until April 2006, so you may argue that you have until April 2012 to make a claim in respect of ALL the unlawful / unfair charges applied to your account since that account was opened with the credit card company.

 

Regarding the £12 charge, The OFT did not give them permission to charge £12.00 ( quote from OFT) “We are not suggesting that default fees should be set at £12, and a court will certainly not consider that a default fee is fair just because it is below the threshold. We consider that a contract term is likely to be unfair if it requires consumers to pay more as a result of a default than the court would order them to pay if they were sued for breach of contract. This means that a default charge should not exceed a reasonable pre-estimate of the administrative costs that the consumer ought to have realised would be likely to be incurred by his or her card issuer in dealing with defaults”.

 

So they would have to show it costs them £12, before they could charge you £12.

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to your first question, an application form is not a response to a CCA request - you should have, and need, a copy of your actual agreement if we are to be able to check enforceability. For a credit card the Prescribed Terms are basically that it should contain the Credit Limit, Repayment Details and the Rate of Interest. Have a read of this excellent thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?103383

 

However, checking enforceability is not as easy as just checking they're there, as if you want to check properly you need to go back and check the rate of interest quoted was the actual rate of interest at the time. It is on details like this that CCA cases are still being won.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...