Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Fart: “Boorish cartoon misogynist.” “Cheeto-dusted cartoon villain.”      Michael Cohen says he used to be ‘knee deep in cult’ of Trump as he stands firm in fiery cross-examination ‘Knee-deep in the cult’: Michael Cohen holds his ground against Trump’s attorneys WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Trump’s attorneys want to undermine the former ‘fixer’ after damning testimony connected him to a criminal hush money scheme   Doesn't nodfathers lawyers/fans realise that anything they say about cohen being a crim reflects mostly on the guy he was crimming for? aka Trump LOL
    • Notice how Kev goes about his scam.  In Kahunaburger's case they left the car park well before the time shown on the ticket they had purchased.  But because Kev added on the time taken to look for a parking spot and queue to pay/try to get an internet signal he still sent them an invoice. So If you had left before the Justpark message, say at 3:55, Kev would still have managed to turn that into a stay of 4:06 and thus an overstay and an invoice. Unfortunately for Kev, judges have ruled against his reasoning.  Have a read of this famous case  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2014/03/waiting-for-space-is-not-parking.html  
    • Its okay - It happens. And this is why DCAs  user every trick in the book to try and make you crack.  Now its time to come back.    Im not sure how to proceed if Im honest if they have issued a Letter Of Claim.  Only as You could complain to Oakbrook and they still proceed with Legal Proceedings, but I dont know if that would help or hinder the legal proceedings if they began down that avenue.  I know a FOS complaint wouldnt stop Legal Action and probably run along side it.  But I guess a judge would view a disputed balance with the original creditor as cause for concern whether the DCA's claim is valid?    A bit of a muddle.     
    • That is superb. To answer your question - Dear Mr Dhaliwal Change the sentence - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us ... To - As our disabilities were ignored and disregarded for the time taken I believe this is discrimination against us contrary to the Equality Act 2010. Iceland have always been useless, not only in your case but in others, but I think if they realise they are breaking the law it will encourage them to act. I also think the letter is overlong and you could lose the paragraph - I cannot afford any unfair charges of this kind as I am severely struggling financially. I cannot work and am a carer for my disabled Son who also has a mental and mobility disability. I obviously do not have any disposable income and am in debt with my bills. So its an absolute impossibility for me to pay this incorrect charge - as the main points are made elsewhere.  
    • Hands up in the fact that i have probably F***** *P!!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Warning: Kitchenware Scam Uk


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5081 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just got conned tonight so pass this round. Dutch guy came round to the door saying that he had been exhibiting at the Ideal Homes Exhibition in Glasgow (not till October but I didn't know that at the time) and had some "Waltmann und sohn" sets of cutlery, chef's knives and pots and pans for sale at 85% discount because he "couldn't take them back with him on the boat". They look like fantastic quality, but there was something about him that I wasn't convinced about. Of course I listened to him and was conned into buying a set of chef's knives for £80 which he told me retailed for £595 (should have smelled a rat). He asked me to write the cheque out to his personal account "C Brennan", which again I thought was dodgey but I figured maybe he was conning the company he worked for or something (more fool me). He had a business card but now I look at it, it just has a UK mobile number and his first name only "Peter".

It was just nagging in the back of my mind because after he left I thought - if you can't get these knives home on the boat how did you get them here in the first place?? So I looked up the internet and I found the same set of knives retailing in Amazon for £23.50. I felt sick. Then I called RBS and they cancelled the cheque for me by direct banking. They've put it through as a lost cheque so I'm not even going to be charged for it. What stars! So even though they shafted their shareholders, I would like to kiss RBS tonight ;-))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I called RBS and they cancelled the cheque for me by direct banking. They've put it through as a lost cheque so I'm not even going to be charged for it. What stars! So even though they shafted their shareholders, I would like to kiss RBS tonight ;-))

 

 

Don't rejoice just yet. You might get a letter from someone at the bank saying, in a chuffed manner, 'I saved the day, I found your lost cheque and put it through for you'. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't rejoice just yet. You might get a letter from someone at the bank saying, in a chuffed manner, 'I saved the day, I found your lost cheque and put it through for you'. :)

 

Confirm your cancellation in writing & take it to the nearest branch

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you legally do that?

 

I mean can you legally cancel a cheque that you issued when you agreed to buy something, and also keep the goods???

 

Mossy

 

No he/she should tell the guy to collect their knives giving them perhaps 7 days after which they will dispose of them;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No he/she should tell the guy to collect their knives giving them perhaps 7 days after which they will dispose of them;)

 

I'm still not convinced it's legal to cancel a cheque for something which you have agreed to purchase and had the goods for.

 

I thought the correct legal process was that you had to request a refund from the seller???????????????

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I imagine that the seller may have a cause of action for breach of contract. Then again, the buyer has a cause of action because the goods were not as described (they are not worth £595); in addition the seller's actions might amount to fraud.

 

It will be interesting to see if the cloggie reappears to complain about the stopped cheque, in which case the knives could be returned - or the police called. I suspect he will realise that his scheme has been rumbled, and that will be that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely in a private sale, which is what this was, it's a case of buyer beware.

 

The seller offered for sale a set of knives and asked for £x, negotiation took place and a price was agreed £y. The seller agrees to sell at price £y, the buyer agrees to buy at £y, money and goods are exchanged. Buyer and seller are both happy.

 

Sometime later the buyer discovers that the knives are available cheaper and cancels the cheque, without informing the seller or returning the goods.

 

Notwithstanding what was said, or might have been said (we don't know that because we were not there), the facts seem pretty straight forward to me.

 

Could I go into Asda buy a TV take it home, and then see the same TV on sale at Tesco where it was £100 cheaper and cancel my payment to Asda?

 

I think not

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely in a private sale, which is what this was, it's a case of buyer beware.

 

The seller offered for sale a set of knives and asked for £x, negotiation took place and a price was agreed £y. The seller agrees to sell at price £y, the buyer agrees to buy at £y, money and goods are exchanged. Buyer and seller are both happy.

 

Sometime later the buyer discovers that the knives are available cheaper and cancels the cheque, without informing the seller or returning the goods.

 

Notwithstanding what was said, or might have been said (we don't know that because we were not there), the facts seem pretty straight forward to me.

 

Could I go into Asda buy a TV take it home, and then see the same TV on sale at Tesco where it was £100 cheaper and cancel my payment to Asda?

 

I think not

 

Mossy

 

err no the seller deceived the buyer by claiming they are worth many hundreds of pounds rather than the now proven tens of pounds. Also he approached the buyer in his home the buyer did not actively seek the so called bargain therefore the CE argument is greatly weakened if not extinguished

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you're right - what you have said below is almost word-for-word what my friend, our local policeman, said. If he shows up for his knives he is more than welcome to them and I have been instructed to call the local police. Have told as many people as I can think of so that they don't get caught out with this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am more than happy to return his knives to him if he shows up again. I am also happy to show him where he can put them, and to let him know that our local bobby would very much like a word with him. Not quite the same as buying from ASDA, since he gave me no receipt so he has no proof of sale - just a dud cheque made out to his personal account. What does concern me is that he has my account number, sort code and signature on the cheque so could set a direct debit mandate to a bogus company. RBS assure me he can't, as they would require further security information, but watch this space (as I keep a close eye on internet banking)...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely in a private sale, which is what this was, it's a case of buyer beware.

 

.............

 

Could I go into Asda buy a TV take it home, and then see the same TV on sale at Tesco where it was £100 cheaper and cancel my payment to Asda?

 

How should one expect to negotiate a private sale at Asda?

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aren't you entitled to a cooling off period if someone cold calls? Not sure of the details or if it only applies to signing agreements but something in the back of my mind is saying you can cancel if you didn't make an appointment for the salesman to come to your home. This sounds like a one off con artist rather than a 'salesman' but the same rules would surely apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The relevant legislation is The Cancellation of Contracts made in a Consumer’s Home or Place of Work etc. Regulations 2008.

 

In order to cancel, a notice must be served on the trader or another person specified. Surmising then that the trader left no particular address to which to send a notice, I am surprised (to say the least) to see it supposed that it is wrong to cancel a cheque instead, as if the inference of cancelling a cheque would be insufficiently obvious to such a seller.

 

Regulation 13. is especially worth a mention

 

Return of goods by consumer after cancellation

 

13.—(1) A consumer who has acquired possession of any goods by virtue of the contract shall on the cancellation of that contract be under a duty, subject to any lien, to restore the goods to the trader and meanwhile to retain possession of the goods and take reasonable care of them.

 

(2) The consumer shall not be under a duty to restore goods supplied under a specified contract in circumstances where—

 

(a) he is required to pay, in accordance with the reasonable requirements of the cancelled contract, for the supply of such goods before cancellation; or

 

(b) the trader has begun performance of the contract before the end of the cancellation period without a prior request in writing by the consumer.

 

(3) The consumer shall not be under any duty to deliver the goods except at his own premises and following a request in writing signed by the trader and served on the consumer either before, or at the time when, the goods are collected from those premises.

:rolleyes:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any chance you can get RBS to give you a new bank account now the current one has been 'compromised'.

 

You might also want to consider checking your credit report to see if anything 'funny' is going on there - although that can open up a whole new can of worms....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...