Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How do DCA's trace?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Electoral roll,social networking sites, dvla, yell.com, info that is passed on by internet sites, phishing methods basically anything.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It has been known for some DCA's to scurry along sewers to gain stool samples to be analyzed so they can tell wheather your a tesco value or Tesco finest man and ajust demands accordingly. Or am I thinking or rats?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will be pleased to know that they cannot trace 65% of the cases assigned to them. A further 10% don't pay so that leaves them only being able to collect on 25% of what they buy and they are not collecting at that level.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that a lot of their tracing methods are now going to be illegal without them proving that the person doing the tracing is properly trained in the nuances of the Data Protection Act.

 

Merely citing 'but its legal under the Data Protection Act' won't be sufficient they have to KNOW the part of the Act they are quoting.

 

I love messing them up on this, especially if I have my DPA crib sheet to hand which effectively has a counter part of the Act for every part quoted! I must remember to post it on here sometime....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

I love messing them up on this, especially if I have my DPA crib sheet to hand which effectively has a counter part of the Act for every part quoted! I must remember to post it on here sometime....

 

Please do:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently it is relatively easy to get the DVLA to reveal information.

 

I once had a mysterious visitor at my front door claiming that his car had broken down at the end of driveway and asking if I had jump leads. He said that driving through a puddle had flattened his battery causing the car to stop. It seemed a dodgy story but I went to help, and lo and behold he just got in his car, started his engine and drove off. I'm guessing that his real purpose was to look at registration plates outside my house (not visible from the road) for cross-checking with DVLA.

 

Paranoid? Maybe, but the following week I had DCA letters recommence after a quiet spell, opening with claims that they had now confirmed I actually did live here (note that I am not on the electoral roll and other than ex-directory telephone line have no household bills in my name)

 

And, if you have ever read that some police force employees are not incorruptible, and will perform DVLA data searches outside of their line of duty, well those stories are true. As well as any documented cases that have come up in court, I also have recent first hand experience that this still goes on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently it is relatively easy to get the DVLA to reveal information.

 

I once had a mysterious visitor at my front door claiming that his car had broken down at the end of driveway and asking if I had jump leads. He said that driving through a puddle had flattened his battery causing the car to stop. It seemed a dodgy story but I went to help, and lo and behold he just got in his car, started his engine and drove off. I'm guessing that his real purpose was to look at registration plates outside my house (not visible from the road) for cross-checking with DVLA.

 

Paranoid? Maybe, but the following week I had DCA letters recommence after a quiet spell, opening with claims that they had now confirmed I actually did live here (note that I am not on the electoral roll and other than ex-directory telephone line have no household bills in my name)

 

And, if you have ever read that some police force employees are not incorruptible, and will perform DVLA data searches outside of their line of duty, well those stories are true. As well as any documented cases that have come up in court, I also have recent first hand experience that this still goes on.

 

 

:eek::eek::eek::eek:

PPI SUCCESS

2011- Lloyds TSB £3874

2011 - Loans.co.uk (GE Finance) £1504.77

2017 - Moneyshop - £977

2018 - Aquacard £1327

2019 - Citicard - £1071.31

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont forget that if you move,

 

royal mail will pass on your redirection details to tv licence

tax

local authority

 

it goes on and on

 

they dont tell you that in the LARGE PRINT

 

I'll wager RM are paid handsomely for it, too.

 

Data is moneh... loyalty cards, ISP's, telecoms providers, store cards, 192.com et al and so on and so on.

 

CRA's use every trick in the book too - they harvest data whether you accept their terms or not (harvested when you turn over the page) and they have other tricks too. 'Just Rewards' from Experian looks like a survey site at first glimpse and they pay around 25p - £1 at the cashback sites as an incentive - what they don't make clear is they are lulling people into a trap to update their bum chums.

 

I have filled out hundreds with nonsensical info, and they paid me for the privilege too. I also like to click the CRA's sponsored google links and tan them for a bit more and they deserve every bit of it. :D

 

I would never use RM redirect, nor, as an aside, would I buy a television signal receiving device without paying cash and giving the name of Mr Figment Ofmy Imagination at some random addy (hoping they do have one!!).

 

Data is precious (he says with a chuffing Clubcard).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experian are a "Partner" of Nectar.

 

Nectar only disclose your data to partner companies, the extent to which they disclose data isn't made clear on the Nectar website.

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll try anything.

 

They are known for making bogus calls to government organisations that they will know will hold the information. They'll ring DVLA, DWP, HMRC, LA's etc pretending to be you, or your representative, or even calling from another government department to confirm information. The DCA's will likely hold data about you such as your date of birth, full name, partner's name (if the loan agreement was taken jointly) and will use this to try and get past the security checks. Most often they fail because the manner of security checks change constantly and they ask questions about personal data which Government departments will not confirm over the phone, or which instantly give them away as an imposter.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...