Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
    • Hello I am a resident of a communal block of flats owned by a Housing Association and since Tuesday 14th May 2024 Matthews and Tannert had put up scaffolding for a job on the roof last week, which was up for the best part of nine days. They had removed the scaffolding on Thursday 23rd May 2024 but my Sky box is still not working because of the satellite dish outside, and I was wondering whether the scaffolders had touched the dish while it was there and as a result had probably knocked the dish and probably made the dish go out of signal or whatever. I needed someone to check this out as well as to see my Sky box to see what could be the problem, and hopefully sort this out. I have had my Sky Digibox for many years and I have got recordings saved on them that I have had a long time - it would break my heart if I had lost them forever.       I contacted Sky but I almost made the mistake of accepting an offer where I would have to pay £31.50 and wait a whole month without television in my front room for it. I am in debt at the moment and I don't want all this on top of everything else - thankfully I have since cancelled it two weeks later when I told the person on the phone that it is the dish which is at fault as well as the fact that I live in a communal Housing Association property, and so that is one of very few weights off my mind. I emailed the Housing Association's Repairs department and they said that they will contact an electrical company to come out and see to the dish outside. I received a telephone call on Friday 24th May from the man to say that he will arrive on Wednesday 29th May 2024 to do the job. He arrived at around 9.40 am on Wednesday as promised; he went into my flat and had a look at the Sky box and saw the blue screen on my front room TV set, indicating no signal. He also looked outside as to where the dish was.  The main problem was that the ladders that he had with him were not enough to reach the dish outside as the dish was towards the top of the building - obviously the Health and Safety aspect of the job didn't allow him to do this. He then mentioned that whether he could do the job as a result of getting onto the roof and doing it like that as the dish is closer to the top. He said that he needed the key to enter the loft part of the building in order to reach this, and he needed to contact the Housing Officer at the Housing Association who had key to this, but lo and behold, he came on the Wednesday to do the job, and guess what? Wednesday was the Housing Officer's day off and so therefore he was unable to contact him for the key so that he could do the job! I just couldn't believe it myself. I am personally annoyed because this has not been sorted, and the man who came to do this is also annoyed because he came all the way to Nottingham from Peterborough, and he said to me that he won't get paid if he cannot do the job, so you see, we are both angry about this for different reasons. We are both in the same boat with regards to frustration, and we both want to see a conclusion to this, once and for all. Sometimes I wish that I didn't live in a flat which is in a communal building and I am thinking of getting a transfer to a one bedroom flat that isn't in that sort of place. I pay around £85 a month in a Direct Debit to Sky to receive their TV services which I cannot use at the moment, and I don't have much money in my bank account as it is due to one thing and another. I also pay nearly £14 a month to TV Licensing so that I can legally watch TV in my front room. I pay for Sky hence the fact that I want the Sky service in my front room and not Freeview. Also, as the General Election is coming up in five weeks' time, I want the satellite TV to be working properly so that I can catch up with what is on the news channels, and I feel rather "cut off" from that at the moment, and I want it working in time for Thursday 4th July 2024 for ovbious reasons . I have Freeview in my bedroom, but that is not the point  - I don't want to be limited to my bedroom every time I want to watch TV. I have tried putting the Freeview in te front room but it doesn't seem compatable for the same uses that I usually have Sky for.  Sunday 9th June 2024 is Day 27 of the satellite TV not working in my flat, and I feel that something needs to be done about this. You can take this message as a complaint if you like, but nevertheless, I want this message to be acknowledged and also something to be done about what has happened. I have enough on my plate with regards to health problems and depression without things like this making things worse. I would appreciate it if something was done.  I don't like naming and shaming but it is Matthews and Tannert's fault that I am in this situation in the first place, and sometimes I wish that I could sue them. In a nutshell, I have had more than enough after being without TV in the my front room for nearly four weeks. Also, at a time like this, I am missing so much of interest on TV what with the General Election comning up in just a few weeks.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Rossendales Bailiff - a positive experience (!)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5140 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya!

 

I popped on here after trying to get some info on rent deposit/property maintenance etc and noticed a few threads in this section on rossendales bailiffs.. thought I'd chime in with a positive (!!!) experience I had with them

 

well, maybe not positive (at the end of the day I still had to pay up), but nothing like the stories some people have told

 

I'd never dealt with bailiffs before, so I had no idea what to expect... (I always had a mental picture of big scary guys who come round and try to leave with your telly)

 

long story short, I owed a fair bit of council tax... ignord it and hoped it'd all go away (it didn't). I got a letter through from rossendales bailiffs, giving me all the legal info, stating my rights etc

 

I gave them a call and made arrangements to pay it in installments... they were really friendly, and didn't try to pressure me to pay more than I could afford

 

am not trying to paint them 'whiter than white' but you've got to tell it like it is... I don't expect to be treated like a criminal for owing a few hundred quid council tax, and fair play rossendales, they didnt

 

so that's my painless rossendales experience - not very exciting eh? :) anyone else had any dealings with them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess if you owe the money then Rossendales bailiffs are entitled to pursue you. People who don't pay council tax cost everyone :-x (who do pay it) more, so I can understand why councils make an effort to pursue those who evade their responsibilities as otherwise they would not be able to provide services to those who really need them.

 

Pay your council tax on time like everyone else and these companies wont bother you, its really easy.

 

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

BB

 

That's a bit naive frankly. Some people, believe it or not, experience temporary financial hardship beyond their control. Like for example, when your boss robs the company's assets and you turn up to locked gates instead of a job. Some people, believe it or not, get ill.

 

In all these cases, your caring sharing local authority will demand THE FULL YEARS CT in advance if you missed say the second and third payment.

 

EDIT - On the other hand, I should add that i sometimes find "oops! i forgot to pay four years Council Tax" a little beyond belief!!

Edited by Thegreenpimpernel
Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ALWAYS talk to the people you owe money to, local council included.

 

If you get into difficulties for what ever reason there is always someone to speak to. They will work hard to help (they want the money even if its late) way before it ever gets anywhere near bringing in the baliffs. What they don't do is allow you to ignore repeated letters, phone calls etc.

 

Baliffs are a last resort for people who just don't want to pay their way. You have to take a stand at some point otherwise nobody would pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think depends on the 'luck of the draw' of who you are dealing with. My experiences vary from good (as you describe) and somewhat less good, like "i don't give a **** i want my ****ing money or i'll *****ing bankrupt you"

 

The public / banking sector equivalent is to reply:

 

"the money IS due"

 

to everything you say, even when you inform them the debtor is undergoing chemo!!

 

Not everyone is as understanding as you seem to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is important to note the distinction between DCA’s (debt collection agencies) and bailiffs. It is also important to note the differences that apply between certain fines even though they collectively come under the umbrella of Magistrate Court fines.

Each bailiff must be certificated in order to collect rent arrears, council tax arrears and certain other debts for example parking fines and speeding fines. The certificate is issued by a County Court Judge and is usually renewed every 2 years. In order to obtain a certificate, the bailiff must lodge with the court a bond or other security to the value of £10,000.

To check to see if a bailiff is certificated simply telephone the Ministry of Justice on 020 3334 3555 and give them the name of the bailiff and the company he is working for, or check online here Certificated Bailiff. They will be able to tell you which court issued the original certificate and you can then call that court and check the details further. However, please note that there may be administrative delays and if a search reveals that a bailiff is not listed as certificated then you should inform the bailiff that a search of the HMCS on-line Certificated Bailiff's Register does not include him. You should then request a copy of his certificate, or have him confirm which Court granted his certificate and when.

A company trading in debt recovery must have had at the time of collection a Category E Consumer Credit Licence pursuant to Section 21(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Since July 2008 this has changed to Category F.

Bailiffs do not have the power to arrest anyone, only the police have that power.

The behaviour expected from a bailiff when carrying out his duty is very carefully laid out in the “National Standard for Enforcement Agents” which, among other things states that:-

- “Enforcement agents should always produce relevant identification on request, such as a badge or ID card, together with a written authorisation to act on behalf of the creditor”

- “Enforcement agents must carry out their duties in a professional, calm and dignified manner. They must dress appropriately and act with discretion and fairness”

- “Enforcement agents will on each occasion when a visit is made to a debtor’s property which incurs a fee for the debtor, leave a notice detailing the fees charged to date, including the one for that visit, and the fees which will be incurred if further action becomes necessary. If a written request is made an itemised account of fees will be provided”

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with BarnoldswkBob -

 

Everyone has to pay council tax and those who don't are not contributing to society.

 

From what I hear Rossendales are actually one of the better companies - they give you notice on what you owe and if you call them they will tell you the law and what your options are.

 

That said obviously having to deal with any bailiffs is not going to be a pleasant experience due to the nature of the business.

 

End of the day everyone thinks that they are an exception or that their circumstances are different, but when it comes down to it you owe what you owe and if you are ill and your doctor can provide evidence of this you can get time off work, benefits, etc!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a big difference between 'don't' pay and temporarily 'can't' pay.

 

You'll find that those who "don't contribute to society" don't have to pay it in the first place.

 

I don't see how adding extra cost (which does NOT go to the council), harassing and removing peoples means to get to work, helps any one (including wider society).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some people in here make it sound oh so easy:rolleyes:

Councils cock up, Fact!! Then take their time to get it sorted, by then its often far too late.

Councils are far to eager to get the bailiffs involved because its easier for them to pass the buck.

Councils dont give people enough time to sort their financial difficulties out and get liability orders out within two months for non payers and then its for a full years worth of CT not just for the amount that is owed.

Its the councils who waste the money in the first place on frivolous things and poor investments, where the CT payers foot the bill for.

If the councils paid more attention in their budgeting and their own financial debt the CT payers would be paying less CT at an affordable rate instead of what we are paying now.

Try putting yourself in the shoes of the poverty stricken who are not entitled to benefits because they earn a penny over the required amount to qualify. what would you choose? feed your kids or pay the CT, I know which one I would choose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont feed the trolls, they are getting fat :p

awww and I wanted to play;)

I have come to this conclusion that bailiffs are scavengers and parasites, feeding off the poorest of the poor and will take what they can just to get what they can at any cost, and its what they want to do. How sad their lives must be.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rossendales must be getting desperate - good! I notice they seem to be leaving the odd comment on the whocallsme boards as well.

 

"Everyone has to pay council tax and those who don't are not contributing to society." - What exactly is this supposed to mean? Not everyone does have to pay council tax, but everyone (through VAT) does contribute to society. You'll have to come up with a better statement than that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone has to pay council tax and those who don't are not contributing to society

I missed that!! And I find offense to that statement spottedp. I do more than my fair share to society. What a lot of verbal diarrhea you spout.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Everyone has to pay council tax and those who don't are not contributing to society."

I dont pay council tax but i contribute to this society!!!

So much so that i even put my life on the line for this society, same as many of my comrades.

hello all:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont feed the trolls, they are getting fat :p

 

We seem to be getting a few lately, do you think they come out and play more in the spring?

 

Oh dear, bailiffs have never been that bright... :rolleyes:

 

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have had very possitive experiences with Rossendales(Proud to be Professional) and rightly so. By their choosing to make all visits and hand deliver all paperwork intended for me to addresses other than mine they have protected me from the headache of opening my door at 07.15 to a bailiff and a van. I have also saved the expence of taking out a front page spread in my local newspaper, informing my fellow residents of my financial status as their bailiffs ensured that my sensitive personal date was presented in concise terms without the need for respecting the Data Protection Act. I say we need more of these civic minded people. The down side is Rossendales(Proud to be Professionals) Expect me to pay for this service, but it's a small price considering the peace of mind it brings.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...