Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA and Magistrates Fine


Saz83
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

Earlier this year I pleaded guilty by post for not having a television license. It went to magistrates court and I was ordered to pay back £110. I am on benefits and couldnt pay the amount back at once so I filled in a form detailing my income and my outgoings per week.

 

I was left with about £3 a week after everything was paid. The benefits I get are Income Support and also DLA. Today I recieved a letter stating I was to pay back £20 per week. I was under the impression that DLA wasnt to be counted in matters like this as it is used for my mobilty and care needs. I currently use my DLA to pay a private carer to help me about my home with cleaning etc and also to help me get to the shops.

 

Am I wrong in thinking that DLA can't be used to pay a magistrates fine?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that benefit was the absolute minimum that one needed to live on, so how can people pay fines out of it?

 

Also, why aren't tax payers complaining to the government. Poor people on the dole should be given all the home comforts and extra spending money they need so they can live a carefree relaxing life.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor people on the dole should be given all the home comforts and extra spending money they need so they can live a carefree relaxing life.

 

Im not on the dole. I am on income support as I cannot work. I am also on disability living allowance. I do not have any extra spending money and I do not live a carefree and relaxing life.

 

I always thought that benefit was the absolute minimum that one needed to live on, so how can people pay fines out of it?

 

Those on benefits do live on the absolute minimum and yes, we have to pay fines out of it should we need to.

 

This still doesnt answer my question regarding the DLA counting as income.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor people on the dole should be given all the home comforts and extra spending money they need so they can live a carefree relaxing life.

 

Im not on the dole. I am on income support as I cannot work. I am also on disability living allowance. I do not have any extra spending money and I do not live a carefree and relaxing life.

 

I always thought that benefit was the absolute minimum that one needed to live on, so how can people pay fines out of it?

 

Those on benefits do live on the absolute minimum and yes, we have to pay fines out of it should we need to.

 

This still doesnt answer my question regarding the DLA counting as income.

Don't the people who pay you have an answer?

What about CAB?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Commiekips

 

Unless I am misreading or misunderstanding your comments, I think you are a little out of order for having a go at someone who has come on here to try and get some help. Irrespective of anything else this forum is here to try and help people, making sarcastic remarks against someone who's circumstances you know little or nothing about does not help anyone!

 

Saz83

 

There are I understand limits to what can be taken out of benefit for fines, council tax and a number of other things as well. Despite the sarcasm from commiekips, the best thing you could do would be to ring the office that deals with your claim. You cannot appeal against a fine being deducted from your Income Support (to the best of my knowledge) but you can appeal against the amount, if it is causing hardship. I am not 100% on the DLA side but I always thought DLA was pretty much disregarded when deciding someones income for the purpose of ability to pay.

 

Someone else may well come along with some more precise answers for you but a call to the office might well be the best course of action for you.

  • Haha 2

:)IF YOU ARE BORED WITH LITTLE TO DO:)

My Story - Simon -V- The (SH)Abbey - :!:WON / 19 November 2007:!:

 

SKY TV and the penalty charge - how far will it go?

 

Me V Its4me and Close Premium Finance:!:WON / 28 November 2007:!:

 

IF I CAN HELP, I WILL, IF I DO, THEN PLEASE CLICK ON THE SCALES ON THE LEFT

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not trying to be funny or nothing but leaving aside your DLA, if I'm not mistaken you also get the I.S. disability premium of £28 per week. The unfortunates on JSA somehow survive on the basic £65.45, I guess they have had to learn to budget more carefully than they would if they got £28 extra.

  • Haha 1

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't the people who pay you have an answer?

 

We just administer the benefits, the goverment pays them, they set the amounts, the applicable amounts, not nearly enough in most cases.

 

 

 

With regards to the fine deductions, its the courts that set the amount to come out each week, they notify third party deductions on how much to take out each week, third party will then take this amount out of the Income Support.

I.S have to take out the instructed amount and pass it on to the court out of the benefit.

 

Seems a lot to be taking out, hope you manage to get it reduced soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pat, have you possibly misread, or read too quickly. I thought that Saz was just c'n'pasteing what another poster said in an earlier post. Making a retort to the poster's inappropriate comments.

 

Best regards,

Paul.

Edited by loan_ranger
bad "speling" LOL

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Commiekips seems to have a chip the size of a boulder on his shoulder, seemingly thinking that every person on any kind of benefit is a scrounger for whom he pays personally by working.

 

He conveniently forgets that by and large these people did work, did pay into the system to help people who weren't working then, and that one day no doubt, he won't be working anymore and at that point, people who work will be paying for his benefits, because that's the way this system works.

 

Either that or he's a troll. Take your pick.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Patrickq1 its not saz with the Snide Comments but commiekips.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DLA is not always disregarded for income purposes, though it is disregarded as income when working out means tested benefit. For example, it is a prescribed benefit from which overpayments of Social Security benefit can be deducted from.

 

I do know that they do not take the mobility component of DLA into consideration when deliberating "income" for a fine - however I am uncertain about the Care Component with this. I wouldn't have thought so, but "thinking" does little to answer your question.

 

They cannot attach a deduction of benefit order to any component of DLA or ask for a third party deduction from it; they can to your IS though.

 

I'm afraid that's the only advice I can offer for the moment. If I find out, I will be sure to let you know.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Commiekips seems to have a chip the size of a boulder on his shoulder, seemingly thinking that every person on any kind of benefit is a scrounger for whom he pays personally by working.

 

He conveniently forgets that by and large these people did work, did pay into the system to help people who weren't working then, and that one day no doubt, he won't be working anymore and at that point, people who work will be paying for his benefits, because that's the way this system works.

 

Either that or he's a troll. Take your pick.

 

Indeed bookie I've noticed its not the first time.

 

PF

  • Haha 1

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i do apoligise sicerely got the names mixed up...doh...thanks for pointing it out...yes i hold my hands up too quick of the mark lol

howz u ranger..just been on you site some intresting work going on there dude..

patrickq1

ps thanks HB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Pat, your cheque is now on its way to you! LOL

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can all see that Commiekips comments have not been helpful. The OP has addressed this herself (or himself as the case may be); though it's very heartening (and helpful) for others to point out when someone has overstepped the mark, it doesn't answer the query at hand. When people keep going back to it, it detracts from the original post.

 

And remember - if you find a post which you find personally abusive (to you or the OP) or if you feel it in some manner is in breach of the forum rules, hit the red triangle on the post to report the matter to site team. I know I am in here frequently but I'm not here all the time so can't see every post made. The triangle sends a report in real time so that mods who are logged on at the time can deal with it.

 

We've moved on from Commiekips' comments, and they have been noted. Let's keep the thread focussed on addressing the OP's query from here, please.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when i was working as a tiler i was paying on average 350 per week on tax and insurance....if i were well enough i would be out the door first light and graftin till dusk,so i think ime entitled to some benefits but i had to fight for it ,hopefully i get through another couple of ops and get back on my feet again,would nt take me any more than an hour to source work....

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not something that she needs to appeal to benefits about as it is not a decision made by any benefit section.

 

The court have advised her that from their income calculations she is to pay £20 per week. She needs to find out if they have used DLA in that income calculation, and if so whether they can actually do that. She would then need to approach the court about this.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow... So much has gone on. Thanks for the helpful comments. I am not against paying my fine. Ive broke the law so therefore I am going to pay my fine.

 

I'll ring the court office dealing with it and see where they got the figure of £20 from.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...