Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Although this situation is mildly disturbing like a fly trapped behind the curtain on a warm day, your creative responses are always a joy to read, Dave. Cheers. Will send across. 
    • Hi I stupidly left my handbrake off,  and my car rolled down a hill and into a fence owned by a company. I am a part owner of the company that owns the fence. My car insurance (Prima) states they won't cover the damage to the fence, just the car as they state  "you own the land', although I don't and I did make that clear to them when reporting the accident.. I understood a company is a separate legal entity, so should be considered third party damage and car insurance should cover? The property has a £400 excess and I'm already going to be paying out the £500 excess on car insurance, so want to avoid paying both if I can.. Thanks for any advice you can give...
    • Lowell , Cabot etc, I'm not sure how I can politely put this, but F taking money from your kids mouths to pay them!
    • Yes, they are digging themselves into a ditch, with regard to people like you who fight back. Remember that, sadly, the vast majority of motorists who get these tickets think they are fines, that companies like ECP have some sort of official status, and give in and pay. They are just putting barriers in your way and encouraging you to fold. How about this as a reply - Dear ECP, Re: Subject Access Request PCN no.XXXXX I refer to my Subject Access Request dated XXXXX and received by yourselves on XXXXX. Thank you for your bizarre letter of 23 April.  Your letter requests Photo ID - which I have already sent to you.  The letter also requests proof of ownership of the vehicle - this is impossible to produce as the vehicle in question was on hire. In any case requests for proof of ownership are silly given your PCNs invite registered keepers to nominate drivers who do not own vehicles. I note all this concern for correct identity was absent when you decided to send letters threatening me with all & sundry if I didn't pay you money! The SAR was received on XXXXX.  I have already sent Photo ID.  The clock is ticking.  I am well aware that I would have the right to complain to the ICO and to sue you for not respecting your statutory duty should you not respect the 30-day deadline. Tick, tock. Yours, XXXXX
    • none of their ruddy business! and if they have been pressuring you in o borrowing from friends and family .. THAT IS WRONG AND AGAINST THE REGULATIONS...if you have that in B&W you need to REPORT THEM. once a debt is defaulted and it gone from your file it can never come back. not without a fight in court you won't. i think you are getting confused here , just because you've been paying 'creditors' via and IVA it does NOT mean the debt can re-appear on your file, and it does not mean you are more likely to get more CCJ attempts. statute barring is 6yrs from a debts last payment, but that can't change anything on your credit file. i really wish you hadn't sent that letter. please dont do anything more now unless you check with us first..no calls, in/out. no emails in/out no letters in/out....thats if you want our help.... NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS STOP GROVELLING to them. could have been worded alot better and more forcefully. dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Financial round 2!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4931 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

 

Been awhile since ive been here. About a year and a half ago, i was being chased by lowell portfolio for a debt about 8 years old. After some great help from these forums, i sent them a cca request that didnt come back within the time frame, and when it did come back, it was a poorly photocopied peice of paper with no signitures on it whatsoever. After this, i didnt hear from them again.

 

Fast foward to 3 weeks ago. I moved into this house around 7 months ago. Every month i've been keeping an eye on my credit report with experian. I noticed about 3 weeks ago, some checks were being made on me by lowell financial! So it wasnt to my surprise that the letters demanding payment (full or payment plan) started coming again. Now, are they allowed to do checks on my credit file to see where i'm living now, and what road do i go down now with this old debt.

 

They have threatened to take necessary action to recover monies owed. They claim to be the legal owners of the debt, and have threatened agent visits.

 

The debt is an old capital one credit card and is for £431.15.

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 months later...

Hey people!

 

Right then, I sent the letter suggested stating that the debt was statute barred. I had no reply. This letter was sent early april.

 

Today however, i received a claim form from the courts. They are claiming that i entered into an agreement with them on 07/09/06. Thinking about it, i seem to remember them phoning me and them scaring me into paying £50 per month, which i didnt stick to after finding that the debt was over 6 years old and was statute barred. But because i entered into this agreement, does that re-activate the debt? The original debt was with capitol one in 2001. So where do i go from here? what do i do now? I have worked so hard to get out of debt and a ccj would put me back to square one! Me and the missus has just had a baby and were looking into buying a house! Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, firstly, was there a continuous period of 6 years or more when no payments were made? because if so it is still SB.

 

Can you let us know what the alleged debt is Loan, CC etc and if you still have their response to the CCA request, can you post it up (if you have not already done so previously). Remove all identifiers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i've been racking my brains out trying to think and im settling at they made that phone call just before the 6 years were up, so i think i made a payment to them at around 5 years 7 months. So does this mean that it is not statute barred and im going to end up with a ccj? Is there any way now to not get a ccj? Its an old credit card debt by the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need a 6 year period of not paying or acknowledging the debt, so unlikely to be SB.

 

You have to defend the action. You have to acknowledge receipt of the court forms and advise them that you will be defending.

 

See direct gov guide on this. County court claims and County Court Judgments (CCJs) : Directgov - Money, tax and benefits

 

You then need to follow a process which will help you defend. You need to request disclosure from Lowells or their solicitors who are taking this action, for a copy of all the relevant papers they will be using in court. I believe the request is under CPR 31.14. Make such requests by recorded delivery letter, keeping a copy and proof of postage.

 

See another thread on defending a CCJ. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/259150-mbna-restons-too-late.html

 

Another thread that will help.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/159445-getting-them-reveal-their.html

 

Have a read through these threads and others about defending a CCJ. Come back with any questions, so people can answer. The main thing first is to acknowledge to the court receipt of papers and that you will be defending.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to be able to show that it's not Statute Barred by providing evidence of when the alledged payment was made and who made it.

 

The CPR request should reveal if they have that or not. Chances are they won't. ;)

These are video links to show how I deal with Debt Collectors.

 

Fly fishing for C.A.R.S

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=zPtzK8FqE6k&feature=related

 

Frederickson International don't accept my card type

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=eiZBULlWW6Q&feature=related

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have to be able to show that it's not Statute Barred by providing evidence of when the alledged payment was made and who made it.

 

The CPR request should reveal if they have that or not. Chances are they won't. ;)

 

 

Ok cool. So if i go down the road of defending this, if it turns out that its not statute barred, whats the worst possible outcome having defended it a failed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok cool. So if i go down the road of defending this, if it turns out that its not statute barred, whats the worst possible outcome having defended it a failed?

 

Well.......

 

You will put them to proof of everything, you'll want the original CCA, a valid default notice and statements showing how the amount claimed arose.

 

If they do miraculously manage to supply all the paperwork you will be demanding, I bet such paperwork shows a number of unlawful charges were applied to your account prior to default and termination if not before.

 

As Lowell now claim to own title to this account, the proper way for you to reclaim your charges is as an equity under sec 136 Law of Property 1925 {("Subject to equities") since the charges existed prior to the assignment}.

 

Forget about Cap 1 for now they haven't taken you to Court, AND they don't own the account that's why lowells are taking you to Court in their own right.

 

Go for your charges plus contractual interest thereupon straight from Lowell by way of counterclaim for setoff under LOP 1925.

 

Cap 1 charges plus 8 years+ of contractual interest should cost Clownells a fair whack. :D

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well.......

 

You will put them to proof of everything, you'll want the original CCA, a valid default notice and statements showing how the amount claimed arose.

 

If they do miraculously manage to supply all the paperwork you will be demanding, I bet such paperwork shows a number of unlawful charges were applied to your account prior to default and termination if not before.

 

As Lowell now claim to own title to this account, the proper way for you to reclaim your charges is as an equity under sec 136 Law of Property 1925 {("Subject to equities") since the charges existed prior to the assignment}.

 

Forget about Cap 1 for now they haven't taken you to Court, AND they don't own the account that's why lowells are taking you to Court in their own right.

 

Go for your charges plus contractual interest thereupon straight from Lowell by way of counterclaim for setoff under LOP 1925.

 

Cap 1 charges plus 8 years+ of contractual interest should cost Clownells a fair whack. :D

 

 

Most of that went straight over my head! lol. Ok, so if i defend then could it end up costing me more?

 

And what do i actually write on the claim form. Sorry if i sound silly, but i am very new to this.

 

Also, to note, i've worked out that its been 11 years since i first had the cc, so with this in mind, and my track record when i was younger, there must have been a period of more than 6 years without payment.

 

Thanks eveyone for their help so far :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is section 136 of the law of Property act 1925, which might assist with your understanding

 

136 Legal assignments of things in action

 

(1)Any absolute assignment by writing under the hand of the assignor (not purporting to be by way of charge only) of any debt or other legal thing in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to claim such debt or thing in action, is effectual in law (subject to equities having priority over the right of the assignee) to pass and transfer from the date of such notice—

(a)the legal right to such debt or thing in action;

(b)all legal and other remedies for the same; and

©the power to give a good discharge for the same without the concurrence of the assignor:

Provided that, if the debtor, trustee or other person liable in respect of such debt or thing in action has notice—

(a)that the assignment is disputed by the assignor or any person claiming under him; or

(b)of any other opposing or conflicting claims to such debt or thing in action;he may, if he thinks fit, either call upon the persons making claim thereto to interplead concerning the same, or pay the debt or other thing in action into court under the provisions of the M1Trustee Act, 1925.

(2)This section does not affect the provisions of the M2Policies of Assurance Act, 1867.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Guys,

 

Not having gone through this before, all of the advice is somewhat going over my head! lol. So a couple of questions if you will.

 

How exactly do i defend this court action. Is it just simply a case of filling out the defense form with the advice stated above? I have no physical evidence to submit, just what i can write on the form.

 

Secondly, i received a letter today from lowell financial today. (I assume its the same people) asking me to contact them to prevent futher action. Now this has confused me a little, as i was under the impretion that futher action was already underway.

 

Should i phone this company and sort out a monthly payment, or should i defend and possibly lose, as i cant recolect as to when the last payment was on the account. As i say, im sure it has been over 6 years, but have no evidence to that effect.

 

Thanks again for the help so far, futher help is greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've a hunch that you aren't the only one without physical evidence to produce in Court hence the offer of avoiding proceedings.

 

We must assume that the Court claim is genuine, could you scan the particulars of claim and post them up please?

 

Have you acknowledged the claim yet it's very important that you do?

As of 03/03/12 please do not under any circumstances wait for my further input or guidance on any current thread or defence of a court claim I might have been involved in on or through Cag.

Jasper1965

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to do 2 things to get the ball rolling.

 

1) Acknowledge to the court you have received their papers and you will be defending.

 

2) Send a letter to Lowell asking them for disclosure of information to assist you in defending. You can't really complete the necessary forms for your defence, unless you have the information.

 

This is the letter. Send recorded to Lowells.

 

Dear Sir,

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored] [delete if no such request was delivered]

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

1 The agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

2 The assignment*

3 The default notice*

4 The termination notice*

5 [any other documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim]*

* delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim.

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

# delete if claim for a sum exceeding £5,000.00

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to do 2 things to get the ball rolling.

 

1) Acknowledge to the court you have received their papers and you will be defending.

 

2) Send a letter to Lowell asking them for disclosure of information to assist you in defending. You can't really complete the necessary forms for your defence, unless you have the information.

 

This is the letter. Send recorded to Lowells.

 

Dear Sir,

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

CPR 31.14 Request

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) County Court.

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

[Prior to the issue of proceedings I had delivered a request for the production of the agreement mentioned in the Claim Form and on which you rely. That request was ignored] [delete if no such request was delivered]

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

1 The agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

2 The assignment*

3 The default notice*

4 The termination notice*

5 [any other documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim]*

* delete if not mentioned in the Particulars of claim.

[Although your claim is for a sum which is not more than £5,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the small claims track for determination upon my delivering a defence, at this moment in time I have not delivered my defence and the case has not been allocated to a track. In consequence the provisions of CPR 27(2) are of no effect and you should not seek to avoid compliance with your CPR 31 duties by claiming otherwise]#

# delete if claim for a sum exceeding £5,000.00

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are copied to and received by me within 7 days of receiving this letter. Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy. Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request. In addition your statement must be accompanied with a statement that you agree to an extension of the time for me to file my defence. Your extension of time must be not less than 14 days from the date when you say you will have complied with my request and you must state the new date for filing my defence.

If you are unable to comply with this request and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

Please note that if you should fail to comply with this request, fail to request more time or fail to agree to an extension of time for the filing of my defence, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order.

I do hope this will not be necessary and look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully

 

Thanks very much, that helps alot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are having a laugh. They do not even have the date of assignment of the alleged debt on it. What a wunch of Bankers. Nor I notice have they even put on the alleged daily interest rates. Has this got an official court stamp on it even.

 

If you think the debt is Statute Barred then you must tell the Leeds Losers. The balance of proof rests with them not you.

 

One word of advice though. They like to make up imaginary payments just to keep a debt within time. Old Capital One CCAs dont comply with the CCA regulations so are totally UNERNFORCEABLE in court

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are having a laugh. They do not even have the date of assignment of the alleged debt on it. What a wunch of Bankers. Nor I notice have they even put on the alleged daily interest rates. Has this got an official court stamp on it even.

 

If you think the debt is Statute Barred then you must tell the Leeds Losers. The balance of proof rests with them not you.

 

One word of advice though. They like to make up imaginary payments just to keep a debt within time. Old Capital One CCAs dont comply with the CCA regulations so are totally UNERNFORCEABLE in court

 

Hey ODC. Thanks for your reply. Yep, all looks official. I did send the statute barred letter in april and had no response. Then recieved this last week. What do you think they are playing at?

 

Do you personally think i should defend? Also last year, i cca requested them and they sent a poorly photo copied sheet of paper with my sig on, thats all as far as i can remember.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...