Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My ex blamed me for her not paying her bills she says I controlled her money. So I have been told I need to pay them as it was my fault. She has not paid the bills where she lives now which was my house. I'm not allowed contact with her and again she is blaming me. As in this type of case it is victim led so no matter what stupid thing she says she is believed. It is for me to prove otherwise.
    • No SAR yet but they have confirmed via email that they have everything and will supply it by this month end.    When you say the FOS considered it a personal loan due to personal guarantee who is the FOS? Financial Ombudsman?  But then that doesn’t make sense as they haven’t been involved yet.    Santander in their final response to my original complaint did not agree to it. They turned my complaint down and specified that the selling dealership had agreed to treat it as personal for settlement purposes.    I guess they could not agree to it as then they would be guilty of miss selling but they gave me what I wanted by saying I would not get treated as a business customer in regards to finance charges.    Awful bank to deal with. Will never touch them again. 
    • Background I am in dispute with Clerical Medical over, amongst other things, statements that I haven't received. They didn't resolve my complaint in time so invited me to complain to the FOS, which I did The FOS investigator in his findings has written that  Clerical Medical have mow provided all missing statements apart from two. One of these is for the policy year 2021 - 2022, which they say is unavailable due to a system migration. I have twice asked the FOS investigator for a copy of his screen shot to try and resolve this discrepancy but they have ignored me so today I submitted a subject access request. I said I was primarily interested in the screen shot but I also asked for everything they held against the complaint reference number. The response I got from firstly the Data Protection Operations Senior Coordinator, then secondly the investigator was that  The investigator expanded on this and said I'll wait the 40 days and see what they come back with then make a decision on next steps at that point, but I want to make sure I've got my facts in the right order before I start arguing with them. They seem to be saying that my SAR doesn't cover the screen shot because it isn't personal data but I disagree. I have a reference number that identifies my complaint and therefore indirectly identifies me. I think that means everything that is held against that reference number, including the screen shot, is my personal data and is in scope of my SAR (subject to exemptions). Who is right?
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Robinson Way 18 year debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5166 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Can someone please help, from looking round this site, I've found out Robinson Way are debt collectors, not very nice one's at that, today I've received a letter from them stating "If you are not the person who formerly lived at the above address, please contact us without delay on the freephone number below"

 

What do I do? I am the person who lived at the named address, BUT, I've lived at my current address for 11 years, I've been on the voters register at this address since 2003, the address they quote is an old address I lived at in 1992, looking back, I'm sure they are chasing an old TSB a/c which I've not had contact with since at least 1996 due to personal issues, how do I get these people of my back? my partner is not aware of this old a/c, it's history and she doesn't need to be aware at this stage, I'm worried in case someone comes round and informs her.

 

Going back to today's letter:

 

"If you are not the person who formerly lived at the above address, please contact us without delay on the freephone number below"

 

If I don't contact them, what happens then, will they assume I am the person from the named old address, although there is no details a/c number or why they're looking for the named individual within the contents of todays letter?

 

Or should I contact them pretending I'm not who they're looking for.

 

Just to mention, I'm in the process of losing my job via redundancy, I'm under enough stress as it is without these people adding to it.

 

Hoping someone can assist me out of this mess, many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Can someone please help, from looking round this site, I've found out Robinson Way are debt collectors, not very nice one's at that, today I've received a letter from them stating "If you are not the person who formerly lived at the above address, please contact us without delay on the freephone number below"

 

If you have not made a payment towards or acknowledged this debt in a clear 6 year window then its statute barred and all you need to do is notify them that as it is stat barred you will not be making a payment to them.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you both

If you have not made a payment towards or acknowledged this debt in a clear 6 year window then its statute barred and all you need to do is notify them that as it is stat barred you will not be making a payment to them

Do I write or phone?

It ought to be the end of it . But this being Robinson way , things may not come to that happy conclusion so easily .

Really?

 

What if they say the debt is not SB? I'm not 100% but when I think back I may have received a CCJ, nothing ever came of it tho, but it's so long ago difficult to be 100% certain.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always communicate in writing never 'phone them.

What if they say the debt is not SB? I'm not 100% but when I think back I may have received a CCJ, nothing ever came of it tho, but it's so long ago difficult to be 100% certain.
If they did have a CCJ and it wasn't enforced within six years they would have to apply to the court for permission to enforce giving very good reasons..... permission is very rarely given.

 

Send the SB letter http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/599-letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred the onus is on them to prove otherwise. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to you all, may I just clarify something, within that SB letter, it states:

 

You have contacted us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by ourselves.

 

The letter I received today doesn't mention anything about a debt, it just gives a previous address, by sending the SB letter am I admitting I know about the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing really to add, but I also had a letter the other day from RW, relating to my sister in law, who has lived in Spain since 2002. My address was used for forwarding correspondence for a few years.

 

I have had hassle from other debt companies chasing debts for my Brother who also lives in Spain, but have kicked these into touch, by telling them they live abroad, so don't bother me e.g. could be contrued as harassment.

 

The strange thing is that no company had to my knowledge written about debts for my sister in law. So this must mean that RW have picked up some very historic debts, that no other company could be bothered to chase.

 

I phoned RW and put them straight. It was their tracing dept and from what they said they had very limited info to go on.

 

It is up to you. But I would ignore them and wait for them to write to you with more information. You may never hear from them again, if you don't write to them now.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Wait until they contact you again actually mentioning it then send the SB letter.

Do I ignore the template letter above then, and just wait for the next letter to arrive?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've done some searching round the net (Google can be dangerous) and noticed Robinson Way can be a pain in the bum, it seems they don't seem interested whether a debt is SB or not, they'll chance there arm until the last moment even sending people round, from what I've read on the internet maybe ignoring the letter as suggested is not going to stop them.

 

I don't wish to get into a dispute with them, neither do I want anyone turning up at my door, so can someone help me think this through?

 

I know today's letter doesn't mention anything about a debt, however, I know what the letter refers to, I'm tempted to send the SB letter of to them, if I send the letter off to them, this will a) confirm it's me, BUT b) warn them that the debt is SB and to back off, or I'll take any necessary action to prevent them harassing me, any suggestions please?

 

Today's letter has opened a can of worms I wasn't ready for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Robbers Way sound like they are getting desperate if they are chasing 18 year old debts. They are Phishing for info so just wait for the next letter then send the Statute Barred letter provided by Cerberusalert in post 5. You are in good hands on CAG.

 

Never speak to DCA's on the phone (unless you can record the call), do everything in writing to keep a paper trail and send all letters by recorded delivery (so they cant say they didnt get your letters)

:cool::cool: Blondmusic :cool::cool:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Robbers Way sound like they are getting desperate if they are chasing 18 year old debts.

 

OK, I just don't want them turning up at my door out of desperation, I've read on the net they have a habit of doing it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you rightly point out, the letter you have received mentions nothing about a debt recent or otherwise, so can safely be ignored.

 

As has been suggested, you should really wait for the second letter, which will hopefully give you further information, and may, or may not threaten a doorstep visitor. There is a link below for the harrassment on the doorstep letter which you could send now if you want, but as most of these people are spoon fed scripts for telephone calls, they cannot always read or indeed comprehend letters written to them.

 

To cover that instance, you could of course print out an extra copy of the said doorstep letter and should someone call, you could just simply hand them the letter and close the door in their face.

 

I was brought up to be a very polite person, and the thought of a doorstep confrontation put the fear of ;;d in me, and as for actually closing the door in someones' face, my parents would be horrified!!!, but it gets easier. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Politely inform them that the debt is disputed. No need to go into raptures as to why.

Then warn them that you will be sending them an admin charge for your time-consuming response if they harass you further.

If they do harass again then give them 14 days to comply with your fee.

They will tell you they do not acknowledged your fee. That is good as you can them go to the small claims court with an NI form.

It works!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, Robinson Way , I don't think , actually recognize the limitations act . I believe their working practices do not cater for it . Moreso, I believe they may have even written their own internal rules that circumvent , replace and negate the actual legislature to a format that is more in keeping with their need to reclaim these sums . You only have to receive a letter from Robinson way denying the statute barred status of an alleged debt , that is stepped in their own distorted interpretation , and still continue to chase you for a full 6 months after receipt of said statute barred letter , under additional duress of multiple complaint to come to this inevitable conclusion .

Edited by Drexl Spivey
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the helpful replies, however, I've decided to be pro active rather than re active, and am going to send them the SB letter above, no doubt this will confirm it's me, but from what I've read they can't do anything as the debt is well and truly SB, I'm going to mention should they continue to harass me, I'll be raising a complaint with OFT, hopefully, they'll back off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they do harass again then give them 14 days to comply with your fee.

They will tell you they do not acknowledged your fee. That is good as you can them go to the small claims court with an NI form.

It works!

 

Hi can you explain how to do this? Just send them the bill for the fee and then after 14 days, start a MCOL claim?

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi can you explain how to do this? Just send them the bill for the fee and then after 14 days, start a MCOL claim?

 

You can ask for all sorts of fees but whether a small claims court would help you enforce is another matter. Give it a try and see how it goes.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well - what you do is write to them, via recorded, stating you will bill them an admin fee if they write with anything other then news of closure/summons.

 

If they write back with crap then send them your invoice for ££££

 

 

Give them 2 weeks to comply.

 

If they fail to comply then go to your SCs court - get in an NI form, and then wait.

 

The shark will be served the notice of issue and then you will either get your cash off the shark or not. If they fail to reply, fill in the notice of issue that you hold and the court will get the defendent to cough up..

 

If they wanna fight then go to court and tell the judge that they wont pay your invoice and remember this is a totally seperate issue as to why the shark is chasing you.

 

I reiterte - IT WORK! ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...