Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dog Attack - - - Advice Needed, Please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5271 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i mentioned before about these jokes about dogs and fingers

 

i will be requesting the thread be closed down if it continues

 

seeing your finger on the ground after being bitten off by a dog is beyond belief

 

the emotional turmoil in its self

 

ive know postman who have had there fingers amputated also through infection from dog bites

 

AND YOU PEOPLE MAKE LITE JOKES ABOUT IT

START TO REJOIN THE HUMAN RACE

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Nah don't close it, just remove my comments from it if you're that bothered, and I promise I won't reply on it again. It's not fair for 'questioner' to suffer because I'm being a clown. Deal?

Mattaius, I'll hold you to that promise. If you break it, then everyone will know whose fault it is when the thread is closed.

In additiion, your account will be put on moderation.

 

Fair?

 

Rooster-UK.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Listen guys

 

I can stand to be the object of abuse and jokes if it makes some posters feel better in them selves to scapegoat me for the personal problems, fears or inadequacies they may carry inside themselves.

 

I know its huge fun to laugh at the misfortunes of others but that of course has its limits.

 

Before I got ripped by that dog I may well have felt the same way that some the more callous know-all, life-style perfectionists felt on here.

 

I have to say that I heard many dogs at many doors and always took precautions but, like the mountain climber who missed that last foothold, I made a simple mistake and paid the price. I heard nothing at this house and thought the place was empty. But this was no excuse to mistreat me here. Why so much hate?

 

I came on this thread to simply gather a little bit of advice and that was all. I did not seek sympathy or understanding for the injury – just a bit of legal guidance. The bits I did get were helpful too.

 

I would personally like the thread to stay open please, if the flamers will permit it, so that I can tell you what happens next. Any kid delivering leaflets can make a similar mistake and end up worse than I did. And yes – I still get pain and discomfort in the finger.

 

For some reason this issue created great emotions, which is just so crazy. And again yes - I can give back much more that I get as some who know about me on this site could tell you.

 

Personally though, if I want violence I will take it out on my six feet punch bag and leave such base things off great forums like this one...

 

CAG is utterly vital to the wellbeing of the 21st century consumer. We have been badly let down by the so-called unbiased authorities, such as FOS, so we need to band together and recruit the public to get with it, wake up and support CAG now..

 

We need to be out there, telling it like it is now – not squabbling like rooks in a tree.

Fighting amongst each other helps no one but the disgusting banks and DCAs, therefore let’s keep it real and remember who the enemy really is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Questioner

 

I was very sorry to read this thread. I hope you are feeling better now.

 

As a dog behaviourist I know that it is often the dogs that don't warn before striking that are the most dangerous. I have to say though that I have never heard of this ever happening before but it is something that I will remember and keep at the back of my mind if I have clients who have dogs that like to tear up the mail. A simple cage at the back of the door would solve the problem and obviously would have stopped this horrendous event happening.

 

I don't think that a warden has any legal right to demand the owner put up a sign or have a cage installed but it may be that this is what they advised the owner to do in case, as you say, a child puts its hands through the letterbox at some stage in the future. That would be terrible!

 

I have never thought about the dangers of leaflet delivering, nor indeed the dangers that our postmen and woman face each day in light of your thread. I will put a warning on some of the dog forums I moderate on to let people know the dangers if their dogs are aggressive to callers (ie postmen, delivery people etc.,). At least I can then feel I have done something to stop this happening again.

 

I do hope you feel better in the future and, I have to say, that if one of my dogs had carried out such an attack (but they're all softies - more likely to lick your hand than bite it!) I would be beside myself with worry about you. The owner does nothing to promote responsible dog ownership.

 

I do think that this would be a very difficult case to prove but perhaps if you had received more concern from the owner initially you wouldn't be feeling like this now. It is horrible for this to have happened and I will do my best to warn other dog owners about the possibility.

 

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

 

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

 

Best wishes

Gemspan

  • Haha 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gemspan for your kind concern.

 

The owners initial reaction, when he saw me standing their covered in blood was, flippant - he was really not that bothered and quickly closed the door on me. I think his partner must have worried him though and seen the potential legal dangers hence his subsequent visit to the hospital to find me.

 

His main concern turned out to be whether or not I had informed the authorities. WHEN I INFORMED HIM THAT I HAD, HE SWIFTLY LEFT THE HOSPITAL.

 

The people who I delivered for were sympathetic but nothing more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Questioner

 

I was very sorry to read this thread. I hope you are feeling better now.

 

As a dog behaviourist I know that it is often the dogs that don't warn before striking that are the most dangerous. I have to say though that I have never heard of this ever happening before but it is something that I will remember and keep at the back of my mind if I have clients who have dogs that like to tear up the mail. A simple cage at the back of the door would solve the problem and obviously would have stopped this horrendous event happening.

 

I don't think that a warden has any legal right to demand the owner put up a sign or have a cage installed but it may be that this is what they advised the owner to do in case, as you say, a child puts its hands through the letterbox at some stage in the future. That would be terrible!

 

I have never thought about the dangers of leaflet delivering, nor indeed the dangers that our postmen and woman face each day in light of your thread. I will put a warning on some of the dog forums I moderate on to let people know the dangers if their dogs are aggressive to callers (ie postmen, delivery people etc.,). At least I can then feel I have done something to stop this happening again.

 

I do hope you feel better in the future and, I have to say, that if one of my dogs had carried out such an attack (but they're all softies - more likely to lick your hand than bite it!) I would be beside myself with worry about you. The owner does nothing to promote responsible dog ownership.

 

I do think that this would be a very difficult case to prove but perhaps if you had received more concern from the owner initially you wouldn't be feeling like this now. It is horrible for this to have happened and I will do my best to warn other dog owners about the possibility.

 

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.

 

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.

 

Best wishes

Gemspan

 

Thanks from me also for your input Gemspan...probably the most constructive contribution made on this thread! :)

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks from me also for your input Gemspan...probably the most constructive contribution made on this thread! :)

 

I'll 2nd that comment.:)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gemspan for your kind concern.

 

The owners initial reaction, when he saw me standing their covered in blood was, flippant - he was really not that bothered and quickly closed the door on me. I think his partner must have worried him though and seen the potential legal dangers hence his subsequent visit to the hospital to find me.

 

His main concern turned out to be whether or not I had informed the authorities. WHEN I INFORMED HIM THAT I HAD, HE SWIFTLY LEFT THE HOSPITAL.

 

The people who I delivered for were sympathetic but nothing more.

 

This is what it makes it a bit suspect. I'm still wondering what breed of dog we are talking about. I still say the police should have investigated to make sure it wasn't an ilegal breed, especially after the tragic Liverpool case.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still say the police should have investigated to make sure it wasn't an ilegal breed, especially after the tragic Liverpool case

 

How could the police be influenced by something that had yet to happen - or are you suggesting they should revisit every complaint involving dogs over the last ?? years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

How could the police be influenced by something that had yet to happen - or are you suggesting they should revisit every complaint involving dogs over the last ?? years?

 

What are you talking about hightail? The OP reported the incident to the police and as such, they have a duty to investigate if any offence has been commited, thats what the police are there for. For all we know, the dog in question may be an ilegal breed, if so an offence is being commited even without the incident. The OP's version of the owner's behaviour following the incident seems to me as suspect.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are you talking about hightail?

 

The first words of the first post of this thread

Dog attack

 

Date – Spring 08

 

Your suggestion that the police should do more "especially after the tragic Liverpool case" makes no sense when the OP was bitten over a year earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your suggestion that the police should do more "especially after the tragic Liverpool case" makes no sense when the OP was bitten over a year earlier.

 

When the OP was bitten is irrelevant if the law has been broken. The dangerous dogs act has existed for many years and incidents involving dog attacks (whether it occurs on private property or not) should be investigated by the police to ensure the dog in question is not an illegal breed. If the dog in this case is not an illegal breed and every thing is above board then fair enough, the OP has little chance of bringing a prosecution which has already been pointed out. But it should still be looked into. If you lived next door to this property and had children, how would you feel if this dog managed to attack one of your kids and it turned out to be an illegal breed which the police should of detected from the earlier incident? Now do you get my point?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also informed the Dog Warden – who has since spoken to the owner and I believe warned him to keep his dog under proper control

 

Again, from the very first post. There is nothing (at least nothing in the reported facts) to suggest the matter was not properly investigated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To the original OP - sorry about some of the replies you have received. Having been the victim of a dog attack myself ( an alsatian belonging to a family member) I understand the consequences can last for some time.I also had no warning of the attack and was inside the owners house at the time. I also ended up in hospital for treatment.

 

It took me a long time to re- build my confidence - so imagine my reaction a few years later when delivering leaflets ( very carefully ) as i pushed the leaflet in the door pushed open ( it was not secured) an behind it was an alsation with his teeth bared. I just totally froze.Luckily the owner appeared and grabbed him by the collar - but to this day I have never delivered another leaflet.

 

By the way I am now the proud owner of a lovely soppy Lurcher. But I still do not let him stay by the front door when we are not in. He would only bark but I understand it actually puts a lot of pressure on the dog as they feel they are constantly trying to protect their owners.He is also trained to sit when we invite people in the house.

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jansus

 

At least if you can see what you are facing you can have a chance to defend against the attack. When you have not seen (or heard) your attacker it takes on a different meaning altogether. The shock factor at the time was incredible and unexpected.

 

Thankfully I am still able to cope with any dogs and have no fear of them after the attack. Mine is a big and powerful hound and I suppose that helps a lot.

 

I will just have to see what the solicitor says next and take it from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Irrespective of the breed of dog, I believe that owners should be responsible enough to prevent any incidents like this.

 

We have a Lab & a Rottie and its the Lab that barks like mad whenever someone is at the door. The rottie sits on the stairs so that he can see who it is before slobbering all over them!!

 

However, this doesn't help when the person at the door has been so influenced by the media into believing that all rotties are devil-spawn whose sole existence is to maul everyone to death. My mother also believes this & refuses to visit us now!!!

 

Our rottie used to shred post so we secured a post box to the front of our door on the outside so that a) post remains secure & b) no hands can push through the letterbox & trigger a reaction from either of our dogs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, this doesn't help when the person at the door has been so influenced by the media into believing that all rotties are devil-spawn whose sole existence is to maul everyone to death.

 

So true - my rottie was great with people and so friendly. The gutter press have a lot to answer for in creating hysteria about such lovely dogs. He was not eager to be friendly with other dogs though and saw himself as the boss.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...