Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if the agreement was taken out jan 23, then she has not reached the 1/3rd mark so the car has not become protected goods under the consumer credit act.  this puts her in a very very vulnerable position regarding ever keeping the car....whereby once they have issued a default notice they can legally send a guy with a flatbed (though they are NOT BAILIFFS and have ZERO legal powers) to collect the car.  if the car is kept on the public highway then they can simply take it away and she will legally owe the whole stated amount on the agreement AND lose the car. if it's on private property i'e like a driveway, ok they shouldn't take it without her agreeing, but if they do, it's not really on but its better than a court case and an inevitable loss with the granting a return of goods order. are these 'health reasons' likely to resolve themselves in the very short term (like a couple of months?) and can she immediately begin working again ? i'e has she got a job or would have to find one?  answer the above and we'll try and help. but she looks to be between rock and a hard place . whatever happens she will still have to pay the loan off...car or no car....unless you can appeal to the finance company's better nature using health reasons to back off for xxx months.
    • no need to use it. it doubles the size of the thread and makes it very diff to find replies on small screens too. just like @username it - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread already inc you ...gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.
    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Toyota Finance - Car loan question. Very concerned!


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Funny I also reported the loathsome creature but they did not bother with a reply. This is out fourth privately bought Toyota and prior to that we had several Toyotas on long lease for our company over 10 or more years. No more!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi,

 

This is my first and last one! My other car i bought cash and infuture i will do that! Sounds awful doesn't it two cars. But i do exhibitions and bought the toyota so i can haul all the equipment about.

 

I can imagine the cv for toyota employees, DO YOU HAVE ABILITY TO ACT AND PORTRAY YOURSELF AS AN IDIOT?

 

I have never meet such rude people, they think they know everything!

 

Do you know anyone who could help me get some of my monbey back as I only owed 1500 on it and they ahve had nearly £4000

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I am defending a claim based on the fact that the claimant never complied with a S78 request having only sent me a copy of a copy of the agreement itself but no copies of T & Cs, statements etc. Having never been to court in my life I have no idea how to go about completing an Allocation Questionaire which has to be at the court by 08/03/2010.

 

In Part A settlement (1) Given that the rules require you to try and settle the claim before the hearing, do you want to attempt to settle at this stage? Are they referring to the amount to settle or are they referringt to discussion with the claimant regaridng the amount on the claim? I am on a DMP at present and paying the maximum I can afford and have never missed a payment although it has not been the required amount. Secondly I have every reason to believe that the original agreement is unenforceable.

 

Next (2) Do you want a stay? I do as I am waiting for them to comply with my SAR sent about 10 days ago.

 

Then (3) Would you like the court to arrange a mediation appointment? Yes as this may be in my best interest as I wil be able to demonstrate that I am making every effort to pay all creditors and that I am on a DMP. The concern here is that a fee pay may be payable but I have no idea on the fee and whether I can afford it.

 

Then (4) If you answered No to question (1) please state reason etc. As (1) is a bit ambigious, the answer to this querstion is variable.

 

Question on Pre-action protocols? Cannot do this until I receive the SAR which may not arrive before the 08/03/2010. What do I do?

 

Also asks the amount of the claim that is disputed. As I have been paying into the account, the amount now will be lower than the amount on the summons and I will only know the true amount outstanding when I received the SAR.

 

I guess that no experts are required as witnesses.

 

Proposed directions. I assume they are not talking about directions to the court. :) I would think that it refers to how I am going to go about defending the claim based on it being unenforceable. Only a court can rule that it is enforceable at this point.

 

Costs. Only if a solicitor is involved?

 

It asks if I have attached the fee for filing this allocation questionaire? On the "Notice that a defence has been filed" it mentiosn that the claimant must pay £200 on filing of their allocation questionaire buy nothing about the defendent.

 

I feel confident that I will win the first round based on the fact that the claimant is in default regarding the S78/99 request but I may have issues with the enforceablity of the agreement if a further summons is issued. If I lose the latter, can I assume that the claimant cannot then add on the £200 allocation fee to their final claim as this was based on S78/99 defence?

 

All help will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received the Allocation Questionaire and would appreciate some help on completing the AQ bearing in mind that at the moment I am only defending it on the grounds that Toyota never complied with the S78 request as they only sent the top page of the agreement and nothing else. They should have sent a copy of the T & Cs and also a statement. See http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/248270-help-allocation-questionaire-received.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I defaulted on a loan with Toyota Finance and it has gone throught he courts but not completed as I have a hearing to attend on Friday.

They are claiming the outstanding amount of £6463.57 plus £225 court costs. I am now in a position to settle the account but want the rebate factor applied. They state they cannot offer it as it is in the hands of the court.

Surely as per the CCA if I pay off the account 2 years early I am entitled to a rebate. After all if I was not able to do so they would have the option of adding on interest.

Edited by Surfer01
Link to post
Share on other sites

any charges or PPI or any insurance on this agreements too?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No none. I took a chance when speaking with the solicitor an told them that I am entitled to a rebate under the CCA 2004 and based on the new way it is calculated. Anyway told me that they woudl conbsult their client and phone me back.

Half an Hour later rebate calculated. They have now agreed to settle for £6000 inclusive of court costs. So good result saving me nearly £600!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:D

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to help - toyota finance Can a DCA arrive on your doorstep unannounced/
  • dx100uk changed the title to Toyota URGENT - Early Settlement query
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...