Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
    • lowell letter = we've mugged you once - why are you not paying this other debt....😎
    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot loses £6m as crunch bites collections - My heart bleeds...


fermi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5294 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh dear. And the poor souls bought 4 of my debts that didn't have the legality of toilet paper and unfortuntely they didn't get a penny from me as a return on their investment. In fact, one of them was from Citigroup and Citigroup kept collecting Money from CCCS after they had sold the debt to Cabot. So next month I am afraid I am taking Citigroup to court to get that money back and I am taking Cabot to court for their default entry. Poor Ken. He'll have to get his cheque book out and lose even more money.:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to make this a little sweeter...I'd almost missed this bit - well I DID miss it:

 

This is far worse than I'd first thought..a £6.7mill loss in 2007-08? - against a profit of £9.6 mill the previous year - That's a staggering £17million :eek: swing not just £6.7 million :D and if you make £9.6million in a year, your projections and budgets/forecasts for the next year are growth year on year. Even an increase by 10% takes that expectation to over 10 possibly £11 million quid...profits - to turn that into a £6.7 million loss means you've not only lost the 10/11 million you'd expected but it's worse by a further 6.7m making the loss nearer £18 - £20 million - :D Ha-ha, now you can all carry on blowing those trumpets my friends and slapping yourself happy on the back for being crucial contributors to this...keep on complaining to them and about them to the OFT!! Support the Cabot Fan Club and Cag in bringing these parasites to heel and making them ABIDE BY THE LAW - which is all we ever campaigned for them to do - their losses are a reflection of how effective we have all been. Well done everyone..:D

 

Even brillianter than we dimwit rogue debtors gived ourselfs credit four! :D:D

 

 

;)

Edited by andrew1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to make this a little sweeter...I'd almost missed this bit - well I DID miss it:

 

This is far worse than I'd first thought..a £6.7mill loss in 2007-08? - against a profit of £9.6 mill the previous year - That's a staggering £17million :eek: swing not just £6.7 million :D and if you make £9.6million in a year, your projections and budgets/forecasts for the next year are growth year on year. Even an increase by 10% takes that expectation to over 10 possibly £11 million quid...profits - to turn that into a £6.7 million loss means you've not only lost the 10/11 million you'd expected but it's worse by a further 6.7m making the loss nearer £18 - £20 million - :D Ha-ha, now you can all carry on blowing those trumpets my friends and slapping yourself happy on the back for being crucial contributors to this...keep on complaining to them and about them to the OFT!! Support the Cabot Fan Club and Cag in bringing these parasites to heel and making them ABIDE BY THE LAW - which is all we ever campaigned for them to do - their losses are a reflection of how effective we have all been. Well done everyone..:D

 

Even brillianter than we dimwit rogue debtors gived ourselfs credit four! :D:D

 

 

;)

 

But what do you think Ken and Glen get paid every year? .. £500 k - 600 - 700? -- Who knows...but if there has to be cuts, do you think Ken's wage is decreasing?....No, me either....The cuts will come elsewhere, one suspects there are internal mails floating around re saving pens, paper etc etc, and if the losses continue- the staff on the shop floor will be first to go- not that I'm bothered...they could all lose their jobs for all I care.

 

It is great news that Cabot have lost a few million and long may it continue - perhaps one day they'll realise there's no future in the DCA business, well not for accounts dated pre 2008 that is.

 

Just one final question; if web sites like this one didn't exist, if groups like the CFC didn't exist (etc) hands up those who think Cabot would still had suffered this loss.....nuff said :-)

  • Haha 1

Just hate every DCA out there

Link to post
Share on other sites

My heart doesn't bleed but it nearly stopped last year thanks to them. Seriously.

Now my heart is ICE towards them.

ICE I tell you. :mad:

- only kidding (about the icy heart bit anyway :)

Blessss the s(t)inking ship Crapbot and all who lie cheat and steal in her. ;)

  • Haha 1

We will not be intimidated.

'The pen is mightier than the sword'.

Petition to Outlaw Debt Sale and Purchase

- can't read/post much as eye strain's v.bad.

VIVA CAG!!! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Debt buyers are ‘walking dead’

 

Debt buyers are ‘walking dead’ - 19/11/2009 - says Credit Today Magazine!

 

...and what are Cabot? :D

 

Quote:

 

Not all debt buyers have survived the recession intact according to a speaker at Credit Today’s Debt Sale and Purchase conference.

 

Lawrence Guthrie, managing director of adviser Hawkpoint Partners, today told delegates that despite the lack of public failure, the recession has badly affected debt purchasers. "Quite a few companies aren’t around today buying portfolios when they were two or three years ago," he said. "They are the walking dead. They will survive for a period of time but will gradually wind down."

 

Guthrie added that to be successful debt buyers must anticipate regulatory change and plan for it, rather than reacting once it is implemented. "The debt purchase industry badly needs more co-ordinated leadership," he said.

 

Guthrie also raised the possibility that debt buyers could float on the stock market in future. However, fellow panellists Howard Garland, principal – equity finance – at RBS Global Banking and Markets, and Simon Hemley, partner at Gresham Private Equity, raised concerns that the need for ongoing funding could make this strategy difficult.

 

"Access to funds after the initial transaction can be far more complicated and take up far more of the management’s time and energy," said Hemley.

 

Garland added: "I’m not sure these businesses are suitable for the public market. They are users of capital and their brands are not built up in the same way. Never say never, but I’m not sure they’re suitable."

 

My heart bleeds even more now :D:D:p:p:D:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am like the old crones with their knitting and their pipes sitting round the guillotine during the Frence Revolution. Every time the tumbrils roll and I hear that the next one is about to meet a sorry end, I cheer like H!!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant. Dead men walking. Their shyster operations were based on misery, lies, total deception and twisting the laws of this land. Oh forgot bullying too. It never was a "proper", ethical business which could build a brand.

The only floating they'll be doing is with the guano in the sewers.

There is a God after all and he with Dragon's Den.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think "Gail" from Corrie will instruct "Kev Webster" to get her new chap out of the debt problem he is in? :)

 

At the moment it looks like an ad for DCA's, bills arrive oh lets sell the house to pay them all off then we will be happy!!

Advice & opinions given by spartathisis are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is a good chance of them going bust. They are stuck with a pile of unenforceable debts and are now using desperate measures trying to chase down all the old moth-eaten useless, unenforeceable toilet paper in the cupboard - all that is going to get them is a swift kick up their corporate derrieres from the OFT in due course. There is no new finance for this industry and Ken Maynard spoke of new business coming on the market, not saying a word about what they are getting zero return on now. They got away with buying debts that were unenforceable for years but now that people know their rights they aren't playing ball with Cabot anymore and Cabot are stuck with it. As the man said at their gong awards, the walking dead who didn't see the writing on the wall. Serves them right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...