Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Invalid Default Notices


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Several of my UK Mail envelopes have had no date stamp on them, BTW.

 

 

 

Incidentally, I don't see how the envelope can show that it was delivered on the 16th. The franking date will be when Royal Mail received it from UK Mail, won't it, not when it was delivered?

 

 

UK Mail will not have a frank, but UK Mail is second class , so according to Ministry of Justice Civil Procedure Rules it is deemed to be served 4 working days after the date of posting, which would be the date on the enclosed letter.

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Anyway, my thought about undated UK Mail envelopes was that if, in your confusion, you'd not kept the original envelope but had inadvertently attached a different, undated, UK Mail envelope (received from the same creditor) to your DN as evidence that it was sent second class, would anyone know how confused you'd become?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyway, my thought about undated UK Mail envelopes was that if, in your confusion, you'd not kept the original envelope but had inadvertently attached a different, undated, UK Mail envelope (received from the same creditor) to your DN as evidence that it was sent second class, would anyone know how confused you'd become?

 

 

Why would the same creditor be sending a letter within 2 or 3 days of sending you a DN?

 

 

You hit the nail on the head , how would the creditor prove they had sent the DN 1st Class when every other correspondence has been 2nd Class via UK Mail?

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Several of my UK Mail envelopes have had no date stamp on them, BTW.

 

 

 

Incidentally, I don't see how the envelope can show that it was delivered on the 16th. The franking date will be when Royal Mail received it from UK Mail, won't it, not when it was delivered?

 

forget all about what the envelope shows

 

the poster made an "admission" that HE received the DN on the 16th

 

if it were to be shown in court that the poster and the defendant were one in the same and that in evidence the defendant had misled (lied) to the court in this respect- he would be in deep doo doo

 

I don't intend to engage further on this- i was merely attempting to point out that posters should not make such admissions on the forum .

 

you can lead some people to water..................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would the same creditor be sending a letter within 2 or 3 days of sending you a DN?

 

It doesn't need to be, since it's undated. It could be one that came weeks before or after. I assume it couldn't be shown not to be the one that came with the DN.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is important...

 

http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/parts/part06.htm#IDAUNJAC

 

 

 

6.3

 

It would seem that a DN sent second class breaches Civil Procedure rules?

Edited by GeoffreyAlby

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't need to be, since it's undated. It could be one that came weeks before or after. I assume it couldn't be shown not to be the one that came with the DN.

 

 

But then the burden of proof is on the Claimant?

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there been reading through the posts, i've got DNs but I'm still unsure as to whether or not they are pukka. Could someone have a look and tell me, I have another thread on here but this looks like a better place to pose the question. Also some of the DNs are a few years old does this make a difference. Cheers PM

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/CrapONE2s0001.jpg

CrapONEPG20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/CrapONEDefaultpage1c0001.jpg

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/CrapOne1s0001.jpg

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/vanquispg10001.jpg

http://i783.photobucket.com/albums/yy115/penmarine/vanquispg20001.jpg

Edited by penmarine
And again I try to link different DNs. Sorry guys n girls!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PM,

They are all the same pic...;)

It's not actually a Default Notice, it's an Arrears Notice, which is just sent for information purposes only and is not a demand for payment.

 

DN's start off:

Important, You should read this carefully

Default Notice served...etc etc..

 

Elsa x

PS if its an error and you manage to sort it I'll take a look and edit this response.

:)

Edited by Undercover-Elsa
Link to post
Share on other sites

just to get this absolutely straight

 

the "rules" do indeed state that it will be assumed that second class postage has been used unless evidence as to first class postage is presented

 

HOWEVER

 

if you admit that you have received the document earlier than the 4th working day from the date of posting then the DN will be deemed to have been served on the day you state that you received it and NOT the fourth day.

 

the "purpose"" of the legislation is to "serve" the DN on the debtor

 

and the admission by the debtor that he received it on a particular day overrides the time for service that was "deemed" if that is an earlier date

 

i thought that you had admitted in an earlier post- receving the DN two days after it was posted (16th)- given the public nature of the forum i would advise that it would be very foolish to later declare otherwise

 

Several of my UK Mail envelopes have had no date stamp on them, BTW.

 

Incidentally, I don't see how the envelope can show that it was delivered on the 16th. The franking date will be when Royal Mail received it from UK Mail, won't it, not when it was delivered?

 

forget all about what the envelope shows

 

the poster made an "admission" that HE received the DN on the 16th

 

if it were to be shown in court that the poster and the defendant were one in the same and that in evidence the defendant had misled (lied) to the court in this respect- he would be in deep doo doo

 

I don't intend to engage further on this- i was merely attempting to point out that posters should not make such admissions on the forum .

 

you can lead some people to water..................

 

The main purpose of my statements was to illustrate that it is doubtful that keeping the envelope is really beneficial, for 2 reasons:

 

 

  • You can basically shoot yourself in the foot by keeping the envelope and noting the date of service. By doing so you could very easily bring “forward” the date you could have used should you not have kept a record. Whatever we think of RM, these letters do arrive well within the given timeframe on many an occasion.
  • As been pointing out by nks, the envelope will only reflect the date on which RM received the letter and not the date of service, proving the date of service will only be beneficial if there is a significant delay between RM receiving the letter and the date that you receive it (which is where most delays occur), and it seems that the envelope will fail to do just that. It will, however, proof the type of service been used.

 

So, my conclusion is that the only benefit of keeping the envelope is to proof the “Type of Service” but then you should have a record of the date of service anyway, unless you haven’t note the date and you are really unsure about the date, you can then use the arguments about date of service.

 

Just to make it clear, I have no intention to make any false statements about receiving this specific letter, I have enough other stuff, starting with the CCA, PPI, charges, etc. Because I have no such intention I decided to use it as an example (with the dates) to illustrate that by keeping the envelope and noting the date of service can backfire and the only way out of it would be to lie, which you should not do. Therefore, keeping the envelope and noting the date of service was a bad idea in this instance.

 

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PM,

They are all the same pic...;)

It's not actually a Default Notice, it's an Arrears Notice, which is just sent for information purposes only and is not a demand for payment.

 

DN's start off:

Important, You should read this carefully

Default Notice served...etc etc..

 

Elsa x

PS if its an error and you manage to sort it I'll take a look and edit this response.

:)

 

They do use the term "Default Charges" often, which is actually strange to me. Default charges would really mean that you will incur it by default, no matter waht you do. Maybe it is a reflection of their point of view?:eek::eek:

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your DN insufficiently identifies the agreement!!!

 

A description of the agreement sufficient to identify it, i.e. Account Number.

 

 

 

i.e. Account Number – for an example an account number, will be sufficient for a credit card agreement, (they have to provide the name and address of the creditor anyway).

 

Other examples:

The description needs to be sufficient to identify the agreement, not the account, therefore it should be something to identify the agreement, something like “This notice refers to a credit agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 under Account No. xxxxx”, therefore the agreement related to a specific account.

 

There could be more examples.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have this question in the back of my mind for some time now:

 

Does a Default Notice served on the back of an un-enforceable credit agreement have any value to the creditor? The purpose of the DN is after all to place them in a position to enforce the Credit Agreement. Doesn’t an un-enforceable credit agreement makes any DN served invalid anyway?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not actually a Default Notice, it's an Arrears Notice, which is just sent for information purposes only and is not a demand for payment.

 

They're not all the same. The fifth one is a default notice:

 

CrapOne1s0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

And the third one terminates the account:

 

CrapONEDefaultpage1c0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

The DN, sent on 19/6/09 gives 28 days "from the date of this letter" to remedy the breach and the termination was sent by Capital One on 25/6/10.

 

This one is a DN from Vanquis but there's only one date visible on it. Was the account assigned (sold) by Capital One?

 

vanquispg20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main purpose of my statements was to illustrate that it is doubtful that keeping the envelope is really beneficial

 

Isn't the sole purpose so that you can disprove any claim that the DN was sent Second Class? (And we know they invariably are sent Second Class).

 

you should have a record of the date of service anyway, unless you haven’t note the date and you are really unsure about the date, you can then use the arguments about date of service.

 

Why should you have a record of the date of service? (I don't record when my letters arrived.) No-one can prove the date of delivery and why would you remember the exact date anyway? And even if you do, why would you announce it in court if it's to your disadvantage?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This one is a DN from Vanquis but there's only one date visible on it. Was the account assigned (sold) by Capital One?

 

Actually the Vanquis remedy date is the day befote Capital One's DN so presumably they're different accounts. The Vanquis one doesn't have a date of issue, though, and can Vanquis issue a DN, anyway?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't the sole purpose so that you can disprove any claim that the DN was sent Second Class? (And we know they invariably are sent Second Class).

 

Why do you want to disprove that it was 2nd class? Do you mean disprove 1st class?

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually the Vanquis remedy date is the day befote Capital One's DN so presumably they're different accounts. The Vanquis one doesn't have a date of issue, though, and can Vanquis issue a DN, anyway?

 

It is 2 different accounts in fact, as you suggest. CrapOne and Vanquis. Vanquis do not have a date on the Notice itself but do send a letter attached to it with the date. You can argue (how successfull I am not sure) that the notice do not have a date on it and that the date on the letter shouldn't be use as part of the DN.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. My point remains the same, though.

 

Yes, recording the date in unnecessary and the envelope only serves to prove that it was send 2nd class.

 

That is my understanding now.

“We believe Capital One Law takes privilege over UK Law” – Sven Lagerberg – Capital One.

-----------------

By supplying ALL the documents WILL NOT answer your questions but by supplying a SELECTIVE few will. – Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Separate requests with a fee should be made to ALL relevant Data Controllers in an organisation. - Jayne Sheenan – HSBC

------------------

Our t&c's overrides ICO guidelines when reporting to CRA's - Karon A Bullock - Capital One

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not all the same. The fifth one is a default notice:

 

CrapOne1s0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

And the third one terminates the account:

 

CrapONEDefaultpage1c0001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

The DN, sent on 19/6/09 gives 28 days "from the date of this letter" to remedy the breach and the termination was sent by Capital One on 25/6/10.

 

This one is a DN from Vanquis but there's only one date visible on it. Was the account assigned (sold) by Capital One?

 

vanquispg20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

Hi NKS,

How strange! They aren't the same links as I am seeing in the post, what I'm getting is listed below. I've just checked each one again and I'm getting all identical Arrears Notices (probably some glitch from when PM edited as he does state he originally copied all the same one):

 

CrapONEPG20001.jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

CrapONEDefaultpage2c0001. jpg picture by penmarine - Photobucket

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4966 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...