Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Own goal by DCA (a win I think)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5431 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had an account with marshall ward that i had been running for quite a few years, had been paying no problem. then i had to retire because of poor health and had to claim benefits. I wrote to all my creditors asking them to suspend charges and offered them, and started paying, an interim payment of £1 per month. MW accepted the payment but would not stop the interest at 39%. by now NDR where in on the act. when i changed my phone number i forgot to tell my creditors;-) but this did not stop the threatograms and charges.

 

this got my back up, so i CCAed them, complained about the charges, and cancelled the standing order. they wrote back saying they where investigating my complaints.

 

then the other day i got a letter confirming that they could not find the original signed agreement and therefore they would be abiding by the law and not chasing the outstanding balance (my words not theirs). whey can't all creditors be like this? the letter was from MW not NDR, so i'll be prepared for possible action from the bottom crawlers.

 

Had they been amicable and stopped the charges i may have carried on paying even without the CCA. bullying and rip off charges do not work!

 

One down twenty odd to go

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mward part of sdfs say they cannot locate a copy and will not pursue, but they do.

 

Keep hold of the letter for future battles:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would keep that letter handy and be prepared to attach photocopies of it when you are in contact with any DCAs that Marshal Ward pass the account to.

 

I have a letter saying the only agreement they have is a blank one- hasn't stopped them trying to pass it to any passing DCA. Be prepared!

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi as the above posters say they have no agreement but will still try to pursue the debt they will by error pass the debt on to another DCA (NDR are in house) just keep a copy of the we are unable to produce an agreement and when the next DCA surfaces send them a bog off letter with a copy of the cannot produce letter.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, ready for stuff crawling out of the woodwork, altghough NDR are on the act the letter about lack of aggreement came from SDFS, so I wouldn't put it past NDR trying to pass it on, but you never know, someone in this industry must be true to their work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

while i have a thread going may i take the liberty of asking advice on the other 20?

 

I still have a few CCAs to send off, and of all the others i have recieved a couple saying they are looking, the one mentioned and one i am not sure about.

 

Just say for example that you had a basic credit card from a company which was allways well serviced and you later phoned said company to upgrade to a better card, they said yes and sent you a letter to sign, would this letter count as a valid aggreement once signed and returned?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had much the same from NDR last year and have heard nothing from anyone since then.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

What they mean is they can't and won't take you to court; but they will keep harassing you in the hope that you will bow to pressure.

 

Don't. :eek:

 

Eventually... after quite some time... they will give up, probably when they finally realise they’re wasting money chasing an alleged debt which they have absolutely no hope of recovering.

 

*Waves at the persistent but ultimately unsuccessful little tics from Simply Be*

Link to post
Share on other sites

And I thought they were MY persistent little ticks from Simply Be???

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

NDR are back, this time in relation to a Littlewoods account. They have no signed agreement but have let me know "that is would have looked something like this" if we could produce it. They want well over 3 grand for a TV i did not order. had i wanted the TV in question i would have got it from Play.com for £899. They told us we could not have the one we ordered as we did not have enough credit.

 

Suppose I'll have to resend the letter I sent them before re MW suitably undated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a query about interest rates, and buy now pay later deals. Had this been the TV we ordred it was on a buy now pay april next year deal. On checking things out since the deal, the TV was priced at well over what it could be purchaed for at other retailers (we ordered the top of the line version, they delivered the budget one and told us we could not return it as we had opened the box and it was not faulty.), the figure that was added to our balance and what is being claimed for by NDR includes defered interest for a year and interest for the next 3 or 4 years, as well as charges, in other words well over double even their inflated price, or nearly 4 times what it would cost from play.com. Even if we had signed an agreement I would have thought it was wrong to demand interest for year into the futire?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had an account with marshall ward that i had been running for quite a few years, had been paying no problem. then i had to retire because of poor health and had to claim benefits. I wrote to all my creditors asking them to suspend charges and offered them, and started paying, an interim payment of £1 per month. MW accepted the payment but would not stop the interest at 39%. by now NDR where in on the act. when i changed my phone number i forgot to tell my creditors;-) but this did not stop the threatograms and charges.

 

this got my back up, so i CCAed them, complained about the charges, and cancelled the standing order. they wrote back saying they where investigating my complaints.

 

then the other day i got a letter confirming that they could not find the original signed agreement and therefore they would be abiding by the law and not chasing the outstanding balance (my words not theirs). whey can't all creditors be like this? the letter was from MW not NDR, so i'll be prepared for possible action from the bottom crawlers.

 

Had they been amicable and stopped the charges i may have carried on paying even without the CCA. bullying and rip off charges do not work!

 

One down twenty odd to go

 

Me too..It was Egg's continual rising of my APR that got my investigating Paypal (im now paying all my card £1 a month) and also got the whole CCA ball rolling.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...