Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you everyone!  thought to share some points from my experience in court today that may help others who are taking Evri to court: The judge sets out how the hearing will go and how each party should behave; while i was certainly feeling anxious/nervous ahead of the hearing (and I'm sure @jk2054 may have also observed this), the judge really does try to put any non-legal persons at ease; refrain from talking to the other party and instead speak to the judge if you have any questions/responses; the judge and the advocate spoke about tort of negligence - i wasn't sure how this applied to my case but the judge was questionning the advocate about this so i chose to stay out of this; the judge made reference to a historical case of Donaghue v Stevenson which established a duty of care; the judge observed that some of the points in Evri's witness statement by george wood needed cross examination but george was not present today for questionning; While i was claiming 8% interest, the judge pointed out that is the upper limit and that today, savings accounts give 4-5%. I therefore opted for 5% interest which was agreed to by the judge and the advocate; above all else, ensure you know your court bundle and have any notes to help you refer to specific sections - it helped me to structure my answers to the judge/defendant's queries, and point to specific evidence where i was asked to prove e.g., the value of the item. @honeybee13 - yes, will confirm when payment is received. I have emailed the Evri.claims email with my bank details and also provided them after the hearing to the advocate. @BankFodder message received and i am replying to it
    • Looks promising then.  Well done   Dx
    • So a little update.  I sent a complaint to ico and have heard nothing. I just got the general reply email and that's it.  Sat twiddling my thumbs and thought about what I should do next. I searched for the CEO of Studio but then found that he'd left so as keep getting letters from studio about the arrears etc. I thought I'd email the David Twigg. Sent him all the bumpft and a copy of my original complaint and sars request.  Got no response. So didn't know what else to do. Then I thought I'd try through the financial difficulties option on the online form. One last try before I just give up and let them default me.  Then on the 5th June. I got an email from their customer services. That the items that had gone AWOL have all been cancelled. Nothing else on that email, so I had a look in an email account that I don't use anymore and there was an email from the customer service.  That they were sorry for the problems I've had for the last 9 months. That the sars info was emailed to me on 14/04, it wasn't I've kept all spam and deleted emails on that account, they have raised a complaint with their studio pay team regarding the issues, balance dispute, fee's and my credit file. They are hoping to resolve in 3 days but they have upto 56. They also said in regards to my other issues I have to raise a complaint with studio retail but haven't told me how I do that.  The sars info only goes upto the end of December 2023. It has my previous complaints on there but nothing after so I don't know how I get hold of that information. Luckily I've kept copies of every time I've contacted them. Every web chat or social media contact.  Apologies for the extremely long post but I wanted to add everything I could just incase.  I have checked my account balance and it's still minus 900 odd pounds but I'll keep checking to see if it's all cleared and on my credit file.  I'm hoping this is the end of the whole debacle and they close my account because I never want to do this again. Although it's been a learning experience.  Thanks to dx100uk for pointing me in the right direction. Much appreciated.   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • If you want to cause DCBL trouble, then complain to the SRA.  It would be even more fun if mystic_bertie would complain at the same time, to show the SRA there is a pattern.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

D/judge Made Wrong Decison What Now??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 434
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 1 month later...

Well its now 5mths on into Dec & having rang the court yesterday it seems there is still no news from my court hearing in July :-) so I am no further fwd. How miffed Restons/MBNA must be to not have had any pennies all this time either :grin:....I'm sure tho when the judge is ready he is ready so I will continue to sit tight for now .....:-) The court also told me the claimants hadnt chased for any directions either :-o

 

Still finding it bizaar 5mths on no outcome yet, apparently the file still sits with him at his chambers. Its certainly the longest 2weeks I've ever experienced for the outcome/directions to be given :-|!!!

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Well its now 5mths on into Dec & having rang the court yesterday it seems there is still no news from my court hearing in July :-) so I am no further fwd. How miffed Restons/MBNA must be to not have had any pennies all this time either :grin:....I'm sure tho when the judge is ready he is ready so I will continue to sit tight for now .....:-) The court also told me the claimants hadnt chased for any directions either :-o

 

Still finding it bizaar 5mths on no outcome yet, apparently the file still sits with him at his chambers. Its certainly the longest 2weeks I've ever experienced for the outcome/directions to be given :-|!!!

 

 

Hey MDAW...how are you and your westie dog? just saw your post on 007's thought i had better not hijack that one with "how are yous"!

 

Yes its not all bad with todays outcome but just wanted it over and done with...you know what i mean im sure!

 

See yours is still hanging in the balance:-o that is the strangest thing!

 

Well hope you had a good xmas and NY and heres to a brighter debt free 2010!

 

regards MJ:)

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yes its not all bad with todays outcome but just wanted it over and done with...you know what i mean im sure!

 

regards MJ:)

 

Yes I know what you mean MJ so thought I'd stay positive in the meantime and keep in mind the saying..."all good things come to those who wait" .....heres to our good luck in 2010 ...& will keep an eye on your threads too :)

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the DJ decision today JUDGEMENT in restons favour been given from the SJ hearing last July. Have to appear at a Notice of handing down of Judgement hearing 28th Jan....9 days away :eek: Been waiting on directions not this so gutted to say the least (#216 posting said he was dismissing there summary judgement until the next hearing so whats gone wrong now to receive this in the post today:?:?:?) My full write up on my day in court was posting#223.

 

Please help what do do now guys....I had such high hopes:-

My CCA has never been produced (Priority Request form no prescribed terms etc so should be unenforceable) No T & C only recent 2008 ones sent. (Judge is satisfied me having been served with a COPY of Priority Req Form & CURRENT T & C it complied with requirements of S.78.)

DN is defective........ 9th Jan remedy date 26th Jan2009 (14 clear days it was not) Judge has disregarded the practice directions given in my defence as deemed it to be served to me on the 12th Jan so exactly 14days .

 

It finishes off he is satisfied the Claimants acted properly in its dealings and I have been seen to delay & frustrate there well founded claim.

 

It seems costs & other ancillary issues are to be addressed at the hearing next week too....:Cry::cry::Cry:

Please help.......as I feel I dont have alot of time on my side & stressing now what to do next asap.....

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could he perhaps have been waiting for the Manchester judgement? This might explain why he is satisfied with the original form and current t&cs? Of course, he is quite wrong about this. Even Waksman makes clear that they have to come up with both the original document and the original t&cs.

But in general, this seems extremely unjust (fairly obvious conclusion that?) in that he has kept you waiting since July (maladministration never mind anything else) and has reversed the judgement verbally pronounced in July. So it seems to me that in the first instance, a copy of the proceedings in July would be more than useful for you. If you follow Humbleman's thread there are details on how to get hold of this - if you havent been keeping up with it, start from about here and move on - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/130101-humbleman-hfc-weightmans-court-21.html.

I would have thought that your judge - rather like the Humbleman's judge - would have a lot of explaining to do - not being capable of understanding a High Court judge's decision and taking six months to hand down a judgement which he has already pronounced in court but has decided to reverse. So, if its in the transcript, go for him. This of course is not to mention, presumably back dating the interest to the last hearing, and then taking all this time to hand down a formal judgement.

On the other hand, I am sorry but I dont think you are going to change his mind next week. You could produce a copy of the transcript and point this out to him. You will need to ask for leave to appeal, but its likely that is about all you could do. Sorry :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks seriously fed up for your thoughts & will look over that link as I dont know what I am to do for the next step to be honest....am feeling stunned & of little hope with it all now tbh & wondering what I do have to do now to prepare for then, appeal/by what forms ???? :?

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will find a lot about appeal processes on that thread too - lots of people advising. You might even think about doing a PM to Humbleman as you are both at/about the same stage. #

Might take you a while to work through it - lots of pages, but many post saying "appalled" (or similar) so not as bad as it looks.

English law aint my thing and I really wouldnt want to advise. But good luck. This is test, so keep your head up. There will be lots of people rooting for you. This looks a fairly clear injustice and I am sure you can do something about it. :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MDAW

 

Good grief thats not the news i thought you would be posting...what a shock!

 

Listen dont give in, i have just read your post on another thread.

Pm 42man he is a great help and always answers. IGNM was also very clever at all this and also helped me last year, but he won his case and has now disappeared:(, dont think Andyorch allows PM's so its luck of the draw with him.

 

Someone will of course guide you through this next stage, but the worrying thing is you dont have much time! I of course can only wish you all the best;)

 

Mine is still looming over head and its all just such a downer sometimes, but you have to be postive;)

 

Sending hugs

 

MJ:)

__________________

CAG Depends Purely Upon Donations. Please help us to continue helping you, and give what you can - Thank you:grin:

Click to donate

 

Please click my scales, if you feel the need;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to stay positive MJ but with time not on my side am beginning to feel like a rabbit caught in the headlights just now & feel so let down by the justice system whilst the other side no doubt will be rejoicing!!

 

Will do a couple of PMs as suggested by you both (thanks) in the hopes I can progress further forward with this tomorrow...its all information overload just now & am beginning to feel at a loss with it all right now....:Cry:

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding of SJ is only where there is no triable issue can you apply, if the Judge was unable to make a decision on the day. one could clearly say that there were triable issues that need to be challenged at the final hearing, thus the application should have been dismissed

Link to post
Share on other sites

He hasnt dismissed or done as I thought he was going to do tho (order disclosure etc) but done a complete U turn on what was implied. I feel disheartened now with it all that he has just decided to discard this now instead as he's had hold of it for too long now.

 

Whats going to happen next wk when I turn up now...is there anything I have to prepare for it??? :confused:

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

very poor judge, I thought that he would require sight of your signature on a document which shows you accept the agreement and it has been correctly executed as per CCA Statutes, not just an application for it, who knows they may have turned you down.

Anyhow, maybe a look through the laws laid down may give you some wiggle room, ( thats if the judge allows you to say something, most likely he/ she wont).

Or save it for the appeal,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bump

 

What happens now then do I just go next week to accept the judgement willy nilly.......Then do an appeal :confused: is that the procedure :confused: or is there something I should be doing now before next week - please advise...I am confused.:confused:

 

This application should have been turned down at SJ without any shadow of a doubt....:sad: my day in court is on posting#223 should anybody want to recap....

 

Please advise as I need to know the steps fwd now thanks

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read your post 223 and I understand your surprise at the latest news. It seems strange reading all of the points put across that the judge decided to make the decision based on the SJ hearing as you had some valid issues.

 

To state that valid legal arguments just delay and frustrate is not justified.

 

I think you should click the red triangle and see if someone on the site team can get the best people onto this for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your posting pedross it is a travesty to say the least (pressed the red triangle last nite but guess other urgent cases may be needing there attn perhaps just now?)

 

humbleman am sorting out the scan & editing it now.... watch this space.

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a copy of judgement (have noticed it was signed by DJudge Sept 2009 yet I only rec'd it yesterday from the court dated 18th Jan with the handing down notice of hearing set for 28th Jan!!!)

 

I have spent hours this evening scrutinising it (5 pages as follows)

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt204/mummywith2kids/img021-1.jpg

 

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt204/mummywith2kids/img022.jpg

 

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt204/mummywith2kids/img023.jpg

 

 

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt204/mummywith2kids/img024.jpg

 

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/tt204/mummywith2kids/img025.jpg

 

Re the judgement.....the judge at no. 15 refers to me receiving a copy of "agreement" after proceedings had commenced ????? LIE (Do note in my amended defence posted below no.21 I do not refer to anything as an agreement (I refer it as a priority request form).

 

No.16 C challenges the DN - does not make sense (think he meant to say D here!)

No 17 No signature on this priority request form - why does the judge LIE here by saying it does. (on the day Restons tried to make out that the sticker (barcode) over the priority request form is where the signature of MBNA would be. Without the orig how will we know that though? I also said it contained no prescribed terms either. The judge clearly aware of too!)

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/t...g?t=1242733254

http://i612.photobucket.com/albums/t...g?t=1242750486

 

No.20 Is only 13 days re the DN judge now has trashed this & said I have been allowed the 14 clear days (see my posting #223 on day in court on my strong defence regarding this which the judge seemed accepting of at that time!)

 

I clearly feel this is not right what has been served to me - why have I only just rec'd it now when it is dated Sept 2009???

What can I do now with this judge who cannot be bothered to uphold court law as he should have?

I have been treated unfairly wholeheartedly & just dont know where now to go with this.....

Please advise as this time next week I will have to be at the court again to be given this judgement I do not agree with...................:mad:

 

 

 

MDAW Cover Letter Amend Defence.doc

MDAW Amended defence.doc

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow what a carve up...

 

An agreement presented with terms from 2008 and this is accepted as you having received the terms & conditions at sign up :eek::eek::eek:

 

Even if we take whats in Para 17/18 at value... in that you signed the form which stated "you have read the terms and conditions blah blah blah" that doesnt prove that the terms and conditions back in 2000 complied with the CCA1974 and contained the prescribed terms.

 

I would normally say its the Judge Lottery but with the number of recent cases that seem to be decided on common law principles rather than statute it would appear the tide has turned and we can expect a tsunami in the coming months :-(

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we will all have to take it on the chin then do we :mad: how bl**dy dare them to just kick us all to the kerb like this...I am so angry its unbelievable. I just dont have barrister money tho I'm afraid but I am not going to let it kill me, it can only make me stronger as the saying goes.

 

So I accept this outcome should I???????????

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just dont understand how some of the conclusions the DJ has reached can be correct.

 

The DN was dated 9th January 2009 (Friday). How on earth can he say it was delivered on Monday 12th ?? Monday is not the 2nd business day after posting. Tuesday, 13th would have been.

 

In the absence of proof, the regulations say that 2nd class mail is deemed to have been used.. 4 BUSINESS days. MBNA inevitably use 2nd class and UK mail services.

 

There does appear to have been quite some delay in sending this to you ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is a lot of codswallop I'm afraid but a judges decision is a judges decision - or is it??? This is my question.....what to do now as the days are looming.....

 

Why dated Sept but not till now do I get it when I called the court every month to see if there had been anything sent out yet (just incase of lost post?)

What interest charges could be applied by them?

Can I appeal regarding whats been served not complying with the law regulations, do I do it before judgement next week or after???

 

I just dont know which way to take this now hence bump bump bump....:confused::confused:

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to the DN the Judge is quoting CPR 6.26 (as amended October 2008) which treats 1st class post as delivered:

 

The second day after it was posted, left with, delivered to or collected by the relevant service provider provided that day is a business day;

 

which makes delivery Monday.

 

This puts a whole new slant on the delivery times that caggers work with. So we have two opinions on delivery times. I have run out of time to get my head round this at the momemt. I will return.

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...