Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
    • That doesn't look like clacton ... Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage buys coastal home in Lydd-on-Sea WWW.KENTONLINE.CO.UK Former Brexit Party leader Nigel Farage bought a coastal home in the county, it has been reported.  
    • It's not a private road.  It's a small public street (with Resi houses) that leads into and from public road/ highway. The garages have land in front of the doors.  Then there's a yellow line. So there's a clear marker on what is private and what is public.  These people keep parking on the private land side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me & my Debts - Haydon DMP since 2001- they charge a £20PCM fee from my <£40 payment - CCA time? In Scotland too!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes they can start procedings without anything and in some cases they do. If there is no defence then theoretically they can win these cases by default. However if they were to start proceedings on this basis then the lack of an agreement is a complete defence and until they can produce it then they can not get a judgement if you defend correctly.

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have recieved a letter from Cabot as follows, REPAYING YOUR ACCOUNT]

Thank you for your recent payment. However there is no agreed repayment plan currently in place.

I have not been in touch or made payment to Cabot since asking them to provide a valid CCA about 2 years ago, also the balance is showing around £300 more than before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I have received a letter today from Link financial

LETTER BEFORE ACTION

Link Financial Outsourcing Limited has attempted to recover the outstanding balance from you but has however not been successful.

COUNTY COURT PROCEEDINGS WILL NOW BE ISSUED AGAINST YOU WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE. WE shall obtain and enforce a county court judgement against you. This may affect your ability to obtain credit in the future.

You should be aware that where applicable contractual interest will continue to be charged on the outstanding balance until the debt has been fully repaid although we will not ask you to pay more than the amount you would have paid if you had continued to pay your account as per the original terms of the agreement.

You may be liable for the costs of any action we take and statutory interest will accrue on your account at 8% for the full period. We will also impose a maximum fee of £130.00, which you will be lable for.

IF YOU WISH TO PREVENT THIS COURSE OF ACTION PAYMENT MUST BE RECEIVED IN FULL WITHIN THE 14-DAY PERIOD. PLEASE CONTACT AN OFFICER ON 02920 808698 AS A MATTER OF URGENCY

Mr T Johnson

Litigation Manager

Link Financial Outsourcing Limited.

Any advice folks will be most appreciated the balance is just over £1600.

Link to post
Share on other sites

think this says it all unless you want to try and negotiate a full and final settlement

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Ida,

In March 2009 Link sent me a copy of the application form signed by me to MBNA in 1999,

the account was purchased by Link in 2001 and i stopped paying them on December 2007.

Fellow caggers informed me that the application form which i scanned on here was not a valid CCA, although i expect if it goes to court they will use it as proof.

It has always been my intention to make settlement of this account when i can afford to, i am considering making a starting offer of £50.00 as full and final settlement.

In 2007 Link made me an offer of £9237 as full and final which i could not afford and still cannot afford, the account is just over £1600. All advice will be grateful.

I telephoned Link financial tonight and explained that the account is in dispute and that i have not received valid CCA copy or notice of assignment from them or MBNA.

The person on the phone said that they will send me a valid copy of the agreement and the assignment and told me that the action will be delayed for 7 days,

then i will be sent notice of court action and if i do not pay in full i will have a CCJ put on my credit file.

As always all advice is welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they send a valid copy of the documentation it will be a miracle. But if that miracle should happen then you need to think what to do next. At the moment they can bluster about 7 days, 7 months but not 7 years or it would be statute barred but that is all it is bluster.

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Strange how Link think they know what the judgement will be 'WE shall obtain and enforce a county court judgement against you'

Well they sent me the same letter and attempted to take me to court but withdrew the action 2 days before the first hearing.

As has been written usual Link bluster.

Keep all your paperwork filed in order and be prepared but on their past record if, and I stress if, they start court action you'll have all the ammo required and assistance from CAGers too .CP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received two new letters from Link financial, the first being a copy of an appliction for a credit card from MBNA in 1999 with my details and signature. the same as they sent to me in january 2009, which fellow caggers said was not a valid CCA copy. The second letter states,

SALE OF YOUR DEBT, and is dated April 2011.

RE : YOUR AGREEMENT WITH MBNA EUROPE BANK LIMITED ( MBNA ) RELATING TO ACCOUNT NUMBER *********

WE write to introduce Link Financial to you. Link financial is the current owner of the outstanding balance due from you under the agreement referred to above. MBNA has as january 2001 assigned to Link finacial the outstanding balance due under the credit card agreement. As a result of this assignment, the full amount of the outstanding balance is due to us immediatiately.

The total outstanding balance is £163*.**

We have appointed Link Financial Outsourcing Limited " Link" to administer and recover your debt on our behalf. In order to discharge the outstanding balance, you should send payment without further delay.

Since you now owe the outstanding balance to Link Finacial, you should make no payment relating to the outstanding balance to MBNA. Any payment made by you to MBNA will take significantly longer to be processed onto your Link account.

You may wish to take legal advice etc. Advice welcome please fellow caggers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More bluster. If the documentation is not valid (and you know why it is not valid) then Link can threaten you with anything that they like but that is all that they can do threaten. Other caggers will advise also but it may be that you have to tell them to put up or shut up.

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks batman, I am going to write to Link and tell them that application form is not a CCA copy and that the above letter is not a notice or letter of assignment, advice is most welcome thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have received a reply from Link Financial,

Thank you for your recent correspondence. Please be aware the documentation supplied fulfils our obligations under the consumer Credit Act and therefore do not consider your account to be in dipute. Please contact us so an affordable repayment plan can be organised and to prevent further recovery action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This means that they have satisfied s78 of the CCA which allows them, basically, any old rubbish and say "this is your agreement" (a computer dump of T&Cs with your name and address carefully typed at the top is one example). Having done that they are entitled to try to enforce - letters. threats, phone calls etc. Even court action should the notion take them. BUT as has already been pointed out if the document they sent you in 2009 still isnt enforceable in 2011, their court action wont succeed - signing requirements not fulfilled go straight to s127 (3).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Thanks seriously fed up.

I received a call from Link financial from Wales today, got me when i was under severe pressure, looking to set up a monthly payment plan,

I told him that link has never provided a valid CCA copy or notice of assignment, he said they have and as i had an MBNA credit card back in 1999 and that as i had paid Link monthly payments for years that their claim is valid,

asked me if i consider it right that i used the credit card then stopped paying, told me that he is phoning to help me and stop court action etc and offer a monthly payment to be set up.

i told him that i am under severe financial pressure and had just heard bad news workwise, i said if and when i can afford it i will gladly offer part payment as full and final payment, he persisted a payment set up and promised to call back tonight.

I am just now under financial stress workwise and cutting back on outgoings, i do eventually make settlement payments to the DCAs, however this is a bad time and i need watch my outgoings and i have applied for working tax credits as my income is so low just now. All advice welcome folks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post up what they have sent to you that they claim is valid and let the experts have a look at it then you will get better advice on how to proceed but at the moment from what I understand they have not proved that it isnt statute barred let alone produced anything that they can rely on in court

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Batman's advice is excellent. If they dont have the paperwork to enforce their claim and/or its statute barred, let them fume. They will put pressure on you and if they think that you are starting to crack then they wont respond by backing off. Their response will be to put more pressure on you. So its important that you put up what they have sent you and get some advice (hopefully that we should all have a good laugh)

I know you have many other things to worry you, but in all seriousness you need to show a confident face, advise them that you have no evidence that they can enforce (dont expect them to agree btw) and that until they can change that there is no point in further correspondence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks seriously fed up and batman, i am unable to view batmans post as there is a page missing although your message is notified in my mail box, thank you batman i hope your posting will turn up tomorrow. SFU you are correct i was cought up feeling very vurnerable and they are seeking to use this against me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...