Jump to content

underdog13

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    2,629
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

underdog13 last won the day on June 17 2009

underdog13 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

562 Excellent

About underdog13

  • Rank
    Classic Account Holder

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I agree, they should all be compelled to state this prominently: The fact that this disclaimer was not on previous T&Cs makes me question their validity.
  2. Couldn't agree more - it should be clearly stated that there is no such thing as 'unsecured' if you own property. You pay a higher interest rate for not securing the loan against your property, then if anything goes wrong, they come after your home anyway.
  3. Yes, I know what you mean, itstheone. I wonder if sometimes people just want to forget a stressful episode as quickly as possible, once it's over and done with - which is understandable. It would be helpful to others to post a quick conclusion, though.
  4. Maybe they're all too drunk to type?!
  5. Thanks! good to know things are quiet for you; at least they're leaving you alone!
  6. Yes, Bridagier2JCS, I'm getting acquainted with the 'delightful' Ruthless, so I thought I'd have a read around the threads to get a feel for their MO. Most threads just seem to tail off and I wondered if this was due to non action on the part of Ruthless or some cataclysmic event like bankruptcy, etc, as they threaten. Sorry if I have been unhelpful bringing up an old thread.
  7. So the banks can't afford to pay back their debts to the consumer........and how do they treat the consumer if he/she can't pay back their debts?! Perhaps we should all send in the debt collectors, threaten court and bankruptcy and generally harrass them night and day.
  8. Totally agree, it is a con. Sorry to hear about your problems, I hate bailiffs. I didn't claim on my insurance, just changed my car because the old one was irreparable (due to old age and mechanical failure, it was not worth repairing). Still had 7 months to run on insurance. Insurance company refunded the unused amount but the broker is adding penalty fees which exceed their actual costs. Can't even insure the new car as they refuse to supply the No Claims certificate.
  9. As those of us who have already been stung will know, most insurers charge a cancellation fee if you end your policy before the full term. However, I thought that penalty fees were illegal and the admin charge could only reflect their true costs. In addition, my insurer is refusing to give me my No Claims certificiate until I pay their penalty fee; surely they are obliged to supply my No Claims certificate and cannot hold it to ransom, like this or make conditions as to its provision? I cannot insure my car with another company without the No Claims certificate. I'd really appreciate other's views on these matters.
×
×
  • Create New...