Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Subject Access Request - Proof of ID required


joski34
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok so Ive heard nothing back from the letter Ive sent above but Ive had a response from them today regarding the Subject Access Request..I dont have a scanner so here goes:

 

Wait for their reply to your last letter. If Wescot have passed it back to them it just goes to show that there is no milage to be made out of it, even for the most tenacious DCA.

 

I don't think it'll be long before you hear the last gasps of a dying claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

;) It was post 2005 actually if im right, The missing payments bit in the middle did not come into force until may 2005 if im reading the Consumer Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 right, just trying to get that confirmed for another problem of mine, as its the exact wording proving this was not the agreemant in force when our accounts where alledged to be opened.

 

Mine has nothing on the back, does yours mention anything about data and how they use it, and agreement for them to record info with third parties?

Edited by blind-as-a-bat

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to have something to default on to get a default notice, speaks volumes the fact they have not sent one doesnt it, could it be they cant find something to base a default notice on by any chance:p

 

And as you never consented to sharing info with third parties any record sent to a CRA is questionable both on the point of a lack of an agreement to be in any sort of default of and consent of sharing that info

 

 

And as for claiming a TV add would contain the info, have you ever seen an add with any mention of how the company will use your data in it? no? niether have I:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets see what responce you get to your section 10 letter, im not expecting them to back down, but am intrested to see what they come back with, then we can pull there argument apart using there own agreemant, or should that be lack of it;)

 

Of course im sure reliable,s threat machine will start up again now, but wescot sent it back to them for a reason, because they couldnt enforce it:p

 

I will be honest im egnoring them now myself, have more pressing issues, but if they follow the same pattern they have with me if you give them time they will dig a big hole for themselves:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Blind as a Bat,

 

Well I have had no response from them regarding the section 10..I sent it to the same address as always and ive checked on royal mail and there is no signature available..so it hasnt been signed for..should I send a repeat to their head office ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blind as a Bat,

 

Well I have had no response from them regarding the section 10..I sent it to the same address as always and ive checked on royal mail and there is no signature available..so it hasnt been signed for..should I send a repeat to their head office ?

Does it say it is deliverd? to me thats good enough, the sig is just an added bonus;):D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope it says that something like "no signature available for this item, signatures are only available after the item has been delivered please try again in a few days" so looks like it hasnt been delivered??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi BAAB, Well I never heard anything back from Reliable so I sent the section 10 again to JDW head office...they signed for it on the 2nd Feb..Ive also had an alert from experian to say that JDW have searched my credit file on the 4th?? so why are they searching my credit file? any ideas?

 

Thanks for all your help Joski

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BAAB, Well I never heard anything back from Reliable so I sent the section 10 again to JDW head office...they signed for it on the 2nd Feb..Ive also had an alert from experian to say that JDW have searched my credit file on the 4th?? so why are they searching my credit file? any ideas?

 

Thanks for all your help Joski

 

Reliable would either have totaly egnored it or forwarded it to head office for there 'Solicitor' to deal with anyway, if they followed what they did with mine.

 

They must however reply within 21 days, if not you can report them, to the ICO i believe, not sure how much good that will do though.

 

As for the search, my guess is they where looking to see who else you where not paying, or your payment history with other lenders, or seeing what JD themselves have recorded so far on your file, not sure what they may do with that info, but it sounds like an abuse of your credit file to me.

 

I would keep an eye open for any changes

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I will...they think they can just do what they want Im sick of them now...should I contact Experian and complain to them? Saying that I have seen posts on here and Experian seem to send generic letters...Il wait until I hear back from JD and Il scan it up and see what they have to say...Im sure I have only given them 12 days to reply though!! is it 21?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive sent an email to the CRA advising them that I have not given any permission to search my credit file Il see what they say..

 

On another note I have looked through the SAR stuff they sent me and there is no default notice...should I write back and ask them for this?

 

Thanks Joanne

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi joski, though this might intertest you, it related to adverts made in 2002 and 2004.

 

Television Advertising Complaints Reports

 

Television Advertising Complaints Reports

 

 

on both occasions they found the adverts were found misleading as they didnot contain a credit check was needed. They still do this on their adverts :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

please help me i am new to this forum, does anyone know where i can find a template for a subject to access request

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

Subject Access Request

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

Please supply me with all data that you hold on me. This includes in particular, but is not limited to, the following:-

 

1. The original signed, executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

3. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with ORIGINAL CREDITOR.

4. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

5. Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

6. Details of any collection charges added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

7. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

8. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

9. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

10. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply.

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

sign your name but put crosses through it so it can't be lifted

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...