Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi All, I've just had the inevitable N24 and other paperwork arrive. I've read other examples on here and I think I understand the steps to follow. I have until the 28th May to return the N180 Small Claims Direction Questionnaire, I also have an N244 Application notice copy. I read an update on a case you kindly put a link in for me to read. Turns out they lost in court and are now struggling. I really don't want to get to that stage and am thinking mediation may be the way forward? Thoughts please? Pretty sure I've missed the 7 days to have the order set aside.  For reference, this is what I received: Dated 8th May Before Deputy District Judge Baker sitting at the Civil National Business Centre, 4th Floor St Katharine's House, 21-27 St Katharine's Street, Northampton, NN1 2LH   The Court will deal with the application to lift the stay without hearing under CPR 23.8(c)   It is ordered that:   The Application to lift the stay and for direction questionnaires to be issued is granted.   Because this Order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the Order set aside, varied or stayed. A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this Order. If the application is one which requires a hearing, and   a) the party making the application is the Defendant; and b) the Defendant is an individual,   then upon the filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the Defendant's home court. In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.  
    • no ftmdave ive not emailed at ceo level..i did not know you could do that....but i will do now, thanks. ive just been wasting time emailing to customer complaints department
    • Dx, I've now blocked out and attached a copy of the letter that I'm responding tonight.
    • You mention that Iceland have been useless, and that has been our experience too in other cases. However, have you escalated to CEO level?  https://www.ceoemail.com/s.php?id=ceo-9061&c=Iceland Foods-Chief Executive If not, it has to be worth an e-mail.  Mention immediately, first line, that you are disabled and have been a victim of disability discrimination on the part of the shop's agents. The idea may fail miserably, but nothing ventured ...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

credit card agrement barcleycard


bolton69
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5040 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The government decides the minimum amount of money you need to live on, in this case its £60 a week.

 

Therefore, you cant actually afford to pay them anything.

 

£5 would therefore be an excessive amount to offer and far more than a Court would expect you to pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, If its that recent its possibly a valid agreement with electronic signature.

What are your intentions? Are you looking at walking away from this, (which wouldnt be advocated)? Do you want to dispute anything such as PPI or charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

can someone help me please. i have a debt with b/c , £1550. i have lost my job and can not aford the min, payment, i have ofered £12 a month , mersers and b/c have said this is to small, and wont acept it, and they have said they will go for a ccj. i am trying to avoid this, at all costs , is there any thing else i can do, or will they pass this debt on to someone else, thanks for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am in debt to barcley card £1400. i have lost my job and cannot afort the min payment, i have offerd them £12 a month but they are refusing that, they say they will get a ccj to get there money back in full. i dont want a ccj on my records. will they go for a ccj or is this a bluff, thanks for any help, i have sent for my cca, already

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have you ever had any late payment charges or over limit charges on this account?

 

If so you can claim them back and BC will refund them against the balance that you owe.

 

In my case BC never got a CCJ that I know of, and I only owed them about £900 - However after asking for the charges back, it ended up that I only owed them £100 or so of which I paid and managed to settle this debt forever.

 

More information here on how to claim these charges back if it helps.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/259192-aquacard-cave.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite often a bluff.

 

Sharklaycard are fools if they think by getting a CCJ they will get more money out of you, because they won't!

 

I take it you have been talking to them over the phone?

 

You MUST keep everything in writing, and refuse to speak to them over the phone, all they are concerned with in their shallow petty lives is how fat their wallet is, they could not care less about you or your circumstances.

 

Make them the offer of £12 a month again, in writing, and send it recorded delivery, 2nd class if needs be, or at the very least get proof of postage, then each and every time they refuse to accept your offer, reduce it by a pound and offer it again.

 

Not only will you have written proof that you have offered reduced payments to them, but they have refused these and simply threatened you with court.

 

DO NOT send them any Income & Expenditure sheets, thats for you to know only, they have no legal authority to see your private finances, so don't be fooled by them.

If they wish to see your I&E tell them to take you to court where a judge will view your I&E and will more than likely only make you pay £1 a month.

They know this, which is why they are really brave on the phone, saying things and using big words, that they wouldn't put in writing, as they can barely spell them.

 

I assume that you know that Mercers & Sharklaycard are the same person? Just that Mercers is the collection arm of Sharklays.

 

Besides a CCJ will not get them their money back in full in one go, normally you will show the judge your I&E and he will decide an amount which is affordable for you to pay back on a weekly/monthly basis, this can be as low as £1 a month, and they know this.

 

If £12 a month is all you can realistically and comfortably afford to pay them each month, then that is all you should pay them, regardless of whether they accept or not, set up a Standing Order, NOT a direct debit, to pay them this amount, or less if you decide, and they would look very very foolish if they decided to take legal action.

 

How old is the card? When did you take it out what year?

I'm thinking that as they are so greedy and playing you for a fool you should ask them to provide you with your CCA..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

LoL boo, Nice one,

Boton listen to the above cagers, thet know there stuff, having a wee war with BC, but there not getting a pennt untill they send me all the unlawfull ppi, late charges, unlawful cgarges and an apology for taking the **** out me,

I also had a doorstep visit from them two weeks ago, and just refused to answer the date of birth , so they could not proceed with further questions, after i told them to F... O.. and they were not getting a penny untill i got my money

canny write anymore boo, you win , av got finger cramp already LoL

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...