Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • rickyleavet
      Claim through officialinjuryclaim.org.uk for PI following RTC Road Rage Incident

      By rickyleavet · Posted

      jk2054 - I haven't started a claim with OIC or MIB yet, due to being unable to obtain the name of the other driver.  BankFodder cheers for that, I'll go back to them with this info & update on here when I've had a response
    • mystic_bertie
      Eviction Time Again - Twice In 7 Months

      By mystic_bertie · Posted

      Andy thanks for your reply. No i am now being evicted from the house i moved into after that previous post. The letting agent lied to me when they said the landlord would not be selling the house. SHe did not mention that the landlord tried to sell the house last year, i was not told this, 4 months into the tenancy i got the eviction notice. Its obvious they lied to me and used me to fill in the gap between their attempts to sell the house. I have filled in the defence form as it was easy to follow the old one from my previous post. I will post it later on in the hope someone can give it the once over. It has to be in by the end of this month may 31st.  
    • adz740
      Arnold Clark - Failure to repair damage to infotainment screen

      By adz740 · Posted

      It's a GR Yaris - Finance is with Alphera, who are part of BMW I believe. I'm sure the unit is very expensive to repair, I have even told them I would be happy with a refurbished/reconditioned unit, in trying to be reasonable as well.
    • Man in the middle
      Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form

      By Man in the middle · Posted

      Without seeing this envelope, document and sticker it is impossible to advise properly. However, just going on what you have told us, there are two ways you can deal with this: !. The easy way. This has the lowest risk but the guarantee of a penalty for speeding.  You can respond to the SJPN by pleading “Not Guilty” to both charges. In the “Reasons for pleading Not Guilty” box you can explain that you responded to the request for driver’s details but it was recently returned to you, seemingly not actioned. However, you are willing to plead guilty to the speeding charge providing, and only providing, the “Fail to Provide Driver's Details" (FtP) charge is dropped. You could also ask the court to consider sentencing you at the fixed penalty level (£100 and 3 points) as this prosecution seems to be the result of an administrative problem outside your control. 2. The not so easy way with higher risk. This could see you convicted of the FtP charge but has the possibility that you escape with no penalty whatsoever. You can do the same – plead not guilty to both charges. If you go down this route the speeding charge cannot succeed as they have no evidence you were driving. This comes from your response to the request for driver’s details which the police say they have not got. You can mention in the “Reasons” box that you returned the request for driver’s details as required. You will then face a trial for the FtP charge and you can produced your response together with the envelope and sticker showing it had been returned to you. The risk with this is that if your defence fails you will be fined a week and a half’s net income, pay a “Victim Surcharge” of 40% of the fine, pay prosecution costs of around £650 and have six points together with an endorsement code (MS90) which will see your insurance premiums rocket.
    • AndyOrch
      Eviction Time Again - Twice In 7 Months

      By AndyOrch · Posted

      This the same issue ?  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Locked in car park

Patma

By Patma
in General Consumer Issues

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4633 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
and of course you need the full contents of what is indexed, not as they say "this is an index" and not showing you what it actually is contained within etc

 

therefore asking for more than their "INDEX" as their submission

 

that will shut the door they are trying to leave open

 

and a complaint to the Court etc is important that it be on record of what you "consider yet another abuse of process"

Thanks Kiptower good point, I've reinforced that point now.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 2.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

middenmess

middenmess

Posted
Posted
Hi everyone I'll give you the info on the latest Application as ap, but first I have an urgent question please.

A letter has arrived today from Lyons Davidson saying the following......

 

Please find enclosed draft bundle index. Please confirm that this is agreed and we will proceed to file our bundle of papers with the court.

Please send confirmation to .........(EMAIL ADDRESS GIVEN) by 2pm Monday 2nd November to allow the court sufficient time for receipt.

If we do not receive confirmation we will assume this agreed and we will proceed to file bundle.

 

We are confused by what it's asking us to agree to. The previous 2 bundles have not come with any such letter and given LDS track record we don't trust them. This is the first time they've asked us to email them too and I can't believe that assuming agreement if no response is given by 2pm today, when the letter has only arrived today can be right.

HELP PLEASE!:confused:

 

Just as well that you get your mail in the mornings--ours arrives around 3.30pm!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Alphageek

Alphageek

Posted
Posted

You have probably replied to them by now, but I would have changed just one thing.

 

Furthermore I have drawn the attention of the court to your conduct.
Cheeky beggars!

The REAL Axis of evil: Banks, Credit Card Companies & Credit Reference Agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just as well that you get your mail in the mornings--ours arrives around 3.30pm!

 

My mail comes around then too. Hey you don't live in the same sleepy village as me do you?:)

Fred is a townie luckily for him so gets his post about 10 oclock. I bet they were hoping he would be out when it came, miss the deadline and do nothing about it.:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
You have probably replied to them by now, but I would have changed just one thing.

 

Cheeky beggars!

Yep they got their reply before 2pm, but to be honest they probably read it first on the thread because there were plenty of guests looking in I noticed.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Fred has just rung me to say that Lyons Davidson's bundle has just arrived and he's quite pleased with it although he's not saying why. He says I'll have to wait till I get over there to see it.;)

 

He did tell me though that Lyons Davidson have applied for a stay in the proceedings to delay the hearing of 17th November on the grounds that Mr Dexter (Director of Finance Plymouth College of Art) cannot attend then.

We're a bit puzzled whether that means he is coming as a witness, because we've written to Lyons Davidson twice to ask them if they intend to call witnesses to please inform us as to who they are, but they have completely ignored the request.

It will be interesting to see what the court's response is.

Link to post
Share on other sites
JonCris

JonCris

Posted
Posted

If they are claiming he's a witness & not the claimant remember there is no property in a witness & if they have identified him as one then you are also permitted to interview him & obtain a statement of the 'facts'. He will almost certainly refuse but you can then bring this to the attention of the court that the witness refused to cooperate thereby tainting his 'evidence'

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
If they are claiming he's a witness & not the claimant remember there is no property in a witness & if they have identified him as one then you are also permitted to interview him & obtain a statement of the 'facts'. He will almost certainly refuse but you can then bring this to the attention of the court that the witness refused to cooperate thereby tainting his 'evidence'

Hey wow, thanks for that JonCris.

We need to find out then whether he is actually attending as a witness and if so we'll go for it. Presumably we would also be allowed to question him if he does give evidence on the day?

He has already made witness statements about which we've complained to the court as they contain false statements made with statements of truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites
JonCris

JonCris

Posted
Posted

Of course your allowed to cross examine but remember its an art. Don't steam in. Having read the evidence & any statements made by him & where there are discrepancies get him to confirm one version before confronting him with the other. I'm a about an hour away from Plymouth would you like a tutorial in advocacy :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
foolishgirl

foolishgirl

Posted
Posted
I'm a about an hour away from Plymouth would you like a tutorial in advocacy :D

 

Gosh, there's an offer you can't refuse Patma!

 

Wish I lived near Plymouth JC :p

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
bedlington83

bedlington83

Posted
Posted

When the latest order came from the court, yet again keeping the defence and counterclaim in limbo Fred objected to the order and wrote complaining to the court, to which he received a reply saying that in view of his comments the matter would be dealt with by a different Judge.;)

On the face of it this might be very very good news. Please tell me that "the matter" is the whole matter (in the sense that courts/judges/legal people generally refer to the case/claim etc as "the matter") rather than Fred's objection to the order...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Of course your allowed to cross examine but remember its an art. Don't steam in. Having read the evidence & any statements made by him & where there are discrepancies get him to confirm one version before confronting him with the other. I'm a about an hour away from Plymouth would you like a tutorial in advocacy :D

 

YES PLEASE!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
On the face of it this might be very very good news. Please tell me that "the matter" is the whole matter (in the sense that courts/judges/legal people generally refer to the case/claim etc as "the matter") rather than Fred's objection to the order...

That's a good question, Bedlington, but we don't know the answer .

We're certainly hoping it means the whole matter. The court staff have all got PHDs in speaking ambiguously:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
If they are claiming he's a witness & not the claimant remember there is no property in a witness & if they have identified him as one then you are also permitted to interview him & obtain a statement of the 'facts'. He will almost certainly refuse but you can then bring this to the attention of the court that the witness refused to cooperate thereby tainting his 'evidence'

 

I'm not entirely clear still whether Dexter is a witness or not. On the application for a stay, it refers to him as the representative of the College, but he has however produced a number of witness statements.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The gentleman at Lyons Davidson who sent the letter giving Fred less than 4 hours to agree the contents of their court bundle index has sent a rather tetchy email today in response to Fred's.

Here it is.......

 

Mr Fred,

I note your actions

 

The purpose of my sending you what I stressed at the time and now again was the draft index was for parties to agree the content of the same before we put it to the Court to assist its understanding of the claim and to allow it to pass judgment

 

Had you asked for any additional documents we had omitted we would have considered the same before filing a single, agreed bundle. You have unilaterally taken a step that will cause confusion at Court, delay and further expense to all parties

 

The Overriding Objective is on co-operation between parties on such matters

 

I am now obliged to file my own bundle which means the Court will have to duplicate its reading

 

Your step, without consultation, was not well-judged

 

I reserve the right to bring this and my previous correspondence to the Court's attention on costs

 

Yours sincerely,

......................

Oh dear, somebody's not happy tut tut. Now if this was a legitimate worry about costs, why didn't they suggest this with their previous two bundles and why leave it till the very last minute when Fred's bundle was already prepared to suggest we share one.

It couldn't have anything to do with a sneaky false statement hidden in their bundle could it? One which alleges falsely that Fred has admitted to causing criminal damage.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Patma

Patma

Posted
  • Author
Posted
I am now obliged to file my own bundle which means the Court will have to duplicate its reading

Oh dear this poor Lyons Davidson man must be so stressed he's forgotten that their court bundle was already filed with the court on Monday and Fred received it today before our tetchy friend had even written his email.:p

Link to post
Share on other sites
wobbly

wobbly

Posted
Posted

Hi Patma,

I see from an earlier post they admitted that the barrier was faulty,did they elaborate on the fault?.The normal thing to do when a barrier is faulty is afix a notice to that effect or remove the arm.i realise time is getting short but as they have now admitted which type of barrier it was it could be an idea to check with the makers what effect it would have on the barrier if it was manually raised if you havnt already.I have repaired numerous barriers and manually raising them has never caused damage to any I have come accross.any news from TLD?.

Wobbly

Living in the wild windy west of Ireland

Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4633 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...