Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Summons out of the blue - What do I do now?


Elkus
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5648 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Oh, one thing I've been meaning to ask...

 

Remember that this is my wife's account, and that the account had been going for about 3 years. She changed her name a year ago when we married, and was sent a new card with her new name on it. Should a new agreement have been provided along with the card?

 

I'm eager to chase this one up as my defence should really be in by Friday (as the deadline is Saturday 29th) and I'm hoping to discover more avenues for our defence.

 

Elkus

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 72
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Andy,

 

The DN says exactly as you see it, that's the whole of the page.

 

The pics are hosted by photobucket but I'll see what I can do!

 

Elkus

 

If you havent heard from andy later on today, you can pm him and put a link to your thread. Alternatively hit the red triangle to the left of the screen under your avatar, just ask if someone could help with your defence.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello 42man,

 

Thanks for the heads-up, but the first link has a defence where the CA has yet to be provided. I have been sent a copy of our CA which hasn't been signed by the creditor so could I state that they have failed to provide a valid copy? Or should I work on something else for my defence?

 

The second link has a witness statement but I'm not sure if that's what I should be providing yet as it's only the defence I need to produce!

 

I'll have another trawl through the forums for a suitable defence but so far I'm not having much luck :(

 

Elkus

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a court summons from egg so will be subscribing to your thread ;)

Claims:

bgqs v Barclays (Claim No.1) - Claim Issued 16/3/07 Await Defence to be Entered - Data Protection Act Non-Compliance - *WON

 

bgqs v Barclays (Claim No.2) - Prelim Letter Sent (Charges + s.68 Interest) - 16/3/07 - *WON

 

bgqs v Halifax - Prelim Letter Sent (Charges +C.I Interest) - 16/3/07 - *WON

 

*Paid Deposit on New House with my Winnings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey folks,

 

Just a quick shout to say that my defence should be in by Friday, and I would like some help with putting one together!

 

Is anyone able to advise please?

 

Thanks!

 

Elkus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elkus

 

 

I would advocate submitting the following this can be input on line vis a vis MCOL using your password on the summons.Copy and paste and submit print off your reciept as proof and sit back.

 

 

A defence should deal with the claimants pleading and not be complicated and long in these matters. It should not contain references to cases etc. Do not forget you may have to argue that which is contained in your defence and so you need to understand that to which you are endorsing a statement of truth. Until the claimant pleads in an appropriate manner, you should not reveal all your 'cards'. I suggest a defence as follows:-

 

 

Defence

 

 

I Elkus make this statement as my defence to the claim brought by(Claimant name)

 

1.The claimants particulars of claim are vague and fail to disclose any cause of action, they appear to be an abuse of the process in that they fail to deal with the basic rules of pleading in accordance with the CPR

 

2.No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered which the defendant needs to establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon

 

3.Without clarification of the claimants claim, the defendant is extremely disadvantaged and the claimants claim appears without merit

 

4.Further to above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed.

 

 

 

 

The above is all you need to place in the defence.

 

You should write to the claimants solicitors as follows:-

 

' Herewith copy defence by way of service, the same having been filed with the court.

 

Please serve amended particulars of claim and plead yor clients case in an appropriate manner within 7 days, so that I am aware of the case I will have to meet at trial. I request that you attach to the particulars a copy of the agreement upon which the claimant relies. The matter will be transferred to my home court and the claimant will have to produce the document, in any event. In those circumstances you should plead in accordance with the CPR.

 

Failure to provide that requested in the time period provided for will result in application to the court. I confirm a copy of this letter will be produced to the court when the question of costs falls to be decided'.

 

 

Yours Elkus

 

Send Rec Del and retain proof dont sign print

#

 

Regards

 

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks very much! That's pretty much what I was looking for but was a bit put off by the long defences :?

 

However I have a couple of questions to ask, if you don't mind? As you say I need to be fully aware of all the facts, so I'd like to clarify a couple of points:

 

2.No documents supporting the claims in the particulars have been offered which the defendant needs to establish what agreement it is that this action is based upon

 

I assume we're referring to the lack of documentation supplied with the claim? I gather this is standard practice with online applications (although last time I saw a claim come from Northampton it had all the referenced materials attached) and is 'acceptable'?

 

I'm also assuming that we're not including the fact that they sent the materials under my CPR request, so is this relevant?

 

4.Further to above the defendant is unable to plead effectively or at all. The defendant is embarrassed

 

I've always been curious about this... What exactly does pleading embarrassment achieve?:rolleyes:

 

I request that you attach to the particulars a copy of the agreement upon which the claimant relies.

 

Haven't we already asked for this under CPR? They did send me a copy when asked, although it is of dubious nature...

 

But apart from that, thanks again, you've all been really helpful with your suggestions :D

(Can there ever be too much praise??)

 

Elkus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, thanks very much! That's pretty much what I was looking for but was a bit put off by the long defences :?

 

However I have a couple of questions to ask, if you don't mind? As you say I need to be fully aware of all the facts, so I'd like to clarify a couple of points:

 

 

 

I assume we're referring to the lack of documentation supplied with the claim? I gather this is standard practice with online applications (although last time I saw a claim come from Northampton it had all the referenced materials attached) and is 'acceptable'? I have never seen one from CCBC with docs attached

 

I'm also assuming that we're not including the fact that they sent the materials under my CPR request, so is this relevant? You recieved a NoA which looked ok the DN is undated so invalid and the CCA is unsigned therefore unexecuted ( This could be regarded as a minor omission and still rendered enforcable )

 

 

 

I've always been curious about this... What exactly does pleading embarrassment achieve?:rolleyes: Doesnt achieve anything just outlines your ignorance to a vague POC.I appreciate the Account number is named but without the CCA means very little.

In view of the above docs being supplied i would be inclined to not send the follow up letter to their Sols but just submit the short Defence.Dont reveal all your cards for now you will have another opportunity at AQ stage.The DN is your key in this matter its invalid because of no date therefore the account as been terminated unlawfully and therefore the proceedings as well.If you feel confident to argue the above point then thats the way to proceed.

 

 

 

Haven't we already asked for this under CPR? They did send me a copy when asked, although it is of dubious nature...Point this out at AQ

 

But apart from that, thanks again, you've all been really helpful with your suggestions :D

(Can there ever be too much praise??)

 

Elkus

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha now I understand!

 

Do they have to state the account has been terminated, or does the issuance of a DN and the follow-up court claim automatically render the account terminated? Still not 100% sure on this one cos they could claim the account hasn't been terminated and issue a 'correct' DN at a later date...

 

Other than that I'll get the defence sent later on in the week once I fully understand what I'm putting there!

 

Elkus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aha now I understand!

 

Do they have to state the account has been terminated, or does the issuance of a DN and the follow-up court claim automatically render the account terminated? Still not 100% sure on this one cos they could claim the account hasn't been terminated and issue a 'correct' DN at a later date...Unlawfully terminated they cant reissue a second DN unless you resign a new agreement which is unlikely

 

Other than that I'll get the defence sent later on in the week once I fully understand what I'm putting there!

 

Elkus

 

 

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to the DN flaw everything else is immaterial

 

 

Andy;)

Edited by Andyorch

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, time for an update...

 

After sending off our defence, the courts sent a letter back stating that they had received the defence and that the claimants have 28 days to respond, etc etc etc.

 

We weren't expecting much of a response this side of the New Year so were a little bit surprised to receive a letter from Howard Cohen. Here's the contents of said letter:

 

"We can confirm that we have been instructed by our client to discontinue the county court claim issued against you as the claim was instructed in error, therefore, please find enclosed by way of service upon you a Notice of Discontinuance."

 

And sure enough, attached to the letter was the following:

 

In The Northampton CCBC

Claim No: XXXXXXXX

 

Between:-

CL Finance Limited

Claimant

 

 

And

 

 

 

XXXXXXXXXX

Defendant

 

--------------------------

Notice of Discontinuance

--------------------------

 

 

TAKE NOTICE That Upon the Defendant making payment to the Claimant that the Claimant hereby discontinues all proceedings under the above numbered action and accordingly withdraws from the same.

 

Dated and signed etc etc

So, they discontinued!

 

However I have a question regarding this notice, something I'm not 100% sure of...

Upon the Defendant making payment to the Claimant
Am I to assume that if we make a payment they'll drop the case? Or is this just their way of saying we owed them in the first place and they're just dropping it without expecting anything from us?

 

Elated and confused! Not a good combination!:p

 

But in any case, many thanks for all your help and support in getting this result! It's very much appreciated! Kudos all round I think!

 

A happy Elkus :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Elkus;)

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done, however, did this come from the solicitor only, have you been notified by the court of the discontinuance. I would phone and check on Monday :D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done...now go for costs ;)

Claims:

bgqs v Barclays (Claim No.1) - Claim Issued 16/3/07 Await Defence to be Entered - Data Protection Act Non-Compliance - *WON

 

bgqs v Barclays (Claim No.2) - Prelim Letter Sent (Charges + s.68 Interest) - 16/3/07 - *WON

 

bgqs v Halifax - Prelim Letter Sent (Charges +C.I Interest) - 16/3/07 - *WON

 

*Paid Deposit on New House with my Winnings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say so....After all, you have spent time preparing and studying case law etc in order to prepare your defence. Also, you will have incurred stationary and postage costs ?

 

Worth a try anyway !

Claims:

bgqs v Barclays (Claim No.1) - Claim Issued 16/3/07 Await Defence to be Entered - Data Protection Act Non-Compliance - *WON

 

bgqs v Barclays (Claim No.2) - Prelim Letter Sent (Charges + s.68 Interest) - 16/3/07 - *WON

 

bgqs v Halifax - Prelim Letter Sent (Charges +C.I Interest) - 16/3/07 - *WON

 

*Paid Deposit on New House with my Winnings !

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...