Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court claim from Lloyds TSB - Advice needed please.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5480 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

But there would need to be a default on the CCJ for a charging order to be granted for the house. Please someone correct me if I'm wrong.

Joan has not defaulted on the CCJ.

All she has to do is apply for redetermination to allow her to pay at a rate that she can afford, The court will only set a payment that she can afford and yes it is true, it is nothing to do with Mr joan at all, even if she had the debt last week, we are not responsible for our spouses debts.

 

Sorry Q,

I was not implying that they could go straight for a charging order on the house, what I was saying was about the charging order itself, and that the spouse could object.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 379
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry Q,

I was not implying that they could go straight for a charging order on the house, what I was saying was about the charging order itself, and that the spouse could object.

 

Hi Mightyacorn,

Actually its my apologies that should be going to you,

I'm sorry I read your post completely wrong, I notice no one else did.:oops:

I am very tired today, I've been up all night.

Please accept my apologies.

kind regards Q. x.

 

Lets not talk of charging orders as that's not gonna happen.

The CCj could be paid by installments of an affordable amount set by the court after the redetermination, and as Mr. Joan said, that in its self is a kind of victory!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You'll need to submit the Redetermination request ASAP as most creditors move for Charging Orders very quickly after the original Judgment.

 

I know it's unlawful but since when does that matter to them ?

 

This is very true. Therefore you really need to prepare for all circumstances. In our case we actually offered to allow the company concerned a charging order without going to court in the first place (all to do with cash-flow problems and assets to be realised etc) but they would have none of it, despite letters from our solicitor indicating a willingness to allow a charging order, They took us to court and finished up still unpaid and with a charging order, only difference being a CCJ against my wife. Some people want their cake and eat it, together with the icing and every last crumb.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just make sure you get their payment details ASAP after the redetermination. ive had them be quite obstructive (ignoring letters,etc) in the past to ensure u miss a payment and then its.... CO next stop

Link to post
Share on other sites

just make sure you get their payment details ASAP after the redetermination. ive had them be quite obstructive (ignoring letters,etc) in the past to ensure u miss a payment and then its.... CO next stop

 

Very true,

 

You have got to do the redetermination with in 14 days from judgment, Sent by special Del. obviously the sooner the better.

 

To pay the judgment the court will set a monthly date and you should then ask for it to be paid by standing order through your bank.

That way your payments will be made on time.

If they are obstructive then I would tell the court, court manager, in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joan here. I've just rung the court and the clerk and her supervisor are not aware of a redetermination order form per se. They're telling me that the order has not been drawn by the court yet, and that once it's been drawn it will be referred to the district judge to ask for directions. So I am meant to wait for the court to draw up the order, then I can tell them I can't afford to pay more than x amount a month.

 

 

You have got to do the redetermination with in 14 days from judgment, Sent by special Del. obviously the sooner the better.

 

How come this applies if the court clerks from the determination dept are not aware of a redetermination order form per se?

 

I'm very confused. Does anyone know exactly how I should proceed? Do I need a form? Does such a thing as a redetermination form exist? What do I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joan here. I've just rung the court and the clerk and her supervisor are not aware of a redetermination order form per se. They're telling me that the order has not been drawn by the court yet, and that once it's been drawn it will be referred to the district judge to ask for directions. So I am meant to wait for the court to draw up the order, then I can tell them I can't afford to pay more than x amount a month.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by questioning viewpost.gif

You have got to do the redetermination with in 14 days from judgment, Sent by special Del. obviously the sooner the better.

 

 

 

How come this applies if the court clerks from the determination dept are not aware of a redetermination order form per se?

 

I'm very confused. Does anyone know exactly how I should proceed? Do I need a form? Does such a thing as a redetermination form exist? What do I do?

 

As far as what I've been told and my experiences, you can write a letter within 14 days of the judgement and tell them you can't pay, enclose your I & E and make an offer you can afford.

After judgement and if its later than two weeks you have to do it on a form and it costs £35.

If they got ccj by default then I think you have to pay a fee for the redetermination, you can't then write a letter.

 

,, I have just found a form from the court and it is an "Application for a suspension of a warrent and/or variation of an order" "N245," that is what the court sent me a year ago that is the correct name of the form.

i always thought it was called a redetermination form, I only ever looked at it once.

 

Sorry Joan that is what I have been informed from the court and been told by nat. debt line,

I'll flag up your post so others who may definately know can help.

 

I must say it seems that the court were not very helpful.

Edited by questioning
added some info.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Joan here. I've just rung the court and the clerk and her supervisor are not aware of a redetermination order form per se. They're telling me that the order has not been drawn by the court yet, and that once it's been drawn it will be referred to the district judge to ask for directions. So I am meant to wait for the court to draw up the order, then I can tell them I can't afford to pay more than x amount a month.

 

Quote:

Originally Posted by questioning viewpost.gif

You have got to do the redetermination with in 14 days from judgment, Sent by special Del. obviously the sooner the better.

 

 

 

How come this applies if the court clerks from the determination dept are not aware of a redetermination order form per se?

 

I'm very confused. Does anyone know exactly how I should proceed? Do I need a form? Does such a thing as a redetermination form exist? What do I do?

 

Flagged this up for Joan if anyone knows exactly how this works.?

 

This is the form that i am talking about called an N245, This is if a court has set an order and you cannot pay and you are applying after 14 days from judgment. Here is the form ..N245...n245_form.pdf......... Have a look here NationalDebt line England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 08 Reducing Payments Or Suspending A Bailiffs Warrant On A County Court Judgment

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

What you need to do is get the letter below in the post wit.hin 14 days of the judgment

 

 

Your Name

Your Address

Your Postcode

Date 2009

 

 

The Court Manager

 

CLAIM NUMBER: ******

 

To the Court Manager:

 

REDETERMINATION UNDER RULE 14.13CPR

 

I apply for this matter to be reconsidered (redetermination under Rule 14.13 of of the Civil Procedures Rules) Under rule 14.13 there is no court fee to make this application.

 

I am unable to pay the full Judgment forthwith/instalment as ordered on (insert date) and submit that this has been set an unrealistic amount.

 

I request the Court reconsiders the Judgment. To assist I enclose an up to date financial statement and list of other unsecured debts.

 

As you can see my budget shows I have £..... surplus / £.... deficit after essential living costs and also have (insert number of creditors in total). Given my circumstances and considering my finances as a whole I am able to offer £.... monthly instalments and request the Court set the Judgment

at this amount.

 

Under rule 14.13 of the CPR it is clear that because the Judgment was granted without a hearing I am entitled to have this redetermination and if necessary transferred to my local County Court. My application is also compliant with the time limit as it falls within the 14 days from the original order.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

Your Name

Amend to suit, signed and sent recorded Delivery

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just applied for and succeeded in an application for redetermination of a judgement at my local court, using formN24 "Defendants Application For Redetermination". Free.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just applied for and succeeded in an application for redetermination of a judgement at my local court, using formN24 "Defendants Application For Redetermination". Free.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

 

Thanks. To avoid confusion, do you mean form N245 as pointed out by questioning here?....

 

Flagged this up for Joan if anyone knows exactly how this works.?

 

This is the form that i am talking about called an N245, This is if a court has set an order and you cannot pay and you are applying after 14 days from judgment. Here is the form ..N245...[ATTACH]8065[/ATTACH]......... Have a look here NationalDebt line England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 08 Reducing Payments Or Suspending A Bailiffs Warrant On A County Court Judgment

 

...oooh they're talking about bailiffs in that link. I hope it doesn't come to that. If it does I have a pile of jam rags ready and waiting, signed by the author (some in blood, some in ink.)

 

 

Thanks questioning and supasnooper, very useful advice and I will get onto it. I'm sure Mr Joan will be on here at some point during his coffee break to add his tuppence ha'penny wth as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. To avoid confusion, do you mean form N245 as pointed out by questioning here?....

 

 

 

...oooh they're talking about bailiffs in that link. I hope it doesn't come to that. If it does I have a pile of jam rags ready and waiting, signed by the author (some in blood, some in ink.)

 

 

Thanks questioning and supasnooper, very useful advice and I will get onto it. I'm sure Mr Joan will be on here at some point during his coffee break to add his tuppence ha'penny wth as well.

 

Just to clarify.........

 

The form I have attached and the link provided are if you have been paying and want to re determine the amount you are paying. It would cost £35 to use this form.

 

After you receive judgement you can write a letter under CPR rules (with in 14 days of receiving Jt.) as posted above and ask for a redetermination, this will not cost any fee.

 

I have no idea if JGJ means this form, i doubt it as he calls it by a different name and says it doesn't have a fee to pay. I don't know what this form is sorry,

Link to post
Share on other sites

from memory, i wrote a letter after judgement asking for redetermination, stating i cudnt pay the full amount, included my I&E breakdown with what i cud afford (proved by I&E), judgement was that i pay the amount i stated. (cant stress enough tho, sorry to harp on but....THEN GET THEIR PAYMENT DETAILS - i didnt quickly enuff)

Edited by r&b
added from memory
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joan

 

Take a look here you should find what is required part14 1..8

Regards

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy, that link doesn't work, for some reason.

 

Mr JoA here:

I'm a bit confused now. When you say "14 days after receiving judgement" is that 14 days after the judge read it out in court, ie gave his judgement? Or is it 14 days after we receive it in writing (which she hasn't yet)?

 

If we wait until we get the written judgement does that mean it will cost us £35 to get a redetermination? It's a bit difficult as we don't even have an exact figure until we get it in writing.

 

Joan rang the court to ask about a redetermination order and the person she spoke to hadn't a clue what she was talking about. Fat lot of help they were.

 

So where do we get this form from? The court? Or do we just write the letter as stated at post #335? Incidentally, there was a hearing (or a trial, anyway), and it was in our local court, so the last sentence of the letter can't apply, I don't think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apologies for the link Joan try this one partic 14.9 - 14.13

 

PART 14 - ADMISSIONS - Ministry of Justice

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy.

 

Just had a look at that. Not straightforward is it? Where it talks about "admissions", that seems to be referring to admission before action. I'm not entirely clear if it applies still once judgement has been made.

 

Mind you, Joan never disputed the amount, only the right of enforcement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

joan of arc,

 

My post #337 is exactly as I stated, I have the form in my hand looking at it now, N24 Notice of DEFENDANTS APPLICATION FOR REDETERMINATION. Successfully applied for and a REDETERMINATION obtained. Best of luck. :D

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

joan of arc,

 

My post #337 is exactly as I stated, I have the form in my hand looking at it now, N24 Notice of DEFENDANTS APPLICATION FOR REDETERMINATION. Successfully applied for and a REDETERMINATION obtained. Best of luck. :D

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

 

Well done JGJ,

Is this a form you use at anytime once you have received your judgment as I see that their is no fee to use it?

I'm just interested to know and its helpful for others too.

So far I know the CPR letter has to be done within 14 days after receiving judgment & no fee obviously and N245 can be used at any time after that and has a £35. fee.

 

I find the lack of information from Joans county court appalling, this info is readily available if you google so whats up with that court, they must know, to say they have no idea is dreadful. The court is supposed to explain procedure and tell you about forms available.

Edited by questioning
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh and the other thing is, Joan has no income, be it gross or net. Mine is the only income, so how do we get round that one, if they look solely at her income?

 

They didn't look solely at my OH income, they took mine into account as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They didn't look solely at my OH income, they took mine into account as well.

 

Hi mightyacorn,

I hope this will make sense,

I had the information straight from a lady who actually goes through the enforcement of debt forms at court.

on my form it asked for my husbands income and mine plus benefits and anything else anyone gives you.

then it said expenses....only include what you pay from your income.

She said to do as the form said and just write, if I wanted to, that all other living expenses ie. morgage/rent etc. were paid by my husband.

I said why do you ask for my oh's income when he is not responsible for my debt?

She said don't worry we ask what your spouses income is but we then subtract that figure (his income ) so in effect it is not included because it is not his debt.

 

Mighty acorn, Was the reason that they took your spouses income into account because you had no income?

If so that means that if one has no income then the OH is liable for the partners debt.

That is the only conclusion I can come to regarding this and your post.

In that case it was a good thing for me that I only work part time.

Doesn't help Joan though.

I googled what happens if you have no income and cannot pay a CCJ.

I found an answer concerning setaside but I won't comment on that as i didn't look into it just a quick google.

 

If I were you Joan I would ring National debt line, I have always found them to be most helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...