Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

tifo and bigpockets (website)


tifo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5754 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought a PC from bigpockets which was advertised in AS NEW condition and RETAIL BOXED. However, i've just received the PC today and it is in USED condition with scratches to the casing front and side and is BROWN BOXED, i.e. just plonked in a brown box with bubble wrap around it. The accessories are also in USED condition, i.e. keyboard, mouse, speakers.

 

Advice on what i can do, if they insist i send the item back at my own cost and blah blah etc. I'm not prepared to spend the money sending it back when it is entirely their fault.

 

I was thinking of asking the bank for a refund, though i paid by Debit card.

 

I bought the PC as a present for my child at the weekend and now that is spoilt because i can't give him this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It remains your responsibility to return the goods, they may refund the carriage cost but whilst it sits in your house, the clock is ticking and your in danger of being stuck with it. However it gets back, make sure that it is signed for on return as there is no way you could prove (to your CC company, for example) that the goods went back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've offered to collect and refund PC cost, but not the delivery charge.

 

why should i end up losing £12 for their fault when i'll be back to square one but out of pocket?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because on a point of principle, you'll be left with a PC you don't want and no refund. By all means stick your heels in, but they're not obliged to refund your delivery costs. The decision will be yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i disagree.

 

the fault is theirs. They've described an item incorrectly and it has been bought on the presumption that the info was correct. This is against trade descriptions. Therefore they are obliged to refund my full costs, including delivery.

 

Imagine them sending a 100 of these out every week and refunding people but keeping the delivery charge of £12. That's an income of £1200 on a cost of about £400, meaning £800 profit by describing something wrongly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simplest answer - return the PC and get your refund.

 

Then, and only then, chase the £12. That way you've already got most of the money and you can go buy another elsewhere.

 

Send a LBA - and issue court proceedings if necessary - under SOGA which makes collection of faulty / incorrect / wrongly described goods the responsibility of the seller. By having refunded you, the seller has admitted that the goods were wrong.

 

Make enough of a nuisance of yourself and the seller will send you the £12 just to get rid of you - they certainly won't waste a day at court defending a claim of £12....

British Shoe Corporation - won :) BT - won :) West Lancs Council - lost :-x 02 - won :) British Airways - still fighting :o STOP PRESS - RSPCA - daughter won with letters I wrote :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

good advice ...

 

but can you understand what i mean? why should i be out of pocket for £12 when the fault is entirely theirs?

 

they've broken the law, not me.

 

i've asked them to replace with a similar spec machine from another manufacturer which is some £20 more but i don't want to pay the extra because of their breach of trade descriptions etc and they have confirmed those are as described, i.e. AS NEW and Retail Boxed. Lets see what they say. As yet, no reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget the box for a sec, as even though it may be misdescribed, it makes little difference to the quality of the PC and I don't know that you'd be able to win a case based on that.

 

Can you explain to me what you understand by "as new" and "second-hand"? Because my understanding of "as new" is that it is NOT new, and if it's not new, then it's likely to be second-hand (or ex-display, but that's something you're going to have difficulties proving, and as BP is an online store, I don't know how you're going to show this).

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS NEW to me means it is not BRAND NEW but looks like it.

 

RETAIL BOXED to me means a BRANDED cardboard box with the correct packaging etc. and not a BROWN BOX with bubble wrap it. Stating one and sending the other is misleading.

 

It might not make any difference to the quality of the PC but it makes a big difference to how it looks. Because it was a present for someone, it does matter to me how it looks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good advice ...

 

but can you understand what i mean? why should i be out of pocket for £12 when the fault is entirely theirs?

 

I'm not suggesting you be £12 out of pocket. Do you really want a computer from that dealer after the way they've looked after you?

 

My suggestion was: Return the computer, get a refund, buy a computer elsewhere - and then go get your £12 back.

British Shoe Corporation - won :) BT - won :) West Lancs Council - lost :-x 02 - won :) British Airways - still fighting :o STOP PRESS - RSPCA - daughter won with letters I wrote :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you explain to me what you understand by "as new" and "second-hand"? Because my understanding of "as new" is that it is NOT new, and if it's not new, then it's likely to be second-hand (or ex-display, but that's something you're going to have difficulties proving, and as BP is an online store, I don't know how you're going to show this).

 

The website describes their product:

 

Product Conditions

New

Items will be new and will have the Original Manufacturers full warranty.

As New

Items will be in as new condition, but may have been returned to the Original Manufacturer as a failed or incorrect delivery. These items would then be fully tested and reboxed if needed by the Manufacturer and sold "As New" with the Original Manufacturers full warranty or covered by Bigpockets warranty which will be stated in the product description.

Refurbished

Items will be used but will have been professionally refurbished to the Manufacturers standard. They will be warranted for typically between 3-6 Months.

Used

Items will be used, but will have been thoroughly cleaned and tested by ourselves. They may have minor cosmetic scuffs or marks but will be in full working order, Used Items typically carry a 30 or 90 Day Return to Base Warranty from ourselves.

 

The used are described as having 'cosmetic scuffs or marks' but no mention in 'as new'.

 

This is not being returned under the distance selling regs so there should be no deduction for delivery.

 

It does say, however, reboxed and not retail boxed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does say, however, reboxed and not retail boxed.

 

The item description stated 'Retail boxed' in my case and 'As New'.

 

I seem to have got something they state as 'used' in the above description .....

 

However, the way i see it, they offered to sell an item in AS NEW condition and RETAIL BOXED, i accepted that offer and when the payment was taken by them, it becomes a binding contract on them to send me what they offered. That's what i'm going to hold them to, even if they now have to send me another PC which they sell for more money.

 

They're a big company, i'm sure they know what they sell ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please document any scratches, broken items, etc and take photographs. Let the company pick up the item (signed for on collection and delivery) and wait for the refund.

 

Then, and only then, request the refund of the original delivery charge by way of a letter sent by Recorded Delivery. Include copies of all documentation, photos, as well as a printed copy of their definitions of "As New", "New", "Used" etc.

 

It may take a while (and several letters), but you will get there in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've offered to refund the PC cost and delivery charge.

 

i'm asking for an exchange PC which costs £25 more than what i paid for mine but they are not willing to exchange.

 

i've asked them to think about it. At the moment i'm not asking for an 'incovenience' payment as the PC i bought was meant to be a present for someone, but being misled about the condition meant i could not give it. Then there is the chasing i've been doing with them for a few days.

 

There's £25 they're saving here. I'm asking for an exchange. They will refund me £12 in delivery charges, maybe spend £5 in collecting the item and i may ask for around £50 as compensation for the inconvenience. That's a cost to them of £67.

 

They could exchange and accept the £25 loss in PC price and think they have saved £42 in delivery, collection and compensation costs. I don't know why they still insist on refunding. The maths don't add up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, got my PC cost + delivery charge refunded.

 

How do i now ask for compensation as the PC they sold was not described accurately and it has been an inconvenience so how much should i ask for?

 

Does anyone know the relevant legislation/regulations to quote?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there are regulations to ask for compensation only for refunds.

Any compensation would have to be goodwill gesture unless you had such a compelling case and were actually out of pocket that you could take it to court.

 

I think if you ask for compensation your will not receive a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have to show actual loss, and be able to prove it. Even then, if the loss is imagined than real, any litigation you take to assert your position could be lost with the chances of paying the other sides costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm ok, i'll send them a letter, lets see what they say.

 

i was asking more for Sales of Goods Act, Trade Descriptions Act etc. statements.

 

The loss was that i paid for a PC which was described differently to what was sent. They then admitted they never had any as described anyway. The PC was for a present, that means because of their mistake i couldn't fulfill its use as a gift.

 

Then they arranged a collection time without asking me. Because i had to be out from home at 2.00pm on that day and the collection would be done between 1.30pm and 3.30pm, i had to drive to another town to drop off the package otherwise it would not have been collected. This cost me time and fuel and was an inconvenience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loss was that i paid for a PC which was described differently to what was sent.
That's not a loss, that's an inconvenience.

 

Then they arranged a collection time without asking me. Because i had to be out from home at 2.00pm on that day and the collection would be done between 1.30pm and 3.30pm, i had to drive to another town to drop off the package otherwise it would not have been collected. This cost me time and fuel and was an inconvenience
You could have contacted them and told them this wasn't a convenient time. I'm sorry, I usually am all out for consumers to stand up for their rights but in this instance, I fail to see how you could show any actual loss.

 

You've been disappointed and inconvenienced but whether that entitles you to anything, I would really doubt. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly do you want compensation for? They've refunded your money and costs to return the item to them, that's all you're entitled to.

 

By rescinding the contract and returning your funds they have done all they need to under relevant laws.

 

You're clutching at straws expecting them to pay you for them sending you an "As New" PC, which to me doesn't imply new anyway. If it was, they would surely simply say New.

 

As for the collection arrangements surely you could have arranged a time with them which was convenient? It's hardly their fault if you can't be in when you agree.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...