Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

tifo and bigpockets (website)


tifo
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5745 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought a PC from bigpockets which was advertised in AS NEW condition and RETAIL BOXED. However, i've just received the PC today and it is in USED condition with scratches to the casing front and side and is BROWN BOXED, i.e. just plonked in a brown box with bubble wrap around it. The accessories are also in USED condition, i.e. keyboard, mouse, speakers.

 

Advice on what i can do, if they insist i send the item back at my own cost and blah blah etc. I'm not prepared to spend the money sending it back when it is entirely their fault.

 

I was thinking of asking the bank for a refund, though i paid by Debit card.

 

I bought the PC as a present for my child at the weekend and now that is spoilt because i can't give him this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It remains your responsibility to return the goods, they may refund the carriage cost but whilst it sits in your house, the clock is ticking and your in danger of being stuck with it. However it gets back, make sure that it is signed for on return as there is no way you could prove (to your CC company, for example) that the goods went back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've offered to collect and refund PC cost, but not the delivery charge.

 

why should i end up losing £12 for their fault when i'll be back to square one but out of pocket?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because on a point of principle, you'll be left with a PC you don't want and no refund. By all means stick your heels in, but they're not obliged to refund your delivery costs. The decision will be yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i disagree.

 

the fault is theirs. They've described an item incorrectly and it has been bought on the presumption that the info was correct. This is against trade descriptions. Therefore they are obliged to refund my full costs, including delivery.

 

Imagine them sending a 100 of these out every week and refunding people but keeping the delivery charge of £12. That's an income of £1200 on a cost of about £400, meaning £800 profit by describing something wrongly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simplest answer - return the PC and get your refund.

 

Then, and only then, chase the £12. That way you've already got most of the money and you can go buy another elsewhere.

 

Send a LBA - and issue court proceedings if necessary - under SOGA which makes collection of faulty / incorrect / wrongly described goods the responsibility of the seller. By having refunded you, the seller has admitted that the goods were wrong.

 

Make enough of a nuisance of yourself and the seller will send you the £12 just to get rid of you - they certainly won't waste a day at court defending a claim of £12....

British Shoe Corporation - won :) BT - won :) West Lancs Council - lost :-x 02 - won :) British Airways - still fighting :o STOP PRESS - RSPCA - daughter won with letters I wrote :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

good advice ...

 

but can you understand what i mean? why should i be out of pocket for £12 when the fault is entirely theirs?

 

they've broken the law, not me.

 

i've asked them to replace with a similar spec machine from another manufacturer which is some £20 more but i don't want to pay the extra because of their breach of trade descriptions etc and they have confirmed those are as described, i.e. AS NEW and Retail Boxed. Lets see what they say. As yet, no reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forget the box for a sec, as even though it may be misdescribed, it makes little difference to the quality of the PC and I don't know that you'd be able to win a case based on that.

 

Can you explain to me what you understand by "as new" and "second-hand"? Because my understanding of "as new" is that it is NOT new, and if it's not new, then it's likely to be second-hand (or ex-display, but that's something you're going to have difficulties proving, and as BP is an online store, I don't know how you're going to show this).

Link to post
Share on other sites

AS NEW to me means it is not BRAND NEW but looks like it.

 

RETAIL BOXED to me means a BRANDED cardboard box with the correct packaging etc. and not a BROWN BOX with bubble wrap it. Stating one and sending the other is misleading.

 

It might not make any difference to the quality of the PC but it makes a big difference to how it looks. Because it was a present for someone, it does matter to me how it looks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good advice ...

 

but can you understand what i mean? why should i be out of pocket for £12 when the fault is entirely theirs?

 

I'm not suggesting you be £12 out of pocket. Do you really want a computer from that dealer after the way they've looked after you?

 

My suggestion was: Return the computer, get a refund, buy a computer elsewhere - and then go get your £12 back.

British Shoe Corporation - won :) BT - won :) West Lancs Council - lost :-x 02 - won :) British Airways - still fighting :o STOP PRESS - RSPCA - daughter won with letters I wrote :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you explain to me what you understand by "as new" and "second-hand"? Because my understanding of "as new" is that it is NOT new, and if it's not new, then it's likely to be second-hand (or ex-display, but that's something you're going to have difficulties proving, and as BP is an online store, I don't know how you're going to show this).

 

The website describes their product:

 

Product Conditions

New

Items will be new and will have the Original Manufacturers full warranty.

As New

Items will be in as new condition, but may have been returned to the Original Manufacturer as a failed or incorrect delivery. These items would then be fully tested and reboxed if needed by the Manufacturer and sold "As New" with the Original Manufacturers full warranty or covered by Bigpockets warranty which will be stated in the product description.

Refurbished

Items will be used but will have been professionally refurbished to the Manufacturers standard. They will be warranted for typically between 3-6 Months.

Used

Items will be used, but will have been thoroughly cleaned and tested by ourselves. They may have minor cosmetic scuffs or marks but will be in full working order, Used Items typically carry a 30 or 90 Day Return to Base Warranty from ourselves.

 

The used are described as having 'cosmetic scuffs or marks' but no mention in 'as new'.

 

This is not being returned under the distance selling regs so there should be no deduction for delivery.

 

It does say, however, reboxed and not retail boxed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does say, however, reboxed and not retail boxed.

 

The item description stated 'Retail boxed' in my case and 'As New'.

 

I seem to have got something they state as 'used' in the above description .....

 

However, the way i see it, they offered to sell an item in AS NEW condition and RETAIL BOXED, i accepted that offer and when the payment was taken by them, it becomes a binding contract on them to send me what they offered. That's what i'm going to hold them to, even if they now have to send me another PC which they sell for more money.

 

They're a big company, i'm sure they know what they sell ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please document any scratches, broken items, etc and take photographs. Let the company pick up the item (signed for on collection and delivery) and wait for the refund.

 

Then, and only then, request the refund of the original delivery charge by way of a letter sent by Recorded Delivery. Include copies of all documentation, photos, as well as a printed copy of their definitions of "As New", "New", "Used" etc.

 

It may take a while (and several letters), but you will get there in the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they've offered to refund the PC cost and delivery charge.

 

i'm asking for an exchange PC which costs £25 more than what i paid for mine but they are not willing to exchange.

 

i've asked them to think about it. At the moment i'm not asking for an 'incovenience' payment as the PC i bought was meant to be a present for someone, but being misled about the condition meant i could not give it. Then there is the chasing i've been doing with them for a few days.

 

There's £25 they're saving here. I'm asking for an exchange. They will refund me £12 in delivery charges, maybe spend £5 in collecting the item and i may ask for around £50 as compensation for the inconvenience. That's a cost to them of £67.

 

They could exchange and accept the £25 loss in PC price and think they have saved £42 in delivery, collection and compensation costs. I don't know why they still insist on refunding. The maths don't add up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, got my PC cost + delivery charge refunded.

 

How do i now ask for compensation as the PC they sold was not described accurately and it has been an inconvenience so how much should i ask for?

 

Does anyone know the relevant legislation/regulations to quote?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think there are regulations to ask for compensation only for refunds.

Any compensation would have to be goodwill gesture unless you had such a compelling case and were actually out of pocket that you could take it to court.

 

I think if you ask for compensation your will not receive a reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would have to show actual loss, and be able to prove it. Even then, if the loss is imagined than real, any litigation you take to assert your position could be lost with the chances of paying the other sides costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hmmm ok, i'll send them a letter, lets see what they say.

 

i was asking more for Sales of Goods Act, Trade Descriptions Act etc. statements.

 

The loss was that i paid for a PC which was described differently to what was sent. They then admitted they never had any as described anyway. The PC was for a present, that means because of their mistake i couldn't fulfill its use as a gift.

 

Then they arranged a collection time without asking me. Because i had to be out from home at 2.00pm on that day and the collection would be done between 1.30pm and 3.30pm, i had to drive to another town to drop off the package otherwise it would not have been collected. This cost me time and fuel and was an inconvenience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The loss was that i paid for a PC which was described differently to what was sent.
That's not a loss, that's an inconvenience.

 

Then they arranged a collection time without asking me. Because i had to be out from home at 2.00pm on that day and the collection would be done between 1.30pm and 3.30pm, i had to drive to another town to drop off the package otherwise it would not have been collected. This cost me time and fuel and was an inconvenience
You could have contacted them and told them this wasn't a convenient time. I'm sorry, I usually am all out for consumers to stand up for their rights but in this instance, I fail to see how you could show any actual loss.

 

You've been disappointed and inconvenienced but whether that entitles you to anything, I would really doubt. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly do you want compensation for? They've refunded your money and costs to return the item to them, that's all you're entitled to.

 

By rescinding the contract and returning your funds they have done all they need to under relevant laws.

 

You're clutching at straws expecting them to pay you for them sending you an "As New" PC, which to me doesn't imply new anyway. If it was, they would surely simply say New.

 

As for the collection arrangements surely you could have arranged a time with them which was convenient? It's hardly their fault if you can't be in when you agree.

The above post constitutes my personal opinion on the facts in the post compared with my personal knowledge of the applicable legislation. I make no guarantees of its legal accuracy. If you are in doubt seek advice of a legal professional specialising in the area concerned.

 

If my post has helped you please click my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...