Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

capquest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4971 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

my wife has just got a crditors notice from capquest requesting full payment 7 days if no payment a count court claim may be issued they are asking for 1174.19 from their client capital one the credit limit on the card is 750 told capital one that she was struggling we asked them to stop interest and charges but obviously they havent sent cca to capquest but it has gone to a po box number so i dont think it will get signed at other end

can anybody help what to do next

Link to post
Share on other sites

So basically Capquest are chasing a Cap1 debt that you have already sent a CCA for, Yes ?

 

That being the case, don't panic as there are legal timelimits for CQ to respond to your request, and while it's in process, without their compliance they can do NOWT.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent cca when she got letter yesterday but as i said it has gone to a po box number will it get signed at other end i sent a letter to link which is on another thread last thursday 1st class and that is still showing on royal mail that it hasnt been delivered(signed for) so im thinking this will happen to this letter will have to find proper addresses for them both without pobox number

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bear in mind that a first class letter is considered delivered after 2 working days, signed for or not.

After all if that's good enough for the courts, it's good enough for us.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got Letter Today From Capquest Saying They Have Put Account On Hold For 28 Days While They Obtain The Information What Do I Do Next There Is Charges And Interest Added To Account From Capital One Do I Send Them A Sar Now

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im in a similar scenario with the infamous Capquest. My 12+2 period elapsed two days ago. During that time I did get the letter asking for 28 days to investigate this matter from Capquest and then later on I got a letter from Capquest along with all the statements going back to 2001 from my Egg account but no CCA!

 

I have come across a template letter for 12+2 days elapsing but Ive noticed some people wait for the 12+2+30 days to elapse before sending any letters.

What is considered the best course of action?

 

Also Capquest say they are acting on behalf of Egg rather than having bought the debt from Egg does that mean if no CCA can be found then this will get passed back to Egg and they will start chasing me instead?

 

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Unfortunately I received my CCA from Capquest after the 12+2 days but before the 30 extra days and it looks right.

 

My next step is to reclaim the charges which have been applied over the years and look into the PPI both of which account for 50% of the balance.

 

In the meantime I guess I will need to come to an arrangement as to a minimal amount I can afford.

 

Any other suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in a similar position regarding CapQuest/Capital One. I was negotiating with Capital One to make token payments as my business isn't doing very well at the moment, but they've passed it on anyway. :mad:

 

Received a Creditor's Notice today from CapQuest saying they may take me to court if I don't pay the full balance in 7 Days. Spoke on the phone (not advised, I know, but I couldn't think what else to do) to a very curt lady who wanted all sorts of details: Am I a homeowner (no), do I own a car (yes, but it's off the road because I can't afford to repair it), got any children under 16 (no) etc. She then said they wouldn't accept less than £166 within the next 7 days or they will "take it further". Not sure what to do now. I doubt I can come up with that figure in such a short space of time. Any advice would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Haha 1

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

This is what i sent them, you will have to change the dates etc. if you decide to use it,

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY OR ANY COMPANY YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT

 

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

Dear Sir or Madam,

Your Reference: xxxxxxxxxx

 

I refer to your letter of 06/11/08, I must admit that I am rather bemused as to why this account has been passed to yourselves, as it is in dispute with the Bank of Scotland and has been since 9th February 2008.

Not only is this a breach of OFT collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998.

My letter to Bank of Scotland dated 26/03/08 outlined the fact that the documents they had sent to me do not conform to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and to date I have received nothing further to remedy this.

As Bank of Scotland are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request, and OFT Collection Guidelines, I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law.

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the Bank of Scotland for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as Iqor cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

If Iqor chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action.

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines

I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

I look forward to hearing from you in writing, as this is the only method by which I am prepared to respond.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

lowell are saying that my dispute doesnt stand as capital one have sent the required information the so called credit agreement looks like one but in the small print it states if my application is successful they with give me a credit card thus i take it that it is an application for a credit card but with a heading of consumer credit agreement please help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...