Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
    • please stop posting up unnecessary unnamed screenshot files  you've done it throughout your threads and we have to renamed them. RENAME THE FILE before you upload if its just text information like a defence or a claim history or a link to a previous post  type it here not by an unnamed screenshot attachment  . sorry NM but you've been here dealing with PPC claims since 2021 somehow you always manage to screw up.......or do totally the opposite of std repeated advice on 10'000 of PPC threads here you are your own worst enemy... dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BACS payment errors and money recovery


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5717 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Anyone know of examples where either a bank or the BACS system itself were held responsible when a mistake was made by the person advising the sort code / account number/account name.

 

The comment by both originating bank and recipient banks are that BACS systen does not check the account name and relies only on the numbers given. Any error is therefore the person advising sort code / account number.

 

Assuming for the moment the above is true, can anyone advise

 

  • can one force the recipent bank to reveal name / address of the account holder to whom the funds were transferred? Does this need something like a court order?
  • does the account holder to whom the funds were transferred have any legal rights to the funds / any obligation to report the error to his bank if noticed?

Any advice would be much appreciated as I am a total novice in these matters

Link to post
Share on other sites

As with all deposits, it relies on the numbers. If you gave the wrong number then it will be deposited into the wrong account. The system doesn't know that you made an error, that may have been the intended destination of the deposit.

It would be wrong for the system to assume it knew best and change the destination of the deposit.

 

The bank should assist in recovery of the deposit, they know who the account belongs to and they should write to them.

 

The recipient has no rights to a wrongfull deposit, unless they can show they did not realise that a wrong deposit had been made. They could only do this by having similar sums deposited into their account around the same time each month.

 

How much are we talking?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not for you nor the wrong recipient to resolve, it is for the sending bank and receiving bank to resolve between themselves.

 

The receiving bank has a right to charge for resolving the problem, and if so it will be passed onto the sending bank, who in turn will pass it on to yourself.

 

The sending bank should of NEVER passed your details onto the recipient regardless if it is the wrong or right party.

 

But yes it is correct, BACS/CHAPS/SWIFT/IBAN all rely on numbers, and not names. The only thing that the system checks is the account number and sort code "match" this is the SORT CODE + ACCOUNT NUMBER * HOW MANY WEETABIX THE MANAGER HAS EACH MORNING. well, not quite, but account numbers aren't just random numbers it is generated against a cryptographic algorithm against the sortcode, so that the account number needs to be one that was generated against the sortcode, if the account number doesn't add up to what it should do when compared to the sortcode the system will reject the payment.

 

If I remember correctly it is something like

 

SortCode 11-22-33 (11 * 22 / 33 * "Digits" = Account Number)

  • Haha 1

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

R v Shadrokh-Cigari [1988] Crim LR 465.

The defendant, who was the guardian of a child to whose bank account approximately £286,000 had been credited in error instead of £286, persuaded the child to sign authorities instructing the bank to issue drafts credited to him. The defendant spent most of the excess money before he was discovered, and was convicted of theft of the drafts on the basis that they remained property belonging to another, namely the issuing bank.

The Court of Appeal expressed the view that the conviction for theft was sustainable on two grounds: (1) under s5(1) as the bank still had an equitable interest in the drafts; therefore the drafts could still be regarded as property belonging to another; and (2) under s5(4) as the defendant had obtained the drafts as a result of the bank's mistake, and was under an obligation to restore the property or its proceeds.

 

 

R v Stalham [1993] Crim LR 310.

The defendant was notified that he would be receiving a pay rise of £4,080, payment to be in instalments. A transfer of the total sum was made to the defendant in error, and he was told that a stop would be put on the transfer, and a cheque for the first instalment issued. The cheque was issued, but a stop was not put on the transfer. When queried by a wages clerk, the defendant expressed the view that he believed it to be a tax rebate. The defendant signed a blank cheque which, with his brother's involvement, was subsequently made out to a woman who paid it into her account and gave the proceeds of the cheque to the defendant's brother. On a charge of theft, the defendant had contended that the money had not been property belonging to another. He was convicted and appealed.

The appeal was dismissed. The Court of Appeal held that it was bound to apply its previous decision in A-G's Reference (No 1 of 1983). As in that case, the property (the chose in action represented by the right to draw on the account) had been transferred as the result of a mistake by the employer. The result was that it remained, as against the employee, property belonging to another, because there was a legal obligation to make restoration, thus the provisions of s5(4) could apply.

 

I hope the above will add some info that will assist in you getting the funds returned.

 

The main points of the above is that it always remains your property and that you have a right to have it returned.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hobbie

You say

It's not for you nor the wrong recipient to resolve, it is for the sending bank and receiving bank to resolve between themselves.

So far neither bank or agency has made any offer to get involved or accept they are responsible for resolving the situation. Are you confident your comments apply where the mistake was made by the person providing the sort code / account number i.e. there was no "error" by either of these parties.

So far the only support offered is to forward any letter I write to the account holder

Link to post
Share on other sites

Powerfulalbert,

 

I would say I am 95% sure, if the bank is unwilling to reclaim the funds back, most likely due to the "admin costs" of a few quid, then take the complaint further, and express the time limits involved.

 

Go to your branch, ask to speak to the most senior member of staff available, explain to them again point out the time scales so far.

 

If no luck then your only other option is to report the banks actions to Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

But remember if the person who received the payment has spent the money or withdrawn it, then it is a matter for the police, keeping a money transfer unlawfully is quite serious. Also the person receiving the money would most likely know the money is in the account wrongly (At a guess) and SHOULD of informed the own bank that the account received a credit from unknown source.

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also the person receiving the money would most likely know the money is in the account wrongly (At a guess)

 

I wouldn't think £22,000 is likely to be missed as a wrong deposit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conniff,

 

No doubt about it, but not everyone checks the balance until receiving the monthly or quarterly statements.... It may of even been paid into a savings account, and only get annual statements :eek:

 

Or to make matters even worse.... It could of been paid into someones account, who unfortunately died some time ago and had no family thus no one to tell the bank, or even worse again... money paid into the account, and the same day HMRC or SOCA or another authority have frozzen the account assets pending a court case scheduled to begin in 2010, for 3 month!

 

A number of possibilities, thats why I said "At a guess" as I don't know the circumstances of the person who's account it was mistakenly paid into.

 

But, Powerfulalbert... Don't worry to much :)

Thanks

- Hobbie

 

--------------------------------------------------------

Under no circumstances should you speak with a Debt Collections Agency via telephone, request that all future correspondence is done in writing, a letter template for this can be located here.

 

Any views expressed are solely that of my own, any advice or information offered is provided in genuine good faith, and should be checked prior to acting upon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not for you nor the wrong recipient to resolve, it is for the sending bank and receiving bank to resolve between themselves.

 

All the sending bank can do in reality is attempt a BAC's recall. Which is asking the receiving bank for the money back. However, this is down to the receiving bank to agree. If they don't agree the sending bank, can't force them to return the money.

 

As previously mentioned if the cash has already been withdrawn, it is doubtful they will be interested. Sadly, I am not sure what the FOS will be able to do as both banks will be able to show that in relation to the payment they acted in good faith and without neglience as they were acting upon your written instruction.

 

I would not have thought that the FOS would instruct either Bank to refund you, when neither of them are technically responsible for the wrong account being credited.

 

Here is an article from the gaurdian

 

How can I retrieve cash from a wrong account? | Money | guardian.co.uk

 

Sorry if this post sounds down hearted and unsupportive but I think the only way you will get your money back is to go to the Police as if the funds have been spent and the account holder is unable to repay them they have committed an offence.

 

Theft (Amendment) Act 1996 (c. 62)

 

Dishonestly retaining a wrongful credit

(1) After section 24 of the Theft Act 1968 insert—

“24A Dishonestly retaining a wrongful credit

 

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if—

(a) a wrongful credit has been made to an account kept by him or in respect of which he has any right or interest;

(b) he knows or believes that the credit is wrongful; and

© he dishonestly fails to take such steps as are reasonable in the circumstances to secure that the credit is cancelled.

 

 

(6) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years.

Edited by tbern123
  • Haha 1

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

£22k paid into wrong bank account due to urs or some1 you knows error, and you want to lay the blame at some1 elses door, okay a mistake has happened, and god forbid a BIG mistake, if it were me, i would be spitting feathers at trying to get it back, visit the bank, and again explain the happenings, and seek what there can assist you with in regaining the funds back, no point going in the branch with all guns blazing, that will get you no where, and after all it was ur fault to start with, the bank will/should look into this matter, only because of the huge sum of money involved, the bank will have proceedures in place for such mistakes.

 

Fat fingers make mistakes, double check numbers etc b4 pressing the send button. A dear mistake but one that you might not repeat....

 

I've checked my three accounts and sadly its not gone in any of mine.... :)

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

As a point of note I received £451 paid into my current account a couple of months ago. I called my bank up to query it (Lloyds) and got absolutely nowhere so decided to just sit on it. Then last week it was, without warning, removed from my account, presumably set back to whence it came. I then received a letter two days later saying payment made in error on such and such a date and corrected on such and such a date. I have since received the same latter a further three times......So it would seem they can reverse the transaction when it suits them

 

 

skb

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

I sent £300 to Barclays and was given the wrong bank account which was non-existent. Barclays took it upon themselves to change the account details and place it into an account. I contacted them to ask for them to return the money but they refused. I do not know if it went into the correct bank account but can only assume it did because they didnt contact me about it.

 

My question at the time was how can Barclays do this? They did not follow my instructions. Had they followed my instructions then the money would have been returned to sender. They just took it upon themselves to transfer the money to where they thought it would go.

 

I recently had £1000 go missing which was sent by CHAPS. You are most definitely entitled to the account numbers etc., to where they sent it and it is up to the bank to chase it as the other side will not do anything as you are not a customer. I would definitely get on to somebody very senior about this and pronto!!!

 

What an absolute shame but I suppose they did follow instructions to the letter if you gave them the account details. However if they placed it into the wrong account that is anothr matter.

 

Kind regards

gemspan

Link to post
Share on other sites

I then received a letter two days later saying payment made in error on such and such a date and corrected on such and such a date. I have since received the same latter a further three times......

 

 

skb

 

 

That must have cost them. Everyone knows it costs the bank 35 quid to send each letter out! :roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...