Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Some Important Information


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6058 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If memory serves from Data Protection Act (I had to study it as part of my job in the Army), they have to BY LAW retain all records for 7 years (at which they can be destroyed by 1 of 4 secure means (Burning, Pulping, Shredding & No one ever remembers the 4th way)).

 

So if they give you rubbish about XXX transactions, remind them they have to by law retain all information for 7 years before it can be destroyed or lost. Any breach of this results in a Breach in Data Protection Act, thus resulting in a Unlawful Destruction Charge (Approx £1,250 per item detroyed)

 

 

If it looks like bullsh*t, and smells like bullsh*t, you can proberly guess its bullsh*t!

 

Is this really the case as I have just had a letter from Barclaycard stating that all my statements for 2000 have been destroyed bar Dec 2000, and they said they now no longer hold them. When you refer to £1250 per item would that mean per statement? Also who states this figure, and how could I claim this?

 

Tanz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Can I just confirm with you ... did you recieve the statements as requested over the phone to the branch. I was about to post off my "request in writing" and have just read you strand. Additionally, did you send off any money (£10) for the request & would the group think it adviseable to have some form of written proof to the effect that you are making the inquiry ... just in case the statements don't show up in a couple of days and you loose time ... :?:

Hello people,

I'm brand new, my first post.

After reading that i might request the past six years charges from the branch as a means of getting them faster i thought, why not try and call them, i did. The lady asked me my security details, as normal, i asked for the charges on my accounts for the last six years, and she said they'll be in the post to you today!

Woo hoo a triumph i think!!

Hope this helps, give em a ring!

Many thanks

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd expect the problem will be with the mainframe systems in their operations dept. The terminology certainly sounds like it. I work for a third party company in ops (I'm there now, yes it's 3:30am!) and to go back past a certain level, old files, datasets and stuff will be archived, often on tapes (yes, physical tapes) that will have to be re-loaded to get the stuff. It shouldn't cause a problem - they HAVE to provide the info, the info IS available, it's just a hassle for the operators on shift at the time. But it's certainly possible these tape requests could generate errors and timeouts at the front end if a customer service jr were to try and request 6 years of statements on his console, and quite reasonable that their immediate response would be 'oh, computer says it can't do it'.

 

For example on an old system I used to use occasionally about 3 years ago, i could request reports for credit card machine usage. (Basically the same process as I imagine statements would use). I could get anything for anyone going back about 6 months, but anything past that I had to send upstairs to support who had to call up the archive data before they could generate the older reports. It's all there. It has to be - all data going back however many years the FSA say. It's just not all immediately 'to hand'.

 

Sorry if that doesn't make any sense, but my main gist is, don't worry! The information CAN be got, and WILL be got.

CrapitalOne - SAR Sent 06-02-07 / SAR sent again 03-02-12 / Prelim sent 20-03-12

HSBC - SAR Sent 12-03-07. SAR sent again 03-02-12

BOS Mastercard - SAR Sent 03-02-12 / Prelim sent 20-03-12

Barclaycard - SAR Sent 09-02-07 / Prelim sent 12-03-07 / Partial offer recd 16-03-07 / New Prelim sent 27/03/12.

Black Horse - SAR sent 03-02-12 / Big load of bumf arrived 07/03/12

Halifax - Statements requested 30-01-07 / 153 pages of statements arrived 06-02-07 / Prelim sent 10-02-07 / LBA sent 01-03-2007 / Partial offer recd 07-03-07 / Full offer received (after phone call) 08-03-07!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello everyone,

My first post today,slightly nervous.Have phoned my Bank up to ask for statements for the last 6 yrs and they have told me i must go into my BANK (HALIFAX).Pay £5 pound and no problem,so i will pop into the Bank Saturday and wait for my statements to arrive.Here"s hoping i can get some money back from the countless times they have charged me!:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi,

 

Wondering, I wrote my BoS branch asking for my 6yrs worth of statements. I have a written response saying I will get them in 10 working days free of charge. The 40 days has expired, and have been offered compensation for the delay. Do I have a legal leg to stand on because I didnt word it, subject access request, and didnt mention Data Protection, does my enquiry still stand? Also how much can I claim for the "delay"?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
...Apparently!

 

if you request information on your account, going back several years, there appears to be a 'transaction limit' set up for their system, which can significantly delay the arrival of your statements.

 

beyond 420 transactions, they have to refer to their 'archive' to retrieve the info, but beyond a certain amount more, their system produces an error, and fails to comply with the request.

 

i have been told this amount is 900 transactions. I called back and the next team leader told me it was 1260 transactions...so i'm unsure as to the validity of the claim, but still, this is useful info.

 

if the system does indeed fail to deliver, they wont tell you. they will wait for you to call in, so the onus is on you; if you suspect that they could use this excuse on your account, demand that they send a direct request to the department that prints the regular monthly statements, and avoid the hassle i've been thru!!

 

No not correct, i asked for and recieved 120 pages of statements going back six years and each page has about 30 transactions, at least 3000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If the Halifax are willing to offer you the majority of your claim, they will pay all of it to you. Stick with it, they just want you to accept what they are offering to save themselves a few quid. They were not bothered about saving your money when they took it out of your account. Stick to your guns, good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah!

 

 

Like the others said: GO FOR IT ALL!

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with everyone else, stick to your guns, & don't let them beat you.

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Don't believe them about them keeping statements in archives as it is just another delaying tactic, I have asked for my baking history and sent £10 in on 3rd of April, reminding of the Data Protection Act. I sent them many letters and phoned many times always getting a defferent excuse and the final one was the best (I asked to speak to someone with some authority who could deal with this matter, a customer relations manager) He told me that to get seven years they would need to contact Bank of Scotland archives to pull out the statements , this was after I had given him the sort code and the account no. He did sound very humble and the very next day I was sent charges for the appropriate dates (not my banking history as required). Because the Data Protection Act had been breached I wrote to the ICO who I knew could do nothing regarding the charges but he could take action regarding the breach of the Data Protection Act. On the 12th May I had written to the FOS telling them the problem but they sent my complaint form back and asked me allow the Halifax 8 weeks from the date of them receiving the letter from the FOS to put the matter right (they have not done so )- as by my calculations on a spreadsheet they owe £2816.00 they did write to me the day before I was due to put in the complaint to the FOS and offered me a goodwill gesture as thy put it of £1216.00, I refused it and carried on with my complaint to the FOS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

Could I ask for some advice please:

 

I have gone as far as actual court action, Halifax offered a partial refund without predjudice and then following this withdrew it and totally deny any acceptance of my claim.

 

This was some months ago as I have been away can I continue to claim by court action? What is the best method, online or via my local court and finally who do I name on the claim is it a person or just Halifax bank PLC?

 

Many thanks

 

S2art

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should start your own thread, as you will get a lot more help that way.

 

You can carry on your claim and file at court within approx 6 months.

If it has been longer than this, you will need to start again.

 

If you are ready to file, please use the N1 and file at your local court.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/110545-urgent-all-mcol-claims.html

  • Haha 1

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, I got my bank charges quite quickly from the Halifax, after a follow up phone call. I then sent the first letter of action explaining the unfair bank charges etc - they replied with in 40 days however told me that no action can be taken untill this court case (to find out if its ok to take customers money) has gone through, this could take years. Do i continue??? What do i do? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Philoanon,

 

As Tilly says, you need to start your own thread as you can get lost in other peoples, as no one an follow your progress.

 

Just go to the main page, click the box "NEW THREAD" give your self a title ie.. philoanon V Halifax and start posting.

 

There is a more in depth guide in my signature. A how to.

 

As for your claim. YES carry on. :D

HOW TO...DUMMIES GUIDE TO CAG...Read here

STEP BY STEP GUIDE...Read here

F&Q's... Read here

EVERYTHING YOU NEED THE A~Z GUIDE...Read here

 

Go to our Cag Toolbar Download page here

 

Please don't forget this site is run on DONATIONS If this site has helped in any way, then please give a little back. ;-)

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All I know has come from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received (finally) statements from HBOS going back to 1995.

Dummie's Guide to CAG: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/welcome-consumer-forums/107001-how-do-i-dummies.html

Me v BofS: Charges: £13,048.10 #2a/c Statements from 08/01/01 received. Charges:£5,156.39 Information Commissioner's Office informed June 12th who wrote to BoS, June 22nd for non-compliance. #1a/c: passed to BoS Senior Review Team. Discovered 2 further a/cs, and 3 Loan accounts. "Goodwill offer" of £7,424.23 06/07/07. Accepted (partial repayment). 20/07/07 Top-up payments of £2,558.10 & £1,154.00

£11,136.33 paid back thus far.

New claim issued: 9/07/2007 for 3rd account: £500+ PRESSING ON!

Don't forget - when you win - a donation to CAG would be welcome!

If anything I've said has remotely been of any assistance, then please tip my scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...