Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
    • No need to worry about Rwanda Just give all the illegals one way trip to Northern Ireland then they can wander off into the EU through your beloved open border.     Job Done 😂🤣  
    • despite the evidence mounting against Chrichton, Vennells wrote in a meeting note that Crichton 'was possibly more loyal to her professional conduct requirements' "Vennells said Crichton was upset that the Post Office had ruined her reputation and compromised her by undertaking a further review of the Second Sight handling. Crichton was said to be ‘very emotional’ and her ‘ego and self-esteem have been undermined’."   That it seems all about their own interests - says a lot about both Chrichton and Vennels views on 'professional conduct requirements' eh?   Former Post Office chief executive Paula Vennells complained that general counsel put her integrity 'above interests of business' | Law Gazette WWW.LAWGAZETTE.CO.UK Susan Crichton was left waiting outside board meeting to discuss damaging forensic accountant's report, inquiry hears.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SORN and Council tenant parking


fro
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3842 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

I have a bit of a problem I am hoping you can help me clarify. I live in a council estate comprising of 70 flats, and we have 21 parking spaces. One of my neighbours has 3 cars, 2 of which are SORN until 04/2009 (I checked on the DVLA site). He drives the one car and still manages to get a parking space. The other 2 cars have not moved for atleast 5years.

 

Now I know you can do the maths, it seems unfair.

 

I want to know, is there something the council can or should do about this? and is the resident parking private, or public.

 

I know its maintenance is calculated in my rent.

 

please advise

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fro,

It depends on whether the parking area has gates across it, preventing non residents from parking there. Strictly speaking as the road is maintained at public expense it is a public road and therefore cars have to be taxed. However if there is a gate and residents need a key to get into the parking area then it is private even if maintained by the local authority. The other points that comes into the equation is whether a residents parking permit is required and to be displayed. Do parking wardens visit to check whether vejicles are parked legally or not. Nothing is simple these days. Strictly speaking for a vehicle to be sorn it should ideally be on a private driveway or in a garage.

 

Cheers - Scousegeezer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Scousegeezer,

 

Thanks for your reply, there are no gates for the car park and we don't have parking permits in operation so the wardens don't come around.

 

From what you are saying if there is no gate then its public

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gwc,

 

You are not answering my questions, some of us work 9 -5

pm and others don't, so the availability of spaces in the car park varies. Say when i leave in the morning he parks in the space i had, b4 i get back.

 

So the problem as I said before is, he has now taken 3 spaces, which leaves the rest of us with 18 spaces to fight for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Fro,

It depends on whether the parking area has gates across it, preventing non residents from parking there. Strictly speaking as the road is maintained at public expense it is a public road and therefore cars have to be taxed.

 

Sorry, no. Otherwise you are saying that every council house driveway without a gate is public highway or every Council Office car park is public highway.

 

The residential parking is maintained by the Council acting as landlord - just the same as a private landlord or housing association; a public highway is maintained at public expense by the Highway Authority (which is usually the county council)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, no. Otherwise you are saying that every council house driveway without a gate is public highway or every Council Office car park is public highway.

 

The residential parking is maintained by the Council acting as landlord - just the same as a private landlord or housing association; a public highway is maintained at public expense by the Highway Authority (which is usually the county council)

 

I have a similar problem here in NI. I am having problems with MOT and my tax is a month overdue. I live in a Housing Executive estate and where I park is a square with space for about 10 cars. In other words it is not a thoroughfare (you can't drive in one end and out the other). So from what you've said, even though it is owned by a public body then I can still SORN my car.

HALIFAX: 13/01/07 Sent S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter (marked as rec'd 16/01)

Paid in full in March 07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some councils and housing associations now have set policies about these issues.May be worth having a word with your estates manager to get clarification.Outside of that theres always the neigbour disputes/resolution schemes that most councils have now.

If the area is council maintained as has been said...and therefore is a public road,then there will be the matter of no insurance-he cannot have valid insurance since the absence of a current MOT would invalidate it.

I dont know about your councils policies but here-they will remove vehicles parked on a public road that are found to be un insured.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cool guys, thanks for all your comments and inputs. From Martins response I can deduce different councils have different rules and policies. I will approach my council and see what's in place.

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, no. Otherwise you are saying that every council house driveway without a gate is public highway or every Council Office car park is public highway.

 

Pat, I did qualify with "depends" and "nothing is simple these days". I also have to say that I disagree. Council house driveway is clearly private property, as you have to drive across the pavement which denotes you are going onto private property. As for the Council Offices car parks, depends on what opffence you are looking at as to whether it is public or private - drink drive etc.

 

As we now have the full facts, it appears that the bays are public . Thats because there isnt a residents scheme in force and also it appears that the bays come stright off the road and not across the pavement into a specific parking area. Ergo a public highway, maintained by the local authority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council house driveway is clearly private property, as you have to drive across the pavement which denotes you are going onto private property.

 

And you don't cross the pavement to turn in here? We don't know - the OP needs to clarify.

 

As for the Council Offices car parks, depends on what opffence you are looking at as to whether it is public or private - drink drive etc.
We are considering vehicle excise and registration here - not drink driving or any other offence. As I have pointed out, VERA has its own unique definition of public highway - not to be confused at all with other offences.

 

As we now have the full facts, it appears that the bays are public .
Er, the OP states that the maintenance of the bays is factored into his rent - that doesn't sound like maintained at public expense to me

 

Thats because there isnt a residents scheme in force and also it appears that the bays come stright off the road and not across the pavement into a specific parking area. Ergo a public highway, maintained by the local authority.
Whether or not a resident's scheme is in force is irrelevant. As stated above, this is not public highway (for VERA) as it is not maintained at public expense.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The way forward then is to speak to the Council it can be done discreetly...We know theres no traffic wardens to ask and it does not appear to have been a worry enough for other neigbours to complain...therefore this is the only option...unless I have missed something ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the area is council maintained as has been said...and therefore is a public road,then there will be the matter of no insurance-he cannot have valid insurance since the absence of a current MOT would invalidate it.

 

Vehicle insurance is not reliant upon the vehicle having an MOT, therefore the failure to have an MOT would not invalidate the insurance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...