Jump to content

Chesterexpress

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    520
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

144 Excellent

1 Follower

About Chesterexpress

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. If he has the v5c (logbook), then he can tax it using that, and therefore does not require the reminder notice.
  2. They carried out the tests in order to find the fault! Can't see what the problem is personally.
  3. I don't see that you have any recourse from the selling garage, due to the fact that you have had the vehicle for almost 12 months!
  4. Your "friend" got exactly what they deserved. Those who drive uninsured vehicles ought to have the vehicle sold and proceeds given to victims of crime and fined a minimum of £1000.
  5. Also in the cases quoted by GTM above, these were I beleive proved to be dealers selling multiple vehicles and not individuals selling there own personal car.
  6. At the most you ought to have received a PCN with contravention code 18 (as gtm quoted above). I honestly can't see that they would remove it without placing a 24 hour notice of intention to remove an abandoned vehicle, which in this case it most certainly doesn't sound as though it was abandoned. As for trading check out Onasanya v London Borough of Newham.
  7. Not sure why your insurance company would be assisting you with this, as nothing to do with them. However did you purchase this through a finance agreement? Is so then they are jointly and severely liable.
  8. Without wishing to stand up for whoever gave those tickets, how were they meant to know which vehicle was the first to park over the lines causing the others to have to do the same? Would be interested in knowing which station you got your ticket from.
  9. Spinner4, this ought to be in the parking forum. Will ask that it be moved, as you will get more response there.
  10. It has already been brought to the public's attention, it was splashed all over the national newspapers months ago. As usual good old auntie beeb is late with the news.
  11. Just because they have agreed to refund the charges imposed on you for you breaking your agreement with them, does not mean that they can or have to alter the factually correct information they gave the CRA's. In fact if they were to alter the information, then techically they would be committing fraud, because the original information was correct and still stands.
  12. Failing to display is a criminal offence and has nothing to do with DVLA. It is not the same as having an untaxed vehicle.
×
×
  • Create New...