Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

moved and getting snowed under with old owners DCA mail.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4969 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all, i have used this site for reference purposes previously, and i have read how a lot of you are threatened by these so called "debt collection" agencies threatening one thing or another. So now i feel it time to let you in on some of the "smoke & mirrors" tactics these companies use.

 

I have lived in my new property since last September, and of course the first couple of months i was returning to sender the previous occupiers mail. Most companies got the message, however some of them it seemed, the more i returned them the post the more they would send out in return, so now i have taken to opening the mail just to see exactly what it is they are so keen to share.

 

Undoubtedly they were from "debt collection" agencies, and i use that term very very loosely. More like harassment threatening agencies. I was going to ring them up to inform them of the change of occupier, but firstly i was not about to ring them on their 0870 numbers and secondly, after researching a couple of them on the Internet, and reading their "exemplary" ability to "track down debtors and gone aways" using "state of the art technology" i got to thinking just how long will they continue barking up the wrong tree?

 

So since December 2007 i started my unscientific experiment and collected all correspondence they were sending through the door, in the hope that one of their "Local agents" would in fact knock on the door and i would be able to hand the letters to him informing them of their incompetent mistake, and close the door grinning like a Cheshire cat!

To date not a single solitary "agent" "debt collector" or even Bailiff has so much as attempted to confirm who actually lives here!:confused:

 

The first letter i have is dated the 3rd September 2007, from a company calling themselves "Red debt collection services!

Then a very comical letter from "Robinson way and company Ltd" Claiming to have sent a "whole series of letters, telephone calls, and local representatives have repeatedly called at your address all with no success"

Well i hope you didn't pay for the representative because i can categorically say that, no-one has ever called at this address, nor rung, and that is the only letter to have been received from "Robinson way & co Ltd", because on the 8th October 2007 "Red debt collection services" sent another letter to say that they acting on behalf of their client "Lowell Portfolio I Ltd"

 

Then on the 5th November 2007"Lowell Financial" sent a letter asking for said debtor to get in touch on this freephone number 0800 0270194 to "confirm" the address details to be correct, if they did not hear anything then they would "assume" that the details were correct!

 

A letter on the 12th November, 21st November, a "Final Notice" on the 13th December, a "Final Demand" on the 20th December, (Merry Christmas) All from "Lowell Financial"

Then on New years Eve! (Happy New year!)"Hampton's Legal" feeling left out decided they ought to get in on the act by sending a letter on "behalf of our client Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd"

 

They then sent another letter on the 11th January 2008 a "Notice to issue a county court claim" on the 22nd January 2008, and followed by another letter this time from "Red debt collection services" on the 7th February who again re-iterated that they "had been appointed as the authorised debt collection agent for Lowell Portfolio"

And finally today i received another letter from "Red debt collection services" threatening that they were going to advise "their client Lowell Portfolio" to issue a claim in the county court! All and i mean ALL of the letters have threatened either court action, some form of legal action, bailiffs, door step collection agents, or "other means of collection?"

 

I know that i am on the outside looking in, and that i am in the fortunate position of not having this debt on my shoulders, and i can certainly see why people would be intimidated by these "malicious letters", but i have come to realise that, these letters are not generated by Human beings, they are simply computer driven printed automated standard letters, at a certain time spewing out the next level of threats in the hope that the recipient or debtor will make contact, if they don't the computer will simply wait an allotted period of time before printing of another malicious threatening letter.

 

That is Three companies chasing one person for the same debt, now either it is the same company just using different names, or they are contravening the Data protection act. I won't say that the left arm doesn't know what the right one is doing, but if you spend 5 or 10 minutes researching these companies who are chasing you for money, you would be mistaken in believing that they would know what you had had for breakfast and if you brushed your teeth today, it simply isn't so, they all talk the talk but very very few actually walk the walk, if there were any professionalism at all in these companies they would, at an instance, be able to tell that the previous occupier at this address has long gone. I for one have no intention of doing their work for them, they apparently have "sophisticated state of the art technology to trace debtors" Pull the other one it's got bell's on!

 

I hope that this may go some way in allaying peoples fears slightly that these bully's are'nt going to turn up kicking your door in in the middle of the night. If i get any further progress i will be sure to add it onto this site, but i won't hold my breath!

Edited by Bazooka Boo

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Well Said Boo, well said!

 

I think the funniest line I have ever seen in the much publicised twaddle was "Valid even if not read by you".

OK-dokey, we'll see how long that stands up in court.

 

I totally concur with your point of view. I recently found out that a certain DCA had sent no less than 6 letters to me regarding the same account over a two year period.....despite being informed by the incumbent occupier that I had ceased to reside at that address, 3 TIMES!!!

 

One such epistle even said 'If this letter is not correctly addressed to you, please call us to let us know that the addressee is incorrect?

Say what?

 

That DCA claimed that I had ignored them. Not quite, as I never knew that they had been sent. Apparently, it was my duty to inform the DCA that I had moved out. Except, I moved out before the DCA was allegedly assigned to collect the debt.

 

Sorry mateys, my crystal ball seems to be malfunctioning, I could not have known that you would be assigned. The original creditor was certainly informed of my movements.

 

Brings me on to another point - I was brought up never to open anyone elses mail. (Not that I am being accusatory Boo, just making the point.)

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

these companies are all linked and by linked i mean that nobby sits at 1 table as lowells , behind him sits nobby who is lowell portfolio behind him sits nobby who is red debt and behind him you guessed it sits nobby who is hamptons , all of them couldnt string a sentance together , they are the dullest lowest form of pondlife you will ever come across .

The last time I looked the only people who can arrest you were the police and there too busy catching speeding motorists .

They are nothing but bullies , i would love to meet face to face these imberciles and then let them sprout their drivel about how we have to speak to them because we owe them money (alledgedely), how we are going to prison for owing 200 on a card (yeh right ) DCA are bullies , dont let them win , dont give them what they want , if you are going to pay them only pay what you can afford , if you are not sure if you owe them or if they are legally obliged to collect a debt then read this site , it has all the answers and can really help you.

CAG v DCA CAG EVERYTIME

CAG v dca

 

CAG EVERYTIME .....

KEEP RIGHT ON TILL THE END OF THE ROAD ........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lowell Farcical/Lowell Portfolio/Red Debt Collection/Hamptons iLegal are all tentacles of the one company. They pretend to be different people in the hope that they will sound important. All it is is the same threats differently compiled sent out bu the same Sinclair ZX80 computer. The only manual intervention is when the call centre monkey with the braincell replaces Lowell notepaper with Red Debt notepaper. Some of the threats seem to emminate from their state of the ark threat printing facilty in the salubrious Bellshill area near Glasgow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ODC .... Please don't be offensive to monkeys by comparing them to 'Collections Analysts'. Thank you.

 

I have to go feed the paper into the threat-o-matic now, I may be gone for some time.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brings me on to another point - I was brought up never to open anyone elses mail. (Not that I am being accusatory Boo, just making the point.)

 

I also agree Simon, however after returning numerous letters back to them initially, and after they insisted on continuing sending them, i felt that as this is now my property i had every right to open mail addressed here, if only to see what or indeed who i might be expected to encounter on my doorstep. And should the need arise for me to obtain credit, and in the event that it was refused, i would be able to understand why. But as is their lack of Professionalism i wholly expect this to run and run, gives me something to look forward to in the mornings when the postie delivers!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can get the post office to redirect them before they are delivered to you, take the letters down and speak to somebody in person and they can go through the process. I think it costs £15 but at least it lets the DCA morons know it is NOT somebody at the address returning mail but a legal entity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you can ask the post office to redirect mail, do they always comprehend? NO, ive lived here 14yr this yr and still get post for the woman that owned the house all of those years ago, i used to put them back in the post for approx the first 18mth, then contacted the PO and explained, but i still receive her mail to this day which i now just bin. My ex husband has been gone 4 yr come oct, same route taken with his mail, only his is either binned or i DO open court papers as im not being dragged down by him again

honey x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of the threats seem to emminate from their state of the ark threat printing facilty in the salubrious Bellshill area near Glasgow.

 

The "If undelivered please return to blah blah Bellshill/Motherwell" is a bit of a con, my good man.

 

They use this address for their victims in Scotland, in an attempt to add a bit of credibility to their home visit threat. I mean, an address in Leeds is of no interest to anyone north of the border where the rules of the game are slightly different anyway.

 

How do I know there's nothing really there?? Because at one time I was resident astonshingly close to the place from whence these threats supposedly came. This was long before I had any dealings with them, but a work colleague went there with every intention of "kicking his @rse so hard he'll be wearing it for a hat" only to suffer the extreme disappointment of finding he'd been denied his chance of justice and conned...yet again.

 

If someone wants to jog my memory of the address, it might be possible for my little spy network to have a gander, but I'm already more than a little confident you'll find it's part of the smoke and mirrors trick.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm doing the same with HFO Services in Wimbledon, I have 20 minutes between trains if I miss one and will take my digital camera and find out if their offices are as 'glossy' as they portray. In fact I am pretty certain they are somewhere different and the address is just a 'postal service' place.... might do that tomorrow as I should have my camera with me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Ive reported Lowell To the Serious Fraud Office as I suggest you all do.

 

Having asked for them to show the deed of assignment in wirting and discussing it with them on the phone asking them why they haven't replied and failed to legally follow my complaint they duly closed my "account"

 

Writing off the debt I supposedly owed.

 

 

This company has made 10 million from basically bullying and threatening people into submission when in fact they have got a legal leg to stand on.

 

It has become more apprarent day by day that many of us here have seen them not turning up at court or not responding to legal letters simple because in FACT they DO NOT have the deed of assingment and therefore cannot prove they own the debt.

 

So they are obtaining money by deception and furthermore demanding money by menace.

 

THE SFO are very interested indeed.

 

And especially seen as a winding up order has been served on RED debt collections

 

MY Advice

 

Ignore their letters ignore their calls , record eveything times dates, phone calls and report to

 

Trading standards

FSA

OFT

SFO

 

Everyone should report them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Does anybody know if they also have a branch at PO Box 8743, bellshill, ML4 3WU. They are a pest!

If you live in Scotland or Northern Ireland they sometimes use envelopes with this return address on them to make you think they are have a Sottish branch. Just another of their childish games. This Bellshill address is used by several DCAs. The address in fact refers to a rather run down industrial estate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just posted a letter back to that very branch in Bellshill, they keep chasing somebody who doesn't live where I work - it's offices - I'm just waiting for their promised 'we will call' person. I'd seriously give them some grief.

 

Letter had clearly showing on the envelope 24866FANDF and then 4900 as another code against the barcode.

 

Stupid idiots.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I found these forums by googling Hamptons legal.

 

I received two letters today, one from Hamptons and one from Lowell Portfolio 1

 

Hamptons reads on the reverse of the envelope:

 

PO BOX 204

Leeds

LS11 1BH

 

Interestingly (I am based in Bristol) the one from Lowell Portfolio 1 reads:

 

PO Box 511

Bradley Stoke

Bristol

BS34 9BH

 

They traced me to my new address, to be honest i wasnt hiding from them anyways, we reached a stalemate the last time i dealt with them (2001/2002) as they were unable to provide a copy of my original credit agreement or what the debt was actually for.

 

It Starts. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

No it doesn't start :D

 

If the last time they contacted you or you made any payment to this debt was 2001/2 then it is Statute Barred and they can politely sod off

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...