Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Standard form being sent to large numbers of claimants. Just answer as the form asks.  No need to  go into any detail, unless the forms asks for specific details of how health impacts on daily activities. If you are worried contact Citizens Advice as they are experts with PIP, as they are trained to understand what evidence is required for assessments.
    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Weightmans/HFC County Court Claim


Hopeful1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Background:

 

Had made payments to W'mans over a period of time - not sure how long.

 

Had missed a few payments but not heard from them for a few months at the beginning of last year.

 

Joined this site and sent a CCA request.

 

No response 'til approx 5 months later to say didn't have docs, they'd asked HFC for them and would send them on.

 

Sent SAR to both companies. Still waiting for HFC, W'mans said they can't send me that info.

 

Have been perturbed by the fact that W'mans have taken money from me but have not provided me with any record of it.

 

Have had letters asking me to sign a voluntary charging order. I refused based on their CCA non compliance.

 

I heard nothing from them until yesterday to say county court proceedings had been issued. There were also threads of bailiffs and attachment orders etc

 

Today i have received the court forms :(

 

I need to be clear that i will be happy to pay this debt.

 

I just wanted to establish the true balance and to clarify whether any charges or PPI had been added to the loan.

 

I also wanted to ensure that W'mans had a legal entitlement to collect the debt. They have caused me much upset in the past prior to me joining this site with threats of charging orders and pressure to make payments i could not afford.

 

I wrote complaints about the actions of W'mans last night, which will still go off today. The above points in bold are included in the letters.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 403
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Particulars of Claim:

 

Breach of Agreement pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

(1) The Defendant entered into a written agreement with the Claimant. This agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

(2) The Defendent is indebted to the Claimant in the sum of 11881.60 and in the respect of the said agreement under account number ********* and maintained by the defendent at the Claimant's Branch and the sum of 1674.11 in respect of costs under the said agreement.

 

(3) In breach of the said agreement, the defendant failed to make payment in accordance with the agreed payment terms and the Claimant issued and serve a Default Notice upon the Defendant and pursuant to Section 87 (i) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

(4) By letter from the Claimant to the Defendant, the Claimant demanded repayment of the said sum, but the Defendant has failed to repay the sum.

 

(5) On the premises, the Defendant is indebted to the Claimant in the sum of 13555.71.

 

(6) The claimant therefore claims the balance due under the agreement.

 

Amount claimed 12357.71

Court fee 190.00

Solicitors costs 100.00

Total amount 12647.71

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, i can respond on moneyclaim. I can't defend anything until i have the account details.

 

Bearing in mind i will be happy to repay what i owe WHEN i have all the paperwork which option do i tick to acknowledge the claim?

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the XXXX County Court

Claimant -v- (YOUR NAME)

Claim Number: (CLAIM NUMBER)

 

 

Dear XXX

 

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

I have received a recent court claim from your organisation. In order to file a defence and counter claim I require some information. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below.

 

The information must be furnished within fourteen days of the receipt of this letter. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

 

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

b. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with *********.(AMEND TO THE COMPANY NAME)

c. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

d.Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

e. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

f. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

g. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

h. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

i. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

 

 

I will require this information within the next fourteen days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

XXXX (type, don't sign).

 

 

Right Hopeful1

 

Get that in the post via special delivery asap to them,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really think it's time this shower were reported to the SRA :mad: .... there are so many threads on here lately about Weigjhtman's going ahead with County Court claims in the absence of any/inadequate docs. from HFC...and all to secure a charge on property, as I see it.

 

If you don't own property, HFC will farm it out to another bunch of chancers instead....

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do you have proof of delivery for the CCA request?

 

do you have any letters from them telling you they dont have an agreement?

 

anything else that could be useful? even if you dont think it is at the time;)

 

 

Hi Paul - you're a Godsend!! (and i'm not that religious :D )

 

***Does the letter go to Weightmans?

 

I have all letters which i put together last night for the complaint.

 

Weightmans always write that they do not have the doumentation but have requested it from their client.

 

Their letters are always very brief and never name refer to anything i've requested by name.

 

I also have the recorded delivery slips for my letters. I'll go on the Royal Mail site over the weekend and print off the delivery proofs.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really think it's time this shower were reported to the SRA :mad: .... there are so many threads on here lately about Weigjhtman's going ahead with County Court claims in the absence of any/inadequate docs. from HFC...and all to secure a charge on property, as I see it.

 

If you don't own property, HFC will farm it out to another bunch of chancers instead....

 

 

Hi P1. I had a look at their website last night and they BOAST about the claims they put through Northampton.

 

I am so cross at their arrogance. I'm on my way to post complaints to TS, FOS and the Legal Complaints Services. I'm not going down quietly.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes send it to weightmans

 

that's cool if you have the documents, it makes life a little easier to deal with and they cant try and bluff their way out by saying they never received your letters etc

 

 

the only thing to bear in mind is that this could easily end up going before a judge, if your local to me then i would be happy to go to the court with you , but if your not then you have to remember that we can give you the arguments but ultimately it will be you that needs to put the case across in court

 

but like most of these cases,its very much winable

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes send it to weightmans

 

that's cool if you have the documents, it makes life a little easier to deal with and they cant try and bluff their way out by saying they never received your letters etc

 

 

the only thing to bear in mind is that this could easily end up going before a judge, if your local to me then i would be happy to go to the court with you , but if your not then you have to remember that we can give you the arguments but ultimately it will be you that needs to put the case across in court

 

but like most of these cases,its very much winable

regards

paul

 

Thanks Paul.

 

The letter's amended and printed.

 

Thanks for your support. I'm in Birmingham so not that close unfortunately. I may look to one of the free advisory services in the 1st instance and then consider costs of defending etc.

 

I really don't think they should be allowed to do this.

 

I have copies of numerous requests for the agreement. I should have complained about them earlier.

 

We shall see what happens. Over the course of the week i shall look at all my options and also see what comes out of my complaints.

 

I will be telling anyone and everyone about their behaviour - enough is enough.

 

Must get to the post office!!

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last question - what do i do about acknowledging the claim - i can't see on the letter how long i have to do this?

 

Thank you very much for your time :)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing too (((hugs)))

 

and sending oodles of supportive thoughts x

 

Stand firm Hopeful1 - I know its daunting at first when you receive court papers cos I know how I felt when I got mine, but as Paul said its winnable, you just need to be one step ahead of/a darn sight more determined than, and more professional than they will EVER be, and now show them up for the utter plonkers that they are :mad:

 

Love SG x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing - I always remember a phrase from one of their letters which was "we really do not understand why you do not settle this claim" (around 10k). They must have had a lot of fun with that one.

 

Good luck

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Subscribing to this thread now,,I am in almost exact same situation with these losers,,HFC have supplied me with a copy of application. I think for every ten people that they threaten at least nine must give in and sign up to a charge on their property. I'll probably be a few weeks behind you at court,,

 

Take care and chin up,,

 

C xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

BB and SG - you are my everfaithful. Thank you Cashins and Cups for subscribing too - the more the merrier :p

 

Cups - let me know how you get on. If you have a thread, post your link so i can follow your progress too. I think you are quite right about the number who must agree to the COs. I won't be without a fight. If i lose, at least i can say i've tried. I've no plans to sell the house for a while, so they will have to wait either way.

 

As well as the letter to Weightmans, complaints have also been faxed and posted inbetween family visits and all the other weekend stuff that goes on :D It's my little one's 5th b'day at the end of the week, with a party to prepare for too, so a busy week ahead!

 

Thanks again everyone.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain.

 

At the risk of revealing how thick i am :eek: , can i just clarify the dates:

 

on moneyclaimonline it say i have to respond within 14 days of service.

The date of service is taken as 5 days after the issue date of the N1.

 

So (bear with me):

 

Issue date 13th Feb.

Date of service classed as 18th Feb.

Response to N1 would have to be made by about the 3rd March?

 

Have i understood that bit right? I just don't want to risk shooting myself in the foot before i get there.

 

Thank you in advance to any takers ;)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, acknowledge service and you get a further 14 days.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, acknowledge service and you get a further 14 days.

 

At this stage do i have to say whether i am defending part of the claim? Or is it literally just to say, yep i've got it?

 

I'm so uncertain because i don't know what is on the account and whether i will find whether there are charges because so far, they've not supplied me with the info.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this stage do i have to say whether i am defending part of the claim? Or is it literally just to say, yep i've got it?

I'm so uncertain because i don't know what is on the account and whether i will find whether there are charges because so far, they've not supplied me with the info.

 

Hiya Hopeful1

 

You'll be doing the same as me won't you? Defending this whole claim because it is not proved that you owe it as no paperwork has been provided as per your requests (CCA etc)? If I've misunderstood here please feel free to give me a cyber-kick up the bottom LOL.

 

Have a look on my thread because I got loads of help with filling in the AQ (wording etc) from Chris & the others ;)

 

Love SG x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SG - you're right, i haven't had any paperwork, so as far as i am aware, they have no right to take this action.

 

I am unsure because i have said i will be happy to negotiate payment when i've seen what charges etc have been added. I just want to fight the charging order.

 

On Tomterms help thread he suggests defending all when acknowledging service. I'm assuming i can change this if needed? Oh dear, i'm such a dimwit with this legal stuff :o

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SG - you're right, i haven't had any paperwork, so as far as i am aware, they have no right to take this action.

 

I am unsure because i have said i will be happy to negotiate payment when i've seen what charges etc have been added. I just want to fight the charging order.

 

On Tomterms help thread he suggests defending all when acknowledging service. I'm assuming i can change this if needed? Oh dear, i'm such a dimwit with this legal stuff :o

 

To have a legal right to claim this debt they MUST BE ABLE TO PRODUCE A VALID CREDIT AGREEMENT

 

 

if they cant then they are whistling in the wind.

 

now if you have CCA'd them and they have failed to comply, that is grounds enough to defend in full. plus the fact that you were prepared to negotiate can only go in your favor

 

i suggest that you defend in full at this stage, we can cite their failure to supply the documentation as unreasonable and their bringing the claim while in default is wholly unreasonable and vexatious

Link to post
Share on other sites

To have a legal right to claim this debt they MUST BE ABLE TO PRODUCE A VALID CREDIT AGREEMENT

 

 

if they cant then they are whistling in the wind.

 

now if you have CCA'd them and they have failed to comply, that is grounds enough to defend in full. plus the fact that you were prepared to negotiate can only go in your favor

 

i suggest that you defend in full at this stage, we can cite their failure to supply the documentation as unreasonable and their bringing the claim while in default is wholly unreasonable and vexatious

 

 

Thanks Paul. You've clarified that for me. I had the legal aspect and "i don't mind paying what i owe" bit very confuddled.

 

I've not actually tried to negotiate payments yet. That would have been my next step AFTER receiving all my docs.

 

I shall now go onto moneyclaim, i'll feel better when i've acknowlwedged things. I had very little sleep last night.

 

Thanks again.

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no worries

 

if they do produce a valid credit agreement then we can ask the judge to take into consideration the fact that they failed to supply the documentation when asked, they ignored the law and forged ahead with legal action while they were not entitled to do so as s77(4) & 78(6) both set out the fact that while in default of a cca request they are not allowed to enforce the debt

 

it may even be the case that they judge kicks their ass out of court so try not to worry, its not worth worrying about at this stage

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...