Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mrs Sharpman V Littlewoods


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4626 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

GM

Below is the link to the Information Commissioners Office information on data protection issues.

Data Protection Act documentation - Information Commissioners Office

 

Below is the information i refered to in my last post. relevant point is highlighted

 

SAR Coded entries highlite .pdf

 

Hope this helps

 

Sharpman

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 126
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah it kinda does it just iam having a issue ATM re a SAR and studio cards.

 

They havecredited the money to my account and sent trading statement.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then, I think they haven't realy complied with what a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

 

 

Taken from 'DATA PROTECTION ACT - SUBJECT ACCESS - A GUIDE FOR DATA SUBJECTS - Pamphlet No2'

From the Information Commisioners website -

 

Data Protection Act documentation - ICO

 

 

WHAT WILL BE SENT TO ME?

You are entitled to be told IF any personal

data are held about you AND, if so:

• to be given a description of the data;

• to be told for what purposes the data are

processed; and

• to be told the recipients or the classes of

recipients to whom the data may have

been disclosed.

This information should include what sort of

data are held, the purposes for which the

data are processed and the type of

organisation or people to whom the data

may be disclosed.

You are also entitled:

• to be given a copy of the information with

any unintelligible terms explained;

• to be given any information available to the

data controller about the source of the data;

• to be given an explanation as to how any

automated decisions taken about you have

been made; and

• if you have specifically requested it, the

logic involved in any automated decisions.

The data controller has an obligation to

provide the information in permanent form.

This means that the information may be

sent as a computer print out, in a letter or

on a form unless the supply of such a copy is

not possible, would involve disproportionate

effort, or you agree otherwise.

It will be a question of fact in each case as to

whether the supply of information in permanent

form amounts to “disproportionate effort”.

 

Send the a Letter stating that the information you requested is still lacking.

 

They have to give reasons why information has not been supplied except in certain circumstances, which is covered in that pdf I linked.

 

IS THE DATA CONTROLLER ENTITLED TO WITHHOLD ANY INFORMATION?

There are circumstances where a data

controller may find that, in complying with a

subject access request, information will be

disclosed relating to an individual other than

a data subject. Unless that individual

consents to the disclosure of the

information or it is reasonable in all the

circumstances to comply with the request

without the consent of the other individual,

the data controller is entitled to withhold the

information from the data subject.

There are other circumstances in which a

data controller may withhold information

from a data subject which are set out in the

Act, details of which may be found under the

heading “your information rights” of the

Commissioner’s website

Information Commissioner's Office - ICO

or in the Legal Guidance which is also available

on the website. These publications are also

available from the Commissioner’s Office.

 

They have 40 days from the day the recieved payment and the request.

 

WHAT CAN I DO IF THE DATA CONTROLLER DOES NOT COMPLY WITH MY SUBJECT

ACCESS REQUEST?

If the data controller fails to respond to your

request within 40 days, or fails to respond

to your satisfaction, and you have sent all

the information required to the data

controller to enable him to deal with your

request, including the fee, you should send

the data controller a reminder by recorded

delivery, keeping a copy of your letter.

If you still do not receive a reply fairly quickly

or if you think that the information you

receive is wrong or incomplete you may:

• ask the Commissioner to carry out an

assessment as to whether it is likely or

unlikely that the data controller is

processing your personal data in

compliance with the terms of the Act;

• pursue the matter yourself through the

court. For information as to how to do

this please refer to the leaflet called

“Taking a case to court”.

An assessment will inform you as to whether

the matters that concern you are likely to

involve a breach of the Act and may help you

in making a decision as to whether to take

legal action against a data controller under

the Act. However, an assessment from the

Commissioner is not necessary to take a

case to court.

 

WHAT ORDERS CAN THE COURT MAKE?

If a court is satisfied that a data controller

has failed to comply with a subject access

request contrary to the provisions of the

Act, the court may order him to comply with

such a request. The court also has the

power to award compensation.

 

Hope this helps

 

Sharpman

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them a letter, attach the original SAR, inform them that they haven't complied.

 

Add this little sentence in your letter:

 

If you do not normally handle these

requests for your organisation, please

pass this letter to your Data Protection

Officer or another appropriate officer

 

That should, well in an ideal world, prompt a better response.

 

They have 40 days from the original request so clock is ticking.

 

Sharpman.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

I am rewording the letter as we speak.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

well i sent both my littlewoods SARs in exactly 40 days ago. trust me they like to play it close to the line as this morning just b4 i was about to adjust the letters to hurry them up a thud came threw the door which was a package from littlewoods containing full details of both S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) requests.

 

There 40 days was up today so u may wanna wait a bit patient the original request was made on the 21st August.

 

You will need a translator for some of it and will need to be able to read threw account numbers and details.

 

Also they will send u a list of abbreviations which will only contain some of them.

 

Hope this has been some help.

 

GM

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

GM,

an off topic question. its concerning user signatures.

I notice, as yours does that there are some users that have signatures at the end of a post.

 

I've ticked the box to display my signature, but it doesn't seem to work. Mind you on the odd occasion it does appear, strange, and i can't figure out what i've done different in those particular posts.

 

Any ideas.

 

Sharpman

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason is because we are not site team

 

the site team only has there signatures, if they have one, displayed on every post. Us normal ppl has them displayed on the odd one or two.

 

Hope this helps.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it does but its the normal really.

 

GM.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i never recieved that.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No what they will do is post to u everything they have in there comps which means u will recieve statements etc.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

Recieved S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) .....ish

 

for the life of me I can't figure out how they've shown payments into the account.

 

Trying to figure out how much has actualy been payed to them.

 

Any one else had a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) from littlewoods, if so did any one manage to decifer payments into account. There doesn't seem to be any order to the printouts.

 

Oh, and they've so kindly assigned the debt to phoenix recoveries the day they sent the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) back.

 

strange that.

 

if Pt is in the vicinity could he pop his head round the door, need to ask a question about something mentioned previously on this thread.

 

Sharpman.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

whatdo u need help with sharpman?

 

i can decifer the sar i got, just.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GM

 

A quick Q, They show extracare 500 of various figures. My O/H swears she didn't request this.

 

Now, I know for a fact they don't have the CCA for the account in question, because on the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) they made a note of destruction when the bullied my o/h into converting it into a fixed sum credit agreement, sadly they can produce that.

 

Now, is it worth trying for a refund on all the extracare 500 entries as it almost comes to what is outstanding on the account.

 

I have an entry :

 

dd/mm pay -1774.35

 

Arrears -771.28

 

then in the comments and query details at the bottom of the sheet there is an entry

Date Class Eff Date Text

dd/mm/yyyy (same date as above) Age Same Date Incentive Scheme

Restriction Invoked on Transaction £1746.01 A991

dd/mm/yyyy SPPD Exceeds Maximum Permitted

 

That's one of many that I need some help with

 

Sharpman

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

as GM said, only the Site teams posts carry their signature on every post,

 

 

 

And I can perfectly understand that as the site signatures are of issues that are relevant to the site - not just the usual crud that fills the teenybopper forums (note, this is not a teenybopper forum!!)

 

I actually find it a lot easier to read the threads without signatures all over the place :)

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Sharpman.

 

Yes you can ask for a refund of all the extracare500, thats there insurance policy for those who dont know, as if you cant say u were offered it and you cant say u agreed to it then they should not be charging it.

 

I know when ever i had a acc i was not offered it and as a result when i noticed it being charged on my acc, the first 6 mths were free acc to my sar, I claimed every penny back.

 

Now re the entry i have an idea that it might be that someone tried to charge a item of that amount to the account.

 

What does there codes book say for some of it.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi GM,

 

well looked at the extracare 500 entries and it comes to about £589+ The charges added to account come to about £187+

 

Can I claim the interest as well? if so which interest rate would I use.

 

in the case of the Fixed loan agreement there is an APR of 29.9, would I use that for the fixed loan charges.?

 

In the case of the extracare entries what, if any, interest would be allowable.?

 

The figures without interest would wipe the slate clean with some change for a couple of cups of coffee.

 

With interest it would cover it and then almost the same again, depending on what interest is the norm.

 

your views appreciated.

 

Sharpman.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...