Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We need to see the actual document from the IAS where it is written - "The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." You can't just type it up yourself. At the hearing in July or August or whenever the judge will have two Witness Statements. One from Bank's director says you never made a second appeal. You say you did make a second appeal and the IAS concluded that payment was made. The judge will immediately twig that either you or the director is lying.  But who? Fail to show the documentation form the IAS and instead just produce something you've typed yourself will make it look like you just made up the appeal and you are lying and you will lose the case. Please let us see what the IAS adjudicator sent.
    • I used to have a retail outlet in London selling my husband's photography.  We also had a co-op with staff so they weren't directly employed by me, but I paid for the other overheads etc.  When my husband died, I carried on as usual for a while but then I became ill and moved quite far away so logistically was becoming very difficult.  I came to an arrangement (verbal) with one of the guys I trusted, that I would send him the images to print and sell as normal, and I wouldn't take any money, as a short term solution until I got back on my feet and worked out the best way to do things. He would pay all the  rent, insurance etc... Over a year later, not able to give things away for free anymore,  I drew up a contract as a wholesale agreement, so I would get everything printed and sent to him and I would invoice his for what he ordered. I noticed form the beginning that he wasn't ordering enough or frequently enough to be making any money, and was suspicious he was doing his own orders on the sly and ordering just enough from me to keep my happy.  I checked with my printer, which I've been with for 20 years, and he sad he wasn't getting orders for my images from anyone else. I emailed a few other printers to ask them to keep a look out for some images but I soon realised this would be impossible to police.  The only option really would be to buy a print from him and check the stamp on the back of it.  I finally managed to get hold of on the prints on sale, and sure enough, he did not order it through me.   In the contract he signed in 2022 it explicitly states that he must destroy all files I had previously sent him etc etc so e is in breach of that.  When I drew up the contract, I was careful to make sure it was legally binding, but before I let rip at him, I need to know where I stand.  The contract is here: PARTIES This WHOLESALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of 30th June, 2022, by and between ############################## The Supplier and the Client, collectively referred to as the "Parties," hereby agree to the following terms: TERMS AND CONDITIONS SALES OF GOODS The Supplier agrees to provide the following goods to the Client (“Goods”): Description of Goods ################################# Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b BOTH PARTIES AGREE: The Client purchases the Goods through the Supplier directly, and agrees to delete/destroy any previously held digital images (Goods) owned by the Supplier, and agrees not to use any such files for monetary gain, outside of this agreement, either directly or through a third party from immediate effect of this agreement. The Client purchases the other materials necessary for resale of the Goods independently of this agreement. The Client shall have exclusive rights for resale of Goods at ###########, and also with permission, as a retailer of the Goods elsewhere, provided that there is no conflict of interest between the Supplier and the Client. The Client is free to decide their own retail prices, for the Goods. The Supplier shall use #####  to provide the printed Goods on Fujifilm Crystal Archive paper, with Lustre finish, and will not use any other Printer unless #### cease to trade, without prior approval from the Client. The Supplier shall not impose restrictions on size or frequency of orders made by the Client. The prices provided by the Supplier shall not increase for a minimum of 3 years, unless the prices of the raw materials rise, in which case the client will be informed immediately. Any discounts/promotional prices of raw materials shall be passed on to the Client by the Supplier, and the invoice will show adjustments for this, as well as credit for return postage of any damaged goods. This agreement can be terminated by the Client without notice; the Supplier must give notice of no less than 90 days, unless the terms of the agreement are breached, in which case, the agreement can be terminated with immediate effect. PAYMENT Orders must be paid for upon receipt of invoice, via Bank transfer: ######### Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b DELIVERY AND INSPECTIONS All orders received by 12.00am (midnight) shall be processed by the Supplier the following working day and delivery of order shall arrive in accordance with the Royal Mail schedule, or DPD, should express delivery be requested. The Client shall be liable for the delivery charge which shall be added to the invoice. The Goods will be delivered to the address specified by the Client. The Client shall be provided with order tracking, and should any problems arise with the ordering system or the couriers (Royal Mail, DPD), the Client shall be informed without delay of any such issues. The Client will inspect the Goods and report any defects or damage to the Goods in transit as soon as possible upon receipt of Goods, and will retain damaged Goods for return to Supplier for refund/replacement. GENERAL PROVISIONS CONFIDENTIALITY The prices of the Goods and other information contained in this Agreement is confidential and will not be disclosed by either party unless with prior written consent of the other party. INDEMNIFICATION The Client indemnifies the Supplier from any claims, liabilities, and expenses made by any third party vendors or customers of the Client. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with UK Law. ACCEPTANCE Both parties understand and accept the wholesale arrangement stipulated under this Agreement. Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Wholesale Agreement as of the day and year set forth above.   Signed by us both electronically.   I haven't broached any of this yet, and I am looking for some advice about what action to take.  The main issue I've got is that he has still go those images.  If I terminate the contract, I will need to know that he no longer has those images and I can't think of a bulletproof way to do this. I'm thinking I might tell him I will continue with the contract but ask for a  sum in damages and say that if I find out he's still doing it down the line I will terminate the contract and sue him for damages. The damages side of things I'm not sure how it would work as he is self employed, and I'm positive he doesn't declare all of his earnings to HMRC, in order to find out how much I have lost, would the court demand to go through his tax self assessments?  I'm not sure how to proceed with this, I don't want to lose that place as an outlet as it is in a prime spot in London, which is why I let him have those images in the first place as I would have had to pull out altogether at that point.  I am regretting it somewhat now though.  Please help.
    • I cannot locate anything in my paper work that states 2 payments were made? Perhaps you could point this out? In reply from IAS it states "The ticketing data has been attached" nothing was sent to me. I made a response to the IAS all this was done online
    • Thanks again for your responses. The concern I have here, is that freeholder of the land (a company, who presumably would have been the ones to have initially instructed PPM to manage the parking here), will have proof of exactly how long the vehicle was on site for, as the driver was meeting operatives from that company on a separate matter. On this basis, if the matter was to get to court, I feel all the other technicalities about signage, size of signage/font, lack of start/finish times, will not be enough to have any case dropped? This PCN was brought up to the freeholder but they have advised that PPM will not waive this charge. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

UK Debts - Living Abroad


davedebt
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4216 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Exactly, the bankruptcy can be enforced in

 

I realise you are trying to be helpful but what you have said so far is really so wrong I would laugh if it wasn't for the fact that someone may take your advice and get seriously damaged because of it.

 

very constructive comment ..... may be you shoud revise your preconception and cliche a bit further before making sweeping statement on my ability to to tell him what i actually experience while living in france

 

Moreover I didn't know by suggesting to him that to ask for a CCA to see if they have any legal right to collect the debt was very funny and badly advised , so it could challenge them and negotiate properly a reduce settlement if he can !! i have never say as well that i was an expert on british law insolvency far from it.

 

if you have read carefully my post i did suggested that it was possible to enforce a statutory demand however you have chosen to overlook this fact ... i should have made myself a bit clearer ....

 

however that to trace the debt abroad will be , i think ,quite expensive things to do ... so i know for a fact that for small debt some company just decide to write it off. I have seen this by myself a lot of this going on when i was living in france. it may have change now perhaps.

i have seen also some rather large debt being pursue which is another thing.

 

however when he will open a bank account in france, the bak may, and i think they will, decide to contact his english bank to check his credit. i kjnwo this is what happened to me, both in Uk and in France. This is what i said, wait for it, to him don't ignore it !!!! as tghey coudl enforce it in Uk and if for whatewver reasonas to come bak ot live inUk it will have to face it.. but again this was overlook also.... i suggested even further that they may engage proceeding infrance by folowing the law , as i could not see englishlaw being enforce outside their jurisdiction i know european law can ... this was again overlook.... or maybe misread

 

i even mentioned that there is a lot of people far more knowledgeable than me..... and that he coudl sek their advise... i implied that my opinion is no legal advise but what i experienced personally myself, and trust me i know quite few people that i have actually done that with not so much problem.

 

i may get a backlash but well for the sake of this post for the purpose i willtell you my personal experience with debt contracted in france... when i was younger and very careless to say the least .. i contracted an overdraft. however as a student i couldn't repaid it so i moved back to UK. my french bank passed my file to the banque of france to get it "bankrupt". However i did receive some threat, phone call and letters . i choose to ignore them for quite a while. so after getting some advice ,i was told that i have two option i could choose to ignore it as it will be expensive for them t recoup what i actually owed or i coud make them a FUlland Final settlemnt which i did and they were not happy so they passed into the banque de france and to date well i haven't seen any kind of enforcement being placed while i was living in UK. they were threateming me with bailiff action as apparently they had a court order from a french court ( thisw was probably a lie fromthe french DCA) .... well iam still waiting of them to turn up after 20 years ... so you see it is not the cleverest things i have ever done far from it.

 

when i go bak to france, ihave met some peole who have doen just that , they met get letter but well they choose to ignoreit.. it is morally wrong i know .. but i am not their conscience and they know the risk if they to go back to live in UK .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being abroad, I can't afford to keep going back to UK for courts

 

Why would you need to? Many english courts are willing to deal with cases by teleconference.

 

In terms of tracing debtors, IIRC, the two big credit reference agencies in england also operate in France, and so - I presume - for a DCA tracing would not be that difficult.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't argue about this !!, I welcome everyones advice and I did ask for anyones experience of a similiar situation in my original post.

 

Just to clear up any confusion, it is a personal credit card not a business card debt.

 

I think we all agree that exploring the CCA request route first would be advisable. I am concerned that they might get a CCJ against me in my absence, I am unaware of teleconferencing and how that might work.

 

I was really hoping that someone could shed some light on probability that they would chase the debt outside the UK. AIC have been calling and sending letters for about a year so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They know where you are so they're more likely to chase you than if they hadn't got a clue where you'd gone. That said they're less likely to chase you as you're not in the UK, but it is £12,000. Depends on how hungry they are...

 

Yes, do the CCA and check they have a valid, enforceable agreement.

 

If they do have an enforceable agreement you should then do the SAR to check what unlawful charges have been levied - and they shouldn't try getting a CCJ if the account is in dispute.

 

Both of these things mean giving them an address... but if the debt is enforceable then.... we've been through that...

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They know where you are so they're more likely to chase you than if they hadn't got a clue where you'd gone. That said they're less likely to chase you as you're not in the UK, but it is £12,000. Depends on how hungry they are...

 

Yes, do the CCA and check they have a valid, enforceable agreement.

 

If they do have an enforceable agreement you should then do the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to check what unlawful charges have been levied - and they shouldn't try getting a CCJ if the account is in dispute.

 

Both of these things mean giving them an address... but if the debt is enforceable then.... we've been through that...

 

 

Thanks bb, I will try the CCA route first, I have a strong feeling but can't remember, that the card was kust issued to me as an upgrade of my account. My only regret is using friends address in UK don't want idiots turning up and hassling them anymore

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's fair to say that davedebt, like all users, should check out any advice given before deciding which, if any to use. Everyone is trying to help, so I agree with dave, please don't argue.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Here is a rough guide to my pridicament. I am in Spain with uk debts of 30k spread over 5 credit cards. I have been chased by every dca in the uk for 5 years, threatened with doorstep calls, bankruptcy and anything else you can think of. Cabot was one of the more persistant ones. I did tell them all my Spanish address so I was not trying to avoid them. I did not write to any of them at all in response to their letters. One dca even passed it to a Madrid dca. All the debts are now, or about to be SB. The long and short of it in my opinion is that in order to take legal action over here they need a CCJ in uk. To get this they need a UK address not last known address as they know I'm in Spain. In short there is naff all they can do. Before anyone starts calling me for evading my debts, you don't know the situation and all were offered payment when I lived in the UK but all got very nasty when I told them I was moving to Spain in a few months so I gave them a take it of leave it, and they left it. I have no qualms about stiching up dca's cos the things they did are worse than what any low life would do. They call on friends, family and neighbours at home and work when they have absolutely nothing to do with the case then they tell them that they can be liable. We all know that's not true but someone who doesn't know can be worried to death by them. SCUMBAGS!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
If they obtain a CCJ in britain, then they will almost certainly be able to enforce it in another european country.

 

What type of debt is this?

 

tomterm8: my understanding is that this is not possible for UK debts chasing residents of Denmark, is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I don't think Denmark signed up to the EU Treaty bit that this was agreed under. The UK government have recently said they may also invoke the opt out they have, so these European Enforcement Orders can no longer be used.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...