Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
    • 3rd one seems the best option, let 'em default, don't pay a penny, nothing will happen, forget about all of this. As for Payplan don't touch them with a bargepole, nothing they can do that you can't, and they will pocket fees. A do it yourself DMP is pointless as it will just string out the statute barred date to infinity.
    • Because that’s what the email said. Anyway it’s done now. Posted and image emailed.    im doing some reading in preparation for defence but I will need my hand holding quite tightly by you good people.  I’m a little bit clueless
    • why do you need adobe...use a pdf online website. all for now...no get reading up and do not miss your defence filing date no matter what. post it up in good time no!!    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit Cheats


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5006 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 618
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think I ever said otherwise, did I? I also know that for some of these kids, it is the ONLY way they have been able to get their condition under any kind of control. That however has nothing to do with the benefit cheats, or the supposed mis-diagnosis you claim happens so much. Anti-psychotic drugs are the only way to bring a social "condition" under control? That's a worrying statement in itself without me needing to add further comment...

 

Keep reading? Not just that, I attend seminars, support groups, conferences as well, which is why I know that the idea of ADHD as behavioural condition is about as discredited nowadays as Bettelheim's fridge-mother theory to explain autism. Oh, I know that some people will never accept that, but then I believe that some people also still believe that God created it all, and that doesn't make it true either. ;-)

 

Good for you Bookie... but we're not talking about autism.... and thank you for finally stating that it's a behavioural condition (my emphasis).

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good for you Bookie... but we're not talking about autism.... and thank you for finally stating that it's a behavioural condition (my emphasis).

 

:-)

But I didn't... I said "the idea of ADHD as behavioural condition is about as discredited nowadays as Bettelheim's fridge-mother theory to explain autism". Where you get from that that I agreed with you I cannot fathom. I KNOW that some people think of it as a behavioural condition, you for instance. It doesn't mean that I agree, far from it. Either you are deliberately misconstruing my words, which is beneath you, or you genuinely didn't read my post properly, which is a bit of a shame. :-(

 

Anti-psychotic drugs are the only way to bring a social "condition" under control?
It's not a social condition. *sigh* Anyway, does it mean that you think a child with cancer shouldn't get radiation therapy? Dangerous stuff that. Can make the kids really sick... Yet, if there is a chance that their condition will improve in the long run, most parents won't hesitate. It's really not that different.
Link to post
Share on other sites

But I didn't... I said "the idea of ADHD as behavioural condition is about as discredited nowadays as Bettelheim's fridge-mother theory to explain autism".

 

My emphasis was on you finally referring to ADHD as a behavioural condition, whether it's discredited by others or otherwise.

 

It's not a social condition. *sigh* Anyway, does it mean that you think a child with cancer shouldn't get radiation therapy? Dangerous stuff that. Can make the kids really sick... Yet, if there is a chance that their condition will improve in the long run, most parents won't hesitate. It's really not that different.

 

Don't be ridiculous Bookie.... Cancer is a DISEASE and to say it's no different to the socially constructed label of ADHD is a massive insult to those who've lost someone to it!

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't be ridiculous Bookie.... Cancer is a DISEASE and to say it's no different to the socially constructed label of ADHD is a massive insult to those who've lost someone to it!
I've lost both my parents to it, P1, so please don't play that card with me, thanks.

 

The only one being ridiculous here is you, denying all advances in research to continue trotting out your beliefs that ADHD is just a convenient social label. If you want to talk about insulting people, your constant scapegoatism and attempt to blame everyone and everything except the fundamental neurological difference which is the root of ADHD, THAT is a massive insult to the people I see battling day in day out, trying to keep their lives, jobs, families together, usually in the face of the same disapproval of people who don't know any better. Frankly, I am shocked that with this attitude of yours, you are even allowed to be in schools, looking down your nose at people whose living hell you seemingly have no interest in understanding or helping. :-(

 

I apologise to the rest of the people who may have been interested in the actual subject of the thread, i am aware that we have strayed well beyond the realms of supposed benefit cheats, but then when I see kids I know who are suicidal from a young age, who have no self-esteem, who don't even understand why they're different, but still suffer the consequences, and then I see people putting them and their carers in the same basket as benefit cheats, scroungers and other dishonest people, it does make me very mad indeed. :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've lost both my parents to it, P1, so please don't play that card with me, thanks.

 

The only one being ridiculous here is you, denying all advances in research to continue trotting out your beliefs that ADHD is just a convenient social label. If you want to talk about insulting people, your constant scapegoatism and attempt to blame everyone and everything except the fundamental neurological difference which is the root of ADHD, THAT is a massive insult to the people I see battling day in day out, trying to keep their lives, jobs, families together, usually in the face of the same disapproval of people who don't know any better. Frankly, I am shocked that with this attitude of yours, you are even allowed to be in schools, looking down your nose at people whose living hell you seemingly have no interest in understanding or helping. :-(

 

I apologise to the rest of the people who may have been interested in the actual subject of the thread, i am aware that we have strayed well beyond the realms of supposed benefit cheats, but then when I see kids I know who are suicidal from a young age, who have no self-esteem, who don't even understand why they're different, but still suffer the consequences, and then I see people putting them and their carers in the same basket as benefit cheats, scroungers and other dishonest people, it does make me very mad indeed. :evil:

 

I don't play games Bookie... the similarity to cancer came out of your mouth, not mine, so stop twisting it. I'm well aware that the thread has gone off topic but your blinkered views on ADHD really do beggar belief!! I care passionately about the kids I work with and even more passionately about the mass drugging of our younger people because their behavioiur is seen as too anti-social by parents, schools and so-called professionals, etc. ADHD is one of the few "disorders" that does not require a medical diagnosis before drugs are dished out... it's a subjective diagnosis based upon observations, interviews and other people's opinions on how kids ought to behave and how best to make them do it. It's a medicalised construct of behaviour as an illness....

 

Anti-social behaviour is a growing issue in our society... but according to you, massive numbers of children have suddenly developed a mental condition and/or were born with impaired brain function over the past 20 years or so. Wake up woman! I'm not talking out of my backside as you seem to be trying to imply through your arrogant stance. I have a psychological/social policy background, including a double Hons. degree in both subjects... one of the reasons why I was approached to work with these kids... It's not an easy job by any means but they've made more progress with me than with any predecessor to date. A fact that I'm very proud of...

 

Unlike you, I haven't sunk to taking a pop at you until now for making assumptions about me, how I think and what I do for a living but it's sheepish attitudes like yours that make my blood boil because of your refusal/inability to look outside the box.

 

In an attempt to lay this to rest, I respectfully suggest that you now go your way on this issue and I go mine now before it escalates any further...

 

Are you capable of that Bookie?

 

Just need to add... your last para does not describe ADHD....

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a very quiet post Patrick.... lol

 

Thanks for the link.... but read it carefully. Must research may have been done but people tend to fall into one of two camps; medical/social.... or nature/nurture. Although research may have been carried out on brain patterns, these can highlight all kinds of things including changes in stimuli; emotion, etc... all of which we experience as part of life. This doesn't make it an illness.

 

Our kids are not scanned for brain patterns before prescribed drugs are dished out.... that would be too expensive. They're dished out because someone, somewhere can't cope with that child and prefers to label him/her as mental through observations of behavioiur.

 

Years ago, we had discipline, stability, respect for rules/guidelines, less computer technology aimed at kids (stimuli) and fewer/zero "e" numbers in our cheap food....

 

Way off topic now... I'm off. This needs to come to a close.

 

:-)

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so glad you aren't working with my child P1. I'd hate for him to become so arrogant and conceited, and think that his many qualified doctors, consultants and the rest of the team were so very wrong and that their degrees were inferior to yours.

 

As Marie said it's impossible to be a benefit cheat with ADHD..it takes years to get diagnosed as it's such a wide spectrum and being a part time know-it-all is not the same as living with the child 24/7 and seeing the changes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm so glad you aren't working with my child P1. I'd hate for him to become so arrogant and conceited, and think that his many qualified doctors, consultants and the rest of the team were so very wrong and that their degrees were inferior to yours.

 

As Marie said it's impossible to be a benefit cheat with ADHD..it takes years to get diagnosed as it's such a wide spectrum and being a part time know-it-all is not the same as living with the child 24/7 and seeing the changes.

 

I'm neither arrogant or conceited and do not go about thinking that anyone's degree is inferior to mine.... thank you. It does not take years to be diagnosed with ADHD; other conditions on the "spectrum" you mention, yes... but ADHD no.. I've known many parents who've had that label pinned to their child extremely quickly...

 

As you're obviously friends with "Marie"... your comments aren't really that surprising... :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go again..I'm friends with a lot of people here. Why should that make a difference? I still have my own views...And if you really think it doesn't take years you are kidding yourself as you obviously haven't been through it. If you think it's also something to smile about then you really are in the wrong job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go again..I'm friends with a lot of people here. Why should that make a difference? I still have my own views...And if you really think it doesn't take years you are kidding yourself as you obviously haven't been through it. If you think it's also something to smile about then you really are in the wrong job.

 

You mentioned her by name... not as Bookie.... so it suggested an alliance otherwise you wouldn't have done it. I work in the system so will see a lot more than you do as a single person "going through it" (no disrespect)... and I'm smiling because I'm happy.

 

There... all your points answered.

 

:-) :-) :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your comment on Bookies last paragraph being wrong? Part of the condition is isolation, frustration and irrational behaviour..not just the usual blues that you seem to think they are and the child being 'naughty' or the parenting skills coming into question. But you wouldn't know that...

Link to post
Share on other sites

And your comment on Bookies last paragraph being wrong? Part of the condition is isolation, frustration and irrational behaviour..not just the usual blues that you seem to think they are and the child being 'naughty' or the parenting skills coming into question. But you wouldn't know that...

 

Your support of your friend is admirable.... I've never mentioned "blues" and of course, I don't know anything about anything to with EBD kids, do I?

 

Finished?

 

:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not supporting my 'friend' I'm supporting my own stance..so stop twisting it to suit yourself. It's clear that you have very little knowledge on the subject and are trying to bully people to think as you do..Sorry, that isn't going to happen ..so go smile in the distance. You really have no idea of the autism spectrum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not supporting my 'friend' I'm supporting my own stance..so stop twisting it to suit yourself. It's clear that you have very little knowledge on the subject and are trying to bully people to think as you do..Sorry, that isn't going to happen ..so go smile in the distance. You really have no idea of the autism spectrum.

 

Im not talking about autistic spectrum. I've never mentioned autistic spectrum. ADHD is not autism. Autism is a developmental condition; not a medical construct of a behavioural disorder! Ritalin is not prescribed for autism! Autism is not ADHD! If you'd read and digested what I've said all along, you would have picked that up.

 

Finished now? Can we all go to bed?

 

Going to bed anyway.... :-)

Edited by PriorityOne
Going to bed... lol!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes JC..Better that this thread get's back on to the swines that continue to have childen when they are claiming benefits and the ones have several houses and claim the housing benefit under different names or rent them to relatives.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My worry with this benefits crack down is people who should be on them will be kicked off them by civil service types chasing stats.

Quite right cirian, it's getting harder and harder to get some benefits and that's a shame :mad:

 

Jeez, some people could have an argument in an empty room! :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...