Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The case against the US-based ride-hailing giant is being brought on behalf of over 10,800 drivers.View the full article
    • I have just read the smaller print on their signs. It says that you can pay at the end of your parking session. given that you have ten minutes grace period the 35 seconds could easily have been taken up with walking back to your car, switching on the engine and then driving out. Even in my younger days when I used to regularly exceed speed limits, I doubt I could have done that in 35 seconds even when I  had a TR5.
    • Makers of insect-based animal feed hope to be able to compete with soybeans on price.View the full article
    • Thank you for posting up the results from the sar. The PCN is not compliant with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. Under Section 9 [2][a] they are supposed to specify the parking time. the photographs show your car in motion both entering and leaving the car park thus not parking. If you have to do a Witness Statement later should they finally take you to Court you will have to continue to state that even though you stayed there for several hours in a small car park and the difference between the ANPR times and the actual parking period may only be a matter of a few minutes  nevertheless the CEL have failed to comply with the Act by failing to specify the parking period. However it looks as if your appeal revealed you were the driver the deficient PCN will not help you as the driver. I suspect that it may have been an appeal from the pub that meant that CEL offered you partly a way out  by allowing you to claim you had made an error in registering your vehicle reg. number . This enabled them to reduce the charge to £20 despite them acknowledging that you hadn't registered at all. We have not seen the signs in the car park yet so we do not what is said on them and all the signs say the same thing. It would be unusual for a pub to have  a Permit Holders Only sign which may discourage casual motorists from stopping there. But if that is the sign then as it prohibits any one who doesn't have a permit, then it cannot form a contract with motorists though it may depend on how the signs are worded.
    • Defence and Counterclaim Claim number XXX Claimant Civil Enforcement Limited Defendant XXXXXXXXXXXXX   How much of the claim do you dispute? I dispute the full amount claimed as shown on the claim form.   Do you dispute this claim because you have already paid it? No, for other reasons.   Defence 1. The Defendant is the recorded keeper of XXXXXXX  2. It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant. 3. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim. 4. In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant. 5. The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer. 6. In a further abuse of the legal process the Claimant is claiming £50 legal representative's costs, even though they have no legal representative. 7. The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all. Signed I am the Defendant - I believe that the facts stated in this form are true XXXXXXXXXXX 01/05/2024   Defendant's date of birth XXXXXXXXXX   Address to which notices about this claim can be sent to you  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Benefit Cheats


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4990 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

All the moaners about people on benefits who are happy in a job right now, just wait and see what's coming, more job losses and so on.
Well said, J&W, the same thought crossed my mind only a few days ago. My husband, for whatever weird reason, decided to bring the Sun home. As usual, unable to resist anything with printed words on it (yes, even the Sun, I am gettign help!!) I had a look, and there was this family with feck knows how many kids proudly boasting that they had never claimed anything (bet you she still claims child benefit though, right?), he worked 2 jobs, all their kids are following suit, bla-di-bla and how they despised the previous family featured (in a previous edition I suppose) with 12 kids, living on benefits all their lives, they should be ashamed of themselves, etc... and my 1st thought was: "and what happens if the factory in which you have worked for 20 years and know nothing else to do shuts next week? How are you planning to feed those 9 or 10 kids? Will you be letting them starve out of pride that you don't want the State's help? and how will it feel when YOU're the next feckless family fronting the Sun as an example of benefit-mad families for the jeering and stone-throwing of the crowds, I wonder?" :mad: :mad: :mad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 618
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

No. It's a diagnosis for a social communication disorder. The word "social" refers to the "communication" part, not the "disorder" part. To misunderstand the condition and misinterpret it because of that is just plain ignorant, sorry too. :-(

 

People like you play right into the hands of the newest minister who was telling us 2-3 weeks ago that there was "too much diagnosis" of autism, also darkly hinting at the "abuse" that was going on, when the only abuse that goes on is the one at the hands of the ones who have all the bloody power to control the media, control whatever we get told, control how things are handled from the inside, and ultimately can turn people against one another so easily with their bloody money and propaganda power. :-(

 

There's too much diagnosis of ADHD, which is a social behavioural disorder... not a communication disorder. That sounds like something that's been chucked in along the way just to make it more plausible! Either that, or you're confusing it with something else that runs alongside ADHD without researching it properly.

 

We live in a diagnosis society... some is justified and some is just plain convenient.... but the growth in medicating children over the years just for behavioural disorders (Ritalin) is cause for concern.

 

We're getting way off topic now....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry folks but the moment you go down the road of intervention in family life as we have recently seen you give a licence to those who want to sterilize or even in todays world genetically engineer humans to make them sterile much like GM crops Family life, anyones family good or bad, should be sacrosanct. Anything else smacks of the gas chambers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said, J&W, the same thought crossed my mind only a few days ago. My husband, for whatever weird reason, decided to bring the Sun home. As usual, unable to resist anything with printed words on it (yes, even the Sun, I am gettign help!!) I had a look, and there was this family with feck knows how many kids proudly boasting that they had never claimed anything (bet you she still claims child benefit though, right?), he worked 2 jobs, all their kids are following suit, bla-di-bla and how they despised the previous family featured (in a previous edition I suppose) with 12 kids, living on benefits all their lives, they should be ashamed of themselves, etc... and my 1st thought was: "and what happens if the factory in which you have worked for 20 years and know nothing else to do shuts next week? How are you planning to feed those 9 or 10 kids? Will you be letting them starve out of pride that you don't want the State's help? and how will it feel when YOU're the next feckless family fronting the Sun as an example of benefit-mad families for the jeering and stone-throwing of the crowds, I wonder?" :mad: :mad: :mad:

 

I've highlighted the point.... which seems to have been missed. No-one's having a go at people on Benefits. The thread is about Benefit cheats and in my recent posts.... people who churn out children while on Benefits to stay in the system and milk it. It's not about people who lose their jobs; people who've worked all their lives; single parents (like myself), or anythng else. In other words, it's not about so-called genuine people.

 

The media will spin what it wants to get us angry at each other instead of at the Gov. who've helped to create this mess. The Sun is (allegedly) aimed at those with a reading age of around 8 anyway... which should speak for itself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry folks but the moment you go down the road of intervention in family life as we have recently seen you give a licence to those who want to sterilize or even in todays world genetically engineer humans to make them sterile much like GM crops Family life, anyones family good or bad, should be sacrosanct. Anything else smacks of the gas chambers

 

Family life stopped being sacrosanct when people realised the amount of abuse that went on within it JC. I take your point about dangerous kinds of intervention.... but as said previously, not everyone physically equipped to produce children makes a good parent and the state is left to pick up the tab for that, which is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's too much diagnosis of ADHD, which is a social behavioural disorder... not a communication disorder. That sounds like something that's been chucked in along the way just to make it more plausible! Either that, or you're confusing it with something else that runs alongside ADHD without researching it properly. .
Sorry, but you're wrong:

 

http://www.ldawe.ca/DSM_IV.html

 

This is the clinical definition of ADHD. As you can see, behavioural issues are not even mentioned as part of the diagnosis, and I draw your attention to this sentence: "clinically significant impairment in social, academic, or occupational functioning." And please don't presume that I talk on the subject "without researching it properly", I wouldn't get very far in my advocacy role without knowing the ins and outs of the diagnostic and associated difficulties.

 

Yes, you're right, we are getting off topic in that aspect, BUT there is already too much stigma and finger-pointing going on as it is for me to let your assumptions unchallenged. The very fact that you posted on the subject on a thread which has to do with "benefit cheats" speaks volumes as it is. :-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do know about the clinical definition of ADHD Bookie... psychology is my area. You said it was a communication disorder. It isn't... it's behavioural. You can argue that social functioning is communication if you like, but it's not a communication disorder in the sense of a medical disability.... and it's a "diagnosis" (in children) that's spiralled out of control over recent years.

 

I'm not sure what "volumes" I'm meant to be speaking by going off topic. It happens in threads sometimes and I was merely acknowledging that fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Family life stopped being sacrosanct when people realised the amount of abuse that went on within it JC. I take your point about dangerous kinds of intervention.... but as said previously, not everyone physically equipped to produce children makes a good parent and the state is left to pick up the tab for that, which is wrong.

 

Whats ths solution sterilization I assume or perhaps starvation because of a refusal to pay beneifts, whats the answer ??

Edited by JonCris
Link to post
Share on other sites

I do know about the clinical definition of ADHD Bookie... psychology is my area. You said it was a communication disorder. It isn't... it's behavioural. You can argue that social functioning is communication if you like, but it's not a communication disorder in the sense of a medical disability.... and it's a "diagnosis" (in children) that's spiralled out of control over recent years.
We could argue about it until the cows come home, and you'd still be mistaken. Even the DWP has finally accepted that impairments of social functioning goes hand in hand with arrested brain development and that it is in fact a medical disability. The behavioural difficulties arise from the communication disorder impairment.

 

It wasn't the OT stuff which I meant spoke volumes, it was the totality of the rant about supposedly mis-diagnosed children with cunning parents so well-versed in social communication disorders that they manage to fool the DWP, CAMHS, psychologists etc... into labelling their badly behaved child (who by definition if he's badly behaved wouldn't do what he's been told to do to fool the specialists anyway) with ADHD, and then are sooo clever that they manage in obtaining benefits that even people with more than an average level of education find hard to deal with. This from people who seemingly spend their time in front of Jeremy Kyle and Big Brother, and can barely read and write themselves. Impressive, no? :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whats ths solution sterilization I assume or perhaps starvation because of a refusal to pay beneifts, whats the answer ??

 

No more money. If people continue to churn out children while on Benefits, then they manage that decision.

 

We could argue about it until the cows come home, and you'd still be mistaken. Even the DWP has finally accepted that impairments of social functioning goes hand in hand with arrested brain development and that it is in fact a medical disability. The behavioural difficulties arise from the communication disorder impairment.

 

You're getting this mixed up with something else Bookie. ADHD has nothing to do with arrested brain development and is not a medical disability. The behavioural disorders do not arise from communication disorder impairment with ADHD... autism yes, but not ADHD. The two can co-exist though... which I think is what you're trying to say... but it's not what I was on about.

 

It wasn't the OT stuff which I meant spoke volumes, it was the totality of the rant about supposedly mis-diagnosed children with cunning parents so well-versed in social communication disorders that they manage to fool the DWP, CAMHS, psychologists etc... into labelling their badly behaved child (who by definition if he's badly behaved wouldn't do what he's been told to do to fool the specialists anyway) with ADHD, and then are sooo clever that they manage in obtaining benefits that even people with more than an average level of education find hard to deal with. This from people who seemingly spend their time in front of Jeremy Kyle and Big Brother, and can barely read and write themselves. Impressive, no? :razz:

 

No disrespect, but you really have no idea.... and bad behaviour (which is what it is) is what they're looking for; not lack of communication (as aready said). Schools want to control the bad behaviour, as do parents.... so a "diagnosis" is really not that hard in our diagnosis society.

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

No disrespect, but you really have no idea.... and bad behaviour (which is what it is) is what they're looking for; not lack of communication (as aready said). Schools want to control the bad behaviour, as do parents.... so a "diagnosis" is really not that hard in our diagnosis society.

and how is the diagnosis going to help controlling the bad behaviour, may one ask? Ritalin? As it acts on the dopamin recipients in the brain, it has no effect whatsoever on non-ADHD kids. And not even that much on ADHd ones, unless you get the dosage just right.

 

SEN funding? Won't make any difference unless the teaching methods are specifically adapted to the individual condition.

 

So exactly HOW is falsely labelling a child going to help anyone, even if they manage to fool the professionals? (which we still haven't established HOW they were going to manage that one)

Link to post
Share on other sites

PO so your solution is starvation, homelessness or perhaps they should beg wadda you think 1, 2 or 3?

 

Contraception JC...

 

and how is the diagnosis going to help controlling the bad behaviour, may one ask? Ritalin? As it acts on the dopamin recipients in the brain, it has no effect whatsoever on non-ADHD kids. And not even that much on ADHd ones, unless you get the dosage just right. It doesn't... it gives a label, which enables (some) parents to wash their hands of responsibility for that behavioiur because he/she "can't help it" As for Ritalin... it's prescribed like Smarties to kids these days... and seems to be ineffective in a lot of cases anyway. Anything that interferes with dopamine in the brain is a dodgy thing... schiziphrenia is also linked to dopamine, by the way... In years to come, society may live to regret putting so many kids on Ritalin...

 

SEN funding? Won't make any difference unless the teaching methods are specifically adapted to the individual condition. Teachers are leaving in droves because of behaviour in schools as it is. The funding just isn't there to support these kids which means that non-behaviour kids fall back; SEN or otherwise.

 

So exactly HOW is falsely labelling a child going to help anyone, even if they manage to fool the professionals? (which we still haven't established HOW they were going to manage that one)

 

It serves to hide the underlying (social) issue which I've been talking about from the start and give it a label.... and you don't have to "fool" professionals looking for behaviour if that behaviour is already there to observe...

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

& what if it doesn't work its not fool proof ya know

 

Are kids the new guinea pigs then JC? Where does the informed consent come into it? It doesn't. Parents have it. "ADHD" is often offered as a diagnosis for behaviour caused by childhood trauma/abuse.... and not linked to a medical condition at all.

 

The most common cause amongst kids I work with however, is that many have been plonked in front of games consoles from a very young age until their brains have gone to mush.

 

As a little social experiment, you try playing fast-paced and/or violent computer games for hours on end and then look at your mood and concentration.... ADHD is a sign of the times which has exploded as a "diagnosis" of unacceptable behaviour amongst kids over the years, but medical it ain't.

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

ADHD is a sign of the times which has exploded as a "diagnosis" of unacceptable behaviour amongst kids over the years, but medical it ain't.

 

Scientific studies have shown that people said to be suffering from ADHD have lowered electrical activity in the area of the brain called the 'frontal lobe', which is the region of the brain located behind the forehead. Additionally, there is a measurable and a reduced reaction to stimulation in this area of the brain. To illustrate this, scientists have been able to conduct neuro-imaging studies, which create visible pictures of brain activity. These images show that sufferers of ADHD have less brain matter in the frontal lobe region of the brain and a lower level of metabolic activity than 'normal' people.

 

Added to this evidence are studies of identical and fraternal twins, where one twin exhibits symptoms of ADHD and the other does not. These studies have shown that there is a genetic predisposition for ADHD, and one particular gene has already been identified; the search is on for more.

 

Furthermore, while parenting skills and other stressful life and environmental events will have an effect on a child's behaviour, this detailed study of twins has allowed researchers to determine that the family environment does not appear to make a significant and separate contribution as to whether a child will exhibit ADHD behavioural traits.

 

Also:

 

http://www.articlealley.com/article_479972_23.html (written by a psychiatrist whose speciality is ADD/ADHD).

 

You especially could benefit from reading this other article written by him:

 

http://www.articlealley.com/article_515557_23.html

 

and maybe consider it's time for you to let go of stage 1 and move on to stage 2? ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

We can all fling articles offering different opinions into the arena Bookie.... The Sun does it all the time... lol :-)

 

It's not assessed through medical tests despite what your article implies. Does your article claim that thousands of children are tested? I suspect not. Psychologists observe behaviour and ask questions; it's subjective measurement. There are no blood tests, urine tests, brain scans en masse or anything else.....

 

Keep reading.... your article sounds like the kind of justification used to carry out frontal lobotomies years ago.... lol. Here's one of mine to balance it out... :

 

http://adhd-children.com/doctors-under-fire-as-an-alarming-numbers-of-children-are-given-drugs-to-combat-depression-and-adhd/

 

And another...

 

http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/164/10/1612

 

As a society and as parents, we owe it to our kids to be fully informed before giving them anti-psychotic drugs en masse, don't you think?

 

Personally, I wouldn't touch these drugs with a barge pole!

Edited by PriorityOne
link
Link to post
Share on other sites

Re the original question...the Court process is in the public domain. The newspapers decide which cases to publish, not the prosecuting authority. As a Fraud Investigator I hear all the time that the only punishment people fear is getting their name in the papers, so I must admit I actively encourage our local rag to attend some days when I've got cases in court. I might even issue a press release, but I can't decidde if it's published or not.

 

It's part of the Justice system, anyone can turn up and view the workings of a court, including the press.

Hello tabs666, I think your line of reasoning is 'sick'. There are many people whom would rather be dead than to be made a public spectacle of. Yes, people do fall on hard times and debts rise. As a result, someone may find the only way of trying to lighten their heavy load a little is to do something they normally would not do. (ok, a goody two shoes like yourself may never have fallen on bad times, but we all know that even ones whom govern or have governed the society in which we live have fallen on hard times and done things that they would never do in normal circumstances) This could and I am quite sure may well result in people taking their own lives. When people feel that they are trapped in poverty, to then put them through something like a figurative 'Public execution' is sick thinking. Remember, one day, you too may fall upon desperate times. Do you have no empathy for anyone except yourself?

Edited by redrum3wins
grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

What?? 52,000 benefit cheats prosecuted under a Labout Government?. That can't be true!. Everyone knows that The Labour Government encouraged people to defraud the benefits system!!.

 

Once you realize that Labour's use of the word 'prosecuted' does NOT mean all or many where prosecuted in a court of law it means investigated & many have either been found not guilty, its just been some jealous neighbour making false allegations, OR they have managed with difficulty, (much of it caused by the DWP), to obtain legal representation & the lawyer after doing the sums finds them either grossly exaggerated or even that had they claimed the correct benefits they would have been better off

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would NEVER lower myself or profession to report about this issue. Personally, I have done quite a lot of research into the subject and most caught doing it are mortified, and it is mostly related to spiralling debt. Some, however, do take the pee.

 

Before you cast the first stone, be VERY sure you've NEVER sinned ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would NEVER lower myself or my profession to report about people who have fallen on hard times!!! "There, for the grace of God..."

 

Good for you BB I get so peed off with the holier than thou of some many of who appear to have forgotten why they came here in the 1st place

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would NEVER lower myself or profession to report about this issue. Personally, I have done quite a lot of research into the subject and most caught doing it are mortified, and it is mostly related to spiralling debt. Some, however, do take the pee.

 

Before you cast the first stone, be VERY sure you've NEVER sinned ;)

 

The best & most efficient way to solve this countries debts is to go after the tax dodgers both illegal & so called legal Its been calculated that the amount recovered could by far exceed that paid in benefits

Link to post
Share on other sites

As a society and as parents, we owe it to our kids to be fully informed before giving them anti-psychotic drugs en masse, don't you think?

 

Personally, I wouldn't touch these drugs with a barge pole!

I don't think I ever said otherwise, did I? I also know that for some of these kids, it is the ONLY way they have been able to get their condition under any kind of control. That however has nothing to do with the benefit cheats, or the supposed mis-diagnosis you claim happens so much.

 

Keep reading? Not just that, I attend seminars, support groups, conferences as well, which is why I know that the idea of ADHD as behavioural condition is about as discredited nowadays as Bettelheim's fridge-mother theory to explain autism. Oh, I know that some people will never accept that, but then I believe that some people also still believe that God created it all, and that doesn't make it true either. ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...