Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, Thanks for the responses. Just a few follow up questions in light of what's been said:   If I dont appeal to PPM, who can I appeal to?   Why should the PCN been attached to the windscreen? Is this written in law?   I assumed the document I had received was the NTK, if this is not the case, what does a NTK look like?   Regarding the compliance with the Protection of Freedoms Act, could the "period" of parking not be argued either way? The legislation doesnt state it must have a start/end time of parking, which I assumed an ANPR camera would pick up if it had one. Is 4 minutes not technically enough to show the vehicle was parked?    Thanks !
    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Boots - We are watching you!


whirlybird
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4772 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Evening All,

 

Came accross a particularly nasty situation today and wondered if anyone could shed some light

 

Went to Boots and lady in front of me at counter asked for co-codamol tablets.Assistant proceeded to ask lady for her name/address and doctors details as she apparantly buys this product once a week.Poor woman, struggling with baby in pram,gave all her details and practically fled from shop in embarassment.Shop assistant went about this as if she had been caught shoplifting and in full earshot of me and any other passer-by.

 

Question I have is: are pharmacies allowed to ask your GPs details and write to them regarding an over the counter product they deem you shouldnt be using?

 

I felt uncomfortable just watching this scene (shop assistants demanding medical records?) as the girl wasnt even a pharmacist.

 

Is this a policy of Boots or can anyone demand to examine our medical records without our permission?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boots will not be able to examine your medical records, I assume they will only inform the gp about how much co-codamol the person is buying. There is nothing stopping boots from requesting the information, however afaik you can refuse (boots will then refuse to sell the tablets as within their rights)

 

Its the same with a TV, before a retailer sells a TV they must take the name and address of where the tv is going. Its a heavy fine if these details aren't take and retailers should refuse to sell you the TV if you don't comply.

 

Co-Codamol is alot stronger then most pain killers, I personally thought it was a prescription drug, but there are reasons its over the counter and not on the shelf.

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks blitz

 

This was a new one on me as I personally have never been asked such details and the lady being served was taken aback.

 

The pharmacist was in the background but was not called over which I would have done if in doubt about selling a painkiller.This was a shop assistant demanding GP details from a customer, no prescription involved.

 

What next, Tesco informing GPs how many bottles of merlot are in your basket?

 

The point is, surely if there were grounds to ask for GP details, would a qualified pharmacist not be best placed to ask, not a shop assistant?

 

This is aside from the fact that this was all done quite indiscreetly in front of complete strangers.

 

Thanks again for your reply

Whirly x

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are different strengths of co-codamol - the one available over the counter (usually labelled paracetamol and codeine) is 8mg of codiene and 500mg of paracetamol per tablet.

 

It's perfectly legal to buy this drug over the counter and all i can think of is that they believed the person may be planning to self-harm or has become addicted to them and so are covereing themselves by notifying her GP.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Co-Codamol is alot stronger then most pain killers, I personally thought it was a prescription drug, but there are reasons its over the counter and not on the shelf.

 

Co-codamol comes in two guises that I have come across (there may be more). The over the counter version has 500mg of paracetamol and 8mg of codeine per tab. The prescription strength has 500mg of paracetamol and 32mg of codeine per tab

 

EDIT tiglet beat me to some of the details

All my posts are made without prejudice and may not be reused or reproduced without my express permission (or the permission of the forums owners)!

 

17/10/2006 Recieve claim against me from lloyds TSB for £312.82

18/10/06 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent

03/02/07 Claim allocated to small claims. Hearing set for 15/05/07. Lloyds ordered to file statement setting out how they calculate their charges

15/05/07 Lloyds do not attend. Judgement ordered for £192 approx, £3 travel costs and removal of default notice

29/05/07 4pm Lloyds deadline for payment of CCJ expires. Warrant of execution ready to go

19/06/07 Letter from court stating Lloyds have made a cheque payment to court

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was the bog standard over-the-counter variety, no prescription

 

I just still fail to understand why a shop assistant can demand access to GP medical records without at least asking a pharmacist.

 

I take your point on the self-harming and addictive issues with painkillers, which is why I would have expected the pharmacist to have at least been asked to speak to the lady.

 

Dont know if this is a Boots policy or a badly trained assistant. Either way I wont be going to Boots for anything other than shampoo and cotton wool in future!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know the legalities behind it and can only assume as others have above it is to protect the person buying the tablets, I do know that if it was a relative of mine I would be grateful that someone had seen what they may have saw as a potential tragedy and acted on it.

And I am sure if the worst did happen the media would be calling for the stores to be more responsible.

Intrusive and clumsily handled maybe, but this is a possible case of damned if they do and damned if they don't.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is ridiculous! Up until May this year it was possible to purchase a box of 60 soluble Boots Co-codamol (or Solpadene or Ultramol) and you were usually limited to the single box. Suddenly they halved the box size, you could not only by a box of 32. Did the price half? What do you think?

 

So in this new enlightened restriction, this woman is buying only half the dosage available 6 months ago, and they want her details? Of course, it she got her Boots Advantage points, they wouldn't have asked (as they would know who she is) but having spoken to the UK Drug and Medicines agency about the pricing issues (nothing to do with them) there is no mandated requirement for personal details, or indeed any problem in visiting every chemist in the high street and beyond to get a single box per purchase. Laughable, just laughable!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are different strengths of co-codamol - the one available over the counter (usually labelled paracetamol and codeine) is 8mg of codiene and 500mg of paracetamol per tablet.

 

It's perfectly legal to buy this drug over the counter and all i can think of is that they believed the person may be planning to self-harm or has become addicted to them and so are covereing themselves by notifying her GP.

 

Codiene can be highly addictive (ironically, for something that's sold for headaches, one of the side effects can be headaches )

 

From what the shop assistant said, I expect they believe the woman might be addicted.

 

That's more likely than suicide, because she wouldn't keep on coming back every week:)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless they believed she was stock-piling them. But i do agree, addiction is more likely.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is ridiculous! Up until May this year it was possible to purchase a box of 60 soluble Boots Co-codamol (or Solpadene or Ultramol) and you were usually limited to the single box. Suddenly they halved the box size, you could not only by a box of 32. Did the price half? What do you think?

 

So in this new enlightened restriction, this woman is buying only half the dosage available 6 months ago, and they want her details? Of course, it she got her Boots Advantage points, they wouldn't have asked (as they would know who she is) but having spoken to the UK Drug and Medicines agency about the pricing issues (nothing to do with them) there is no mandated requirement for personal details, or indeed any problem in visiting every chemist in the high street and beyond to get a single box per purchase. Laughable, just laughable!

 

It was a lot earlier than May this year. The rules changed in September 1998 to allow a maximum pack size of 16, or 32 if sold in a pharmacy. This applies to all drugs containing paracetamol or aspirin.

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Codiene can be highly addictive (ironically, for something that's sold for headaches, one of the side effects can be headaches )

 

One of the stated side effects of the anti-depressants I was taking a while back was 'depression, and increased thoughts of self-harm or suicide'. Just lovely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What next, Tesco informing GPs how many bottles of merlot are in your basket?

 

 

Aaargh - I find it tough enough when the checkout girl shouts out 'alcohol' because she is too young to sell it.:D

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe the theory behind reducing the number of tablets containing paracetamol being purchased was to reduce the huge number of on 'impulse' suicide attempts - not sure if this has been achieved. There is no way to stop someone who is serious stockpiling or using different shops. As a nurse who has cared for many folk who have taken overdoses, many on the spur of the moment and later regretted, some of whom did not come to the hospital until a day or two later and who subsequently developed liver failure, I am for anything that may reduce the likelihood.

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a lot earlier than May this year. The rules changed in September 1998 to allow a maximum pack size of 16, or 32 if sold in a pharmacy. This applies to all drugs containing paracetamol or aspirin.

 

Which is why I buy in the US now during trips, I come back with suitcases rattling.

 

I buy Ibuprofen and paracetamol(acetaminophen) in tubs of 500 for about $6 (under £3). I also get a Tylenol version of Night Nurse at $4.98 (about £2,50) for a pack of 2, in cherry flavour. A single NN costs over £5 here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this woman goes in every week and buys a box of co-codomol then i think the assistant was right to be worried and ask questions. Boxes of tablets all say that if symptoms persist consult a doctor which this person obviously hasn't if she hasn't got a prescription for something more suitable yet.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

cant some of these prescription drugs be used to create illegal drugs? If I recall they can be used to create very nasty examples like Cystal Meth. Wether it was for this reason, or reasons mentioned earlier in the thread i totally agree with them consulting her GP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the point is also that they would be advising her GP, rather than her GP giving out her details, which I believe was a concern of the OP.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Laughable, just laughable!

 

I wish it was laughable. It's sad is what it is.

 

The OP asked, "What's next?"

 

I would hazard a guess at what's next:

 

You buy a pack of smarties from Tesco. You use your 'points card' or whatever it's called (I will NEVER have one of these from any shop), one of the directors of Tesco is also on the board of directors of Equifax (or one of the other two, I forget which, but it's not relevent), and also on the board of Westcott.

 

I would guess that should you fall behind on a payment on anything (which is very likely as the cost of things is going up far faster than inflation, thanks to taxes and fuel costs (which are NOT counted in inflation calculations...????!!), then Westcott could ask "well, if you are so skint, how can you afford luxuries like Smarties?"

 

Or of course, Tesco could refuse to sell you Smarties as you 'owe' the money to Westcott.

 

It's just around the corner. The systems are in place already.

 

Scary isn't it.

 

Where does it end? 1984 is where it ends.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Gertie100

I saw this happen in another Boots last week. The woman refused to sell co-codamol to an elderly lady in front of me. Apparently the GP had instructed them not to do so...

I think the issue here is that possibily the GP hadn't informed his patient was going to do this...and surely if the GP is worried about the purchase of these tablets for a specific patient, they should get the patient in the surgery and talk about the worries....

Who knows perhaps they did?

 

Ah well, off to buy some smarties in Asda (not Tesco for fear of dave at my door!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If this woman goes in every week and buys a box of co-codomol then i think the assistant was right to be worried and ask questions. Boxes of tablets all say that if symptoms persist consult a doctor which this person obviously hasn't if she hasn't got a prescription for something more suitable yet.

 

If only it was as easy as you make out. Our family gets through a box of Solpadene (60) each week. This equates to 15 doses per person every 7 days. (You are allowed a maximum of 4 doses in any 24 hour period, so before abuse becomes an issue, a person would have to take 28 doses weekly (56 tabs). Because of the revised box sizes, I have to make two visits to buy less than the legal dosage maximum, as they dropped the pack size but not the maximum dosages.

 

My doctor is fully aware of what I do, and ever since I was 11 I have had suffered from ongoing headaches than a barrage of tests from blood to eyesight have not identified the source. Since these tablets are on available on prescription, I'm unable to get them on a valid prescription, so I have to purchase them retail (and now at 50% additional cost due to the pack size change).

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth going to your doctor, Buzby. As I said, Solpadene if used for long periods of time, even within the amount of dose you are using, can actually cause headaches. It could be that you would be better off on a different painkiller. Of course, ther are a huge number of reasons for these kind of problems.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with tomterm - you really should push your GP to investigate the cause more thoroughly. failing that, he should either change your pain relief (you may require weaning off it by now) or, preferably, refer you to the pain management team at your local hospital. The nurses there are especially trained to ensure the maximum effectiveness of drug combined with the minimum side effects/addiction issues. also, if they believe that more investigation is needed, they will speak to their consultant and get you referred for further tests or to see an appropriate consultant that way.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid BTDT there is no addiction as there are times no dosage is required for 3 or 4 days, this discounted the theory dependence. Also I can spot the paracetamol-induced headaches and ignore those should they occur. It's also worth pointing out that I only use the soluble product which is more kindly to your system, but since I'm effectively taking them under doctor's supervision, short of a quick trip to the guillotine, there's not a solution in sight. CoCodamol Xmas Gift vouchers anyone? :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...