Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
    • Good morning all, No further communication with P2G so now submitting my small claims action. Would be grateful for any feedback on my description of claim before I submit later. The defendant in this case is Parcel2Go Limited The claimant sent a parcel using Parcel2Go Ltd as a broker and Evri as the shipper containing two handmade bespoke wedding trays to a customer with tracking number P2Gxxxxxxxx. The parcel was never delivered although the defendant stated that three attempts had been made to deliver the parcel.  The claimants customer waited in for four days to receive the delivery but no delivery was attempted. There was no communication with the claimants customer.  Despite many web chats and emails the parcel was not delivered and on the Parcel2Go website it stated that the customer had refused delivery. This was not true as no delivery had been attempted.  I was informed that the parcel was being returned to me but after waiting three weeks was informed by Evri that the parcel was lost. I was offered compensation of £20 + shipping fee which I refused and after sending Parcel2Go a Letter of claim this was increased to £75 which I also refused. It is clear that the defendant is responsible for the loss of the parcel as they did not act with reasonable care and skill when handling the claimants parcel, contrary to section 49 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The claimant therefore seeks £370 in respect to the value of goods plus court costs. I thought it might be better to use the CRA rather than the Supply of Goods and Services Act as we are sole traders - is this correct?
    • No new development, I'm afraid. The last update I received was a letter from the court, advising that the case had been transferred to Croydon County Court.
    • Read how your orgnisation can make opportunities and employment more accessible for disadvantaged young people.View the full article
    • Hi, I am aware there’s been few threads about this already but just wanted to confirm information on my case. I was with Village gym last year(2023) on initial 6 month usual contract they do, I lost my job and due to that I couldn’t afford to pay for gym nor I had any motivation to go to gym at that time so they sent me arc phone message in September 2023 that I owed them £140 so I paid them back on instalments in 2 months time.  Then I started receiving new years deals in December 2023 and I decided to give them a call but they never mentioned anything about 6 month contract or anything, only that it would be monthly rolling contract and I paid them for 2 months and then I realised both months they charged me £59 instead of £38 they offered me on the phone when I mentioned that I am still student, even though before I was paying £43 a month in mid 2023. I spoke to gym entrance lady and she said I should give a call to gym on the phone number so I did and whoever answered said they’ll pass my info to manager and he will give me a call back in 24 hours, of course no one called me back so I called again and they said same thing. And of course once again no one got in touch with me so I got tired of them charging me more than they should and decided to cancel my direct debit and stopped going there as I got new job with rotation shifts which is not good for me as I cannot visit gym after I finish at 10pm every second week.  And now in April I received arc message saying this :  Also they have my old flat address where I used to live. What is the  best thing to do for me please? Thank you!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private Parking Tickets - Template Letters - If you wrote before finding this site.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4551 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I can find a lot of people who have grudgingly paid the initial charge, BUT, has anyone actually been summoned and fined or been visited by the balif's ?.

 

really...i cant find any:grin:

 

mainly people pay because they are stupid and believe the threat-o-grams. or did not find out it was a [problem] in time.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 226
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

OK fine I see now it is a well worn thread.

 

But when I first opened the envelope from parking eye I had an idea it was a clever [problem] but I was livid, spitting blood even, I was a genuine co-op shopper who never noticed any cameras or the new designated parking hours and one day after shopping I just fancied some fish and chips which took me over the allotted 1hr 30mins stay !!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Back to the thread:

 

All you advice givers do a great job because all any parking eye virgin victim wants is reassurance, however, there are quite a lot of if's and but's still used so, and following the receipt of the four ? envelopes from PE to myself plus a significant passage of time thereafter and/or any balif caught by my german shepherd, I shall hereby reserve judgement.

 

Cheers, Johnny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are still getting confused and looking for ifs or buts.

 

there arent any

its a mail [problem], simple.

 

also you seem to think anyone can send bailiffs at the drop of a hat...they can't it take many months of court action and DCA's are not bailiffs!

 

oh these ppc's love posters like you,,

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey dx old boy, you see I have led such a sheltered law abiding life - RETIRED NOW, former motorcycle road racer, divorced three times, only been driving for 46 years - psv, hgv class 1, police driving instructor, IAM - ADI (cars and motorcycles), no driving convictions, some driving commendations, clean licence, no parking tickets, no cci's, I've even got a tv licence, just the two fines for not wearing a seatbelt, one in 1983 on the first day it became law (an over enthusiastic fellow bobby) and two years ago in a town I never usually frequent they got me in a 'seat-belt sting' operation.

 

This parking letter thing was a complete surprise, out of the blue and really I was innocently searching for some advice when I stumbled on this site, plus I'm new to forums and I guess I posted on the first thread relating to PPC's. Clearly I have irritated you and I apologise, from now on I will look (I was going to say 'listen') and learn and keep shtum !!!!!!!!

 

BUT, IF, finally any baliff ever does become entangled in the jaws of my dog re-this matter I will let you know the outcome.

 

Cheers, Johnny.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey Johnnie, the trouble with forums is that the 'tone' of a reply can be misinterpreted at times, I should know, I've got into SOOOO many rows in the past.

 

Letters from these bully boys are disgusting. I get really angry when I think they might be sending harrassing letters to little old ladies living on their own, etc etc. I've had numerous parking fines in the past, where they place them on your windscreen in yellow plastic envelopes and I've always paid them -online - to the COUNCIL- within 14 days. When I got that tacky letter out of the blue a couple of months ago, my immediate reaction was to pay it. It was only when I looked at it again that it seemed really fake.

 

I just feel irritated to the point where I want to say - 'come on then, take me to court...'

 

I also googled parking fines to see what other people thought, as these letters are very intimidating - it's not a question of being STUPID. In fact, the latter. Better to try and find out how other people are dealing with this, than just paying up.

 

Don't be put off by supercilious forum police - I had a similar reply a few weeks ago telling me not to put the same post on different threads. Yawn.

 

People write on forums because they want genuine information from other people in the same situation. And thank god they're here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
To : barnyboot.

 

What is your current situation re the PPC fiasco, are they taking you to court or have they gone quiet, have the letters ceased?

 

Has any of you on here successfully achieved satisfaction and an end to all correspondence by the 'do nothing and ignore' method ?

 

I can find a lot of people who have grudgingly paid the initial charge, BUT, has anyone actually been summoned and fined or been visited by the balif's ?

 

Thanks, would appreciate any reply as I can just feel the hook ( received a parking notice from parking-eye last week ) but at the minute the line is still slack !!

 

Cheers, Johnny.

 

all quite no more letters

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spanglespangle, was that also from PARKING EYE ?

 

Cheers, Johnny.

 

no, it's "Private Car Parking Enforcement Agency". PO Box 346. WA16 6UR. Telephone 0871 434 5118. www.parkingenforcementagency.org

 

I called the number and asked to speak to the manager, saying I thought the letter was a [problem]. They left me on hold for ages, so I put the phone down. I also looked at their website to see if it existed.

 

Ooh, I've just noticed I've got a court referral date of 30th june, 10.00am. It doesn't say which court or where.

 

I'm particularly impressed with the .org bit, as if it's a charity!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news then barnyboot - but just who were your car park pirates, was it PARKING EYE ?

 

Cheers, Johnny.

 

It’s very good news for me :rolleyes: I had no intention of paying any fees :smile:

As for who was begging ;) it’s been going on since December 2009

and I forgot :cool:

Don’t give them the time :| and just forget these threats :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I have now had 3 letter from Parking Eye, and finally today a letter from CCS Collect (Debt Collectors). But on Parking Eyes initail letters the payment was going to go from £50 to £80 to £110, but the Debt Collectors are asking for £140.

 

How long will this go on for? I'm getting bored now.

 

I take it I should just ignore it

 

 

any news on these debt collectors?

i have also received a letter and just wondering if anything what they will do :-x i am also very bored with this :Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

update

i have now received a letter saying they have handed my information over to a debt collector

 

:eek::eek: Not a debt collector? Quick get your cheque book out. On a more serious note a debt collector is someone with absolutely no powers whatsoever. They just send silly threatening letters some even in scary red ink.

 

and a solicitor.

 

Usually the ridiculous Michael Sobell using the name Graham White. Even more pathetic than the stupid debt collectors.

 

they have given me 7 days and another Chance to pay the fee of £141.00

 

How kind is that? If they thought they had a hope in hell in court do you really think you would get endless threatening letters, no, you would get one and if ignored off to court, soesn't happen, ever thought why?

 

i received the letter already past the 7 day post date

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Wish I found this site before I wrote to CEL, heres my problem CEL contacted me via post saying i overstayed in a CO-OP car park and invoiced me a sum of £90 or £45 if I pay up in 14 days, I immediately wrote back to them with a letter with the effect of saying that I was the owner of said vehicle but was not the sole driver and that i had no control over who and when vehicle was being driven and further more that i kept no records of the vehicle being driven by such persons as well as telling them to cease contacting me. Now here is my dilemma CEL have contacted me again with a letter with the effect of saying they issue court proceedings against me seeking a NORWICH PHARMACAL ORDER. I wish I had come across the this forum before i wrote to them as i would of simply ignored the letters however unfortunately i contacted them now they have contacted me seeking this order, could somebody please advice me on this or is there anybody else in a similar situation.

 

Thank you for your time and would appreciate any help on this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They wont seek that order it is very expensive to take proceedings just for that order. It is all bluff and sadly you are falling for it. STOP contacting them because you only encourage them. So ignore all their correspondence from now on and they will eventually go away.

regards

Please remember our troops, fighting and dying in our name. God protect them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Parking-eye have not bothered me since they sent a 3rd 'official' notice which I duly received on June 24th.

I never responded and have no plans to frequent any co-op stores or anywhere with a parking-eye sign in the future.

That's the best way to beat them in the end. I don't mind parking controls; I just hate it when they're unfair and extortionate.
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4551 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...