Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I suggested consideration of bankruptcy some years ago. It was not well received.
    • That is a superb WS. However, I have a few tweaks to suggest. In (2) "indicating" not "indication". I think to be consistent with your numbering, in (6) the Beavis case should be EXHIBIT 2. Do you really need to include over 100 pages of Beavis?  I think that would be likely to annoy the judge.  Just try and find the bit where they decide it was not a penalty due to having an interest in limiting the time that vehicles can stay. I'll have a look myself for this bit later as it's highly likely to be in WSs from PPCs who think that that paragraph means all their charges are valid always on every occasion. After your current (7) add this.  It's always useful to refer to a judgment when making a legal point - 8.  In the case PCM vs Bull, Claim No. B4GF26K6, where the Defendant was issued parking tickets for parking on private roads with signage stating “No parking at any time”, District Judge Glen in his final statement mentioned that: “the notice was prohibitive and didn’t communicate any offer of parking and that landowners may have claim in trespass, but that was not under consideration”.   In (14) if my maths are right the CPR request should be "EXHIBIT 3".  it is missing from your list of exhibits. In (16) the two figures should be £100 and £170.  They are entitled to increase fro,m £60 to £100, they are not entitled to increase to £170.  To make it clear for the judge I would write - 16. The Claimant has artificially inflated their claim for a £100 invoice to £170. This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims. 17. The Claimant has also invented a second fictitious charge, for legal representative's costs, when they have no legal representative. You also need ot number your exhibits. The rest is excellent - well done.
    • Did you ever think of walking away? Become bankrupt and in 12 months it'll all be behind you. My feeling is that you may well get nothing from the sale of the property anyway. Going by the date this thread started it looks like eight years of arrears, lender's costs and receiver’s fees on top.
    • Just to clarify - I make use of evening legal clinics. It is not always possible to see a lawyer (they have limited time and days/week).  This means questions one has may never get answered or there's weeks between follow-ups.   To be really clear - I am representing myself; I am playing at being lawyer/ barrister - which means I take help wherever I can get it (and then research it thoroughly). Ae - a judge in a recent hearing pointed out the receiver is not part of my current proceedings - and suggested I have a separate claim v the receiver. Disclosure has presented damning evidence v the receiver  The receiver against whom I have a complaint is not part of the receiver governing body.   The receivership is in 2 names - a joint one.  My complaint is directed at whom I was told is the lead receiver.  The other named receiver IS a member of the governing body.  But he has now left the company.  And the lead receiver has retired - but is still a working consultant on my case.   All the evidence shows it was the 'lead' receiver who was doing all the  work/ the misbehaviour.   But if the appointment was 'joint' would I make a complaint against them both?    I am sure that wouldn't go down well with the other receiver who is at the beginning of his career. The law is very much against borrowers.   But the evidence against this receivership is crystal clear.   I just don't know how and to whom to complain.   The places I've tried so far don't offer much transparency       
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP for a PIP reconsideration - Need help with reconsideration letter


Helen2264
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3006 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

 

Can someone please tell me where I can find a sample letter or how to draft a letter asking the DWP for a PIP reconsideration. I've never written one before and I've been helping an autism to fill in her PIP she just got a reply back to say that her daughter has got the enhanced care but lower rate mob.

 

I have filled in the criteria properly the letter says she did not get enhanced because her daughter can walk more than 250 yards. Her daughter has autism disorder and Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey without another person, when she's been out alone in her local she's had the police called twice on her because of her violent behaviour which has been written in her reports by the hospital, I've read through her reports myself and the DWP still gave her 0 point. We need to argue her case.

 

 

Any prompt reply would be much appreciated.

 

Many thanks.

 

Helen

Link to post
Share on other sites

The criteria for higher PIP mobility (assuming she can walk) is "Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey without another person, an assistance dog or an orientation aid" She needs to gather evidence to explain why. She needs to give examples. For example, there's a route which is rather familiar to me which I always have to use Google maps for. No matter how many times I use GM, I always get lost because my Autism means I don't understand written or verbal instructions. Therefore, would need another person with me. (and because of my physical disabilities, would need another person with me) There are actually only a few routes (which I've had to do several times before being able to do them unaided) that I can do completely unaided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send a SAR for the medical records. Get this as it may help.

 

Then ask the GP for a patient disclosure letter for the most recent visits and why.

 

Then maybe get some reports from the carers I.E. care plan. If the person has a personal assistant too then also one from them. Get as many of the support team to write a report as well as one from the main carer and or parents. This can only but help.

 

Since the Police have been involved ask them as well. The reasons for this is it could assist you when completing the claim forms that the claimant is a danger to herself and others. (I know this seems harsh but it's necessary I think in this case) I will add further help shortly as on a mobile device...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The criteria for higher PIP mobility (assuming she can walk) is "Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey without another person, an assistance dog or an orientation aid" She needs to gather evidence to explain why. She needs to give examples. For example, there's a route which is rather familiar to me which I always have to use Google maps for. No matter how many times I use GM, I always get lost because my Autism means I don't understand written or verbal instructions. Therefore, would need another person with me. (and because of my physical disabilities, would need another person with me) There are actually only a few routes (which I've had to do several times before being able to do them unaided) that I can do completely unaided.

 

Thanks for your reply and for those tips appreciate it, I have written them similar in the PIP form it's just wanted a sample letter how to write the reconsideration letter.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send a SAR for the medical records. Get this as it may help.

 

Then ask the GP for a patient disclosure letter for the most recent visits and why.

 

Then maybe get some reports from the carers I.E. care plan. If the person has a personal assistant too then also one from them. Get as many of the support team to write a report as well as one from the main carer and or parents. This can only but help.

 

Since the Police have been involved ask them as well. The reasons for this is it could assist you when completing the claim forms that the claimant is a danger to herself and others. (I know this seems harsh but it's necessary I think in this case) I will add further help shortly as on a mobile device...

 

Thank you for your reply appreciate it. The PIP form has already been completed and sent off my friend child got enhanced Care but low mob, the dwp already got all the hospital, doctors, any other person involved in her child autism case, I think the dwp has enough evidence but I will tell her to get in touch with her doctor with with regards to the pip low mobility. I have already done a SAR and will add on the reconsideration letter that a SAR has also been done that should help a bit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they already have the evidence, all you need to put in the reconsideration letter is why she meets the criteria, linking that to the evidence, e.g. 'as stated in paragraph x of the report dated y, the claimant cannot follow the route of a familiar journey because ...' and 'if she does try to follow the route of a familiar journey on her own she is at risk of getting lost as per paragraph z of report dated a' etc. Make it easy for the DWP and enclose copies of the relevant pages of evidence (no need to send all of it again) with bits highlighted.

 

Was there a face to face, and if so do you have a copy of that report?

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they already have the evidence, all you need to put in the reconsideration letter is why she meets the criteria, linking that to the evidence, e.g. 'as stated in paragraph x of the report dated y, the claimant cannot follow the route of a familiar journey because ...' and 'if she does try to follow the route of a familiar journey on her own she is at risk of getting lost as per paragraph z of report dated a' etc. Make it easy for the DWP and enclose copies of the relevant pages of evidence (no need to send all of it again) with bits highlighted.

 

Was there a face to face, and if so do you have a copy of that report?

 

Thanks for your reply. The claimant has Autism and her mother has a tracking device on her iphone so she could track her whereabouts because she get lost and then panic and cannot get home by herself and get violent outburst which has been written in her report.

 

The problem I am having is how to write the reconsideration letter to the dwp, I know what to write about her disability and everything else. I'm just having problems its how to ask the dwp for a request of re-consideration. There are no sample letter about that I can follow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are just asking how to go about requesting a mandatory reconsideration I think you will find what you want at this link:

 

https://www.turn2us.org.uk/Benefit-guides/Challenging-a-Personal-Independence-Payment-decisi/What-are-my-options

Any problems just ask and we'll try and help

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are just asking how to go about requesting a mandatory reconsideration I think you will find what you want at this link:

 

https://www.turn2us.org.uk/Benefit-guides/Challenging-a-Personal-Independence-Payment-decisi/What-are-my-options

Any problems just ask and we'll try and help

 

Thank you so much yes this is exactly what I'm asking how to go about requesting a mandatory reconsideration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One tip I have, as a person whose job used to involve reading the letters that people send to the DWP, is perhaps stating the obvious but it's surprising how often it's forgotten. It's this: make sure that you say clearly in your letter what it is you want them to do.

 

So you might start the letter a bit like this:

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Personal Indepence Payment - Mrs Jane Smith - NiNo AB 12 34 56 C

 

I am writing to ask that you reconsider your decision, made on to award me the lower rate mobility component of PIP. I believe that I satisfy the conditions for a higher rate award because....

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I seem to remember that when it was DLA, you could fill in a form if you were appealing. (you had to ask for them to reconsider it first) Do these forms exist for PIP? You just wrote your details and then what you were appealing against adn why.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One tip I have, as a person whose job used to involve reading the letters that people send to the DWP, is perhaps stating the obvious but it's surprising how often it's forgotten. It's this: make sure that you say clearly in your letter what it is you want them to do.

 

So you might start the letter a bit like this:

 

Thank you this help greatly. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I found out from the mum that her daughter actually got 10 point "Cannot follow the route of an unfamiliar journey without another person, assistance dog or orientation aid" but on the PIP claim form I have written Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey without another person, an assistance dog or an orientation aid”.

Does “Cannot follow the route of an unfamiliar journey without another person, assistance dog or orientation aid" give you low mobility PIP? Or no mobility at all?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi... Mobility is a different part of the claim entirely. If there are mobility issues then you may wish to list them and see what if any advice is required. I myself have myself have mobility issues as well, as I am not 'confident' in new places. I use Google maps should I get lost, which is in my case very often... What you have noted would come under the care side of your issue....

 

 

Even when shown several times I can still get lost or have an episode where it all gets too much and I end up very confused. In my case I call my carer/s and say I am going out here or there and they can track me with Google maps. It's happened often even last week on a route I thought I knew well, that said I was only in town and forgot where the car was parked and panicked.

 

 

What makes it hard for me may not be hard for someone else. So each case is dealt with on its own merits ok?... You just need to make all of your points individually and remember that what is deemed as safely is not always the case. Like crossing a road and then stopping in the middle of it because your memory has frozen for a moment. Things like this we take for granted until someone points something out that they may have missed in the application form...

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

I found out from the mum that her daughter actually got 10 point "Cannot follow the route of an unfamiliar journey without another person, assistance dog or orientation aid" but on the PIP claim form I have written Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey without another person, an assistance dog or an orientation aid”.

 

Does “Cannot follow the route of an unfamiliar journey without another person, assistance dog or orientation aid" give you low mobility PIP? Or no mobility at all?

 

 

Thanks in advance.

In post # 14 you say that you have written:

Cannot follow the route of a familiar journey without another person, an assistance dog or an orientation aid”.

That is descriptor (f) which attracts the highest score from Activity 1 (12 points).

If your friend scored 10 points from Activity 1 the assessors must have assessed that either descriptor (d) or (e) applied.

Have the assessors shown your friend what evidence they have to show that a 'familiar' journey could not result in the same consequences or effects on her as an 'unfamiliar' journey might have. Might not a 'familiar' journey easily turn into an 'unfamiliar' one?

It would only take, say, meeting a familiar person or stranger who challenged her with a question or comment, a group or crowd of people or kids who may appear to her as aggressive or posing a threat, or some obstacle in the way, or some unusual occurrence, to make the 'familiar' journey 'unfamiliar'.

Not only that but would not the effect of such an incident occurring, or even the dread of such an incident occurring, or that she is expected to undertake such journeys and be exposed to such incidents, leave her in a constant state of anxiety, dread or fear irrespective of whether a journey is anticipated imminently or not? Surely that cannot but worsen her condition over all.

If the assessors can't be persuaded that (f) from Activity 1 applies, can they be persuaded that even the lowest point scoring descriptor in Activity 2, Moving around, which is 4 points, is applicable?

In which case, would the 10 points from Activity 1, plus, say, a minimum of 4 points from Activity 2, be sufficient together to qualify for the higher mobility PIP? Could a strong, or stronger, case be made for this option based on the evidence? Would this not give more than the requisite number of points (12) as well, if successful?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...