Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
    • China green-lights mass production of autonomous flying taxis — with commercial flights set for 2025 | Live Science WWW.LIVESCIENCE.COM The EHang EH216-S autonomous flying taxi is the first eVTOL ready for mass production and could lead the way for flying cars around...  
    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2700 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

I have today received a Notice of Enforcement from Rossendales, it is relating to a council tax liability order from 2011.

 

I had made an arrangement with the local council to pay back monthly which was quite a low amount as I was on JSA. rather stupidly we never set up a direct debit and paid via online or payment card as and when we had the money by the due date.

 

Unfortunately after paying regularly for a couple of years we missed a few payments ( I thought the wife was paying it she thought I was!)

 

I called the council and tried to get the plan back on track and they would only accept a one off payment for the arrears £80 and then carry on the original plan at £20 per month.

 

To my absolute horror when I checked my notes from the call after receiving this notice today, the £80 payment was due on the 15th of September, I had it in my mind that that it was due 15th of October!

 

The enforcement notice is demanding full payment or agreement of a payment arrangement for £1466.20 no later than 23:59 on the 15th of October!

 

Does anyone know if these people will actually listen to my circumstances and agree a reasonable repayment plan as I cannot pay the full amount and in all honesty could not afford more than probably £30 - 40 per month

 

. I'm not going to go fully into figures but my monthly salary is just under £1200 my wife works part time and my Rent alone is £700pm (Due to rise soon) my current council tax £139pm without Gas and Electric etc etc plus also the monthly living costs of 3 of us Eating etc!

 

I know I'm not the only one with problems but any advice anyone can give me would be greatly appreciated

 

, I actually feel physically sick after opening the letter and after surfing around a bit and reading things like the Bailiffs will take your car!

 

I am very worried! (BTW the car was paid for by my mother in law as we were without one for 2 years, but it is in my wife's name and is probably only worth about £300) I am not completely naive regarding Baliffs and know not to let them in etc

 

Thanks in advance

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am thinking of emailing them, does this seem acceptable?.........

 

Dear Sirs

 

I have received today a Notice of enforcement regarding a liability order for outstanding council tax owed to Uttlesford District Council.

I had agreed to reinstate a payment plan after missing a couple of payments to them and agreed a payment to them on the 15th of October however it transpires that it should of been the 15th of September and they have now passed the account to yourselves.

 

I cannot pay the outstanding balance of £1466.20 (which includes your Compliance stage fee) in full as I am on a very limited budget and will have to pay by monthly instalments. Please advise me of how I can set up a payment arrangement with yourselves. Do you provide an Income vs Outgoings document that I can complete to prove that any offer I make is reasonable? Please do not offer the opportunity for one of your officers attend my premises to discuss the matter as A) I cannot afford the existing balance let alone an added fee of £235 and B) I do understand the implications to myself once your agent has been ‘let in’ and I will not be willing to do so.

 

 

Please reply via this email address as soon as possible.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you 'Bailiff Advice' that would be very much appreciated :) I am not disputing that I owe the money, I am just not prepared to be bullied into an agreement that I cannot afford.

My worst nightmare is they come and clamp the car as it would mean I couldn't get to work (without paying £30 per week in bus fare!)

 

I may not be able to reply until late tomorrow as I work 12 hours shifts starting at 4am tomorrow :(

 

Speak Soon

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am thinking of emailing them, does this seem acceptable?.........

 

Dear Sirs

 

I have received today a Notice of enforcement regarding a liability order for outstanding council tax owed to Uttlesford District Council.

I had agreed to reinstate a payment plan after missing a couple of payments to them and agreed a payment to them on the 15th of October however it transpires that it should of been the 15th of September and they have now passed the account to yourselves.

 

I cannot pay the outstanding balance of £1466.20 (which includes your Compliance stage fee) in full as I am on a very limited budget and will have to pay by monthly instalments. Please advise me of how I can set up a payment arrangement with yourselves. Do you provide an Income vs Outgoings document that I can complete to prove that any offer I make is reasonable? Please do not offer the opportunity for one of your officers attend my premises to discuss the matter as A) I cannot afford the existing balance let alone an added fee of £235 and B) I do understand the implications to myself once your agent has been ‘let in’ and I will not be willing to do so.

 

 

Please reply via this email address as soon as possible.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

 

It would help if you provide a bit more detail. The following draft letter could assist (change as necessary).

 

 

 

 

Dear Sirs

 

Re: Reference number: xxx

 

I am writing with regards to a Notice of Enforcement that I received from your company on 2nd October in relation to arrears of council tax from 2011 owed to Uttlesford Council.

 

Background:

 

Following the Liability Order in 2011, I contacted the council and explained that I was out of work and in receipt of Job Seekers Allowance. The council agreed to accept small monthly payments of £20 per month towards the debt. After paying regularly for the past couple of years we unfortunately defaulted. I contacted the council in xxx and they agreed to reinstate the previous payment arrangement (of £20 per month) on condition that I pay the amount of arrears (of £80) by 15th September. I genuinely believed in my mind that payment of this amount was due on 15th October (instead of 15th September) and I was shocked to discover the error when reading back on my notes of the conversation after receiving the Notice of Enforcement from your company requesting the full balance of £1,466.20.

 

Financial position:

 

I am married and have one child aged xx. The property that we live in is rented. I work full time and my monthly take home salary is just under £1,200 per month. My wife works part and her take home salary is £xxx. In addition we receive monthly child benefit of £x.

 

The vast majority of our income goes towards our monthly rent of £700 and our council tax of £136 per month. The balance only just meets the everyday costs of electricity/gas/food/clothing and motoring costs.

 

Taking our income and expenditure into consideration, the maximum that we can afford to pay towards our arrears is £30 per month. I am unable to borrow any money from family or friend to reduce the debt. The goods in our property are normal everyday items worth very little the vast majority of which are considered exempt under the new regulations. We have a very old motor vehicle which is valued at approx £300 and which is vital to me for my employment.

 

I would be grateful if consideration can be given to accepting the above payment proposal. If you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Yours faithfully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Thanks so much for that. do you think this will be ok to email, or should it be sent in the post recorded delivery?

 

Obviously I'm thinking the email route would be quicker and I'll know where we stand

 

Once again thanks for your advice

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have today recieved a reply via email it is as follows:-

 

Thank you for your email,

We note the reply email address potentially belongs to a third party and as such we are unable to discuss the case via a third party without a signed letter of authority from the named liable party.

Please provide the necessary letter of authority in order for us to assist or ask the named liable party to contact us on 0844 701 3980 to discuss the matter further.

A letter has been posted out to the named.

Yours Sincerely,

........ Not sure how they can determine that the email is a third party or not! It's not b.t.w it is my own personal email address.

In other words I'm guessing they are trying to get me to phone so they can bully me in person :(, Do you think I should call?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all

 

Update.........

 

After a bit of backward and forward of emails I was eventually emailed a financial statement paperwork and all action was held until today 21st October.

I filled out and emailed everything yesterday and asked them to confirm that all was well (which they didn't) I have today had a reply which includes the following .......

 

We regret that your offer of repayment is not acceptable, due to your contribution to non-priority spending and disposable income available.

 

Council Tax is a priority debt which takes preference over ALL non essential spending and unsecured creditors. Your financial statement lists the following non priority spending: £50.00 per month for TV/Phone/Broadband, £50.00 per month for Clothing.

 

Therefore the minimum amount we must request is £100.00 every 31 days.

 

Your first payment is due by 31st October 2014.

 

How can it be non essential to allow for clothing for a family of three in a monthly budget ? ( I have a 12 year old who unfortunately is growing at a rate of Knotts) and I got that figure from National debtlines monthly suggested living expenses! and regarding the Phone/ TV/ broadband - I'm in a contract?! and I was including all mobiles in that figure as well!

 

I don't know what to do I certainly don't have £100 per month spare!

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanks

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter confirms that they will accept a payment proposal which is at least a step in the right direction and you now have until 31st October to make the first payment. You need to ensure that you use this time to email Rossendales to outline that the figures for the phone charges cannot be reduced due to the contracts and that the figure of £50 per month for clothing is not only correct but is within the guideline figures as provided by National Debtline.

 

All creditors rely upon 'trigger figures' which are updated yearly. Naturally I have copies and I can assure you that the figure given by you are perfectly acceptable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

 

I will draft an email in response and if you don't mind could I ask you to pass an eye over it?

 

I am also considering ringing my council and asking them if they will recall the debt as the Bailiffs are being unreasonable? if I get no joy maybe ask them to provide me with the details of my local councillor as a last resort and maybe bug him for advice ?

 

As I've said before I'm not disputing the debt and am currently paying my current council tax on time every month, I just messed up (still kicking myself) but now have the stress of the wolves at the door. My wife is currently on tablets from the GP for stress and anxiety, so I am trying to do this as peacefully as possible!

 

Will be in touch soon

 

Thanks

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sipea71

 

I would second BA's advice that those clothing/telecoms costs appear perfectly reasonable in this context. Rossendales appear to be implying that you should budget for £0 across these two areas, which is nonsensical.

 

I would advise you to make payment of the amount you deem affordable by the above deadline, whether Rossendales have formally accepted it or not by then. Paying by a more "impersonal" method, such as via their website, might be best as it avoids you getting sucked into further debates about what is or isn't acceptable expenditure.

 

Dennis

@natdebtline

For Free, Confidential and Independent advice: 0808 808 4000

Monday - Friday 9am to 9pm // Saturday 9.30am to 1pm // 24-hour voicemail. Please leave a message to request an information pack. http://www.nationaldebtline.org // http://www.mymoneysteps.org

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would I be right in saying in the email that the figures stated in my financial statement fall well within trigger figures suggested by the Common Financial Statement that helps identify that levels of monthly expenditure are deemed reasonable ?

 

Or am I trying to understand something that I don't? lol!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be the cynic in me but another reason why this could be is that it may then give them an excuse to send someone out so the cost to you is increased. We have seen a few such things of late.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had that thought in the back of my mind as well, I will mention it in my email that I want to avoid any such action that will increase in the debt!

 

I have drafted this email, let me know what you think please.

I am about to go out for about an hour so will be unable to reply to any comments.

 

Thanks

 

Simon

 

 

Thank you for your email.

 

 

I do not understand why you consider my offer unacceptable due to the payments.

 

 

The figures stated in my financial statement fall well within ‘trigger figures’ suggested by the Common Financial Statement that helps identify that levels of monthly expenditure are deemed reasonable.

 

 

If this is not the case, could you please explain to me why Rossendales would consider £50 per month not a reasonable allowance for two adults and one 12 year old child for clothing on a monthly basis.

 

 

I would also like to inform you that the figure for Telecoms included the entire allowance for the whole family, which includes mobile phones as well, all of which I am contractually obliged to pay for the next 14 months at least and are not an expenditure I can just stop paying. The figures for the phone charges cannot be reduced due to the contracts.

 

 

Can you actually confirm to me that Rossendales are implying that I should budget for £0 across these two areas?

 

 

With this in mind however I am willing to try and budget elsewhere, and would like to revise my original offer of £30 per month to £50.

 

 

I am aware that Rossendales next stage of action is to send a Bailiff to my address and am also aware of the additional cost involved if they do, and would like to avoid any further action as I cannot allow the debt to increase. I have stated previously I am unable to borrow any money from family or friends to reduce the debt. The goods in our property are normal everyday items worth very little the vast majority of which are considered exempt under the new regulations.

 

 

I would be grateful if you would give my revised offer your consideration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks BA

 

I will hold off sending until you've clarified the points.

Thank you so much for your advice it is very much appreciated.

 

Look forward to hearing from you

 

Simon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I have drafted this email, let me know what you think please.

I am about to go out for about an hour so will be unable to reply to any comments.

 

Thanks

 

Simon

 

 

Thank you for your email.

 

 

I do not understand why you consider my offer unacceptable due to the payments.

 

 

The figures stated in my financial statement fall well within ‘trigger figures’ suggested by the Common Financial Statement that helps identify that levels of monthly expenditure are deemed reasonable.

 

 

If this is not the case, could you please explain to me why Rossendales would consider £50 per month not a reasonable allowance for two adults and one 12 year old child for clothing on a monthly basis.

 

 

I would also like to inform you that the figure for Telecoms included the entire allowance for the whole family, which includes mobile phones as well, all of which I am contractually obliged to pay for the next 14 months at least and are not an expenditure I can just stop paying. The figures for the phone charges cannot be reduced due to the contracts.

 

 

Can you actually confirm to me that Rossendales are implying that I should budget for £0 across these two areas?

 

 

With this in mind however I am willing to try and budget elsewhere, and would like to revise my original offer of £30 per month to £50.

 

 

I am aware that Rossendales next stage of action is to send a Bailiff to my address and am also aware of the additional cost involved if they do, and would like to avoid any further action as I cannot allow the debt to increase. I have stated previously I am unable to borrow any money from family or friends to reduce the debt. The goods in our property are normal everyday items worth very little the vast majority of which are considered exempt under the new regulations.

 

 

I would be grateful if you would give my revised offer your consideration.

 

I am responding to your email dated xxx where you have rejected my proposal to repay the balance of xxxx by way of monthly payments of £30 and I note that you would be prepared instead to accept a figure of £100 per month. In your email you questioned the amount of £xxx for telephone/mobiles.

 

Unfortunately, much as I would like to reduce this monthly figure this would not be possible given that the mobile phones are provided under contracts with 14 months still remaining.

 

The second item of expenditure that you questioned was the figure of £50 per month for clothing. Before writing to you I had contacted National Debt Line and the figure for clothing (of £50 per month) was within their Common Financial Statement for a family of two adults and a 12 year old child.

 

I am anxious to avoid the account being referred to an individual bailiff as this will add further fees to my account which will make my financial position even worse than it is at present. I am also anxious to get the account paid as soon as possible. With this in mind, I will have to reduce the expenditure for clothing by £20 thereby enabling me to increase the monthly payment proposal to £50 per month. I hope that you will find this revised payment proposal acceptable.

 

I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...