Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I suggested consideration of bankruptcy some years ago. It was not well received.
    • That is a superb WS. However, I have a few tweaks to suggest. In (2) "indicating" not "indication". I think to be consistent with your numbering, in (6) the Beavis case should be EXHIBIT 2. Do you really need to include over 100 pages of Beavis?  I think that would be likely to annoy the judge.  Just try and find the bit where they decide it was not a penalty due to having an interest in limiting the time that vehicles can stay. I'll have a look myself for this bit later as it's highly likely to be in WSs from PPCs who think that that paragraph means all their charges are valid always on every occasion. After your current (7) add this.  It's always useful to refer to a judgment when making a legal point - 8.  In the case PCM vs Bull, Claim No. B4GF26K6, where the Defendant was issued parking tickets for parking on private roads with signage stating “No parking at any time”, District Judge Glen in his final statement mentioned that: “the notice was prohibitive and didn’t communicate any offer of parking and that landowners may have claim in trespass, but that was not under consideration”.   In (14) if my maths are right the CPR request should be "EXHIBIT 3".  it is missing from your list of exhibits. In (16) the two figures should be £100 and £170.  They are entitled to increase fro,m £60 to £100, they are not entitled to increase to £170.  To make it clear for the judge I would write - 16. The Claimant has artificially inflated their claim for a £100 invoice to £170. This is simply a poor attempt to circumvent the legal costs cap at small claims. 17. The Claimant has also invented a second fictitious charge, for legal representative's costs, when they have no legal representative. You also need ot number your exhibits. The rest is excellent - well done.
    • Did you ever think of walking away? Become bankrupt and in 12 months it'll all be behind you. My feeling is that you may well get nothing from the sale of the property anyway. Going by the date this thread started it looks like eight years of arrears, lender's costs and receiver’s fees on top.
    • Just to clarify - I make use of evening legal clinics. It is not always possible to see a lawyer (they have limited time and days/week).  This means questions one has may never get answered or there's weeks between follow-ups.   To be really clear - I am representing myself; I am playing at being lawyer/ barrister - which means I take help wherever I can get it (and then research it thoroughly). Ae - a judge in a recent hearing pointed out the receiver is not part of my current proceedings - and suggested I have a separate claim v the receiver. Disclosure has presented damning evidence v the receiver  The receiver against whom I have a complaint is not part of the receiver governing body.   The receivership is in 2 names - a joint one.  My complaint is directed at whom I was told is the lead receiver.  The other named receiver IS a member of the governing body.  But he has now left the company.  And the lead receiver has retired - but is still a working consultant on my case.   All the evidence shows it was the 'lead' receiver who was doing all the  work/ the misbehaviour.   But if the appointment was 'joint' would I make a complaint against them both?    I am sure that wouldn't go down well with the other receiver who is at the beginning of his career. The law is very much against borrowers.   But the evidence against this receivership is crystal clear.   I just don't know how and to whom to complain.   The places I've tried so far don't offer much transparency       
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Work trying to get rid of me after knee op. *Settled Out Of Tribunal*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3103 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Should have adjourned until the rep was available it was your right.

 

Bill

All information given above is purely my own opinion. Some based on personal experience. Where backed up by case files I will make that known. However, until then please take all of what I say with a pinch of salt and accept it only as a reference. :madgrin::madgrin::madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thats fine, do the notes anywhere make mention that you were asked if you wanted representation? :)

 

If you said yes or they did not mention it then use that as added grounds for appeal

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats fine, do the notes anywhere make mention that you were asked if you wanted representation? :)

 

If you said yes or they did not mention it then use that as added grounds for appeal

 

Yes they asked and I said 'no' due to the fact I thought proceedings were still informal. I didn't know we could adjourn till after the meeting

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, can an employer dismiss you on medical grounds on 'perceived disability' one which doesnt exit outside of the Occupational Health nurses mind? Theres wear and tear in my knee, but nothing more than age and the deterioration has ceased between two MRI scans 18 months apart.

 

Can I argue that if that is the case, it leads my ex-employer to require vetting of all new employees ,which in its self is illegal on disability grounds?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Anyone? :violin:

 

You could appeal the termination in writing on grounds that at the very least there should have been and ergonomic work place assessment carried out by an external assessor (usually provided by access to work via DWP) this would have been conducted by a qualified occupational therapist/assessor who should assess your role, it's demands, it's mechanics, stresses on your system etc and then reviewed that against your medical diagnosis, prognosis and also a full functionality assessment which may include the assessor monitoring your condition and its effects upon you throughout a usual working day.

 

Depending on what that report said then if in your favour the company could and should then conduct an individualised risk assessment of the role, your conditions, the medical reports, the access to work report and the companies off health report.

 

I do not know of time limits to appeal terminations based on capability but there should be capability procedures in your staff handbook etc.

 

Sounds like a typical public sector Occ Health management fudge up of these things. Do you work for public sector or a very large organisation?

 

I would appeal straight away, learn the employee relations act, the employment act and the health and safety act, sounds like your Union guy was useless too.

  • Confused 1

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could appeal the termination in writing on grounds that at the very least there should have been and ergonomic work place assessment carried out by an external assessor (usually provided by access to work via DWP) this would have been conducted by a qualified occupational therapist/assessor who should assess your role, it's demands, it's mechanics, stresses on your system etc and then reviewed that against your medical diagnosis, prognosis and also a full functionality assessment which may include the assessor monitoring your condition and its effects upon you throughout a usual working day.

 

Depending on what that report said then if in your favour the company could and should then conduct an individualised risk assessment of the role, your conditions, the medical reports, the access to work report and the companies off health report.

 

I do not know of time limits to appeal terminations based on capability but there should be capability procedures in your staff handbook etc.

 

Sounds like a typical public sector Occ Health management fudge up of these things. Do you work for public sector or a very large organisation?

 

I would appeal straight away, learn the employee relations act, the employment act and the health and safety act, sounds like your Union guy was useless too.

 

Have you been pensioned or dismissed on grounds of capability.

Also if you have funds or union insurance that will pay for it lodge a claim at the ET for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.

 

What matters with your disabities is the effect on you doing the job not what they perceive is the effect.

 

If it's a health and safety reason then this should have been properly assessed as outlined in my comment above.

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could appeal the termination in writing on grounds that at the very least there should have been and ergonomic work place assessment carried out by an external assessor (usually provided by access to work via DWP) this would have been conducted by a qualified occupational therapist/assessor who should assess your role, it's demands, it's mechanics, stresses on your system etc and then reviewed that against your medical diagnosis, prognosis and also a full functionality assessment which may include the assessor monitoring your condition and its effects upon you throughout a usual working day.

 

Depending on what that report said then if in your favour the company could and should then conduct an individualised risk assessment of the role, your conditions, the medical reports, the access to work report and the companies off health report.

 

I do not know of time limits to appeal terminations based on capability but there should be capability procedures in your staff handbook etc.

 

Sounds like a typical public sector Occ Health management fudge up of these things. Do you work for public sector or a very large organisation?

 

I would appeal straight away, learn the employee relations act, the employment act and the health and safety act, sounds like your Union guy was useless too.

 

Have you been pensioned or dismissed on grounds of capability.

Also if you have funds or union insurance that will pay for it lodge a claim at the ET for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.

Ppp

 

What matters with your disabities is the effect on you doing the job not what they perceive is the effect.

 

If it's a health and safety reason then this should have been properly assessed as outlined in my comment above.

 

Loads of stated cases at the employment appeal tribunal and court of appeal etc where someone who didn't want to and they should have found another role for you even if it meant moving someone or giving you a job higher than your grade as long as you could do it.

 

A

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

I explained at my meeting 'pre-dismissal' that I'd like to stay within the company as the pension company has a deal where if you have to move jobs, they'd make up the difference on wage if it was a lower rate. I asked to be moved to two jobs, which we all agreed seemed within the remit of Occupational Healths requirements ,but once again they swung in and said 'no'. So basically dismissed on medical grounds. The union guy said I '...should be happy I've had so much time off' To which I said '..if they'd said there would be no hope of a return twelve months ago, I could have made better provision for my further,rather than being medically dismissed at the point of return' I also have the 'medically dismissed' black mark against me for future employ. This will definitely impede my chances of getting a decent job. Also, why would the pension company make provision for me over such a length of time if the company had no intention of redeploying/re-employing me?

 

I've lodged an appeal ,which will be heard in a weeks time. We both think (me and the union guy) that they've not given me a fair crack of the whip at my old role. Even though the consultant has written to my employer basically saying there's nothing wrong with me. I kind of feel as though all trust has been broken between me and the employer.

 

 

They basically feel as the role will be too demanding for my knee. Which is odd ,as they have guys 20 years my senior doing the same role with dodgy knees. So much so,they provided knee guards for when they have to bend down.

 

Thanks for the link, I've read it with gusto!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going through an issue with work. Im finding the union is a little laid back. Nothing too major yet, but they're very reticent regarding action.

 

Im a little worried they might be weak in the face of my Tribunal (They're the same ones who work with employees of a company which rhymes with 'Besco')

I've been so worried ,I've approached a private company who do work on a 'fixed fee' basis. I can afford to go down the fixed fee route. I want to make sure my ex-employer really isn't left off the hook.

 

Would anyone recommend a best route? Its the first time I've ever done this in 25 years of work. Im not asking for definitives, but in the face of an ineffectual union ,but with unlimited access to legal cover, or go for a fixed fee from a firm which I'll be the main focus ie. they'll be working directly for me.

 

Are union legal cover as effective as paid private action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say, given the choice, it's probably better to go with a solicitor of your choice.

 

In my experience, unions will either conduct the work in house, send the work to a referral team of semi qualified paralegals who keep the work in house there, or refer it to their panel solicitors who generally do the work for a low fixed amount.

 

A no win no fee qualified solicitor will be more likely to work hard on the case, in my opinion. They need to get the right result to get paid for the job!

 

The other option is to see if you have legal expenses insurance under your household contents insurance policy - in which case you could invoke your right to freedom of choice and find a reputable firm.

 

It's a matter of personal choice though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take advantage of the legal plus if it's more of a legal issue which your membership covers and take it from there.

All information given above is purely my own opinion. Some based on personal experience. Where backed up by case files I will make that known. However, until then please take all of what I say with a pinch of salt and accept it only as a reference. :madgrin::madgrin::madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might edit your post Bill... calling company into disrepute when looking at your whole posting history, and so on....

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I explained at my meeting 'pre-dismissal' that I'd like to stay within the company as the pension company has a deal where if you have to move jobs, they'd make up the difference on wage if it was a lower rate. I asked to be moved to two jobs, which we all agreed seemed within the remit of Occupational Healths requirements ,but once again they swung in and said 'no'. So basically dismissed on medical grounds. The union guy said I '...should be happy I've had so much time off' To which I said '..if they'd said there would be no hope of a return twelve months ago, I could have made better provision for my further,rather than being medically dismissed at the point of return' I also have the 'medically dismissed' black mark against me for future employ. This will definitely impede my chances of getting a decent job. Also, why would the pension company make provision for me over such a length of time if the company had no intention of redeploying/re-employing me?

 

 

 

I've lodged an appeal ,which will be heard in a weeks time. We both think (me and the union guy) that they've not given me a fair crack of the whip at my old role. Even though the consultant has written to my employer basically saying there's nothing wrong with me. I kind of feel as though all trust has been broken between me and the employer.

 

 

 

 

 

They basically feel as the role will be too demanding for my knee. Which is odd ,as they have guys 20 years my senior doing the same role with dodgy knees. So much so,they provided knee guards for when they have to bend down.

 

 

 

Thanks for the link, I've read it with gusto!

 

 

 

 

You need to try and get the role profiles/job specs for those other roles asap. If you have any access to the companies policies and procedures handbook I would get them too together with any Generic Risk assessments made.

 

I am sure the Union guy would have access to those documents if he is still an employee. Either that or get a mate still working their to source them for you.

 

IMO they sacked you off because of your disability and quite clearly acted unlawfully. I would be preparing to go tribunal

I am fighting it all the way :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again phaitun!

 

sage advice indeed. This is exactly what I'd suspected...and sort of thought the union guy would be jumping all over company for breaching rules, but he seems quite relaxed on the matter. He doesn't work for my company ,he works directly for the union (not sure if I used 'rep' in right term?) which is why Im a bit concerned at 'laissez faire' attitude to proceedings. I have job specs off the works intranet (still have access) and there are guys the HR guy they openly admitted had knee problems doing the job already:( Also ,many of the drivers are approaching retirement, so I'd assume I'd have better health ? (not wanting to sound ageist, but trying to underline case)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most companies will use tactics we don't like. Highlighting that in my opinion does not meen your bringing them into disrepute. However point taken and post edited.

 

Bill

All information given above is purely my own opinion. Some based on personal experience. Where backed up by case files I will make that known. However, until then please take all of what I say with a pinch of salt and accept it only as a reference. :madgrin::madgrin::madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

use the union. Get a full time regional officer involved rather than your local reps. Contact head office if the branch wont get off their backsides to help. The legal help will cost you nothing via the union and their solicitors are better than any no-win no fee people, trust me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lodge an appeal and also an ET claim if the three-month deadline for EqA looms. The mandatory ACAS intervention will suspend the time limit while you negotiate.

 

You do not have wait until your appeal. Take care they don't time you out.

 

Take action early and quickly. Try to find a lawyer. Address all your concerns from now on for the benefit of the ET.

 

Cite this other person as a comparator. Try to find out whether he has the same condition as you. Ask him if he's willing to share details about his knee and OH.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lodge an appeal and also an ET claim if the three-month deadline for EqA looms. The mandatory ACAS intervention will suspend the time limit while you negotiate.

 

You do not have wait until your appeal. Take care they don't time you out.

 

Take action early and quickly. Try to find a lawyer. Address all your concerns from now on for the benefit of the ET.

 

Cite this other person as a comparator. Try to find out whether he has the same condition as you. Ask him if he's willing to share details about his knee and OH.

 

Thanks Pusillanimous!

I'm in her middle of an appeal now. They've stuck by their guns and glossed over the points above. It's adjourned til next week as the union guy blew holes in their OH assessment . So hopefully it won't time out. It looks as though getting my job back is a pipe dream :( they're looking at a settlement agreement. Roughly three months pay as I've had a lot of time paid for when off (even thought that wasnt through the kinder ness of my employer,rather it was out of my own pocket via the pension company) so the union guy said :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Negotiate, negotiate, negotiate. If that is their plan, tell them you will settle for six months salary to go quietly.

 

Be realistic.

 

We floated that on the table and got a 'you can forget that' reply.

I've lost a well paid job here. All the medical evidence points to the contrary of what the employer is saying. I feel as though they should put a zero on the figure to commensurate for what Im actually losing here. :( I've done nothing wrong, I've complied with all requests from my employer, (medical disclosure, attending meetings when requested ,being generally very open) and Im now looking at getting punted in to the long grass due to a normal medical procedure ,which I came out of with no ill effects.

It leaves a real bitter taste in my mouth when I think about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...