Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.    Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.   The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved.  Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
    • It was all my own work based on my previous emails to P2G which Bank has seen.
    • I was referring to #415 where you wrote "I was forced to try to sell - and couldn't." . And nearer the start in #79 .. "I couldn't sell.  I had an incredibly valuable asset. Huge equity.  But the interest accrued / the property market suffered and I couldn't find a buyer even at a level just to clear the debt." In #194 you said you'd tried to sell for four years.  The reason for these points is that a lot of the claims against for example your surveyor, solicitor, broker, the lender and now the receiver are mainly founded in a belief that they should have been able to do something but did not. Things that might seem self evident to you but not necessarily to others. Pressing these claims may well need a bit more hard evidence, rather than an appeal to common sense. Can you show evidence of similar properties, with similar freehold issues, selling readily? And solid reasons why the lender should have been able to sell when you couldn't.
    • You can use a family's address.   The only caveat is for the final hearing you'd need to be there in person   HOWEVER i'd expect them to pay if its only £200 because costs of attending will be higher than that
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSA going to see us homeless!


LouiseK
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Could anyone with experience of this please give advice because we really are at our wits end.*

 

Today my partner recieved a 'review' of what Child Support he must pay each month for the next year for his 2 children from his ex wife and is being collected by a DEO straight from his wages every month so he cannot do anything about it.

Despite regular payments for his children he now has 'arrears' to pay which have seemingly appeared out of nowhere. If regular payments of the required amount on the CSA's demand have been paid then how could there possibly be any arrears?*

 

To complicate the matter a whole lot further:

My partner and his ex wife separated 13 years ago.*

After divorcing on grounds of adultery on her part the house was sold and she kept the equity that the house had made and my partner saw not a penny of it.

However, he still had his children at the weekends and he and his ex wife arranged and agreed maintenance payments between themselves which was adhered to. After moving on with his own life he later met somebody else, much to his ex wifes dismay. She soon made things difficult in regards to access with his children by stipulating that he wasn't to have the children around his new partner. As you can imagine things got out of hand and the poor kids involved were just trapped in the middle and soon didnt want to see their Father because of the atmosphere created and the fact their mum forbid them to go to his house if his partner was there. She made it all but impossible for him to see his children and then filed a claim for CSA despite him paying regular maintainance and wanting to be a part of his children's lives.*

 

He has not seen his children for a few years now and from what she has said; they sadly do not want to see him either.

 

The ex wife has since remarried. They have a very plush 4 bedroom house in a nice part of London and her and her husband both have very good jobs each earning around the 60k mark a year. My partners kids never go without and they refer to the new husband as their Dad.

 

My partner and I, like a lot of working class families, are not just feeling the pinch of the credit crunch but are also suffering financially.*

 

My partner has a low paid job and I am on statutory maternity leave only bringing in £28.73 per week.*

We have a baby boy who is almost 6 months old and between us have outgoings and debts that exhaust our income. We live in a 1 berdoom place which we rent and only just get by every month and this £400 a month now being taken from the pittance we bring in a month is literally going to send us over the edge.

We have tried speaking to the CSA and they do not care about what our outgoings are and say that the CSA payments much come before anything else... Even our 6 month old child who has to go without. The preposterous idea that we 'take out a loan' to cover the arrears is just laughable - we've reached our limit in credit with trying to survive as it is!*

I must state that we do not qualify for help from the government as apparently we earn just above the breadline for the qualifying margin to recieve any benefits.

 

While I whole heatedly agree that parents do not live with their child/children should help towards the financial cost of having them I do think that it should be made reasonable and affordable in a way which is fair to the absent parents as well as the mother and children.

 

The very fact of the matter is this: paying this now £400 per month means we will not be able to afford anything else. Every penny we bring in is accounted for so the CSA payment will have to come out of something else, be it food, electric, the rent etc. we just cannot afford it and we will end up homeless! How can they see my 6 month old child on the street. That is inhumane when the children the CSA payment is for will not be affected at all if they didn't recieve as much or at all for that matter!

 

We do not have anywhere else to go, friends and family cannot put us up so what are we to do?*

Like I said.. I agree parents should pay for their kids but when the ex wifes situation is a pretty cushy lifestyle and ours is about to see us and our baby homeless it rings alarm bells that something's not right.*

The £400 to the ex wife is a pittance to her but everything to us to ensure warmth food and a food over our heads. Why should my partner pay such an extortionate amount to kids his is restricted to see which results in the child he has living with him to go without essentials?

What do we do?*

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not a CSA expert by any means but I have has experience of the CSA and have come to the conclusion that they are not fit for purpose for either the absent parent or the parent with care.

Under the old CSA rules, the parent with care is deemed to have no assessable income if they are in receipt of tax credits or other benefits which she might not be if the joint household income is as high as you say it is

When I was having problems with the CSA I got my mp involved and he managed to get it sorted.

If you go on the theyworkforyou website you can find out who your mp is and ring, write or e mail them

Also, when your partner was making voluntary payments did he have a record of them such as bank statements?

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone

I am very much hoping you can help me too as partner is at his wits end.

Basically he has a 15 year old son from a previous relationship who he has been giving money too, buying his clothes, paying for school trips / holidays etc for the past 10 years. He has a very vindictive ex who likes nothing more than to cause grief wherever she goes.

Although said ex, is in a relationship with a man who works full time, she sits at home on benefits saying she lives alone totally milking the system. She really does want to have her cake and eat it!

CSA have contacted my partner and demanded £7,000.00 in arrears, they simply do not care that he is self employed and has made a loss this past two years. We asked for an assessmnet based on his earnings and they have demanded he pay over £120 a week for arrears and the current CSA. He offered to pay £120 a month for assessment and arrears until his situation improves but he got threatened with court action, bailiffs and prison! They cannot serve a DOE as he is self employed - thank heavens for small mercies!

It isn't that he doesn't want to pay, he does but this is a son who he doesn't see at all, contact ceased as every time he visited it was constant, 'where are you working', 'how much do you earn', 'how much do you spend on shopping' all the time, it was quite sad really that she had programmed her child to do nothing but ask questions!! Money money money.

At Christmas and birthdays my partner spends over £250 on son, she spends about £40, last christmas just one xbox game!! This will have to stop if he has to pay out vast amounts of money every month.

He is in an IVA as he only just managed to scrape by when recession hit and hung onto his business by the skin of his teeth, he struggles to pat £430 IVA every single month and the CSA told him that mortgage, Electricity, Gas, IVA payments etc are not priority debts???? Well hello, if he fails to pay his IVA he loses his house??

We asked for a new assessment on his earnings, they have now asked for £36.00 per month for CSA assessment and want more for the arrears of £7k. Any advice would be so greatfully received.

Thankiing you in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

For the first poster, the very best thing you can do is to contact your MP and ask he takes on your case. It is the best way forward to have the CSA look at your case. You are not dealing with a Government Department directly, but with a sub contracted out private agency. They very much wish to retain the contract and MP contact is black marks against their performance.

 

The last poster if it is that the PWC is at home claiming benefits, she will not be receiving the money you are paying in. If she is on state benefit she will receive the first £5 (or that's what it used to be a few years ago) the rest go into a government pot. She will only receive the full amount you are paying if she is working or not claiming. Sadly this fact has caused many families who had amicable arrangements to fall out unnecessarily. PWC are told to go through the CSA when they start to claim benefits other wise their claim is affected...so effectively the ex wont be eating your cake the government will.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Post 6 is wrong if a pwc is on benefits the csa monies are not counted as income, she will be getting benefits and the full csa monies, this changed about two odd years ago wheras before a pwc only got nothing of it or about 10.00.

 

PWC may not get any arrears owed from when csa monies were counted as income, but certainly will be getting ongoing csa monies.

 

I know as get the support my ex pays.

 

One thing do want to add for new partners painting very poor pictures of pwc as in sits on bum on benefits etc...... and sides told by exs, be careful, my ex told his new partner I was this and that and also refusing a divorce as to he could not marry her but so so wanted to. Told her many bad stories a bit like what told me when we were together whilst seeing new partner, you know the type. She has not been told by him however we have been divorced for years, some exs rather than tell true situation as in dont want to remarry and happy the way they are, prefer to say oh the wicked ex wife, tick tick, and the new partner starts to hate a person they do not know. Mine still has her believing we are married and that its my fault, so remember there are indeed two sides.

 

Some pwc actually use their csa monies would you believe for the children.

 

The post refering to a pwc on benefits only buying a child an xbox game, terrible, but perhaps that is all she can afford and if you are getting all this feedback from your new partner, then beware it may be one sided.

 

As for new families with their own children on breadline with csa demanding so high amounts you have my sympathies, but you have to remember the pwc of the prior children will only have them as her concern. In my case luckily ex has not had further children as I can see really does not want to re marry and have more children, he sadly however is stringhing his new partner along by telling her it is my fault he cannot marry and therefore wont go for ivf as she cannot have children naturally. Sick eh but i wont get involved and tell her, not my place.

 

I have been fortunate with the csa when the actually did seem to get cases sorted under csa 1, they seemed to at time target sorting cases with single parents on benefits as was obviously in their interest to regain these monies. I am a reasonable person and ex has had a huge pay increase and I have not asked for recalculation. I am hoping when changes start again as they are planned to then he will pay directrather than deo due to my being reasonable, but we will see.

Edited by watchinginvestigation2011
ivf
Link to post
Share on other sites

ps. Right way to go to fight csa is your MP.

 

As ashmk says self employed does protect fromd direct payments being taken, but it very much depends on what job you do and wether can becoem self employed. Either way you still have to pay maintenace but self employed gives you more protection whilst fighting but if you earn the money and csa has allowed for what you are entitled to as in new kids, they you still have to pay.

Edited by watchinginvestigation2011
Link to post
Share on other sites

We know how you feel.

My husband phoned the CSA after he split with his ex, and asked to pay her money (as she wouldn't take it directly from him) - the told him it couldn't be done that way, so my husband left it and carried on with his life. 18months later (just before we got married) we were hit with a bill for 18months worth of arrears as the CSA had set the claim up anyway (however we didn't know this at the time and just assumed his ex had claimed).

We are now in the situation where the CSA take 40% of my husbands earnings every month - often leaving us borrowing money off friends and family just to pay our rent - where as his ex lives rent free at her mums, has all her bills paid for - so this is just extra spending money (on top of her salary which is double that of our combined salaries!). We are now on the verge of loosing our house - and in the CSA phone operators words 'it is our problems, not that of the CSA!!!'

 

We have already given up our car (only a ford fiesta, but it gave us our freedom) and moved to an area much cheaper where my little boy will not be allowed to the park or out to play because of the type of area it is.

 

I'd like to say I can give you good advice on how to deal with them - however we have had no luck at all so far!

 

And like most fathers - on top of dealing with the problems the CSA cause we also have his vindictive ex to deal with, who withholds contact for no reason, has made my husband quit the TA (whcih she also goes too, and provided us with that little additional income), and regularly slates us to friends.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not all ex wives are greedy so and so's :)

 

I had to use the CSA, my ex wouldn't pay a penny otherwise, and I really needed it. We had 4 children, the youngest being only 6 months when he slept with my mother.

 

The CSA make it difficult for all concerned, it seems to bully those that will pay, whilst forgetting those who won't. I have a DOE on my ex now, not by choice, by necessity.

 

However.... I did find that the MPs were very useful to me, and I think they would be to those on the other side of the coin as well. Within 4 weeks of them becoming involved the CSA had got their butts in gear and sorted it out. I honestly think they are your best weapon at the moment. No new wife or partner should have to live in fear of being made homeless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful whose advice you follow with regards to the CSA. Many of what I've read is either ranting (and nowhere near helpful) or a bit of of date.

Even if a NRP is self-employed it doesn't mean they will 'get away' with paying as it'll just mean a quicker route to the CSA's enforcement teams to go and apply for a liability order (the first step in the whole enforcement process). If the debt isn't then paid or at least an agreement to clear it, then they will try bailiffs. If that fails, it'll go to the next stage where the CSA will apply to county court for various things including a CCJ and applying the debt against your home.

 

If the NRP has no clue how the arrears have built up, they have very right to ask for an Account Breakdown. If the CSA officer says no then immediately ask to speak to the line manager, and complain to them if they still refuse. If they send you a 'notice of intention to apply for a LO' (via a mags court) immediately request that you have the hearing at your local court as you will attend. Basically turn up and say that the CSA refused you an account breakdown and therefire you cannot contest their figures. The Magistrates will adjourn the case for the AC BD to be done. In fact you can attend their 'mass' hearing as the court doesn't allow clients to see the mags BUT a CSA court presenting officer can speak to you briefly beforehand and as they'll only have basic details, they themselves will postpone it. Basically the CSA should do the AC BD to save time and money in the long run.

Sometimes the arrears build up through no-ones fault but it's good to check that nothing's amiss or that all your payments you have made are recorded.

SAFU

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing... Any decision the CSA makes, has to include 'welfare of the child' this means ANY child affected by their decision (regarding collecting arrears).

Those who have a Deduction of Earnings Order at maximum and are struggling, call up and negotiate the amount for arrears. Make a point of your child is suffering. If they refuse, either write to the complaints or go to your MP about it.

SAFU

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jdes: make them show how they've worked out that figure.

What income are you on now? Have you told the CSA what you are on AND specifically requested a new assessment?

You would think they'd act when they received your letter but you do need to be straight to the point and send in your documents to show what income you're on etc.

If you've done all this and heave failed to act, then you can complain for maladministration. Not rewarding but annoying to the lower senior management. If you can show them they've made a mistake, they have to correct it. If it means reducing your assessment down to nil, then so be it and they'll have to back date it to the assessment date.

SAFU

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm self employed

Im assessed at £61 a week

And when I'm not working I write a letter to tell them

And when I go back to work I write a letter to tell them

I'm back in work

It's irrelevant what I'm

Earning as it gets assessed every April when my yearly accounts are done

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Several posts that are either bad advice, unhelpful or just plain rants have been removed.

 

jdes26 - if you have posted on a thread - you dont need to "sub" to it as well !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

im sorry im new and dont know how to start a new thread ..sat here in tears cannot take anymore ...my husband works and pays £125 a week through a doe order ...which leaves me my husband and our 2 kids without gas and electric 3-4 days a week ... i only get careers allowance as i am caring for my dad who is terminally ill.....last week we got a letter from csa saying we owed 5 grand still....today we got a letter saying we owe 14 grand :( and they taking hubby to court for L.O and said bailffs will come and i will loose my house ...has anyone had an L.O before do they give you chance to make arrangements to pay weekly ? im sat here now with my 15 month old baby who is on inhalers for his chest with no heating we already living in poverty cos of them ...i dont think i can do this anymore

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi kjovi. Have u had a letter from them saying 'notice of intention to apply for a LO'?

The main idea with the LO is to get the debt secured. This action is taken if the arrears isn't going to b paid in 2yrs.

They have to consider ur circumstances before they send to bailiffs. They have to physically have the LO granted and in their hands before bailiffs r even thought of.

 

Is there any dispute about the amount of debt? That will b needed to b addressed before court. Ur partner can request a local hearing if he intends to attend as a general bulk hearing the court will not allow the NRP to speak to the judge. (a court thing not CSA thing).

 

Has the CSA said where the debt accrued? U can ask for an account breakdown. At a push and a lot of persuading u can get a rolling statement but this takes awhile.

 

Am I right in assuming ur hubby's case is quite old?

Can u tell me when the case was open and was there an imposed maintenance assessment? If so this can b converted to a formal MA and reduce the overal debt.

 

From the day the CSA tell u they have sent the case to their court presenting officer, it can take up to 12weeks to get a court date as it is down to the court to schedule it. Then they will send a summons. This has to b at least 2 weeks ahead of the court hearing date I believe. This is an administrative action. It's not a criminal proceedure at all.

 

If u want to act on ur hubby's behalf, get him to write, date and sign a letter stating this. He can also ask for a standard form from the CSA.

 

One of the main parts of the decisions the CSA makes has to include 'welfare of the children'. That includes those in ur household. U or ur hubby need to stress that u r on the poverty line as it is and any additional collections would affect ur family's well being.

 

Now what u must bear in mind is that certain outgoings r deemed unimportant and should not come before paying CM.

For example if u have a big sky tv package u will b expected to reduce this.

If u have consumer debts, they must take a back burner as there is little they can do and CSA debt is a crown debt and therefore must come first.

 

The CSA will check ur hubby's credit reference record to determin if he has the ability to pay a chunk towards the debt or clear it. If he hasn't got this sort of credit it is less likely that it will b referred to bailiffs unless the deciding officer thinks he may have assets.

 

I would suggest that ur hubby writes a letter of complaint pointing out that the decision to collect a maximum DEO is detrimental enough, but to attempt collection on top will negatively affect the welfare of the children in ur household which is contrary to the CSA rules.

 

If ur hubby has shown that he's tried jigging his finances to try and pay more to the CSA then he can't b told he hasn't tried.

 

Get an appointment with the CAB. They can do a budget sheet with u and help u to see if there's anyway of increasing ur income or reducing ur outgoings.

The LO will b sought and granted but it may affect the CSA's ability to refer to bailiffs.

If u show the CSA there is nothing on a budget sheet and there's nothing on a CRA then they won't want to waste money sending the case to the bailiffs.

Whose name is the house in?

Is there any chance u can pay a chunk off the debt? If u can it will help with any negotiating.

 

It's a tough situation but I will give u any advice I can.

Edited by Stressedandfedup

SAFU

Link to post
Share on other sites

first of all thankyou so much for your reply and advice ...the case started in 2001 when my husband contatced csa to start paying for this child .. my husband and i have bad credit from bith being made redundant a few years ago ..however our outgoing are all mortgage , gas and electric ...council tax etc that we carnt afford ..the water board have just secured a debt on my house so i could pay it back later ..the only job my husband could find last year after being made redundant the year before was 40 miles form home ..so he driving 80 miles a day to stay in work ..obviously this is about £60 a week .

 

as for the house i originaly bought it ..but my husband name is on the new mortgage but not on the deeds . and the house is in negative equity

 

the csa told me they gonna apply for the L.O yesterday not had a letter yet .

they said it because we carnt pay arears back in two years .

dont quite understand what you meant by M.A ( sorry )

i have been in touch with cab and im also waiting an appointment with my local mp

the only car we have is a motorbility car with is obviously my dads and im insured to drive him to and from hospital etc

 

we think we owe about 5 grand of arreas ..i have receipts for 12 grand of payments ..there saying there are gaps in there assesment and unless i can prove he wasnt working the presume he was ..he was on jobseekers after being made redundant .

 

also we rang them last year to tell them about my new born son...they are saying they didnt know and they will only take the extra 5 % into consideration for him from this friday gone ?

 

as for a lump sum i dont have it but could try asking my parents but how would this help

 

thanks for taking your time to read this and help me x

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the other thing which is always at the back of my mind ...12 years ago we did a dna ..his ex addmitted to cheating ..it came back saying it was 95.2 % my husbands child ...most positive dna test come back 99.999 etc ...the odds are its my hubby child ..but the person she cheated with was my husbands half brother /cousin

 

we dont want to question paternity again so havent raised this issue but can you see why its always on the back of our mind ..to add insult to injury the child is his half brother double :(

 

we not trying to run or stop paying etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...