Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • yep. they are all simply trading names of perch to try and scam people into thinking their debt is going up some kind to mystical legal chain...which is BS. all dca's pull these stunts and have done since the late 1970's
    • just type no need to hit quote. what you really need to do is forget about it now they have  just steer clear of THAT ONE STORE for a few months. other B&Q's are OK. even if you do go back in, they'll simple ask you to leave, then if you return again, could invoke trespass laws BUT WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT HERE. as for getting out of your tree about police, prison, criminal record, arrested, knocks at doors, letter of claim....NONE OF THE CAN EVER HAPPEN. and has not on these joe public low level shoplifting incidence since 2012. you've already got a scary letter ratchetting on about some mystical FAKE civil restoration scheme .  you'll probably get a few more ...NOTHING THEY CAN EVER DO. bin shred burn give to your pet hamster any money people pay CRS/RLP/DEF etc regarding their letters goes straight into their pocket and off they go down the pub and LAUGH at people they mugged. the retailer never sees a penny.  i admire your action of send £5 to B&Q. its done now and its over with....move on with your live. dx
    • 4.  Under The Pre-Action Protocol 201?, a Debt Buyer must undertake all reasonable enquiries to ensure the correct address of a debtor, this can be as simple as a credit file search. The Claimant failed to carry out such basic checks. Subsequently all letters prior too and including ,The Pre action Protocol Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 and the claimform dated 14th February 2020 were all served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018. 9.   The claimant failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis on the 2nd February 2024 'The Claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents.' None were received by the court nor the defendant by that date. re: 13 & 15...they dont need to produce the deed, thats a private b2b document only the judge can demand sight of. i would remove 13 totally as within their WS they have produced the Notice Of Assignment. and delete it from 15 a few ideas. dx  
    • Underp04 (I think it was him) put up the statement IDR used in court from some supposed expert mr edge. can you find it? It stated 10 years was the statute barred limit but also that the laws were very confusing. very much worth digging out!
    • You'll be fine don't worry.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

any suggestions please as what to do next,also according to welcome a secured loan can be in one name even if the property is mortgaged in both names,but both people have to sign to allow the charge to be placed on the property.

 

 

biddy, do you have a copy of the legal charge document from welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check your pm's

 

Id love that !!

 

Once again, apologies for the nosiness....:-)

 

What do you think I should now do with Welcome ? ( I know what I would like to do but I cant say it on here or Im sure I will get Cagbooted ! )

 

Do I write another letter ? Call them ? Be a pain in their a**e ?

Forsure

 

** One woman crusade against the rip off lenders ! **

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a question.

 

On the back of the credit agreement clause 14.9 says they can amend \ increase the charges for missing payments ect , as those charges are itemised in the contract that we have signed , is it legal for them to make that change ?

Case Statistics 13 Wins - 0 Losses

Cases In Progress 2

Link to post
Share on other sites

no i don't havent even got an agreement,must of got lost in the post!!

well if you have both not signed a loan agreement then there is little chance that you have signed the legal charge document and according o the legal charge document it has to be signed by both owners and witnessed before to be correctley executed and used as a legal charge. I would request from welcome all the documentation and if it does not arrive in the given time then i would go down the disclosre route that andie has taken with them. I dont think they have a legitimate contract for you and they know it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen this post apparently about an e-mail sent to employees in welcome:

 

An e-mail was sent around the company about further cost cutting ie stop using the 118 numbers and the company will save a small fortune. This was sent by Gary Edwards who has just been brought in by David Postings to help save the company.

 

The interesting thing though is certain other information was included in the previous e-mails he'd sent which for some reason were included in this e-mail.

 

Such as the company has been riding a shock wave over recent weeks and that what is to come is another shock wave.

 

He then goes on about a communication he is working on and the areas to be covered are....

 

Madrid (could some cattles employees confirm what this is)

cash collections

cost management

bonus deferment

 

Next few months - mobilise the project re TOM (again could an employee confirm what this is), continue discussions with banks, future focus dealing with local issues.

 

Something big is brewing but I cannot see any further news being released until the results come out.

 

Spot the words "Bonus deferment"?

Dipply75

 

I am in no way a legal advisor and only speak from my own experiences and the helpful advice of those in the same boat! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just wondering if anyone knew the answer to this - If I put my account into dispute regarding the enforceability of the agreement then can they ask you for payment.

It is just we decided to do this last week and have had a call from complaints team to say it is welcome policy that payments should continue as and when they fall due while they investigate? is this true it is just I don't want to do anything to jepordise our house. I was under the impression that because the account is in dispute they can't ask for payment until investigation is complete:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if you have both not signed a loan agreement then there is little chance that you have signed the legal charge document and according o the legal charge document it has to be signed by both owners and witnessed before to be correctley executed and used as a legal charge. I would request from welcome all the documentation and if it does not arrive in the given time then i would go down the disclosre route that andie has taken with them. I dont think they have a legitimate contract for you and they know it.

thanks mojo,asked for a c.c.a they sent the one for an old account,have sked for a s.a.r,don't suppose i'll get the correct one of those either,how do i go about a disclosure and what is one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i am new here to, i have bhought a car from welcome finance about 2 and half years ago the car was 3,808.65, paid 185 pounds per month at the time, i had a secure job, but now i was on maternity leave from a diferent job the money wasnt much so i asked welcome finance to cut the amount i would pay per month but for that they said i would have to go there and do another contract wich we did,at the time we have sort out the new contract i had allready paid 2,539.1, the new contract was made oficial on the 7th of october 2008, now i am 2 months late on payments, i have been on adittional maternity leave for the last 3 months, i called welcome finance about 4 months ago to let them know that the last 3 months of aditional maternity leave are not paid, and they told me that is not they problem that i am on aditional maternity leave i tried to warned them that the month after i would not have money to pay them,they dindt care,now they are sayng that they will collect the car if i dont pay them, the payment of the new contract is 108 pounds per month, at this moment i dont have the money to pay them but they wont accept anything or wont hear me, as the full amount of the car is allready paid,all i am payng now is interest wich is 5000 pounds they told me it would take 6 years to pay for this , my car is a ford ka from 2001, by the time i finish to pay all this interest the car wont be worth anything, with the new contract they removed the insurance, wich i had paid a lot before the new contract, wich means i lost lots money because i paid insurance before for 2 years, they keept the money for the insurance and now i dont have one when i paid previously for the insurance, my question is should i let them take the car? or should i wait to go to court and then they will have to explain why it was such high interest? any advice? as far as am concerned the car is paid, if anyone is going through a similar situation or has been what did you do to sort this out? thank you for any advice that may be given to me

forumbox_top_left.gifforumbox_top_tile.gifforumbox_top_right.gifforumbox_left_tile.gifclose.gif What are your rights at work Follow this link to read the review of the Guide to your Rights at work, published by Lawpack

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was just wondering if anyone knew the answer to this - If I put my account into dispute regarding the enforceability of the agreement then can they ask you for payment.

It is just we decided to do this last week and have had a call from complaints team to say it is welcome policy that payments should continue as and when they fall due while they investigate? is this true it is just I don't want to do anything to jepordise our house. I was under the impression that because the account is in dispute they can't ask for payment until investigation is complete:confused:

 

 

LMAO - the operative words there are "it is Welcomes policy that payments should continue"

 

If an account is in dispute...

 

they cannot ask for payment nor are you obliged to offer one

they cannot add further interest or charges nor pass the account to a 3rd party.

Lastly they cannot register this information with a credit reference agency nor can they issue a default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks mojo,asked for a c.c.a they sent the one for an old account,have sked for a s.a.r,don't suppose i'll get the correct one of those either,how do i go about a disclosure and what is one?

 

 

andie might be the best person to answer that as she seems very clued up on that area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, i am new here to, i have bhought a car from welcome finance about 2 and half years ago the car was 3,808.65, paid 185 pounds per month at the time, i had a secure job, but now i was on maternity leave from a diferent job the money wasnt much so i asked welcome finance to cut the amount i would pay per month but for that they said i would have to go there and do another contract wich we did,at the time we have sort out the new contract i had allready paid 2,539.1, the new contract was made oficial on the 7th of october 2008, now i am 2 months late on payments, i have been on adittional maternity leave for the last 3 months, i called welcome finance about 4 months ago to let them know that the last 3 months of aditional maternity leave are not paid, and they told me that is not they problem that i am on aditional maternity leave i tried to warned them that the month after i would not have money to pay them,they dindt care,now they are sayng that they will collect the car if i dont pay them, the payment of the new contract is 108 pounds per month, at this moment i dont have the money to pay them but they wont accept anything or wont hear me, as the full amount of the car is allready paid,all i am payng now is interest wich is 5000 pounds they told me it would take 6 years to pay for this , my car is a ford ka from 2001, by the time i finish to pay all this interest the car wont be worth anything, with the new contract they removed the insurance, wich i had paid a lot before the new contract, wich means i lost lots money because i paid insurance before for 2 years, they keept the money for the insurance and now i dont have one when i paid previously for the insurance, my question is should i let them take the car? or should i wait to go to court and then they will have to explain why it was such high interest? any advice? as far as am concerned the car is paid, if anyone is going through a similar situation or has been what did you do to sort this out? thank you for any advice that may be given to me

forumbox_top_left.gifforumbox_top_tile.gifforumbox_top_right.gifforumbox_left_tile.gifclose.gif What are your rights at work Follow this link to read the review of the Guide to your Rights at work, published by Lawpack

 

Ok as you have paid more than 1/3 of the agreement they cannot 'just come and take the car' they would have to get a court order for that so please do not worry.

 

Were you given any rebate of this PPI - if so how much were you given? and did they just take this off the back end of the loan?

 

Have you sent either a CCA or SAR to get all your information off them as I bet you'll find a hefty whack of charges on their as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks mojo,asked for a c.c.a they sent the one for an old account,have sked for a s.a.r,don't suppose i'll get the correct one of those either,how do i go about a disclosure and what is one?

 

 

sorry biddy, i may have missed something there, was your old loan secured and was the correct procedure carried out for that one, the reason i ask is that the security on your house may be from that loan and just not removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks mojo,asked for a c.c.a they sent the one for an old account,have sked for a s.a.r,don't suppose i'll get the correct one of those either,how do i go about a disclosure and what is one?

 

Disclosures are risky as if you lose you can be liable for MASSIVE costs - when does your SAR run out?

 

I would write back to them enclosing a copy of the CCA they sent and tell them you require the CURRENT CCA as this one is now invalidated.

 

I would also tell them if they are out of their 12+2 then the account is now in dispute - you can legally do this if they have not provided you with your CCA - the old one does not count!

Link to post
Share on other sites

LMAO - the operative words there are "it is Welcomes policy that payments should continue"

 

If an account is in dispute...

 

they cannot ask for payment nor are you obliged to offer one

they cannot add further interest or charges nor pass the account to a 3rd party.

Lastly they cannot register this information with a credit reference agency nor can they issue a default.

 

Thank you Andie I thought this was the case but really just wanted to make sure - I suppose this is just another tactic to try and make me doubt myself and my rights.

 

I will just wait for the final response - many thanks again :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...