Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
    • urm.. i seem to recall another assault case whereby the approved bailiff company claimed the body camera was nor theirs but a pers one of the bailiff, i think they got in serious trouble for it. i believe that breaks certain gov't approval for a bailiff company/firm regulations/laws  if memory serves me right?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Courts & Stays


Noddy73
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5975 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ihave just been informed by Brighton Court that all cases are to be stayed by the judge until March 2008!!

Gutted as MCOL sent my claim to the courts on 03 July 2007 and due to court backlogs now have to wait for ages!!!!!!

Hi Grey Rabbit and Noddy 73

I phoned Brighton County Court today regarding my receipt of an order of stay of my case with a view to objecting.

They asked me to write in with an objection, giving reasons.

I have written in, using the default CAG letter of legal objections.

Suggest you do likewise.

The Court seemed to give the impression that they would consider each objection on its own merits.

 

Good luck,

Mihail

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is worth just writing if you wish, I did that in june requesting their defence be struck.............. it wasnt even looked at............ yes it varies from court to court......... letter mostly just get added to the file..............

 

anyone who gets a stay notice, would be much safer filling a N244 and asking for a hearing........

 

my main concern as I have said before is that by just writing, you have no guarentee that it will be looked at by a judge within the time frame......... ie 7 or 14 days.......

 

if it is not then you have lost valuable time and the chance to submit a N244 and possible to have your stay removed!!!!!!

 

again only my view surely it si much better to be safe................ the courts and Dg are rapidly changing, up until recently they may have accepted just letters..........

 

it is only a matter of time before the courts become very stringent in dealing with these cases.......

 

I was asked to submit any representations which I did, they werent even looked at, but DG's request for a stay was seen and granted in less than 3 days over a weekend...........it took 9 days for my N244 to be seen......

 

at the end of the day it is down to each person to choose their own route, but please think carefully, you have gone this far, is it worth risking running out of time becuase you send a letter rather than an offical court form that cannot be just put in a file!!!!

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Up to date news in wandsworth County Court:

 

I called the Court today, looks like my case is going ahead for Tuesday the 28th. So far DG solicitors have not applied for a stay, all they have on record is a letter saying that they may. This is what I received some two weeks ago. I immediately responded to that letter by sending the Court and DG Solicitors a letter protesting using the template about Human Rights, etc. In the beginning of this week, I also sent the Court an N277 letter (hope thats the right numner) asking for judgment in default.

 

So with one day left to go, I wonder what will happen....

 

Anything I need to bring, do or think about before Tuesday.....the 28th?

 

Thanks Auburn and Caslte for your guidance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good news for Brighton County Court claimants :). Having submitted the CAG legal arguments against a stay until March 2008, I got a letter dated 29 August from the Court saying thtat a hearing has been ordered for my case against First Direct on 12 October. It will be a 5 minute hearing. Both sides must file a skeleton argument and copies of all relevant authorities relied on not later than 7 days before the hearing.

The application will be heard together with a number of other similar applications at a composite hearing.

I now need advice on what to submit as a skeleton argument and what to include as 'relevant authorities relied on'. Would this include the original FD charges?

Also is the purpose of this hearing to decide if the charges are unfair, or just that the stay to further action until March 2008 is unfair?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mihail here are a couple of links which will give you all the info you need . your case is 2 days after mine but mine is for 20 mins...and being heard for 20 mins......lol............. must be the only 1............ good luck

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/17065-application-removal-stay-updated.html#post1046820

 

 

did DG miss any court deadlines by any chance?:)

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone from Listings section at the Court has just explained to me that the hearing will be to decide that the stay itself is unfair.

The judge will be looking to hear the legal arguments and precedents we have gathered to support our case as claimants, as well as the banks arguments, as defendants.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mihail here are a couple of links which will give you all the info you need . your case is 2 days after mine but mine is for 20 mins...and being heard for 20 mins......lol............. must be the only 1............ good luck

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/17065-application-removal-stay-updated.html#post1046820

 

 

did DG miss any court deadlines by any chance?:)

 

Thanks for that.

The listings officer advised me to get as much authority as possible. Is there any case law precedent to help the Judge come to a favourable (from our pov) decision? In any cases quoted as authority, he needs legal arguments and the judge's decision in that case.

re DG and deadlines, they haven' t missed any in my claim but they haven't bothered to reply to any 'nudge 'letters I have sent them (2 so far) which may be evidence later to suggest a 'cavalier' attitude that HSBC/FD have towards claims such as ours.

The listings officer believes there will be a DG representative there for the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

county court decissions do nto set a precedent. but this article printed might just help a bit.............. all it needs is judges to see what other judges are doing . and then they will follow.................. like everything it takes one brave person to step up to the plate 1st. then others will follow...........

 

BBC NEWS | Business | Judge calls halt to bank charges

rockin all over the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

 

So I was in court today ( Winchester ) with the arguments:

  1. Human Rights
  2. Overriding Objective
  3. Balance of convenience, and
  4. Status Quo

None of which ( combined ) held up : the banks were represented and Wincherster / Salisbury at least will be automatically applying stays (where requested) for all those who run with these arguments.

 

The judge stated that, unless there were additional factors, he would judge all similar cases in the same way.....

 

..... need more arguments....

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ooh yes! I would like a copy of something like that too. I have just received a letter from the Brighton County Court. I called the court and was told that there has been an ORDER that all bank claims are stayed!!

 

They didn't seem to realise that there are differences on Business and Credit Card claims. :-x

 

I have seen a template for lifting stay on Credit Card account but I was a little afraid to change the wording to suit less I stitched myself up!

Link to post
Share on other sites

So far I have only found this one:-

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You -v- XXXXX Bank Plc

Claim Number: *******

 

I write in relation to the matters as detailed above, and specifically the order of a stay in proceedings made by district judge XXXXX on **/**/**.

The basis upon which a stay has been granted is with regards to awaiting the outcome of the ongoing "test case" currently being taken by the OFT against several banks.

I respectfully request that this stay be lifted. This is upon the contention, that as the central focus and grounds for the OFT’s case is to determine whether or not the charges are subject to the test of reasonableness, as required under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (UTCCR 99), then it is not of any consequence to the basis of my claim in this case.

 

As a Business account claimant my claim did not include any reference to nor make any reliance upon the UTCCR. As such, it would serve no purpose to delay proceedings in order to await the outcome of a case that would have no bearing or relevance upon this case.

 

As such I respectfully request that the current stay be lifted so that this case may proceed without further delay.

 

Yours faithfully

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Going to Court on 19th Dec.

 

Bank is requesting case to be set aside and a stay granted.

 

Ive already been granted a Judgement by Default and had a warrant granted, now this.:mad:

 

Will update nextweek.

30-12-2006--Requested statements from Local Halifax.

02-02-2007--Statements Recieved.

18-04-2007--Prelim sent.

20-04-2007--Reply , Thanks , give us 8wks letter.

02-0502007--Sent L.B.A. & Schedule of Charges

11-05-2007--Recieved reply ,still investigating.

17-05-2007--Sent Amended L.B.A. for Contractual Interest this time.

14-06-2007--Received standard Bog Off letter.

13-06-2007--Took N1 to Local Courts.

26-06-2007--Copy of N1 from Court, issued 21-06-2007. to Halifax, Deemed Served 25-06-2007

Have till 09-07-2007 to file Defence.

05-07-2007--Note that Acknowledgment of Service been Filed on 29-06-2007.

Have 28 days from date of Service to File Defence.

07-07-2007--Offer from Halifax.

09-07-2007--Rejection letter sent to Halifax. Next day delivery.

10-07-2007--Money put in Account:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...