Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

N1 Help


juicebox
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6144 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Help!

 

I have been staring at my N1 form for days now and am still unsure if I have completed it properly. I've read umpteen posts on the subject too so please forgive me if the info I need is posted elswhere - if it is I can't find it :oops:

 

Background: I am claiming several thousand including CCI, questions as follows:

 

  1. I have entered Brief Details of Claim in the N1 as "Money claim for return of penlaty charges applied to the Claimants Credit Card account by the defendant" Should I mention CCI here?
  2. Should I mention the s69 alternative to CCI in the Value section or leave it to the PoC's? My value currently reads as Charges £XXX, Compund Contractual Interest £XXX and Total £XXX.

I am fairly happy with my PoC's which I borrowed/pinched from another post. I would like to present my N1 to the court this Friday so urgent help would be most appreciated.

 

Thanks to you all and keep up the good work!

 

Juicey B

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Juicebox

As no-one has replied yet, here's what I put in my N1:

 

Money claim for return of penalty charges applied to the claimant's credit card account by the defendant.

 

Value

 

charges £x

Interest £x

Court fee £x

Total £x

 

Plus compounded contractual interest from date of issue to date of settlement/judgement at £0.x per day or at such rate and for such pertiods as the court deems just. (Note, the latter refers to the statutory s69 interest rate of 8%)

As you state, in the Bank Templates Library, there is no N1 for Capital One Bank but perhaps this is being worked on ...

 

Also, if you like I can PM you my own POC for the claim I won against Cap One a couple of months back. Let me know.

 

Cheers, Painty x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Juicebox.

 

Just had a look through my computer files and have seen that I DID complete an N1 for my Crap One claim. It shall be winging its way to my CC on Monday 6/8. Yippeee!! I always do the PDF versions on my computer so that they are typed. Any extra attachments I complete in Word and then add them to my N1 PDF ( I have full Adobe Acrobat :D)

 

Anyway back to the matter at hand. Paintball has got you off to a flying start with the value section. Would you believe that when I did my first N1, this was the section that gave me the most headache!

 

Please find below the POC that I intend to use.

 

1. The Claimant had an account, number XXXX (the Account) with the Defendant which was opened on DATE

 

2. During the periods in which the Accounts had been operating the Defendant debited numerous charges to the Accounts in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The Claimant understands that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

3. A list of the charges applied is attached to these particulars of claim.

 

4. The Claimant contends that:

 

a) The charges debited to the Account, as outlined in the attached schedules, are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the Defendant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the Defendant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the Claimants; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Defendant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Defendant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999) paragraph 8 and schedule 2(1)(e), The Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 section 4 and the common law.

 

5. Accordingly the Claimant claims:

 

a) the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £910 and any interest charged thereon;

 

(CONTINUED ON SEPARATE SHEET)

b) the removal of any prejudicial information which the Defendant bank may have passed to third parties in relation to the Accounts and in particular the removal of any Default Notice registered with any credit reference agency which was allegedly notified to the Claimant in 2005, since this was caused solely by the level of disproportionate penalty charges. The Claimant’s request is made under the Data Protection Act 1998, section 14, which gives the power to the Court to order the removal of inaccurate personal data.

 

c) The Defendant concealed the nature of its charges and lead the Claimant to mistakenly continue to pay the unlawful charges believing that they were lawful.

 

d) The Claimant’s right of action has been deliberately concealed from itself by the Defendant.

 

e) The Defendant continues to conceal both the nature of its unlawful charges and account holders rights to recover unlawful charges.

f) Court costs

g) Interest at the contractual rate of XX% per annum from the date of each transaction as set out on the attached list of charges from DATE to DATE for account XXXX and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment, at a daily rate of £xx.

 

The Claimant believes this rate to be justified under the principle of mutuality and reciprocity, and is based on the Defendant’s Classic Card interest rate that would be applied under the terms of the above mentioned account.

 

h) Should the court find that this interest rate is not applicable, then as an alternative the claimant wishes to claim Section 69 County Courts Act interest as set out on the attached list of charges or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true.

 

 

Hope this helps. Please also wait for Paintball's input as she won with CCI which what I am also claiming. She has offered to PM you her POC, so I would take her up on the offer.

 

Best of luck. :)

 

deedee

  • Haha 2

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your swift and informative replies!

 

Just a couple of minor details I want to check with you if I may.

 

1) Is the Interest in the Value section CCI or 8%?

 

2) In the section below, next to Defendant details there are 4 boxes, "Amount Claimed", "Court Fee", "Solicitor's Cost" and "Total Amount". Should Amount Claimed = Total Charges + CCI?

 

Paintball, you suggest adding the line that mentions the rate at which the court see's fit, did you put that in the Value section too? I am guesssing you also have words to that effect in your POC too? Paintball, I would very much appreciate it if you could send me the POC that you used for successfully winning CCI with Cap One.

 

I appologise if I sound pedantic and overly cautious, but I am guilty on both charges ;)

 

With the recent publicity of the OFT test case, I suddenly feel under pressure to ensure I get everything just right and to get my claim in quick...

 

Cheers

 

Jb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your swift and informative replies!

 

Just a couple of minor details I want to check with you if I may.

 

1) Is the Interest in the Value section CCI or 8%?

 

2) In the section below, next to Defendant details there are 4 boxes, "Amount Claimed", "Court Fee", "Solicitor's Cost" and "Total Amount". Should Amount Claimed = Total Charges + CCI?

 

Paintball, you suggest adding the line that mentions the rate at which the court see's fit, did you put that in the Value section too? I am guesssing you also have words to that effect in your POC too? Paintball, I would very much appreciate it if you could send me the POC that you used for successfully winning CCI with Cap One.

 

I appologise if I sound pedantic and overly cautious, but I am guilty on both charges ;)

 

With the recent publicity of the OFT test case, I suddenly feel under pressure to ensure I get everything just right and to get my claim in quick...

 

Cheers

 

Jb

 

J

 

1) CCI

 

2) Amount claimed = Charges + CCI plus any additional costs ie SAR fee; Court Fee; Solicitor's Costs - leave this blank; Total amount add these sums together (:rolleyes: gets trusty calculator out ...)

 

3) s69 8% goes under directly under the value section - see my post above.

 

You should have received my POC by now sent by PM BUT I prefer Deedee's 'Accordingly the claimant claims' Section 5 a -g) better than mine :)

 

Any other Qs please shout xx

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JB.

 

Did you file your N1 last Friday? If so, good luck! :D

 

I am filing mine today. So will be a few days behind you.

 

deedee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you ever sleep Deedee?...

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortuntaley I have had to delay filing my N1 :(

 

I now hope to present it to the courts on the 13th.

 

Oh dear, the 13th - unlucky for some? Unlucky for Cap1 I recon :p

 

Best of luck with yours Dee, I will keep you all updated on my progress...

 

jb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't you ever sleep Deedee?...

 

Good question................... :D

 

Not sure I know the answer to that myself. LOL!

 

deedee x

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortuntaley I have had to delay filing my N1 :(

 

I now hope to present it to the courts on the 13th.

 

Oh dear, the 13th - unlucky for some? Unlucky for Cap1 I recon :p

 

Best of luck with yours Dee, I will keep you all updated on my progress...

 

jb

 

Don't worry JB. I was supposed to file my N1 on 19/7/07 but had to delay due to spreadsheet error :o. I filed my N1 today :) so you'll get to do it when the time is right. £120 is a lot to find :mad:.

 

Including this action, I will have spent £360 to bring action against Abbey, Halifax and now these lot. With the uncertainty regarding bank claims, I have to accept that the money owed from these claims will not be forthcoming as soon as I have liked, but there you go.

 

Get your claim in as soon as you can. Yell if you need anymore help.

 

deedee xx

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dee, is their any chance that i too could have a copy of the N1 form that you have sent to the courts for crap one, as i am in exactly the same position as you, ready to file at court, a bit stuck with the form, your help would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Avanti.

 

Send me a PM with your email address and I will send you a word document of what I wrote plus a blank N1 PDF.

 

I included points on setting aside my CCJ that Cap One obtained against me and default removal. Delete as appropriate.

 

Can't guarantee that I'll send it tonight (sleep is finally catching up with me) but will get to you as soon as is humanly possible. :)

 

deedee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...