Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
    • I think they're inventing stuff now. They seem to know they won't be around to implement any of it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is My Agreement Enforceable - Useful


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest malissa7999
BTW, as ukaviator says, if this all they sent it's completely unenforceable.

 

How long is it since you sent for the CCA? More than 12+2 days? More than 30 days?

 

IMO it's probable that they won't have an agreement anyway but you need to wait the statutory time to give them the chance to produce one before considering your options.

 

hello,

i sent my 1st request on the 2nd august,..and that was what they sent me,...there covering letter says should i require further assistance to call them..., so i dont think they will send me anything else,...i did call them and i was told that they will issue me a default if i continue to miss payments,..(even though they already closed my account on the 23rd july, without warning or default??..account was always paid ontime,they closed it cos i was owing £53 on the solo card account)..... he also told me that normal collection procudures apply, so assuming they are still going to add on interest,??.. he even told me that despite the fact i had removed my permission to process data to referances agancies, they will still continue to do so, as it is there procudure!!...they are so shocking!

 

do you think i should write to them again, telling them that what they have sent me isnt what i asked for, and that the original timeframe still stands?... or should i just leave it?...my concern is that if i dont write to them telling them that the account is in dispute they will give me a default by the time the 30 days r up.

Edited by malissa7999
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Malissa - think perhaps you should start new thread for this in HSBC forum as it looks as though it's going to go on for a bit...

 

In the meantime, IMO a letter to HSBC stating

(1) that their docs. do not fulfil the requirements of the CCA1974 for an enforceable agreement (you sound as though you know the content template)

(2) account in dispute, therefore no payments, no interest, no defaults etc.

(3) no telephone calls, all communication to be put in writing etc.

 

If you have problem finding the 'template' for the above, please post back & I'll help.

 

Note - the likelihood is that they will prob. default you anyway despite the above. Also do NOT phone them or speak to them on the phone.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malissa7999
Malissa - think perhaps you should start new thread for this in HSBC forum as it looks as though it's going to go on for a bit...

 

In the meantime, IMO a letter to HSBC stating

(1) that their docs. do not fulfil the requirements of the CCA1974 for an enforceable agreement (you sound as though you know the content template)

(2) account in dispute, therefore no payments, no interest, no defaults etc.

(3) no telephone calls, all communication to be put in writing etc.

 

If you have problem finding the 'template' for the above, please post back & I'll help.

 

Note - the likelihood is that they will prob. default you anyway despite the above. Also do NOT phone them or speak to them on the phone.

 

Foolishgirl, thanks for your help/advice,

i have already read on this thread a letter that i will copy and use,..i am however concerned that they will continue to process my data and give me a default even though this would be a breachj of the data protection act,..also i am very close to having my credit file clean this december actually, and a default would put me back to square 1,..would i be successfull in having the default removed?

 

i do have a thread, but i am getting more help and advice from this one (sorry)..this is a link to my thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/hsbc-bank/153426-hsbc-have-cancelled-my.html

 

im just not getting enough advice on my thread:(

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malissa7999

hiya,

 

please can someone tell me what exactly has to be on the prescribed terms of a cca for a credit card?... i know it outlines it at the beginning of this thread but i dont grasp what it means exactly?..so if someone could explain in laymans term i would very much appreciate it...cheers!:)

 

malissa

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Certain businesses are advertising to "wipe your credit card obligations completely" because agreements don't comply with the 1997 CCA. They ask for an upfront fee and claim 90% success rate. (Another fee is payable on success.) Is this genuine and has anyone been down this route? Or is it something else that is too good to be true?

Link to post
Share on other sites

just jumping on the CAG bandwagon. charging for what we do.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certain businesses are advertising to "wipe your credit card obligations completely" because agreements don't comply with the 1997 CCA. They ask for an upfront fee and claim 90% success rate. (Another fee is payable on success.) Is this genuine and has anyone been down this route? Or is it something else that is too good to be true?

 

More than likely too good to be true.

 

They can't do anything you can't do yourself (with a little help from your friends ;))

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no smoking, you might need to increase the file size a bit (unless it is just me), it is a bit small. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

no smoking, you might need to increase the file size a bit (unless it is just me), it is a bit small. :)

 

That's odd the file I uploaded was 500KB, but the one here is actually only 8KB - it must convert them in the process. Any idea how to get round this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have tried enlarging the page but it just goes into gobbledgook.

 

Is there a way u can upload them via photobucket please so i can try and read them.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok i will have a proper look later but i have yet to see an unenforcable egg cca so please dont be disapointed.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks OK to me, nosmoking, provided page 2 is the reverse of page 1 but as the date of signing by Egg matches the date at the top of Page 1, think this is probably the requisite link.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi NS

 

Can you identify any marks on the 2 documents which might show that one is actually/definitely the reverse side of the other? The reason I ask is that document 1 could actually have been reproduced from personal information stored on a computer and printed onto a form at any time (just by printing stored info such as name, address, date, barcode etc. at the corresponding positions). There is no handwriting on that page.

 

I can see from your uploaded images that doc 1 has fold creases at the 1/3rd, 2/3rd and 1/2 way positions (measuring from the top), whilist doc 2 (signature doc) has creases at approx. 1/3 and 3/4 positions. Admittedly some of these may have been done after the copies were produced and before you scanned them.

 

Cheers

Rob

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Hello NS,

 

Bit busy at present but these "agreements" have surfaced before..... something about there should be three pages .... Egg signature is dated before you and lack of some info on the doc I think ....... I might be totally wrong here but try looking in the following places ......

 

Try looking at the thread ... Consumer Credit Act Agreements ... Post 7891 and onwards for about five pages and then thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/egg/71280-zubo-egg-3.html might be worth reading.

 

If I am wrong I am sorry but working under stress here :-D

 

Onwards and Upwards

 

Chalkitup

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

 

Thanks for all the replies!

 

The letter was folded in 3 when it came, however there are lines that look like they come from a scanner or photocopier on both sheets, in different places.

 

I can't see anything to indicate that one is the reverse of the other, and there are no identifiable links between the two.

 

I had heard that egg scanned these documents and destroyed the originals, but I guess there's no way of finding that out - except by going to court! Eeek!

 

The problem I have now is that I was originally making token payments of just over £20 (the total is 11K), sent the CCA off and stopped paying when they failed to send the agreement. It's over a year since I asked for it and I've been telling them to get stuffed since then.

 

Seems very odd to me as it was passed to a new DCA about a month ago, I can't understand how they got the agreement when the original one couldn't. So now I don't know what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, that does sound odd.

 

Is it def. your signature? Could it have been copied from any corresp. you sent them?

 

Have you looked up Chalky's suggestion re. 3 pages? i.e one missing

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Is there a template letter to send to a DCA to say - you haven't sent me an enforceable CA, just an application form?

 

Thanks

 

Hello,

 

If the prescribed terms are on the application form then you could be in trouble!!!

 

Try these letters....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/138991-disabled-scared-owe-20k-6.html

 

Posts 303 + 304

 

Onwards and Upwards

 

Chalkitup

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4822 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...