Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thread title updated. so a sold debt. who are the solicitors? TM legal? why didn't ovo do this themselves as they do but chose to sell the debt on for 10p=£1? funny debt you state you reived a letter of claim, why did you not reply too it.? also is there is no indication of the date this bill comes from on the claimform? how do you know its from 2022? what other previous paperwork have you received? please scan page 1 of the claimform and bothsides of ALL previous letters upto one mass pdf read upload carefully. .................. pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Thank you again. I'm hoping it will come out in the wash and will endeavour to check my online account. I'm a bit unsettled by not hearing from Booking.com but the host is sounding helpful at the moment. HB
    • I've just remembered that a friend of mine had bookings cancelled on Booking.com about a month ago - and the good news is that all worked out in the wash. I'm at work now but will scribble properly in a couple of hours with the full tale.
    • Thank you Dave. I've had nothing from Booking.com, just a message via the site from the host. I know I need to check my bank account, just trying to resolve some technical issues. HB  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre Name of the Claimant ? JC INTERNATIONAL AQUISITION How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self Date of issue – 22 May 2024  Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – 1. The def owes the claimant £300 in respect of gas and electricity charges supplied by OVO. 2. Debt was assigned to the claimant with notice given to the def. 3. Despite formal demand the def has failed to pay the debt and the claimant claims £300 and further claims interest pursuant to s69 of the CCA 1984. What is the total value of the claim? £385 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Energy debt When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Moved home and they were the current energy supplier  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax/Etc...) ? No Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt assigned to JC International Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not sure probably  Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Again can't remember but probably  Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? Changed supplier What was the date of your last payment? Never  Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ebay item sold buyer wants refund help!!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6557 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Dunno if i have posted this in the right place but ill give it atry anyway!!

My partner has sold his car privately on ebay on 30th April 2006

On the listing he stated what problems there was with the car and ehat has been done to the car since he has had it.

When the seller can to look at the car he brought his friend (who he siad was a mechanic) they looked at the car and found 2 additional things that we wrong with the car, so my partner took some more money off the selling price.

My partner gave him the reciepts for all the the work that had been done and also all the required document.

The buyer has now sent a letter (6 weeks after purchasing the car) stating that he has sought legal advice and will be entering the case into small claims court to obtain a refund for the car and the costs of the repairs he has had to pay for. However, as far as my parnter is concerned, he has done everything correct, we understand that the only obilgation that the seller has is to list the item truthfully, which is what he has done, and it is up to the buyer to check that the car matches the description.

One of the items that he has listed that he has had to replace is the drive shaft, which we ourselves replaced in December 2005 (and provided the receipts to the buyer)

He also stated that the oil in one specific part has dryed up so he has had to replace something in it and is wanting to charge us for it.

Can any one please advise on this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I hope someone who is more knowledgable than I on general consumer issues will be along soon to help... I am just going to get my otherhalf to come along and post to see if she can help - she is a bit of an Ebay whizz..

 

questions:

 

1. did you retain copies of the receipts you passed to the buyer (please say yes - or that you can obtain duplicates from the original vendor that carried out the repairs on your behalf).

 

2. what correspondance has the buyer had withyou prior to filing this claim with the court?

 

 

I would not worry too much - I cannot in my lay experience, see this has legs at all. I just hope the buyer is not harrassing you and your partner unduly?

"BA Group. The World's favourite CA Group"

 

HSBC 2 claims amalgamated. £1195. settled in full prior to filing claim.

BARCLAYS settled in full 2 days prior to submission of defence by Barclays

CAP ONE settled in full on day 14 of LBA (£210)

Link to post
Share on other sites

it does seem a little previous for them to be threatening legal action without having contacted you first.

 

In any case though, when you buy a second hand car it is generally up to you as the buyer to ensure that the car is in an acceptable condition, unless it has been grossly misdescribed or somesuch. If they brought a mechanic with them and you knocked money off for additional problems found, I can't see they've got a leg to stand on.

 

As far as Ebay goes, they certainly haven't. Ebay car sales are not final and binding in that once you win an auction, it is not a binding contract because obviously you could get to the car and it could be a complete wreck. But that only covers the buyer up until they actually go ahead with the purchase. Ebay just protects them so that if they win an auctiona nd the car is crap they are not required to follow through and pay,

 

The buyer was obviously satisfied when they looked around it, so that satisfies the ebay side of things.

... a little

Mahala is a powerful thing ...

 

If you like my advice, please click the scales.

All advice is offered informally. If in any doubt, seek professional advice.

Barclays:claiming £908. Defence filed

Simply Be: settled in full

Abbey: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

GE Capital: Claim issued for DPA compliance order

Aktiv Kapital: Failed to comply with CCA disclosure. Debt unenforceable.

If this site has helped you, please make a donation to help keep it going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like they have a nice little [problem] going there. Buy a car, threaten legal action, get a refund and I presume they also want to keep the car?

 

Report em to ebay for a start and send something back saying see you in court...

Just the FAQ’s ma'am. Please read 'em thoroughly before jumping in. Cheers :)

 

Find all the letters under the rainbow here

 

Being a man, I am always right (however I will make no admission of liability if you have misinterpreted my instructions!! :) ) If you are in any doubt, then consult a professional. All opinions offered on this site are just that, and should not be taken as legal advice.

 

Halifax - £1400 reclaimed. Now on a crusade to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like they have a nice little [problem] going there. Buy a car, threaten legal action, get a refund and I presume they also want to keep the car..

 

That was my initial gut feeling. But I have no Ebay experience. sounds like a right [problem]. Bid for the car. Bring along a mechanic mate. Get more money knocked off. Drive off with receipts of work done to prove condition. Carry out additional work that you desire (rather than at best request returning the vehicle to the vendor) - then have the cheek to claim for that work?!? You can't do that?!? - you don't buy a hot dog from a street vendor, eat some of it, go and buy a ciabatta bread from Waitrose to put the sausage in, return to the hot dog seller and demand that he pays for the ciabatta. (dunno where that analogy came from?!?)

 

anyway legally speaking I cannot see that you are in any way liable - you have broken no law, nor are in breach of any relevant consumer legislation or sales of goods acts that I can think of. In fact I might be tempted to pop a letter back saying that you intend to defend any litigation in full, claim for your costs, and request that the court considers entering the claimant onto the Vexatious Litigants register.

 

That'll put a new drive-shaft right where it belongs.

"BA Group. The World's favourite CA Group"

 

HSBC 2 claims amalgamated. £1195. settled in full prior to filing claim.

BARCLAYS settled in full 2 days prior to submission of defence by Barclays

CAP ONE settled in full on day 14 of LBA (£210)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, there is nothing to worry about here. I would do nothing until a claim form arrives, if it does which is unlikely then post the particulars on here.

 

If it doesn't and they continue to harrass you, inform the police.

First Direct, £4031 Recovered

Halifax, £953 Recovered

MBNA Credit Card, £120 Recovered

American Express, £160 Recovered

Coming Soon......

Blackpool Council, £190 in unlawful parking tickets

Carstoppers. £50 from the cowboy clampers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just going to get my otherhalf to come along and post to see if she can help - she is a bit of an Ebay whizz..

 

Glad to see that DQ offered my humble assistance to you on this one, but as he promised I'm here...

 

It's true to say that I do have a knowledge of ebay but have never ventured into the realms of car sales and I believe that there are different rules to cover such sales, as mahala has pointed out in her post.

 

Just to cover another angle, am I correct in thinking that this was a cash sale?

 

I would go with what all the others have posted, it was sold as seen...the buyer came and checked it out and was satisfied, end of.

 

In fact I might be tempted to pop a letter back saying that you intend to defend any litigation in full, claim for your costs, and request that the court considers entering the claimant onto the Vexatious Litigants register.

 

That'll put a new drive-shaft right where it belongs

 

I would also give some serious thought to a DQ style letter...

 

You may find some useful info here:

 

http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/cgi-bin/callist.cgi

 

There is a dedicated motor vehicles section.

 

Please let us know how you get on with it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one concern - I am assuming that this was paid by cash or cheque, and not Paypal. If it was then you would have a problem.

 

The other question, did the buyer leave feedback. If positive feedback was left I would class that as almost as good as a signature of acceptance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one concern - I am assuming that this was paid by cash or cheque, and not Paypal. If it was then you would have a problem.

 

The other question, did the buyer leave feedback. If positive feedback was left I would class that as almost as good as a signature of acceptance.

 

The car was paid for with cash when he came and looked and it and drove off in it!!

 

The buyer left feedback about a week or so after - and it was positive feedback!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was my initial gut feeling. But I have no Ebay experience. sounds like a right [problem]. Bid for the car. Bring along a mechanic mate. Get more money knocked off. Drive off with receipts of work done to prove condition. Carry out additional work that you desire (rather than at best request returning the vehicle to the vendor) - then have the cheek to claim for that work?!? You can't do that?!? - you don't buy a hot dog from a street vendor, eat some of it, go and buy a ciabatta bread from Waitrose to put the sausage in, return to the hot dog seller and demand that he pays for the ciabatta. (dunno where that analogy came from?!?)

 

anyway legally speaking I cannot see that you are in any way liable - you have broken no law, nor are in breach of any relevant consumer legislation or sales of goods acts that I can think of. In fact I might be tempted to pop a letter back saying that you intend to defend any litigation in full, claim for your costs, and request that the court considers entering the claimant onto the Vexatious Litigants register.

 

That'll put a new drive-shaft right where it belongs.

 

Hot Dog on a Ciabatta?? What is the world coming to....

Just the FAQ’s ma'am. Please read 'em thoroughly before jumping in. Cheers :)

 

Find all the letters under the rainbow here

 

Being a man, I am always right (however I will make no admission of liability if you have misinterpreted my instructions!! :) ) If you are in any doubt, then consult a professional. All opinions offered on this site are just that, and should not be taken as legal advice.

 

Halifax - £1400 reclaimed. Now on a crusade to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The buyer left feedback about a week or so after - and it was positive feedback!!

 

That would seem to be a very useful piece of evidence to wave under his nose. I would get a screen print to include with your defence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What car was it and how much did it sell for?

 

Do you have a link to the comleted listing (or the item number)?

 

OC

 

It was an X Reg Vectra, will find listing for you and ill post link when i can figure out how!!!

 

Think it sold on ebay for £1690 but partner accepted £1600 as the mechanic 'found' things that needed to be done

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. did you retain copies of the receipts you passed to the buyer (please say yes - or that you can obtain duplicates from the original vendor that carried out the repairs on your behalf).

 

We can obtain duplicates, original receipts were given to the buyer

 

2. what correspondance has the buyer had withyou prior to filing this claim with the court?

 

This is the 1st we have heard from the buyer, a letter listing what 'repairs' we have to pay for and asking for a refund.

 

Could we also wave under his nose the fact that he has not contacted us before now to inform of these repairs? Instead, he has just done the repairs and is now attempting to claim the money?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really six weeks down the line I don't think he would stand a chance in court anyway, and he would have to pay £150 to make a claim in the first place.

 

I think he is trying it on in the hope that you will back down - if he sought advice, as he claims, then it was probably from a mate down the pub...it certainly isn't from anybody with any legal knowledge as they would know that complaining about a second hand car six weeks after purchase is a complete waste of time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I wouldn't let it bother you overly, which I know is easier said than done.

 

You are not a car trader. He bought a second hand car, in a private sale, with a 'mechanic' present, paid for it and drove away. As far as I am aware, that is the end of the matter. What happens after that is of no concern to you. He is trying it on BIG style and I doubt very, very much that he will take you to the small claims court.

 

Let us have the user ID it was sold under and we'll suss him out :)

Please note that I am not a legal expert and all advice given is without prejudice and is purely my opinion only.

 

** Nationwide - £1821.15-PAID IN FULL - Aug 06 **

** Halifax Mortgage -£390 - PAID IN FULL - Nov 06 **

Lloyds TSB - MCOL issued 09/03/07 - £2953 + costs - ON HOLD....

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The car was paid for with cash when he came and looked and it and drove off in it!!

 

The buyer left feedback about a week or so after - and it was positive feedback!!

Did you give him a receipt for his cash? did you write anything on the receipt, eg 'bought as seen'

 

Positive feedback on a public forum would in my view be as good as a 'letter of satisfaction' if it went to court. They had 7 days to decide if it was up to scratch or not, you don't even get that long at car auctions.

 

Second hand cars sold privately I would assume come under the term 'Caveat Emptor' Buyer beware!! 'The axiom or principle in commerce that the buyer alone is responsible for assessing the quality of a purchase before buying'

 

therefore no recourse for future action unless the goods were not fit for purpose, or they were purposely described to be much better than in fact they reallly were with the intent of defrauding the buyer!

 

Tell them to take a hike!! they are trying it on!! and if in the unlikely event they do follow through with a claim, do as DQ says mention reporting them to the courts to be entered on the Vexatious Litigants Register

 

Chris

Chrismc v Vertex Data Science Ltd

SD Set Aside WON + Costs

 

 

Chrismc v Barclays

Won - Settlement Agreed at 11th Hour.

 

Philips Bailiffs

Lost - Judge changed at last minute, it didn't help!

 

G-MAC Early Redemption Charges Waived

Won - Early Redemtion Fees Waived in Full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is utter bull. BUT its happening all around. trying to get their money back whilst keeping the car. if they had legal advice surely they would have contacted you without the threat of legal action. people usually use legal action as a threat (sometimes when they havent even had legal adivice to scare people). my fella is a mechanic and he buys cars and sells them. it is known in private sales for this to happen. (do you remeber it happened in coronation street a while ago, but the mechanic recognised him). do report him to ebay though.

 

dont worry i very much doubt anything will happen. and i would not even reply to his stupid letter.

 

good luck lisaxx

if i have helped you at all click please the scales on top right!

 

ABBEY

11/4 S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) SENT OFF

1/6 LBA SENT

22/7 LETTER SENT REQUESTING THEM TO REFUND CHARGES

15/7 STATEMENTS RECEIVED (ALL 6 YEARS WORTH)

20/7 CLAIM ISSUES IN OLDHAM COUNTY COURT.

8/8 CLAIM ACKNOWLEDGED GIVING THEM TILL 21/8.......

SETTLED IN FULL!!!!!!!

 

T MOBILE i won!

16/6 Data Protection Act SENT OFF

 

5/8 t mobile have failed to comply with the Data Protection Act/S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) reques ....BRING IT ON BABY!!

7/8 LBE SENT GIVING THEM 7 DAYS TO COUGH UP MY CASH

7/9 FULL REFUND BEEN SENT!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an X Reg Vectra, will find listing for you and ill post link when i can figure out how!!!

 

Just post the item number

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you buy a used car without a warranty the old adage applies - caveat emptor - buyer beware. As long as you have not told him something about the car that is untrue and which induced him to buy it he hasn't got a leg to stand on.

 

The vehicle was examined by his "mechanic", he was given a list of faults that you were aware of, and agreed a price. He bought the car "as seen" and he won't win his claim IMO.

 

Doesn't mean he won't claim though and you might have to go through the drag of defending it. But don't budge - it was his responsibility to check the car and he did - that's that :)

 

Just a suggestion - if you sell another car get the buyer to sign a piece of paper that says, for example:

 

Date: XXXXX

 

Buyer: [name]

 

£xxxxx paid to Mr [name] for vehicle Reg no XXXXXXX. Vehicle bought as seen and inspected and no warranty given.

 

Signed......................

(Buyer)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was an X Reg Vectra, will find listing for you and ill post link when i can figure out how!!!

 

Think it sold on ebay for £1690 but partner accepted £1600 as the mechanic 'found' things that needed to be done

 

In a trade / retail environment the buyer would have much more protection. However, this was a private sale and as such, the buyer has very little protection indeed.

 

If the vehicle was listed honestly, which from what you say sounds like it was, and the buyer inspected it and agreed to buy it, they have effectively accepted all the faults on it - especially as they inspected it and negotiated a reduction in the price based upon further faults which they allegedly found.

 

If this was a retail sale, the goods sold must be fit for use for a reasonable amount of time after sale (the same probably applies to private sales too although if it's properly described then this should be covered). However, there are a number of factors to take into account when determining this which include age and price. Whilst £1,600 is a lot of money, it isn't a huge sum of money for such a car and as such, you could probably argue that the price reflected the condition of the vehicle. Further, it is a six year old car and as such, no buyer can expect a six year old car to be completely fault free and must take the rough with the smooth (the faults with the low purchase price).

 

As others have mentioned, by leaving positive feedback they have effectively confirmed they are happy with the vehicle and the matter is closed.

 

If they had issues with the vehicle then they should have contacted you BEFORE effecting repairs done and allowed you the opportunity to arrange for repairs yourself (not that you would have been liable anyway) or to allow you to take the vehicle back and offer a full refund.

 

As a gesture of goodwill you could possibly offer a refund and take the vehicle back but state that you would not be willing to pay for the repairs as they should have contacted you before authorising such repairs. However, I would say that you are under no obligation to do this and therefore would not recommend it.

 

I don't think they have a leg to stand on and think that you could defend this quite easily if it does come to court.

 

Finally, just to really wind them up, you could respond suggesting that they persue their mechanic friend in this matter because, as far as you're concerned, they inspected the vehicle and should have spotted these faults (which you were not aware of and therefore hadn't disclosed) at the time of inspection BEFORE the vehicle was purchased.

 

Keep us updated.

 

Good luck

 

OC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a trade / retail environment the buyer would have much more protection. However, this was a private sale and as such, the buyer has very little protection indeed.

 

If the vehicle was listed honestly, which from what you say sounds like it was, and the buyer inspected it and agreed to buy it, they have effectively accepted all the faults on it - especially as they inspected it and negotiated a reduction in the price based upon further faults which they allegedly found.

 

If this was a retail sale, the goods sold must be fit for use for a reasonable amount of time after sale (the same probably applies to private sales too although if it's properly described then this should be covered). However, there are a number of factors to take into account when determining this which include age and price. Whilst £1,600 is a lot of money, it isn't a huge sum of money for such a car and as such, you could probably argue that the price reflected the condition of the vehicle. Further, it is a six year old car and as such, no buyer can expect a six year old car to be completely fault free and must take the rough with the smooth (the faults with the low purchase price).

 

As others have mentioned, by leaving positive feedback they have effectively confirmed they are happy with the vehicle and the matter is closed.

 

If they had issues with the vehicle then they should have contacted you BEFORE effecting repairs done and allowed you the opportunity to arrange for repairs yourself (not that you would have been liable anyway) or to allow you to take the vehicle back and offer a full refund.

 

As a gesture of goodwill you could possibly offer a refund and take the vehicle back but state that you would not be willing to pay for the repairs as they should have contacted you before authorising such repairs. However, I would say that you are under no obligation to do this and therefore would not recommend it.

 

I don't think they have a leg to stand on and think that you could defend this quite easily if it does come to court.

 

Finally, just to really wind them up, you could respond suggesting that they persue their mechanic friend in this matter because, as far as you're concerned, they inspected the vehicle and should have spotted these faults (which you were not aware of and therefore hadn't disclosed) at the time of inspection BEFORE the vehicle was purchased.

 

Keep us updated.

 

Good luck

 

OC.

 

More or less what I said

Did you give him a receipt for his cash? did you write anything on the receipt, eg 'bought as seen'

 

Positive feedback on a public forum would in my view be as good as a 'letter of satisfaction' if it went to court. They had 7 days to decide if it was up to scratch or not, you don't even get that long at car auctions.

 

Second hand cars sold privately I would assume come under the term 'Caveat Emptor' Buyer beware!! 'The axiom or principle in commerce that the buyer alone is responsible for assessing the quality of a purchase before buying'

 

therefore no recourse for future action unless the goods were not fit for purpose, or they were purposely described to be much better than in fact they reallly were with the intent of defrauding the buyer!

 

Tell them to take a hike!! they are trying it on!! and if in the unlikely event they do follow through with a claim, do as DQ says mention reporting them to the courts to be entered on the Vexatious Litigants Register

 

You could have a lot of fun with this if you were so inclined!! and really have them on! :)

Chrismc v Vertex Data Science Ltd

SD Set Aside WON + Costs

 

 

Chrismc v Barclays

Won - Settlement Agreed at 11th Hour.

 

Philips Bailiffs

Lost - Judge changed at last minute, it didn't help!

 

G-MAC Early Redemption Charges Waived

Won - Early Redemtion Fees Waived in Full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Alison82

You should make them pay you back the pay you would have missed out from your for having to go to court!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going to sound really stupid here but wat is 'Vexatious Litigants Register'

 

Thank you all for your fantastic advice so far, we are currently compiling a letter to send back to him high lighting our points and have also spoke to the person who had done any repairs on the car when my partner owned it and he is also writing a letter/report of his opionion of the car. Ill keep you all posted!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going to sound really stupid here but wat is 'Vexatious Litigants Register'

!

A vexatious litigant is a person who has been forbidden by a High Court Judge to issue proceedings in any County Court in England and Wales without permission.

 

You can get a list from HMCS Her Majesty's Court Service.

 

Chris

Chrismc v Vertex Data Science Ltd

SD Set Aside WON + Costs

 

 

Chrismc v Barclays

Won - Settlement Agreed at 11th Hour.

 

Philips Bailiffs

Lost - Judge changed at last minute, it didn't help!

 

G-MAC Early Redemption Charges Waived

Won - Early Redemtion Fees Waived in Full.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...