Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft and an natwest OD


safc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i am in exactly the same position except with the nat west they closed my account and have instructed moorcroft to recover the debt i dont dispute the debt and have agreed a repayment but i am also lost as to what moor croft can acctually do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Don't make any admissions to anybody. Inform Moorcroft that the account is in dispute, and you will be dealing with HSBC directly. Phone HSBC in the morning and tell them you now dispute the account, and that they should update their records accordingly.

 

Then mak a Subject Access Request to HSBC (template on this site) and include a £10.00 cheque or postal order (make a note of the PO No. in your letter so it doesn't go missing).

 

Once you have your information from them, which you are entitled to under the Data Protection Act 1998, use a highlighter to mark out all of the charges made to the account.

 

Then, input these dates and amounts into one of the spreadsheets (in the Library) and make a claim to HSBC.

 

If in doubt, look through the FAQ's before going any further.

 

Tide

Link to post
Share on other sites

if u are making payments to a dca who are acting for a bank and u send a sars request to the bank to start the process of reclaiming bank charges do u still carry on making your payments to the dca while the process is ongoing ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if u are making payments to a dca who are acting for a bank and u send a sars request to the bank to start the process of reclaiming bank charges do u still carry on making your payments to the dca while the process is ongoing ?

 

 

Yes this is advisable. Continue to pay the debt until your settlement is through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Could Any One Answer A Question Ive Been Asked,if A Bank Has Shut Down An Overdrawn Bank Account Of Say £1300,50%charges And Passed It For Collection To A Dca,how Would Repyment Of Charges Be Made, To The Person By Cheque Or Would The Bank Try To Take It Off The Debt

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to find out if the debt has been brought by the DCA or has just been passed to them for collection.

you should be able to gauge this by how long ago the a/c went into arrears. i would guess it just been passed for collection.

if this is the case, then send the sar to the bank

this will put the a/c into dispute, you then write to the DCA, informing them the a/c is in dispute, they will them pass it back to the bank, this will get the DCA off your back.

 

when you get to the stage of the pre-lim letter with your spreadsheet,

include the line 'i wish the refund to be paid by cheque, as i have other debts that require an equal share of the money you unlawfully took from me'.

 

if when you get [any] money, and they use it to payoff their debt, them immediately write, refusing the refund, stating again quite clearly that it id your money, you have other debts also, and will only accept a cheque.

by that time mcol should be near too so you can use that as a lever.

 

dx100uk;)

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

hi is there a template letter that states any refund in charges are to be made by cheque only or do you just have to ammend the one in the templates thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi is there a template letter that states any refund in charges are to be made by cheque only or do you just have to ammend the one in the templates thanks

Hello,

 

Just amend the templates one to your own needs.

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have recived all statements and ready to do a schedual of bank charges, i have a lot of interest charges on statements aswell. i have looked at the different spreadsheets but cant get my head round them.can anyone tell me which is the best to use thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion is that it is best just to use the interest charges listed on your statements. Claim that proportion of each interest payment that is attributable to charges.

 

Otherwise, if you know the interest rate used by the bank then Mindzai's spreadsheet is probably the best for compound interest calcualtions.

 

Steven

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have done a schedual of bank charges goinging off my statements. as for the interest do i just write the ammounts down as shown on the statements they come to about £250 then add them all up as with the bank charges and send off with my letter. cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

No SAFC you cant add all your overdraft interest.

 

If you can persist, try to fill out the England Complex Excel in here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/182-6-interest-calculation-spreadsheets.html

 

It will calculate what proportion of your overdraft interest was caused by charges and is therefore reclaimable.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have sent prelim letter which nat west have recieved is is 14 working days to next letter or 14 straight days . thanks

 

straight days

 

Steven

 

If this post is helpful, please click the scales

  • Haha 1

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i recieved a letter from m/croft this week it is headed by a big red box stateing re; national westminster

:notice of intended litigation:

 

"if you do not repond to this letter we will assuime you are purposely avoiding repayment and will take steps to secure settlement which may include legal action against you.if legal action is necessary the debt will increase as follows"

current balance £130

solicitors costs for issue of claim £50

court fees for issue of claim £20

soilcitors fees for entering judgement £25

debt if judgement obtained £225

 

moorcroft have told me they do not own the debt so are they in there rite to start the legal action ?

even though its for a bank acount i still sent them a cca and a person told me on the phone they sent me the documentation on the 20th march.not ecieved anything

i have since read somewhere on this site bank accounts are not covered by a cca ?

what to do now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bank accounts are covered by a CCA if you have an overdraft (anything over £50 is covered by a CCA). As the DCA don't own the debt they can't take you to court. You may also want to have a look at the sticky on OFT guidelines for debt collection.

Even if they were to take you to court solicitors fees wouldn't be awarded.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to put your mind at ease Moorcroft have been sending me similar letters for over 6 months......still waiting on my court date.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unauthorised is a bit different as there wasn't an agreement for you to borrow a sum of money (so no CCA). Have you SAR'd nat westminster to see if they have added charges to the account? Might be worth doing. If you want to get around the £10 charge you could ask M/croft for a statement of account (this should list all transactions on the account).

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify on the unauthorised bit, if you had an unauthorised overdraft of £130, but your agreed overdraft was £50 or more there would need to be a CCA.

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...