Jump to content

safc

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About safc

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. hi a dq n180 form has been recieved an online one from your link will be filled in as avised in other threads and sent by the given date and Yes to mediation yes to Small Claims Track State your local county court 1 witness = you. is that the only form to send back there is a ex130 advising about mediation and does this mean now sll capitol have paid what they have to to proceed thks
  2. A one line letter from moriarty law saying the client is proceeding with the claim Looking around other posts should an agreement number also have been mentioned in the poc Next will be the directions questionaire they couldnt even put the letter in a sealed envelope it was left open for anyone to look at Thks
  3. could that have gone in the defence aswell if i had realised
  4. so if sll capital are saying noa was given and thats it it doesnt prove anything am i right in thinking
  5. hi here are the two noa,s one as said dated 12.05.14 the other just uncovered dated 20.11.13 are they both the same thing thanks ss 001 (2 files merged).pdf
  6. hi im trying bto scan the docs but cant scan into a pdf file ive seen a page on here someware with instructions when i start scan i cant c anyware to save to
  7. hi can someone put the dummys guide how to upload files trying to attach two items but keep getting max size is 4.33mb ive seen it loads of times now cant find it thanks
  8. exellent should i copy and paste that in mcol now as i cant do anything tomorrow before 4pm and your point 3 is the sentence ive been looking for for ages thanks and is there a minimum donation or is any amount accepted
  9. and you are a star minor edits make all the difference but seriously thanks for help SO far when copied and pasted into mycol do i put the heading claiment blah blah v defendant blah blah defence and type sign it after all the defences ive seen theres been no heading last one for a few days if sll capital acknowledge straight away and go ahead with claim what is the likely timescale to go all the way to a hearing thank you
  10. are we getting there now .thks DEFENCE The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. the claimant replied to a request made under a pre action protocol letter of claim and a Consumer Credit Agreement request , pursuant to s.77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 )request made on 19/11/2018 the reply contained incomplete reconstitutions and with with documents missing from the list in my request a cpr 31.14 request was made to the claiments solicitor on 02/06/2019 which the claiments solicitor has refused stating cpr 31 does not aplly even though no track has yet been allocated 1- The Claimant claims £657.10 is owed under a regulated loan agreement with money in advance r. I did not recall the precise details and have sought verification from the claimant and the claimants solicitor by way of a Section 77 and CPR 31.14 request who are yet to fully comply. 2-the Claimants statement regarding the assignation of the debt is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served on the defendant from either the Claimant or money in advance 3 The claimant has produced a reconstituted version of the original agreement , it is considered that this is not a true copy of the executed agreement as it is the claiment has yet to produced a copy of any legal assignment of this debt 4 It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 87.1 CCA 1974. c) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. d as per Civil Procedureicon 16.5 it is expected that the Claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed.
  11. any better thks 1.the defendant owes the claimant £657.10 under a regulated loan agreement with money in advance ltd dated 25/07/ 2013 which was assigned to claimant on 12/05/2014 and notice of which was given to the defendant on 12/05/2014 (debt) 2.despite formal demand for payment of the debt the defendant has failed to pay. 3.and the claimant claims £657.10and further claims interest there on pursuant to section 69 of the county court act 1984 limited to one year to the date hereof at the rate of 8.00% per annum amounting to £52.56 DEFENCE The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. the claimant replied to a request made under a pre action protocol letter of claim and a Consumer Credit Agreement request , pursuant to s.77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ) made on 19/11/2018 the only reply contained incomplete reconstitutions and with documents missing from the list in my request a cpr 31.14 request was made to the claimants solicitor on 02/06/2019 which the claimants solicitor has refused stating cpr 31 does not apply even though no track has yet been allocated 1 The claimant has produced a reconstituted version of the original agreement , the reconstituted version is different to that of the original creditor It is therefore considered that this is not a true copy of the executed agreement as it is the claimant has yet to produced a copy of any legal assignment of this debt 2. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) Show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for b) Show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 87.1 CCA 1974. c) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim. d as per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the Claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed.
  12. dx or andy this getting any better ! you can tell me to raise the white flag DEFENCE the defendant contends that the poc are vague and generic in nature the claimant replied to a request made under a pre action protocol letter of claim and a cca request made on 19/11/2018 the reply contained incomplete reconstitutions and with with documents missing from the list in my request a cpr 31.14 request was made to the claimants solicitor on 02/06/2019 which the claimants solicitor has refused stating cpr 31 does not apply even though no track has yet been allocated 1 The claimant has produced a reconstituted version of the original agreement , the reconstituted version is different to that of the original creditor It is therefore considered that this is not a true copy of the executed agreement as it is the claimant has yet to produced a copy of any legal assignment of this debt 2.. The claim is not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing the monies stated to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; show how any breach occurred and a valid Default Notice was issued, by original creditor show how it has legal assignment of any alleged debt.
  13. I know time is getting you cudnt point me in the direction of a best thread to compare with it would be most appreciated or is it keep reading thks
  14. Ok thks have looked round and round and came up with what was thought will try again needs to be in thurs night as cant do anything friday
×
×
  • Create New...